Fight Zionist Lies with Scientific Truth - Wilberg on Wednesday

[When it comes to discussing the 'holocaust'] sticking to the forensic facts and scholarship is all-important. Unfortunately that alone will land you in prison in Germany! On the other hand it makes it all the more important to protect the mostly highly scholarly www.holocausthandbooks.com  series - produced in the UK by Germar Rudolf and his Hastings-based Castle Hill publishers.

Germar hasn't got a racist or 'antisemitic' bone in his body and would like to see nothing more than a new German-Jewish symbiosis. But he's already done time in German jails and paid the price, big time, for his scientific work. And his personal story makes very interesting and touching reading: http://germarrudolf.com/en/welcome-to-my-world/ 

But with all their scientific and scholarly books already having been axed by Amazon, Barnes and Noble etc. (even though one can still buy Mein Kampf, the Protocols etc. and loads of other overt antisemitic material from them), clearly it is the really high-level, detailed critical scholarship and science that is feared the most. And despite their huge loss of revenue from Amazon, [Castle Hill / Codoh] are now allowing all their books to be downloaded for free as pdfs. Videos too.

So I think it important that everyone - including other comrades - takes advantage of this - so that the truth can be protected,  Samizdat-style, even if Codoh/Castle Hill are eventually shut down.

Editor's note:

The entire Codoh Holocaust Handbook library can be downloaded in a 415MB zip file at this link:
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/HHS-pdf.zip

For an overview of what is in the library, have a look at the PDF of the catalogue at this link:
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/HHB-Brochure.pdf

The documentary library is also free, and at time of posting this article, has 17 titles to download and distribute electronically or by handing out freely of dvds or memory sticks. The link for the videos is:
http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=2

There is nothing racist about the truth, about facts, about historical information.  Spread the information freely to everyone with a mind open to see through the lies of the holocaust industry.  Many good people have suffered to get this truth out, including many good Jewish people.  This information knocks away one of the pedestals of Zionism, and for that reason, it matters that it is not censored out of existence.

Visit the links, take what you are happy to take, and if possible, maybe make a donation to help the brave defenders of independent research, in this time of Zionist Oppression.

On 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' - Wilberg on Wednesday

Further political and philosophical notes and reflections:

Part 2. On 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion'

Some extracts:

Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy. The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game…

Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgment, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interest? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable; for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.

The part played by the Press is to keep pointing our requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. ...through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade...

NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

What is it to the proletariat labourer, bowed double over his heavy toil, crushed by his lot in life, if talkers get the right to babble, if journalists get the right to scribble any nonsense side by side, … once the proletariat has no other profit out of the constitution save only those pitiful crumbs which we fling them from our table in return for their voting in favor of what we dictate…

It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the "goyim" the very principle of god-head and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.

In order to give the GOYIM no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus, all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the GOYIM, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.

Economic crises have been produced by us for the GOYIM by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals ....

We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the GOYIM, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any GOYIM who oppose us by deed or word.

Commentary:

That the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a Russian ‘forgery’, full of plagiarisms from many earlier texts, is irrefutable. What is less remarked upon is their clearly Russian character, expressed by a hatred of both the landed (Tsarist) aristocracy and also by the ‘plan’ to replace it with a Stalinesque-type “despot” in full control of the State and all property - and who would be deified like a God. What is also not remarked upon enough is the failure of the Protocols to promote or anticipate the success of the Zionist movement - with its aim to reclaim Jerusalem. Then there is the clear lack of knowledge presented in the Protocols of the Judaic holy books themselves - which in themselves contain ample material of an even worse sort than that presented by the Protocols themselves - and which already declare that the Jews are destined to be global rulers of mankind and non-Jews their slaves. Instead the Protocols simply seek to re-contextualise elements of Jewish scripture and of the historical roles of the Jews in a more modern context.

From this point of view - and as Goebbels himself recognised - the whole question of the ‘authenticity’ of the Protocols is, in the end, wholly irrelevant - since most of what they are purported to ‘forge’ was already a reality at their time of writing - for example the reign of liberalism, Jewish control of the press, of speculative finance capital - and also of socialist and Bolshevik movements etc. But the biggest mistake of the Protocols was the perceived need of their authors to present Jewish supremacism as a carefully crafted conspiracy of a single directorate. It is better described as an international tribal network of diverse political and economic groupings elites - a ‘worldwide web’ - one with no central headquarters or leader, but with a clear history, direction and agenda (albeit one of which most Jews, even those participating in and supporting it, are largely ignorant).

“The locusts have no king, yet they advance together in ranks.” Proverbs 30:27.

Does this all mean that, in truth, Jews are indeed to blame for all the ills of this world, and have worse in store for it? Such a claim rests on a wholly impoverished understanding of history and historical developments. It is like claiming that the rise of capitalism was ‘planned’ and executed by a secret elite. To be sure, there were countless individuals, financial elites and also ‘secret societies’ like the Masons - all of whom did indeed vigorously participate in and furthered the rise of capitalism under the slogan of ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’. But to attribute the rise of capitalism to these individuals, elites and societies - rather than understanding them all as an expression of this rise - is to turn the dynamics of history on its head. Man does not make history. History makes man. This was the understanding that both Marx and Heidegger brought to expression.

“...the conspiratorial theory of history, which is based on the assumption that whatever happens is intended to happen, i.e., it is the result of conscious planning and deliberate action. Since Heidegger rejects this premise, he also rejects such anti-Semitic conspiracy theories as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as naively humanistic in their understanding of history. Heidegger does not, however, deny that human thought and action play important roles in history. But he believes that they are not the ultimate forces. Thus Heidegger does not deny that the Jewish community world-wide actively pursues its perceived collective interests. But he does believe that Jewish policies are not the cause or explanation of modernity, but instead that modernity arises from deeper, broader, and ultimately inscrutable forces. Heidegger sees the rise of Jewish power — in both Anglo-American capitalism and Bolshevism — as a product of the Jews’ unique adaptation to the spirit of modernity, which is an age of rootlessness and calculation. Jews, therefore, appear to be both subjects and objects of the modernization process. Primarily they are objects, since history is ultimately outside of human control. But since world Jewry is already characterized by rootlessness and calculation, it is capable of accepting the “world-historical task” of driving modernity toward its consummation: a rootless, homogeneous, technological mass society, which will ultimately ensnare and destroy the Jews as well. So, in the end, they are objects as well.” Greg Johnson

In other words, Jews are as much an object - indeed a slave and also a victim of their own ‘chosenness’ and supremacism - as they are its subject or ‘agent’. Similarly, the financial speculator or billionaire is as much a slave to speculation and money as he is master of it. Mammonism is no more a creation of money owners than capitalism, as an international economic system, was the planned creation of owners of capital.

In what then, lies the uniqueness of the power of international Jewry? The answer is simple and plain to see - and ever more so. Namely that it has become, like the fake gas chambers of Holocaust mythology, something totally outside the realm of ‘politically correct’ discussion and rational critique among leading statesmen and politicians of all colours or parties - not least the ‘far Left’. As Gilad Atzmon put it, Jewish power is the power to prevent any discussion or critique of Jewish power. As for Zionism in particular, far from being merely a response to anti-Semitism, its philosophy was, from its very inception, itself rabidly anti-Semitic. Herzl was an anti-Semite of such virulent extremism that his remarks puts the ‘Protocols’ in the shade. His aim was nothing less than to eradicate what he saw as disgusting and dirty Eastern Jews - and turn them instead into virile Gentiles with their own land, state and racially pure nation.

“Leon Ritter von Bilinski — the man whose memoirs were to expose the Disraeli origins of Herzl's ideas — told Herzl bluntly that the Zionists’ ideas and assumptions were exactly those of the worst anti-Semitic racists.” Mark Burdman

Martin Heidegger was perhaps the deepest philosophical critic of biological racism - both that of the Jews and its mirror image in Hitler’s biologism - and indeed Hitler’s Anglophilia:

“The idea of an understanding with England in terms of a distribution of imperialist “prerogatives” misses the essence of the historical process, which is led by England within the framework of Americanism and Bolshevism and at the same time world Jewry to its final conclusion. The question of the role of world Jewry is not racial, but the metaphysical question of the type of humanity that can accept the world-historical “task” of uprooting all beings from Being.”

Today this type of humanity is exemplified in Silicon Valley, with its principal and on-going project of creating machine-like human beings whose thought and perception are linked directly - digitally and electronically - to a singular Artificial Intelligence called ‘The Singularity’. What is here called ‘intelligence’ however, is nothing but the technological expression of what Heidegger called “machination” and “calculative thinking”, i.e. a type of ‘intelligence’ than can only calculate (previously associated with specifically Jewish financial talents - but which knows no dimension of living, meaning or being outside ‘the virtual’. But it is also not difficult to guess who the main financiers of research into this wholly artificial ‘intelligence’ are.

See also: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-capitalists-high-technology.html

Some more critical historical questions relating to the Brexit debate - Wilberg on Wednesday

Further political and philosophical notes and reflections:


Part 1. Some more critical historical questions relating to the Brexit debate

Questions: how would either Brexit or remaining in the EU bring us one millimetre closer to true socialism or even real national sovereignty? Does anyone seriously believe that any party in the UK Parliament, pro- or anti-Brexit, has any more interest in controlling immigration than Germany or the EU? Why was the UK under Blair one of the few EU countries, besides Ireland and Malta, that did NOT impose a transition period before accepting migrants from ex-Soviet states such as Romania or Poland? The answer is ‘the elephant in the room’: Jewish influence and the taboo on talking about it - the ‘Jew taboo’ in talking of Jewish supremacism. Britain is not a democracy: it is an oligarchy. The most influential component of this oligarchy is Jewish, and if Jews opposed Third World immigration it would not be happening. And according to Theresa May “Jewish values will prevail.” But what of Blair’s Jewish immigration Minister - Barbara Roche.

Labour let in 2.2million migrants during its 13 years in power – more than twice the population of Birmingham. Lord Glasman, 49, had already told BBC Radio 4 in 2011: The most incredible revelations [about New Labour’s conspiracy] concern Barbara Roche, a little-known MP who was immigration minister between 1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies – with Mr Blair’s approval – that changed the face of the UK. … Like [Jack] Straw, Blair was careful never publicly to mention the rising number of immigrants from India and Pakistan who could now enter Britain. Nor did he consider how to provide housing, schools and healthcare for an additional 300,000 people arriving a year. Least of all did either of them question whether the immigrants would have any effect on the lives of the British working class. (Nine years later, a report by the Migration Advisory Committee found that 23 British workers had been displaced for every 100 foreign-born workers employed here.) Could this chicanery get any worse? It did — with the appointment of Barbara Roche as Junior Immigration Minister. Blair’s only instruction to her was to deport bogus asylum seekers. But Roche wasn’t playing. ‘It was clear Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain,’ recalled Stephen Boys-Smith, the new head of the immigration directorate. ‘She didn’t see her job as controlling entry, but by looking at the wider picture “in a holistic way” she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.’ Jack Straw never openly contradicted Roche — it simply wasn’t worth the risk of alienating the Labour Party. So she set to work on a speech, in which she outlined the advantages of reducing controls to immigration and portrayed asylum seekers as skilled labour. She didn’t discuss what she was going to say with Straw. …‘Well done, Barbara,’ Blair told Roche soon [after the speech]. Despite its controversial content, her speech passed relatively unnoticed. But migrants quickly grasped its importance and passed the news on to their friends and family across the world. Labour was letting more people in, they told them, and — unlike other European countries — Britain would provide benefits and state housing. … One of Roche’s legacies was hundreds more migrants camped in squalor in Sangatte, outside Calais, where they tried to smuggle themselves onto lorries. News about the new liberalism — and in particular the welfare benefits — now began attracting Somalis who’d previously settled in other EU countries. Although there was no historic or cultural link between Somalia and Britain, more than 200,000 came. Since most … would be dependent on welfare, the Home Office could have refused them entry. But they were granted ‘exceptional leave to remain’. Daily Mail, 26th February 2016)

See also: http://www.unz.com/article/wicked-muslims-innocent-jews/

As regards refugees from Syria, American Jews and Jewish organisations united around the idea that they were victims of some sort of Syrian Hitler - Assad. As a result they encouraged America to eventually let in the grand and generous total of 10,000 Syrian refugees - completing forgetting that it was precisely America and Israel - and not Germany, which is where the majority of refugees ended, who were responsible for their plight.

Eleven Jewish organisations joined another 70 groups in pleading with Congress to keep open the Obama administration’s program, which would allow in 10,000 refugees over the next year from among the 200,000 to 300,000 in Europe. Among the signatories were mainstream bodies like the the Reform movement, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the National Council of Jewish Women, as well as HIAS, the lead Jewish body dealing with immigration issues, and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the umbrella body for Jewish public policy groups.

If the EU broke down tomorrow and we would have a new ‘Europe of Nations’, each of them imposing strict immigration controls and regulations - as Austria has now also done - how would even this bring us closer to socialism or true national sovereignty? For the fact is that most of the European parties or governments pursuing this goal are:

1. in hock to the Jewish-dominated global monetary system.

2. bow down to and pledge fealty to Israel - whatever it does.

3. pursue neo-liberal economic policies aimed at reducing state spending of the sort and promoted first by the Milton Friedman, and then by Thatcher and Reagan - not the EU.

4. strong supporters, like Poland, of the NATO-Atlanticist alliance which, through the Zionist neocons in the White House, first created the flood of internal and external refugees through US wars of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Syria.

As well as Hungary and the Czech Republic, the new Austrian government bows to Israel:

During the recent (2017) Austrian election campaign, “the ruling Social Democratic Party of Austria (called SDO for short) imported an Israeli dirty-tricks master, a macher in Yiddish, Tal Silberstein, to besmirch its [anti-immigration] adversary Sebastian Kurz.The idea was that the Austrians will get cold feet and run away from Kurz. Kurz figured this out and asked the Facebook moderators to stop it. Usually you do not have to ask FB twice to stop Nazi stuff. Kurz was lucky as Silberstein had been arrested in Israel for corruption-related offences. After that, the FB unplugged its ears and removed Silberstein’s created pages and groups. This was sheer luck: if he were arrested elsewhere, he would be considered a victim of antisemites, and his nasty web would remain intact. So the attempt of Silberstein to frame Kurz as an antisemite had failed, up to a point. He anyway continued to smear another Austrian politician as a Jew-hater. That was the ‘far right’ FPO [Austrian Freedom Party] leader Heinz-Christian Strache. The end of the story may comfort us: the Austrians preferred these two parties, Kurz List and FPO, despite the alleged antisemitism, and punished SDO, the kosher party. However, before celebrating let us see the downside of this wonderful event. In order to extricate themselves and their parties from the Jewish smear, the two leaders swore loyalty to Israel. They went (separately) to Israel, took photo-op with PM Netanyahu and at the Holocaust memorial, they spoke endlessly how much they adore and appreciate Israel. The antisemitism accusation is a win-win proposition for Jews. If a politician doesn’t do what the Jews want, they call him antisemite, and he (a) does what they want, and/or (b) swears fealty to Israel. In case (a) he is a liberal, in case (b) he is a nationalist. In both cases, Jews win.” from Antisemitism Weaponised www.unz.com

Similarly, although Hungary banned billionaire financier George Soros, it’s still business as usual for the banksters: https://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/hungary Viktor Orban went on to promise Netanyahu “zero-tolerance for anti-Semitism”. And according to Netanyahu, “Israel has no better friend in Europe than the Czech Republic”.


Question: What does it mean, besides mere words, for a country to “declare independence” or say that it is “taking back control” - whether through leaving the EU or by plotting a supposedly independent course within it. Does this not beg the basic question: declaring independence or taking back control from what or whom - if not from the parasitic international banking system? And is it any accident that the EU migration chief in 2015 was non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International, and affirmed the Kalergi agenda in no uncertain terms:






Further questions in this context:

What possible reason obligates a Corbyn, like most Tories and many other Labour MPs, to become a ‘Friend of Israel’? Does this not lend credibility to the term ‘ZOG’ - Zionist Occupied Government?

And again, why are those European countries, parties, governments and leaders who most oppose the Islamisation of Europe ‘the best friends of Israel’ - and vice versa? Voltaire’s answer: “Ask whom you cannot criticise and you know who rules you.”

But this question is not asked. Instead opponents of Islamisation in Europe ignore all those facts that point to the main instigator of ‘Islamisation’ being none other than Israel itself.

Fact 1: Israel and its neocon Zionist agents in the White House were chiefly responsible for the US wars of aggression in Iraq and the Middle East which first gave rise to the refugee crisis.

Fact 2: Israel gave and still continues to give military support to Islamic terrorism in the form of ISIS, even to the extent of bombing Damascus and the Syrian army.

Fact 3: Zionist jews actively promote an ‘open borders’ policy in Germany, Sweden, the UK and elsewhere in Europe. See the words of Barbara Lerner Spectre below, who though she is an Israeli national, has the support of the Swedish government in promoting immigration:




See also report on Rabbinical support for the Islamisation of Europe: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4299673,00.html

Fact 4: Israel benefits from the rise of ‘anti-Semitism’ stemming from Arab immigration - because this distracts attention from its own genocidal war crimes in Palestine and Lebanon, its ambitions for a ‘Greater Israel’ and its warmongering policy toward Iran. Yaron London, an Israeli journalist, wrote that if Trump’s America’s can be made to “hate Arabs more than they hate Jews”, it would be a “good deal”.

Fact 5: rather than using the full force of the law to stop rampant crimes and also sexual attacks on European women in Sweden, Germany and the UK (not a single victim of which has been Jewish) both Britain and Germany are introducing new laws against so-called anti-Semitic ‘ ‘hate crime’.

Fact 6: even if uncontrolled immigration does lead to a rise in anti-Semitism, this would not prevent Jews returning to Israel. But it is more likely to fuel a violent civil war - itself a convenient excuse to impose a form European martial law on the nations of Europe.

Fact 7: Count Kalergi, founder of the Pan-European movement whose 1925 book laid the programmatic basis for the present EU, was funded, with the help of the Rothschild family by the Wall St. banker Max Warburg and believed that Jews would be the new ruling elite in a Europe whose population would be transformed into a mixed “Negroid-Eurasian” race.



Fact 8: Jewish supremacism is not a conspiracy but a fact. Zionist jews control Hollywood, almost all the major US media, the hi-tech internet giants like Google, Wall Street - and, last but not least, the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. As for the EU, Mario Draghi, head of the ECB, was vice-chairman of Goldman Sachs. And Emmanuel Macron was a Rothschild investment banker. And already in the 18th century they had financial control over America, a control they fought ruthlessly to maintain in the face of resistance from both Lincoln and the Southern states - and which culminated in the secret but successful plot to create a Jewish-controlled private central bank - the Federal Reserve - in 1913,

‘Globalisation’ is simply the monetary and political form taken by Jewish supremacism.
How can any country simply ‘declare’ political sovereignty from the global monetary system, for example through Brexit, unless it first of all reasserts - as Lincoln did, as Germany did in the thirties, and as Kennedy tried to do - its sovereign right as a nation to issue its own debt- and interest-free money - rather than getting into mounting debt with the global banksters.

US corporate interests and their controlling Jewish financial interests are therefore the ‘elephant in the room’ of the acrimonious and divisive Brexiteer/Remainer debate which obsesses British politics - a debate which only divert all attention from this Jewish elephant.

Should not Marxists look a little deeper beneath the surface of this simplistic and simplifying debate, which has nothing to do with the real interests - or real enemies of workers - Brexit or no Brexit? It seems that socialists have forgotten or know nothing of the extraordinarily well-researched work of German economist and sociologist Werner Sombart - according to Friedrich Engels the only professor who fully understood Marx’s Das Kapital. It was Sombart’s book on The Jews and Modern Capitalism showed, without the slightest trace of racial or religious malice that without Jews and Judaism capitalism simply would not exist in its present form.

Thus simply demonising or sanctifying the EU forgets that it is part of the U.S.-Zionist-Wall St. imperial project to dominate Europe through TTIP, sanctions on Russia and by employing NATO to encircle and harrass Russia. And yet this US supremacist project is itself in essence a Judaic one through and through, whether led by Jews or not. For it is above all Jews who are happy to see Europe crumble and - once again - see Russia submit to Jewish oligarchical power, as it did to the genocidal violence of Communist Jews, from Trotsky to Yagoda, against ethnic Russians and Ukrainians - particularly the peasantry, whom Lenin himself despised, believing that if any Russian had intelligence they would most likely have a Jewish element in their ancestry.

Leave or Remain? In itself is this not a question which has proved to be perhaps the most effective form of divide and rule - one which has not become almost neurotic political obsession - obscuring all other and larger issues - but is perhaps the most divisive political civil war that Britain has seen since Cromwell - he whom Dutch Jews veritably praised as their Messiah - and through whom they gained re-admittance to England. Later the reign of William III created conditions for the establishment of the first - and notoriously usurious - ‘Bank of England’. William himself was dedicated to Calvinism - a Christian reinvention of Judaism that sanctioned usury. And even before the accession to power of the Jewish Tory Prime Minister Disraeli, the unholy alliance of British Imperialism and ‘proto-Zionism’ had already been forged. See also: Disraeli and the Imperial Anglo-Zionist Alliance

Additional notes:

The CPBML in particular seem to see Brexit as a sort of fuse lighting the way to socialism. Yet they admit that: “Leaving the EU will only mean an independent Britain if we make it so. Above all, we need control over our economy.” By “control over our economy” they then go on to list a set of traditional Corbynesque style socialist policies. Yet they have the naivety to insist that Brexit negotiations themselves “must” be conducted in this with these aims - by the Tories!!! And their idea of “control over the economy” includes everything except what is most essential to implement any socialist policies - the creation of a sovereign money supply independent of the banks and the debt-based global monetary system.

The oldest and biggest immigration wave still visible in Britain today began before the European Common Market even existed - resulting from the catastrophic and totally arbitrary British-drawn partition of India and Pakistan in 1948, which, along with a huge post-war need for labour, resulted in the 1948 Act allowing the immigration of Commonwealth citizens. Many hundreds of thousands came from India, Pakistan and the West Indies to Britain through the 1950s, not just for short-term work, but settling for good. Immigration has continued and widened ever since, resulting in an ethnic and cultural diversity that would have been unthinkable in 1945.

It was not Angela Merkel but Winston Churchill, who, already in 1946, promoted the idea of a ‘United States of Europe’ launched by Count Kalergi, whose “International Paneuropean Union, also referred to as the Paneuropean Movement and the Pan-Europa Movement, is the oldest European unification movement, beginning with the publishing of Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi's manifesto Paneuropa (1923), which presented the idea of a unified European State.”

Lenin believed that “in the civilised world….the great world-progressive features of Jewish culture stand clearly revealed: its internationalism, its identity with the advanced movements of the epoch … the percentage of Jews in the democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews among the population.”

In the end it makes no difference whatsoever how many Russians were or were not murdered under Soviet rule, even if it were tens of millions. Why? Because the mythos of Auschwitz and the identification of Germany and National Socialism as the embodiment of Absolute Evil has long cemented itself. Hence also the 1943 Hooton plan for population replacement in Germany through the mass immigration of non-white males and their forced intercourse with native German women (sound familiar?).

The Soviet Union under Stalin was the first country to recognise the State of Israel - only after which did Stalin gradually begin to see hidden Jewish tribalism and nationalism as a problem - resulting in a plan for the world’s first Anti-Zionist Congress - something still long overdue! NB Stalin had 3 Jewish wives, the last of which was the sister of the Jew Lazar Kaganovich.

It is interesting to note also that, from 1967 to 1994, 43% of all the heirs of previously 'loyal', solid Soviet and Communist citizens and apparatchiks of Jewish ethnicity had emigrated to Israel and the USA. Those that went to America became the arch neo-cons and today's Clintonite Russophobes. Those that remained included the oligarchs and key, Western-backed players in undermining Russia from within.

Jewish bankers had their grip on America already from the 18th century onward: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=640

A most interesting critical review by Keven MacDonald of “Stalin’s Willing Executioners” https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mYBcq78yIvKOHaRJEH6hPqOZAsryPQpC/view?usp=sharing This reveals the immense and disproportionate influence of Jews in the institutions of the USSR right up until the immediate years before Stalin’s death.

Holocaust Memorial Day - A Celebration of Globalist anti-Working Class LIES

Global Capitalism is a sickness which is destroying the entire world.  It is a sickness which only survives because of a mendacious propaganda which links criticism of an economic system with a racist genocidal mania.  This is a difficult subject to broach, but it is one which must be.  As Socialists opposed to the Liberal Left and the Racist Right, the temptation to shy away from such a controversial topic as the 'holocaust' is a very strong one.  But to do so is the politics of cowardice. On this day, we have to look at the propaganda, who it benefits (the Ruling Class, Banking system and multinational capitalist corporations), what impact it has on free speech and freedom in general, and to grasp the nettle and openly discuss an area which is forbidden in many countries and which will result in attacks by devotees to a new religion which only continues to hold sway due to the willingness of the 'faithful' to use physical violence and the full weight of the law to attack 'foul blasphemers' who do not share their devotion.

Everyday, without fail, there will be mention in the media of the genocidal gas chamber-operated, human soap-creating, miraculously efficient (at least temporarily) killing machine of Nazi Germany. In conventional schools, every opportunity presented will be used to bring up the evil of Europeans who did 'nothing' to stop the murder of the Jewish people - including the nasty Brits who waited until 1939 to destroy their country, their people, and their future, by going to war with the Germans; nearly a whole three years before the fictitious annihilation of European Jewry began. The evil Poles are especially focused upon for their failure to save the Jews; being selfish enough to be more pre-occupied with the German and Soviet occupation of their homeland, and the war which ravaged their nation.

There are those who have looked into the Holocaust story and found strange anomalies in the story. There is the bizarre fact that the alleged Gas Chambers could not have been operated as described, without killing the guards of the internment camps. Then there is the whole issue of the work-load of the camp crematoria, which achieved such efficiency that they defied the laws of physics; miraculously disposing of more bodies in two and a half years than they could have been reasonably expected to process in over a century. The marvels of German engineering are so amazing, that one wonders how they managed to lose the war. If the Nazis were so efficient at killing human beings, then how did the inmates of the concentration camps manage to survive at all. The global Jewish population was higher after the war than before it. If the Germans had been as efficient as propaganda maintains, this would have been impossible.

Whether it is the revision of the Auschwitz death toll from 4 million to 1.5 million (and lower) by Israeli officials, and the outrageous stubborn refusal to lower the total 6 million figure; the lack of real evidence to prove that any of the 'crimes' happened, except that procured by through torture or given by witnesses who have been proven to be, ahem, untrustworthy; the fabled tales of geysers of blood, electrocution swimming baths, shrunken heads, Human Skin lampshades and soap, or any of the other amazing tales, which have been thoroughly debunked, the Holyhoax is still taught as fact. The Flat Earth Society is laughed at for clinging to the Biblical idea that the Earth was created in Six Days, and that it is possible to fall off the edge if one sails too far. The Holyhoax is founded on the same religious claptrap, yet is solemnly taught to school children, and is repeated incessantly to the mind-controlled masses of all ages; with legal penalties in several countries for those who refuse to have faith in the impossible tales of Gentile evil and Jewish victimhood.

Does any of this matter? Is it really important that the fairytale be debunked? Is it only nice and polite to allow those who witter on about the evil Nazis to indulge in their fantasies? Is it the duty of all who do not wish to be labelled as 'anti-Semites' to stay silent as all Gentiles are libelled and slandered as psychopathic butchers, and homicidal maniacs? Is it acceptable to allow the defamation of all non Jews, but especially the European people, to go unchallenged?

Europe is in trouble. Our cities have been turned over to peoples from across the globe who do not share our traditions, our culture, our heritage, or our identity. These new-comers have been wrenched from their homelands by the economic destruction wrought by the international corporations and their proxy armies. The initial waves of non-European immigration came soon after the catastrophic Second World War, when the work required to rebuild our devastated lands was such that those working on the restoration programmes were able to demand higher wages, and better working conditions. The ruling Establishment needed to create mass unemployment in order to keep wage demands down, and to keep the indigenous common people in their place - as obedient and cowering wage slaves. The newcomers were used as Scapegoats to divert attention from the real destroyers of the nation who brought the immigrants into the European lands; the spectre of the Holyhoax was used to reinforce a prohibition of any criticism of the hidden Zionist ruling power.

Immigration in Europe is a real and growing problem; a problem which must be dealt with if the European nations are to survive. The relocation of the immigrants to their home countries can only be achieved if the factors which caused their dislocation are dealt with; namely the economic system which has turned their homelands into economic wastelands. It is far easier to focus upon the immigrants themselves, than to look for the reasons they have migrated across the globe. For this reason, knee jerk anti-immigrant parties are tolerated (albeit half-heartedly abused by the media), but those which question the cause of mas migration are crushed. The Holyhoax is a useful tool of our enemies; it make criticism of the Zionist mafia synonymous with a desire to exterminate the Jewish people in toto - ignoring the fact that ordinary Jewish people are not represented by the Zionist Ruling Class and nor are all Zionists Jewish.

There are Hollywood Nazis who shout ridiculous slogans such as 'Six Million, Not Enough', and who call for people who are physically different to them to be killed. These types are a gift to the Establishment, and in most cases the organisations to which they belong, are created and guided by the Establishment. The existence of those who wear Nazi regalia and chant slogans calling for genocide, is a continuation of the Holyhoax propaganda. Whereas this sort of behaviour should be passed off as an irritating diversion from serious efforts to resolve our problems, it has a damaging impact which helps to reinforce the popular image of anti-internationalists as anti-humans. The Hollywood hobbyists are a part of the problem, not a part of the solution.

The Holyhoax has been used to halt criticism of Israel. By accepting the lies of the Holyhoax, the people have been conned into accepting the ongoing lies of genocide by heretics who fail to accept Globalism as innevitable. In Serbian Bosnia, the fabricated Srebrenica Massacre fable drew on the Holyhoax tales; in Syria, the lies about Houla, and the foul anti-Libyan stories about a government massacre in Benghazi, were also echoes of the Holyhoax propaganda. If the people only knew that the Holyhoax has as much truth in it as the lies of German soldiers bayoneting babies during the Great War, then they would be less likely to believe the lies of the modern era. The Holyhoax propaganda has pre-programmed the masses who have not questioned it, to accept the lies against Serbia, Libya, Syria, and of course the 9/11 World Trade Centre Massacre. From these outrageous calumnies have come wars of aggression by the NATO terror machine, and millions of deaths - not illusory 'gas chamber' deaths, but real deaths of people of all manner of ethnic and cultural backgrounds, including a number of Jewish people who the Zionist terrorists are just as happy to sacrifice in order to achieve their goals - all organised for the benefit of the internationalist corporations.

There are laws prohibiting research into the Holyhoax. Why? Because without this evil propaganda, the entire edifice of the globalist war machine would collapse, and with it the wage slavery it enforces. The Holyhoax defames Europeans. It paints us as murderers who must be eliminated as a race, lest the Jews be liquidated 'again'.  The fact that the Capitalist system is not controlled by or headed by a single ethno-cultural group, is ignored by the promoters of the Holocaust story and of their pain-staking linkage of 'holocaust denial' to anti-Semitism.  More than this, the neo-nazi groups who chant racist slogans against the Jewish people, help to keep this link alive.  Ordinary Jewish people have become a collective human shield behind which the Global Ruling Class of all ethnic backgrounds, sit in smug safety.

The Holocaust does matter. It matters because it is the rationale for our destruction. It matters because it keeps the ordinary Jewish people in the grips of their leaders who have lied to them just as they lie to us. Without the Holyhoax, perhaps the Jews could escape from the mind control of the Zionists, and renounce their vile supremacist Talmudic creed, which is used as a divine excuse for the subjugation of the Palestinians. Then, maybe, the pariah nation could return to the fold of humanity, and without the likes of the Rothschilds to mislead them into the path of tyranny, they could live in peace side by side with everyone else.

The Holyhoax is the cornerstone of Internationalism. To destroy the greatest threat humanity has ever faced, we must expose the lies upon which the very real evil facing us, is founded.

Today in the UK, and in many other countries, is Holocaust Remembrance Day. The 27th January is the holiest day for the Cult of Holocaustianity.

In our schools, all year round children are spoon-fed lie after lie about the treatment of Jews in wartime Europe, and about the 'guilt' they must feel because their grandparents and great-grandparents didn't do enough to stop a piece of fiction dreamed up by the victors of the Second World War.  The deaths of countless Britons in the suicidal war for Global Capitalism means nothing to the Ruling Class. The Zionist media devotes its entire schedule to the brain-washing of gullible viewers into accepting the lies of the Holocaust as a means of countering criticism of the brutal occupation of Palestine. The legal system criminalises all objections to the brain-washing of the school system and media. Everything the Establishment is doing to destroy Working Class European life in our unhappy lands, is celebrated in its purist form on this day; Holyhoax day.

Politicians across the land have been attending services presided over by corrupted clergymen and professional liars lamenting the demise of 6 million Jews; failing to mention that the global Jewish population actually rose in the alleged Holocaustian years. The media-numbed masses have been listening intently to Jewish Germans telling fantastic tales which would make the worst fiction authors blush. How many will pause to consider the fact that had the Jewish population of Germany been annihilated as the lying propagandists of the Holyhoax maintain, rather than simply relocated to the USA and elsewhere, then there would be almost no Jews with German names, rather than the majority, as is the case? Of course, the Cult of Holocaustianity is built on blind faith, and its devotees can no more consider questioning the trustworthiness of those who preach to them, than they could allow room for doubt even when confronted with the blatant absurdities of the fables themselves.

Those of us who have survived the genocide of rational thought which is laughingly referred to as 'education', are duty bound to ensure that we too mark the festival of self-abasement with a defiant defence of the Truth. We will be called 'Holocaust Deniers' but we should not be cowed by such a label. Of course we deny the ridiculous lies of our oppressors, and we should do so with pride. Submitting to a lie out of fear of the repercussions of upholding the truth, is the worst kind of cowardice; a cowardice which emboldens our enemies and tightens the mental shackles which hold our children in a position of servitude.

The Holyhoax is a faith which can easily be disproven. There are the fantastic tales of lamp shades and soap made of human skin, which even the High Priests themselves have admitted are false. There are the fabricated statements of 'survivors' which attest to information they cannot have been privy to at the time of their detainment; although such fraudulent 'evidence' was sufficient for the Zionist victors to judicially murder those defeated in conflict. There are the stories of mobile diesel vans, electrocution swimming pools, gas chambers disguised as telephone boxes, gas chambers masquerading as shower rooms (built in such a way that should gas have been used, not only would the inmates have died, but also those removing them, inmates and staff alike), and indeed so many other ridiculous tales as to make belief in the Holocaustian nonsense impossible but for the power of media manipulation.

Holocaustianity is crafted in such a way that any criticism of anything in which Jewish people have a leadership role is automatically reacted to as an expression of anti-Semitism which can only the lead to the Gas Chambers. Criticism of Usury is not allowed, thus giving the Rothschild Bankers and the likes of George Soros absolute power in the West. The genocide of Palestine is only half-heartedly spoken of (or in the case of the BBC, treated as self-inflicted and no fault of the Israelis at all).

More Germans died during the Zionist-orchestrated RAF terror bombing of Dresden than the total number of Jews who perished throughout the entire Concentration Camp system. In the case of the latter, the majority of those who died, did so after contracting Typhus, which should have been curable had it not been for the military actions of the powers under Zionist control. In the case of the former, old men, women, children, the disabled and those wounded in battle who were no longer fighting, were deliberately murdered in a carefully crafted fire-storm, calculated to murder as many human beings as possible as a means of instilling fear of the Zionist War Machine - in a real Holocaust of fire.

There are people who consider opposition to Holocaustianity as a pointless exercise, akin to discussing the nonsense of the Flat Earth Society. However, whereas both articles of faith have their origin in the Bible, the Flat Earth Society has never harmed anyone, let alone been used as a justification for the genocide of entire peoples. Holocaustianity excuses the crimes of Israel against the Palestinians with the childish logic that because the Jews suffered in the early 1940s, that somehow makes their decades-long persecution of Arabs acceptable. This argument is of the level of a school child fighting in a playground arguing that the other child 'started it'. Two wrongs do not make a right - especially when the first 'wrong' is the product of a disturbed imagination, and didn't occur to begin with.

Perhaps the greatest lie of the Holocaust is that the Jews were a people without a land, and therefore had to be given Palestine as a homeland where they could 'never again' be Holocausted. Palestine was already populated, and the Jewish Homeland of Birobidjan had been in existence for decades before the Zionists stole the land on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean.

The name of Auschwitz has become synonymous with suffering. We all know the stories of the 4.5 million Jews who were done to death by the evil Nazis in Shower Rooms which had inside them carefully hidden Gas Chambers. We all know how the wicked Germans destroyed all evidence of their crimes against humanity, including making the ashes of their millions of victims disappear without trace. The super efficient Nazis removed all traces of their murderous death industry, even to the point of making the Showers Rooms appear as nothing but Shower Rooms - even removing any indication of the use of Prussic Acid (Cyanide), which would have stained the walls of the 'Gas Chambers' with an unmistakable blue tinge which could never be removed. We all know the stories of the endless number of 'survivors' who escaped the murderous Nazis in such numbers that they almost outnumber the entire Jewish population of Europe at the time of the Second World War. We know the stories because for seventy years we have had them rammed down our throats and have been prosecuted and beaten (some people have even been killed) if we ever dare to consider that they may not be entirely true.

The Auschwitz legend of the 4.5 million murdered Jews has so many flaws in it that even the official Holocaustian narrative has had to be toned down, with the number of dead revised to 1.1 million Jews done to death at the infamous camp. The 6 million total has not been reduced to take into account the reduction at Auschwitz. According to the religion of the Holocaust, 6 million minus 3.4 million does not make 2.6 million (which would still be a tragic figure if it was true), rather it still makes 6 million. Such absurdities only help to throw doubt upon the entire story of the sufferings of the Jews in wartime Europe. In Germany it is a criminal offence to point to this obvious mathematical discrepancy. The Holocaust story has to be protected by law because it is far more than an account of a period of history; it is the justification for the anti-borders globalist nightmare which is destroying the entire planet.


Auschwitz was an internment camp and a labour camp. Neo-Nazis claim that the Jews didn't suffer; that they had swimming pools, brothels, bands and all the amenities one would expect of a holiday camp - the neo-nazi argument is of course absurd. Being interned for a long period of time is doubtless not a pleasurable experience; no matter how relaxed a prison is, it is still a prison; being forced to work for the benefit of those who have imprisoned you is an insult and an affront to one's dignity, no matter how easy the work. Those who like to compare Auschwitz to Butlins are idiots, and they make real research into that period in history all the harder. The inmates of Auschwitz and all the other internment camps (regardless of whether they were Jewish), did suffer the indignity of being incarcerated. Some of the inmates died of sickness which they would not have endured had they not been incarcerated. At the end of the war, as typhus ravaged Europe, the camps were not spared by the sickness and people died in large numbers inside the camps, just as ordinary people did outside them. With the exception of the unavoidable outbreaks of sickness which created intolerable conditions, the inmates of the internment camps in German-controlled Europe suffered the same indignities as those in the internment camps in the countries controlled by the Allied powers. The Auschwitz experience was not unique, and until the final days of the war when sanitation broke down, the inmates experienced conditions no harsher nor easier than those in camps in any of the countries involved in the war.

We are told that the Nazis gassed the Jews - they did not. We are told that the Jews were tortured, raped, experimented upon and brutalised - they were not; in fact in the rare instances when camp guards mistreated the inmates, the guards were harshly punished, including the use of the death penalty for the worst offenders. We are told that the Holocaust was a unique tragedy in which humans suffered more than at any time before or since - it was not. The internment camps were simply internment camps and of no significance to anyone other than those who were in them at the time.

The propaganda of the Holocaust was used to justify the partition of Germany and the outlawing of any political expression of a desire for nations to exist as sovereign entities. This political action was extended to every nation on the globe outside of China, Israel and a very small number of independent nations - the number of which has been reduced steadily in the last 70 years, but rather more rapidly since the contrived propaganda which was the massacre at the World Trade Centre on the 11th September 2001.

The Holocaust is the justification for globalised capitalism. According to the official narrative, Europeans murdered 6 million people simply because they had a different ethno-religious background. This is an act of defamation which paints ordinary Europeans as murderers or as callous individuals who will turn a blind eye to the murder of innocents. If Europeans have a trait which defines us, that trait is compassion and empathy. We are naturally a kind and welcoming people who abhor injustice and cruelty. Our famed fondness for animals is an extension of our desire for people to be treated fairly. That we are labelled as murderers and uncaring bigots is offensive and inaccurate. The Holocaust propaganda has resulted in our natural desire to see people treated in the same manner as we would like others to treat us, turned into a weapon to bring about our own demise.

In Europe, the Holocaust has been used as a stick to beat us into submission to Globalism. Because the Germans in the 1930s dared to attempt to break away from the Global Banking System, Germany was smashed. Anyone who suggests that Globalisation is bad for the ordinary people and only benefits the Ruling Class and multinational corporations, is automatically labelled a 'Nazi' who wants to gas the Jews, who we are led to believe (with neo-Nazi collusion) are the top Bankers and the heads of the largest corporations.  The Zionist machine carefully keeps this narrative alive while making noises about anti-Semitism.  Capitalism is multi-ethnic, but it serves the Ruling Class to keep opposition to Globalism focussed upon one specific people.

 Anyone who suggests that we should have border controls to keep the number of people in our own country at a level which doesn't harm the land, the infrastructure, the environment, the wildlife etc, is labelled as a 'Nazi' who hates people who are different and wants to halt mass immigration as a first step towards committing genocide. Anyone who suggests that multiculturalism is bad for our own culture is labelled as a 'Nazi' who has a bigoted supremacist hatred of others, which (yawn) must lead to genocide. The example of the Holocaust is used to show what happens when people want the seurity of Sovereignty, to live in peace with nature, free from the diktat of the Global Financial Elite, to enjoy their own culture, traditions, land and environment. The fact that the Holocaust is nothing more than 1940s propaganda is the reason that it has to be protected by law to stop people realising that there is nothing wrong with wanting to be free and not wanting to be a part of a Global Plantation in which we are cattle to be used and abused by the Ruling Class as they see fit.

In Palestine, the Holocaust had the impact of taking a country from its then occupiers and giving it to the Zionist criminals under the lie that the Jews needed a special homeland lest they be holocausted out of existence. Collective European Guilt was used as a means of giving over territory to the Zionists - or more specifically, the Banking Financial elite - to use as a centre of operations in their criminal plan for the creation of a Global Order in which all countries paid allegiance to the Usurious Order. The Arabs in Palestine lost their land and the Jewish people who moved into that territory did so in complete ignorance of the fact that they were being used as a human shield to hide the criminal elite within.

The Holocaust has brought nothing but misery to the world. It has been used to justify the obliteration of nations, endless wars of aggression for financial gain, mass immigration with the inevitable (and planned for) destruction of cultures and peoples. It continues to be used to silence all who can see the ruination of the planet at the hands of greedy Capitalists. Its promotion by collaborators in high places, such as the Pope, celebrities and politicians of all conformist hues, gives it an air of respectability which it does not deserve. The enforcement of acceptance of lies upon lies by the cowardly media, civil servants and police of many countries, who would rather destroy the lives of their fellows than lose their positions of authority, maintains the Holocaustian dogma and enslaves us all.

Yes, some Jews suffered during the Second World War, but their suffering was no worse than the suffering of non-Jews. We are told that in all 80 million people died during the War, but that the 74 million have to be forgotten and the 6 remembered forever. The 6 million figure is a lie. At most, maybe a quarter of a million Jews died in mainland Europe during the war; most of them through natural causes, the rest as a result of the war itself. More Germans died in the destruction of Dresden than Jews died in the camps - and most appallingly of all, the photographs of dead Jews in Auschwitz which we are all familiar with, contain a good number of pictures of the victims of the RAF terrorists, murdered in Dresden whilst the interned Jews were kept safe from the war by the kin of the Germans who perished. No Jews were gassed. The Holocaust is a lie from start to finish.

On this seventy third anniversary of the entry into Auschwitz of Allied forces, let us have the courage to speak the Truth. We Europeans are not monsters. Wanting to be free does not mean wanting to enslave others. It is time to say NO to the propagandists and to tell our children that what they are bombarded with in the Schools, Churches and Cinemas, is a vile fiction to make them feel guilty for existing. This evil propaganda has to be confronted and the minds of our people liberated.

We cannot leave this issue in the hands of the racist bumbling Hitler-worshipping skinheads, who would have had no place in the nazi state they revere. We have to expose the Holocaust lie as a means of bringing freedom to Palestine, of stopping the NATO aggressors who justify their murder of Africans, Asians and Europeans by referring to the hackneyed propaganda, and of defending the Working Class from the machinations of the globalisers who hate our defence of Socialism and Sovereignty, because it stands in the way of their theft of the land and wealth of the Working Class worldwide.

Another perspective on the Calais crisis

A response to your Calais report:

Admitting thieves, rapists, drug dealers, sexists, racial supremacists, religious bigots, terrorists, carriers of disease etc into our land is NOT beneficial to the people.

Respected Comrades,

I am not disputing what you yourselves saw in Calais or seeking to invalidate the feelings it aroused.

Such reports as you brought back are valuable. On the other hand, it was not from msm but from the personal experience of my sister - who also visited Calais to check out the situation. I should add that my sister also worked in the Medical Institute for the Victims of Torture - where she got to know the harrowing stories of many ‘illegals’. Then there is the situation in Paris, from where accounts are quite different: for example of refugees sleeping on the streets in having their blankets and sleeping bags stolen by police while being violently forced to move on, a report has found. Men, women and children being beaten and tear gassed by officers in the French capital, despite government pledges to shelter vulnerable people. Eritrean families who said they were told to “get out of France” as police tore away children’s blankets, leaving them without protection as the bitter temperatures plummeted to -7C. According to one young Afghan man: “If we question them or say we have nowhere to go, they bring out the tear gas.” Then there is Dunkirk, where as you may know there are accounts by volunteers, medics, refugees and security officials which reveal that sexual abuse is common within the large camp there and that children and women are forced to have sex by traffickers in return for blankets or food or the offer of passage to the UK. As a result legal proceedings will be issued against the British Home Office, which is accused of acting unfairly and irrationally by electing to settle ONLY minors from CALAIS, ignoring the child refugees gathered in Dunkirk, 40 miles away along the coast.I think also of a friend of mine, one of the ‘do-gooders’ you refer to, who gave accommodation to a most gentle young Afghan man with no religious or racial bigotry - but the most extraordinary European style artistic gifts.

My questions:

To begin with, I ask you to accept there are alternative narratives that also based on first-hand experience.

As for the men and youths you observed, I ask you to also consider the question of WHY they are in France at all? Can anyone seriously believe that they hatched some fiendish plan in their war-torn or war-ruined countries of origin to somehow get all the way to England with the sole intent to rob, rape, drug deal and spread bigotry?

I ask you to consider too, whether English youths - who are not all gentlemen themselves and so many of whose lives have been already blighted by vicious austerity - often leading into a life of drug-taking as a result - would bother learn a foreign language even if only to seek employment and escape the bleakness of their lives in England. And if they were put in some refugee camp for illegals near the border of a more stable country with better employment opportunities, what would they do - and how would they behave - without work, any prospects of life fulfilment - or even a room of their own in an actual house? This is not just a hypothetical question by the way - even though Britain is not a war-ruined country.

But these questions are all purely preliminary.

What I see as important are historical and political background to the question of WHY so many refugees, illegals or whatever you want to call them are here in Europe in the first place. I will not need to remind socialist comrades of the Zionist-backed wars of aggression deliberately planned and launched against so many nations such as Iraq and Libya which previously had stable and essentially secular social nationalist governments - Syria, as we all know being the last in line. I do not need to remind you also of the 4 MILLION or more Muslim deaths caused by the so-called ‘War on Terror’ (the real ‘Holocaust’) or the resulting sectarian civil wars and rise of Islamic extremism - not to mention the millions of refugees from Palestine and Iraq which countries in the Middle East like Jordan are struggling to contain with little help from the West. The msm are principally responsible for under-reporting the many hundreds of Iraqis who have died every month from terrorist bombings by ISIS and other anti-Shia groups every single year since the U.S. ceased its own terrorist bombing - and compared with which the number of victims of of terror attacks in Britain, Europe is almost negligible. I will not need to remind you also of the role of the US-Zionist-Saudi axis in not just laying the groundwork for but actively funding ISIS - just as they did Al Qaida (again to pursue regime change in what was then a stable country under Soviet protection - and thus to bring down the USSR). Now US ground troops are actively killing civilians and children in Yemen too - Saudi bombs having failed to kill enough Shia rebels. And of course Iran - a country with no history of aggression or terrorism - will be the next target of US-Zionist aggression, threatening a war which Americans will be able to view in comfort on their TVs while Europeans bear its possible nuclear brunt.

4. If the SWPE is indeed not brown on the outside and red on the inside - but, as it claims, red through and through - should not these global realities count in its analysis of the refugee problem? Should not America and Israel - rather than fear of the possible criminality of their largely helpless and pathetic victims - be made to pay for their actual and massive war crimes? Is it not political and moral cowardice to primarily target some close-at-hand victims of the US-Zionist-Saudi criminals - even if some of these victims do present some dangers - rather than attacking the criminals themselves, who are happy to turn Europe into a dumping ground for victims of their crimes and in this way weaken Europe further. Should not Europe should ask America and Israel to make reparations for its war crimes and pay the bills for refugee problems? But of course Europe is now just a colony of the US and the bankers from which National Socialism freed Germany. Today of course, even Germany is still a country under US occupation - and still enslaved by a 1949 treaty that allows America to keep all German gold, spy on its government, control its press and force it to publish CIA propaganda. Only one person predicted Europe would become such a weak and disunited colony of the US empire if Germany was defeated in WW2. Adolf Hitler. But where is any socialist critique of America’s ‘invasion of Europe’ - the photo subtitle of your report?

5. I would like to remind the SWPE that socialism and social nationalism has a venerable history not just in Europe but also and particularly in the Arab world. Indeed the only party actually calling itself Social Nationalist is itself Syrian - the Syrian Social Nationalist Party - and even though its social nationalist ideology was founded by an Orthodox Christian - it is still the biggest legal opposition party in Syria itself. But I would hate to see the SWPE sink into something more like ‘Daily Mail Socialism’ than true red and Socialist Nationalism.

6. A final but central point in this whole context. Let us not forget history comrades!

I find it truly ironic that no one in any nationalist movement of the Left or Right has challenged the total historical amnesia of the MSM. That is because, viewed from a historical perspective, it is ironic to say the least, that the on-going squabbles between Britain and France on the Calais and Dunkirk refugee problem forget that the roots of this problem go back, not a few years or even a few decades - but right back to 1916. For it was then that it was precisely the British and French who - even prior to the disastrous Balfour Declaration - created a secret agreement (the Sykes-Picot plan) to carve up the Ottoman empire at the end of the war into puppet kingdoms and ‘nations’ - whose borders were drawn up by pencil without any knowledge of the language, religion, history and demography of the people in them. This was the start of the entire tragic history of the Middle East - a story for which millions have paid for with their homes, lives and those of their families, and in a way that makes English fears of illegal immigration - however valid - pale by comparison.

“Ottoman provinces became Arab kingdoms, while Christian and Jewish enclaves were carved out in Lebanon and Palestine. Syria, Libya, and Palestine were given names resurrected from Roman antiquity. Libya re-appeared in 1934, when the Italians combined Cyrenaica, Tripolitania, and Fezzan. The French mandate marked the first time “Syria” had been used as the name of a state, whereas “Palestine” was merely a Syrian appendage. Iraq had been a medieval province of the caliphate, whereas “Lebanon” referred to a mountain and “Jordan” to a river. The new Arabic-speaking states adopted derivations of the flag of the Arab Revolt, which had been wholly designed by British diplomat Sir Mark Sykes. The four colors of the Arab flag—black, white, green, and red—represented the standards of different Arab dynasties: Abbasid, Umayyad, Fatimid, and Hashemite. They remain the colors of half of today’s Arab flags. Neither the names nor the symbols of the new states had any connection to their inhabitants.The early post-World War I settlement was extremely unstable. Coups were common, kingdoms were overthrown, and the French and British exercised a strong influence over local affairs. By the 1960s, Arab republics outnumbered Arab monarchies. Arab attempts to undo the partition of the region culminated in the merger of several states, such as Syria with Egypt and Iraq with Jordan, which itself annexed those parts of mandatory Palestine that were not ruled by Israel. The effort was short-lived. Repeated failures to excise the Zionist state from the Middle East marked the end of the endeavour.” from http://www.thetower.org/article/the-map-that-ruined-the-middle-east/

And as we know, all this occurred even before the mercilessly planned and executed destruction of independent Arab Republics that followed 9/11.

Summary:

Respected comrades: is it not the task of socialists to educate people in the contradictions of capitalism and how these find expression globally and historically - rather than focussing on the present-day local symptoms of these contradiction?

For example in considering the present-day refugee situation in France (including Paris and Dunkirk as well as Calais) and the problems it now presents for England, should socialists not also point out that it was the 1916 Anglo-French Sykes-Picot accord that marked the very beginning of the whole tragic story of the Middle East - one which has now ended up posing a problem also for the very countries that started it - France and England in particular?

Admitting thieves, rapists, drug dealers, sexists, racial supremacists, religious bigots, terrorists, carriers of disease etc into our land is NOT beneficial to the people.

Who can disagree? But whose responsibility is it that they want to get into our land? Are you implying that the miscreants you wish to keep out of England are worse than the WW1 Anglo-French colonialists - and the later US-Zionist warmongers in the Middle East, i.e. those that drove them so close to our shores in the first place and the name of a so-called ‘War on Terror’ - in actuality, and to repeat, a REAL but unreported ‘Holocaust’ resulting in at least 4 MILLION unreported Muslim deaths (for whom of course there are no PC memorials in Western cities)? This all goes to show also is nothing in the least bit ‘liberal’ about the real face of global capitalism!

Holocaust, Holodomor, Hollow Propaganda

The 27th of January is an ordinary day with no special significance.  SWPE has a policy of opposing mind rotting religions.  For this reason, although this date has absolutely no value in itself, it has to be addressed for its central position in a most heinous piece of malicious propaganda, which is being used to create an atmosphere which s conducive to the destruction of sovereignty and to all barriers to globalisation.

In the early part of the twentieth century, a series of countries in Europe began to break free from the criminal Capitalist Banking System.  In 1917, one hundred years ago this October, Comrade Lenin led the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party to victory over the Tsarist regime.  In the 1920s, the leadership of the RSDLP passed to Comrade Stalin.  Stalin reversed many of the policies of Lenin, correcting mistakes which had been made in order to accommodate the liberal lunatics of the Mensheviks, headed by the Wall Street asset, Trotsky.  The Russian Revolution was designed to oust the Tsar and to make the penetration of Russia by globalist Capitalists far easier.  Trotsky was the key figure for the annihilation of free Russia, and Stalin was the man who did everything in his power to halt that.  The vilification of Stalin is revenge for his valiant attempts to stop the Trotskyite takeover of the USSR - an attempt hampered by Trotsky's OGPU/GPU/NKVD/KGB, which was sadly so entrenched that no matter what Stalin did, the poison of Trotsky could not be fully overcome.

For the crimes of restoring the importance of family, and even more for the crime of putting emphasis on sovereignty, the enemies of Socialism created the myth of the Holodomor to discredit the USSR under Stalin.  The Holodomor fable was concocted after the end of the Second World War, but did not become a widely distributed weapon against the anti-Capitalist (anti-Trotskyite) policies of Stalin, until 1987 when the infamous 'Harvest of Despair' was made, using imagery of the 1922-3 Volga Famine, twisted with mendacious propaganda to create the illusion that Stalin organised the famine as a means to murder dissidents.  Stalin was by no means an angel as can be seen by his free use of the Gulags, but he was not guilty of the genocide in the Ukraine.  The Holodomor is Capitalist propaganda to program an emotionally averse response to the name Stalin and to any positive examination of the ideals he embodied.

Although the Holodomor is painted as a 1920s massacre, it was not even heard of until after the Second World War, and it is eclipsed by the 1940s propaganda against the Socialist countries of Europe outside the USSR in the period up to 1945.  The most infamous propaganda in the twentieth century, which has become a religion for the twenty-first, is the idea that the people of Europe passively allowed the leadership of Germany to massacre 6 million Jews in 'gas chambers'.  The Holocaust is such a disgusting defamation of the character of the European people that it has to be protected by law, with many countries making it a crime to even question the details of the lies.

The Holodomor and the Holocaust are pieces of Hollow Propaganda which do not stand up to scrutiny.  They are emotionally charged, with the intention not to question the various strands of Socialist ideology, but to make these strands unpalatable by associating the figureheads with 'evil'.

Stalin stood for Socialism in One Country, making love of the Motherland, love of family, self respect, honour and duty, central to the lives of the people of the USSR.  He turned the ugly open borders bigotry of Trotsky on its head.  What is now referred to as 'Cultural Marxism' and the Social Justice Warrior phenomenon is Trotskyism, which is itself a negation of Marxism and is a tool of Global Capitalism.  Socialism has always been about doing what is best for the people - open borders is what is best of the corporations.

The Socialists who put the label 'National' as a qualifier for their interpretation of the ideology, have been even more vilified for opposing the total obliteration of sovereignty - even though groups like the Waffen SS were multi-cutural, multi-ethnic and multi-religious.  Pro-refugee, pro-Identity, anti-Borders ideology rests entirely on an emotional opposition to Sovereignty - which is why the Holo lies (domor and caust) are being pushed onto innocent naive minds at every opportunity.  The sickness which paints the quest for truth as 'anti-Semitic' hides the reality that there are ever more Jewish people speaking out against the propaganda which is assumed to be written for their benefit.

SWPE calls for the end of the Holo religion, with the laws prohibiting free research being abolished, and the temples of this insidious religion (so-called Memorial Museums) torn down and the very building blocks smashed into dust.  The propaganda of the last century has no place in the present one or any centuries to come.  The economics which thrive on open borders and the libeling of Sovereignty advocates as 'haters', has to be done away with forever.  Liberalism, Capitalism, Holoism - all these affronts to reason and sanity must be swept away, to make way for a free Socialist society in which the study of history is a part of the greater cultural drive for knowledge, and not something to be legally defined as acceptable and unacceptable thought.

Recommended reading:

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/special/library/famine.htm
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/more-on-the-fake-holodomor/
https://codoh.com/library/
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/holocaust-day-the-time-is-ripe-for-a-jewish-apology.html

Holocaust Memorial Day - Keeping Propaganda Alive and Killing Nations

SWPE has a policy which we call National Zionism.  In brief, this policy is to recognise Israel and Birobidjan as the two sovereign Jewish States, and to take Theodor Herzl's Zionism to the next level, by not only demanding that the Jews have a homeland which is exclusively theirs, but that all Jews from every part of the planet must live exclusively in these lands.  Of course an SWPE State would only be able to act for our country, which our opponents choose to use to twist our words into a desire for the expulsion of the Jewish population of the UK due to anti-Semitism.  This is a lie. National Zionism means that no non-Jews may live in the twin Jewish States, and that no Jews may live outside the twin Jewish States.  We are not anti-Jewish - we wish the best for everyone - we are realistic to know that we cannot live alongside people who are not of us, as it is bad for everyone concerned.  We break with Herzl in our belief that anti-Semitism is good for no-one, and that the security of our People can be achieved in tandem with the achievement of security for the Jewish People, with no need for anyone to be libeled, blackmailed or subjected to ruinous propaganda.

SWPE is not anti-Jewish.  We support the National Socialist Party of Israel.  We admire the Kibbutzim, although as Socialists, rather than Communists, we have no desire to transplant Jewish political economics into our country.  We are vehemently opposed to the financial system of Capitalism with its roots in the religious-economic practice of Usury.  It is up to the Jews to decide whether to follow the path of Kibbutz or of Rothschild thievery, but in their own homeland (Israel-Birobidjan).  We want no part of the corrupt and tyrannical Banking economy, nor do we see any merit in adopting Trotskyism, but what the Jews do in the Jewish homeland is the business of the Jewish people and only the Jewish people.

The existence of the Diaspora is the reason for anti-Semitism.  The criminal system of Banking/Stock Market Global Finance Capitalism is a product of Diaspora.  The Rothschilds crooks use Israel as a headquarters and their co-religious/co-racial kin as the tentacles to subvert foreign countries in order to achieve Global Zionism, which is an ideology we are absolutely opposed to.  End the Diaspora, end anti-Semitism - it really is that simple.

Today is Holocaust Memorial Day in the UK.  The UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, has used the day to announce the creation of a Holocaust memorial to be situated next to the Westminster Parliament.  It is this type of behaviour which fosters anti-Semitism.  Forever forcing non-Jews to feel guilty because of what happened to Jews in the period of 1942-45, is to impose collective guilt on people, many of whom were not even born in that period, and this is to elevate the suffering of Jews above that of everyone else.  What makes this much worse, is that the entire Holocaust story is pure propaganda, invented by the UK-US-USSR Allies to justify the destruction of continental Europe in the Second Global Bankers' War (WW2).

The ongoing invasion of Europe by Mohammedan terrorists and rapists is justified by the nonsense that we must accept 'refugees' or we will be guilty of committing another holocaust against them by not saving them.  Fighting age men can save themselves, their families and their homelands, by staying where they belong.  Even if their sob stories were true (which they are not), our concern is with our people, not with the global population.  We will not sacrifice our Workingmen to unemployment to accommodate outsiders.  We will not sacrifice our Women and Children to the lusts of rapists who have no morality other than a belief in a demonic entity who hates humanity.  We will not sacrifice our animals to appease the lusts of barbarians who practice halal/kosher.  We will not sacrifice our beautiful precious land to house millions of people who have no place among us.  We will not feed people who believe in 'jihad' and the virtue of killing people who don't share their insanity - they want to kill all free native Europeans and are more than happy to put this desire into practice.  We are expected to do all this because of the lies of the Holocaust industry, pushed by the Diaspora Capitalists in order to break sovereign nations so that they may be more easily financially exploited and de-cultured. 

We demand that the brain-pollution of our children and our gullible television watching people be ended.  Europeans are not mass murderers and we should not be made to feel ashamed for something which we didn't do, and which didn't happen.  The following sites gives ample information to prove that the Holocaust is a tissue of lies, and there are many, many more sites which do likewise:

http://www.holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1001
http://nodisinfo.com/holocaust-against-jews-is-a-total-lie-proof/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmrHBT5h-BA&noredirect=1

SWPE says NO to Holocaust Memorials, Holocaust Memorial Days and lying propaganda to make us ashamed of who we are.  In the interests of better Jewish-Gentile relations, end this anti-European hatred now.