Short circuit and endless shame.
by Federico Pieraccini
Syrians, Hezbollah, Iranians, Houthi and Russians are bombing al Qaeda. The same organization that perpetrated almost 17 years ago the 9/11 attack in NYC, according to the CIA.
How does the mainstream media react to what is going on in the middle east? Ignoring the Saudis bombing the Houthi, ignoring the Western coalition that has killed more than 30,000 civilians in Raqqa and Mosul and obviate ignoring Israel that has been exterminating Palestinians for more than fifty years.
Naturally the same mainstream media are ready to defend al-Qaeda (al nusra) in the east of Ghoutha in order to pursue their campaign of lies and disinformation.
Summing up, between Afghanistan in the 80s, Libya in 2011, Syria and Yemen today, the media is always on the side of Islamist terrorism.
Now go take a look at the news coverage of 9/11 and how the media reacted when it was the US struck by terrorism: tears and despair.
What’s the moral? For the media al Qaeda is bad only if it hits the US and Europe, in any other case it must be protected by deliberately changing terminology from 'terrorists' to 'moderate rebels'.
Yet, despite this idyllic relationship between the media and jihadists, Anderson Cooper and his cronies haven’t managed to go to Aleppo 2 years ago or in east Ghoutha to interview their 'heroes'.
Why is this you ask? Because these 'rebels' are so moderate that they usually behead their journalist friends and post these atrocities online.
Journalists and politicians are willing to lie and cover up for this scum in the vain and ridiculous hope that their jihadist friends will reach Damascus to displace Assad and reap further deaths.
Despite being proven in every possible way that al Qaeda are not 'moderate rebels', western humanitarian fanatics and other scum prefer to see the civilian population at the mercy of these beasts, rather than Damascus triumphant.
Rather than the fight against terrorism and the defense of civilians against bloody regimes, Washington and its cronies ARE the bloody regime that uses terrorism to exterminate defenseless civilians.
When the next attack hits the West, remember those politicians who armed and trained Islamic terrorists, stamping them as 'moderate rebels’.
To the next journalist who speaks about human rights and Assad, remember that he is not an impartial voice, but an al Qaeda spokesperson
by Federico Pieraccini
Syrians, Hezbollah, Iranians, Houthi and Russians are bombing al Qaeda. The same organization that perpetrated almost 17 years ago the 9/11 attack in NYC, according to the CIA.
How does the mainstream media react to what is going on in the middle east? Ignoring the Saudis bombing the Houthi, ignoring the Western coalition that has killed more than 30,000 civilians in Raqqa and Mosul and obviate ignoring Israel that has been exterminating Palestinians for more than fifty years.
Naturally the same mainstream media are ready to defend al-Qaeda (al nusra) in the east of Ghoutha in order to pursue their campaign of lies and disinformation.
Summing up, between Afghanistan in the 80s, Libya in 2011, Syria and Yemen today, the media is always on the side of Islamist terrorism.
Now go take a look at the news coverage of 9/11 and how the media reacted when it was the US struck by terrorism: tears and despair.
What’s the moral? For the media al Qaeda is bad only if it hits the US and Europe, in any other case it must be protected by deliberately changing terminology from 'terrorists' to 'moderate rebels'.
Yet, despite this idyllic relationship between the media and jihadists, Anderson Cooper and his cronies haven’t managed to go to Aleppo 2 years ago or in east Ghoutha to interview their 'heroes'.
Why is this you ask? Because these 'rebels' are so moderate that they usually behead their journalist friends and post these atrocities online.
Journalists and politicians are willing to lie and cover up for this scum in the vain and ridiculous hope that their jihadist friends will reach Damascus to displace Assad and reap further deaths.
Despite being proven in every possible way that al Qaeda are not 'moderate rebels', western humanitarian fanatics and other scum prefer to see the civilian population at the mercy of these beasts, rather than Damascus triumphant.
Rather than the fight against terrorism and the defense of civilians against bloody regimes, Washington and its cronies ARE the bloody regime that uses terrorism to exterminate defenseless civilians.
When the next attack hits the West, remember those politicians who armed and trained Islamic terrorists, stamping them as 'moderate rebels’.
To the next journalist who speaks about human rights and Assad, remember that he is not an impartial voice, but an al Qaeda spokesperson
No comments:
Post a Comment