Pages

19 July 2014

Feminism is a Capitalist tool to reduce Working Class women to wage slavery

Alain Soral sums up the truth of liberal-feminism.  Far from being a movement for the liberation of women, feminism is a tool of Capitalism to enslave Working Class women as producer-consumers.  It is the play thing of rich bored women who can afford to dump their children with strangers whilst they seek hedonistic delight in work which they enjoy.  For Working Class women, wage slavery is the dead-end production line, the supermarket till or caring for the children of the liberal feminist rich parasites who have so kindly 'enriched' them by destroying the security of the family.

Real feminism is a celebration of the feminine; a celebration of motherhood.  Liberal feminists are the enemy of the family; the enemy of the Working Class; above all the enemy of women who cannot afford the luxuries of playing at workers, but who have to work in order to survive.

1 comment:

  1. Well said. I reject socialism, but feminism is indeed an upper and upper middle class phenomenon. Working class women, to borrow that phrase (though we can look at agrarian peasants just the same), have always worked. The freedom from work is a privilege of rich ladies and a vanishingly small minority. Sadly, many seemed to prefer to squander their time on recreation instead of the virtuous pursuits of motherhood and constructive community involvement, some no doubt embracing feminism as a means of acting out out of self-inflicted or imposed boredom or against their husbands' philandering or neglect (in which case, it is a petulant way of dealing with the transgressions of others).

    Feminism makes women miserable, including upper middle and upper class women. Hedonism does not lead to happiness, and the statistics (as if you even need to cite them to see what is evident and conceptually necessary) demonstrate it.

    It would have been better had such limousine feminists instead turned their attention toward true leisure and the liberal arts as classically understood (see Josef Pieper for a nice summary of what is meant by "leisure"; it is not "recreation" or "rest from work so that we may return to work"; leisure is not easy!).

    ReplyDelete