Socialism is the past, Socialism is the future.
It is an aberration that Socialism is not the present.
We are here to correct this tragedy.
We fight for a Free British Isles: a Socialist British Isles.
Our vision is the British Isles of Social Justice: the British Isles of National Freedom.
It is the British Isles freed from Capitalism, Liberalism & Trotskyism.
The so-called 'royal' family are the most ungrateful of all parasites. They sit in their palaces, getting fat from the riches extorted from the Working Class by the Middle Class tyrants who work hand-in-glove with the Ruling Class to wrench every penny from us to support their obscene decadent and degenerate lifestyles.
The newest member of the clan, Rachel 'Meghan' Markle, has complained to the media (!) that she is tired of getting so much media attention. The ACTRESS who has lived her adult life in the spotlight, getting paid to show her wares to the camera, is now suddenly shy. Bless her hypocritical bones. The new bride of Henry 'Harry' Hewitt, the half-brother of future king, is happy to live like a pig, getting her designer clothes, palaces, permanent luxury holiday lifestyle, etc, but whilst she is content to piss away the taxes of the Working Class - leaving many of us literally wondering how to feed and clothe our families after our incomes are taxed to pay for the parasites - she isn't happy that the media want to take her picture. Aw, shame. Well, the good news for Rachel, Henry, and the rest of the royal rats, is that when the Socialist Republic dawns, they won't have to worry about the media intruding in their lives. They will join the rest of us in living a normal life, where ancestry and class mean nothing - either that or they can take their ungrateful over-privileged selves out of our lands. Either way, their days of sponging are numbered.
Since at least 1066, the Monarchy of this country have acted in a manner which can only be described as arrogant betrayal of the needs of the non-Ruling Class population.
Under the First Queen Elizabeth, ordinary people (including children) were press-ganged into the Queens Navy. They were enslaved to make the Royals rich. The English Empire, and the British Empire which followed, were built on the exploitation of the native people.
The Royal Family claim the ‘divine right’ to rule over us. For religious people, this is blasphemy. There are no chosen people, and the idea that 'god' has a special affinity for the royal rubbish comes from King James who ordered the rewriting of the English translation of the Bible to give him non-existent God-given authority. It is from the foul Henry VIII and his murderous daughter that the heresy known as the Church of England arose. It is a consequence of Henry VIII's selfish and cowardly actions that the Church was split and it is thanks to the Royal family that all the troubles and sectarianism in Ulster, Belgium, Germany and elsewhere have come.
The British Monarchy has pushed the globalist agenda relentlessly. It was the Royal Family who encouraged General Kitchener in his policy of murdering farmers and their families in Southern Africa. The tyrannical Queen Victoria presided over the invention of Concentration Camps, the burning of Pretoria, the rape and murder of entire Working Class farming families – men, women, children and babies – all for the pursuit of increasing her despotic family’s wealth.
The young Princess Elizabeth, (now Queen) proudly posed with her parents as the RAF, under their direction, committed unprecedented atrocities including the wholesale slaughter of civilians in Dresden, Hamburg and other cities. The present Queen once knighted Robert Mugabe for his contribution to majority rule in erstwhile Rhodesia. Mugabe's achievements amounted to the brutal murder of Rhodesian civilians of British and European descent, which were really but a continuation of the crimes committed at the whim of the 'royals' in the Boer War.
The present wars for oil and empire in the Middle East. Asia and elsewhere all fit the Globalist agenda, which the Royals not only support, but revel in. Prince Charles has proclaimed his desire to be 'defender of All Faiths'. This is sheer lunacy, which even manages to make a mockery of the King James farce which the royalty cling to as justification of their domination over us. The royals are not only parasites, they're a bit thick too!
The Monarchy have profited immensely from globalism. Their profit is gained purely at the loss of all the people they have subjugated. How can anyone support the focal point of this 'elite' mafia and their figurehead, the monarchy? There is no justification for anyone, especially those who want the best for their people, giving any loyalty to a family who have been demonstrably disloyal to the people of this nation, a people they purport to serve.
Let Rachel, Henry and the rest cry over the loss of privacy which goes with a lifestyle of plenty at the expense of the Working Class who have a life of struggle and poverty. Perhaps the new 'princess' should consider returning to Hollywood, taking all of the in-laws with her? One thing is certain, unless they change their ways and become ordinary citizens of the coming Republic, none of them will be tolerated to remain in these Isles a moment longer.
The first casualty of war is the Truth. From this first victim are spawned all the victims which follow. Every death, every dispossession, every foul destruction of humanity; all stem from the initial lie. But what if the lie should be discovered? What if the reasons for war are exposed as fictions? The first casualty must be butchered repeatedly until mere mention of the truth is heresy. Not only must the Truth be denied in the first instance; it must be defiled to the point where history itself is rewritten to erase any questions as to the validity of the new reality; a reality born of the war-mongers fiction.
In Europe, warfare gradually evolved into a game of the Establishment, with rules of combat and a surreal etiquette concerning the conditions in which human life could and could not be taken. Of course, the people giving the orders ensured their own safety at all times and let ordinary soldiers do the killing and dying. Behind the official romantic imagery of gentlemanly war, the reality was very different. For all the prancing around in military uniform, the days of the Ruler leading his men into battle are but a page in distant history.
Warfare is nothing new. However, it is only in recent times that the propaganda justifying acts of brutality has become so pervasive. Before the advent of the printing press, most people could not read. The extension of literacy to include the majority of people came about through economic necessity. As the people were reduced to the level of cogs in the machinery of the English, (and later British), Empire, literacy was needed to facilitate efficient commerce across previously unthinkable distances. The education of the new merchant classes inevitably trickled into the population as a whole, and with this widespread popular ability to read, came the opportunity to shift population control from pure barbaric force, to the more subtle, yet more dangerous level, of mind-control through propaganda.
We are told today that George III alienated the British in the North American colonies, due to being afflicted with porphyria which he may have contracted from his sexually diseased mother. If this tale is true, then according to the touchy-feely liberals, he cannot really be blamed for the deaths of Britons on both sides during the American Revolutionary War. The spotlight on George III conveniently absolves the Establishment's pocket media for dehumanising Britons across the Atlantic Ocean, in order to justify incredible acts of terror against ordinary civilians.
Whether George III was mad, or evil (or both), it is now clear that the War for Independence was a farce. In reality the patriotic movements in the 13 colonies were infiltrated by the Freemasonic Founding Fathers who ensured the continuation of the power of the Crown and the City of London. Thousands died and outrages against civilians went unreported. The Establishment media continue to hide the role of the Founding Fathers as tools of the very same Crown which the colonists fought to free themselves from. Instead they focus on the mental well-being of British Head of State; who we are told was bound by Westminster and therefore had no influence over the actions of Government in the home of liberal democracy! See how the media fables discredit one another? Yet no one notices.
Following the slaughter of our own people in the American Revolutionary War, focus shifted onto the War to capture Europe - focus, that is, on fake war crimes of the Napoleonic forces. The modern notion of prosecuting leaders from the losing side came to the fore in the arrest of Napoleon. The media campaign against Bonaparte was so relentless that even today children are told that if they are bad the Bogeyman will get them. The term Bogeyman was invented by the British media; Bogey, deriving from Boney as in Bonaparte. It is amusing, that the great Emperor is now known in the USA as the Boogeyman, conjuring images of a 1970's disco dancer; hardly the child-eating leader of Imperial France!
Victors' Justice does not only apply to those defeated in war; it applies equally to those oppressed by despotic regimes. Propaganda against the Irish was so successful that the London regime of William Stadholder was able to murder vast numbers of Irishmen in their own country, to the cheer of Working Class Englishmen who had everything to gain by rising up in defence of their Irish cousins and securing freedom for all. Instead they hailed the persecutions and paved the way for their own suffering; which duly followed. Two centuries later, the British again butchered the Irish, this time stealing the food of our kin across the Irish Sea, leading to terrible loss of life through deliberate Establishment-created starvation. The English of the 17th and British of the 19th centuries said nothing about the cruel and unforgivable horror of the Great Hunger.
Persecution of civilians is a tradition of the British Establishment. One of the most notorious examples of the anti-human policies of the London terrorists came in the War in Southern African, which we know as the Boer War. Boer is the Afrikaner word for farmer, and should be pronounced to rhyme with fur. The mispronunciation of the word 'boer' deliberately associates the Dutch farming folk with pigs (boars), and makes them seem less than human. The atrocities of the British Establishment against the North American Britons and the Irish, must not be seen to be diminished by comparison with the crimes against humanity perpetrated by the London despots against the Dutch farmers in the south of Africa. The unique aspect of the barbarity in the Afrikaner lands was the total war against men women and children.
Under the direction of the Kitchener and Baden-Powell (founder of the monarchy-loving Boy Scouts), food, cattle, buildings and land were stolen from the Afrikaners or destroyed; all to maximise their suffering and undermine resistance to the British imperialists. The media like to harp on about Concentration Camps in Second World War Europe, but never mention that they were an invention of the British Empire. The Dutch settlers rounded up by the British were beaten, starved, raped and murdered; the victims including old folk and babies. The media reported the actions of the British in the Boer War as heroic; they were not heroic, they were shameful.
The controlled media is used to push lie after lie, However, on rare occasions the media dare to speak the truth. The most recent example of this (and possibly the last) resulted in the closure of the News of the World in 2011. It was closed by the State for eaves-dropping on the Establishment. The media continue to tap telephones and intercept emails, letters, isp information etc. The News of the World made the mistake of tapping the 'wrong' people. The media is referred to as the fourth estate, but far from being a collection of autonomous entities, the media form a single unit, controlled by the State. There is no free press in the UK, other than lone activists who operate outside the mainstream and increasingly find themselves squeezed by ever-more draconian censorship. We may as well 'publish and be damned' if staying wholly within the law requires self-censorship to the point of deception.
The media have excused atrocities, blamed the victims, or simply ignored the crimes of the Establishment. The following are but a few examples, and many, many more could be added:
Bloody Sunday - Irish civilians murdered by the State in cold blood; the murderers reported as heroes acting in self-defence.
General Belgrano - Argentine wounded returning home, sank by Royal navy terrorists; hailed as a glorious victory.
Sepoy Mutiny - Indians tied to canons and blown to smithereens; reported as necessary to maintain order.
Great War 'over the top' trench warfare - hundreds of thousand killed for no reason; presented as intelligent strategy, bolstered by lies of non-existent German war crimes.
Coverage of Israel - made up attack on Israel presented as facts, real massacres of Palestinians by Israel white-washed (and the Racist, Apartheid state referred to unquestioningly as the only democracy in the Middle East)
How much longer will the people swallow the lies of the media? The Establishment are barbarians who have committed the most unimaginable horrors against humanity, at home and abroad. The media have lied for them, even blaming the victims.
In the long build up to war against Iran, the UK Office of Communications (Ofcom) made the decision that the Iranian TV station, PressTV, had to be taken off air in the UK. This blatant censorship of information would provoke crocodile tears of outrage if it was carried out by a foreign government. Yet this proof that we live in a Police State did not become major news in the UK; obviously because the media as a whole are a part of the machinery of the Police State itself.
It is part of the task of the SMPBI to act as a voice against the censors and the media liars. The BBC are notorious stooges of the State, but so are the likes of the Huffington Post, Jewish Chronicle, etc, which are even now slandering/libelling Jeremy Corbyn as a racist, for speaking openly against the racism of the Zionist regime in Occupied Palestine.
If anyone questions the need for Revolution, the proof is in the dictatorial nature of government and the willing brutality of the media distorters who wage war on reality every day, even daring to label any trace of truth as 'fake news'.
Thoughts on Marx and the Free Press
by Carl Barjer
Matter is the precondition of mind's possibility; and vice versa. As Marx well knew, the Bible was a balm, with a god made up by men to make life more tolerable. In the beginning was the word of men, with which they wrote god into mental existence; 'He' resides exclusively in the minds of the men who created 'Him'.
Marx was right about some stuff, wrong about others; but his work is shot through with honest endeavour. Communism was to come at the end of a process that would've dissolved corporations and withered away the state.
Marx adamantly, explicitly supported press freedom. What later came to be called 'Communism' perverted Marx's ideas.
What Marx knew, and we're seeing today, is that capitalists, when left to their devices, will create a system where power and wealth becomes concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.
That means a small minority enjoy considerable freedom, while a large majority are constrained, restrained, chained. One thing Marx failed to foresee, is how major a role debt would come to play in later stage 'capitalism'. Most of the masses are enslaved by new masters: mortgages, credit owners, loan sharks, etc.
Big bank takes little bank; the latter's now suborned to the former.
Marx's support for "press freedom" was principled and practical. As subsequent revolutions showed, unless you take the people with you - by educating and freeing them to achieve class consciousness - the a 'socialist' state will soon become as oppressive as the one it replaced.
EVERY society that attempted a premature and violent revolution, soon abandoned Marx's ideas, and imposed new variants on age old forms of oppression. Monarchs, aristos and priests were replaced by 'strongmen', tyrants and dictators. Instead of 'dictatorship' of the proletariat, new elites were formed to dictate to, and reimpose oppression over, the proles.
Marx opposed property. Communal living means everything is there for everyone to enjoy, as and when they need it. They are collectively and individually free; the one facilitates the other. For 'socialism' to transform into 'communism', the state (and the oppression that goes with it) must whither away
'Communism' refers to a post state, communal society, where people collectively make use of the products of their work; and control the means they collectively produce goods and services with.
'Corporatism' refers to control by certain groups, in their interests, at the expense of society in general.
Bourgeois 'capitalism' refers to control of the means of production by a minority, who own property.
All isms are impossible, in a sense; such is the nature of ideals. But those who used the term 'Communism' in reference to their regimes, abused it absolutely.
'Corporatism' was established as a reaction, and opposition, to supposed 'Communism' and 'socialism'.
'In the last half of the 19th century people of the working class in Europe were beginning to show interest in the ideas of socialism and syndicalism. Some members of the intelligentsia, particularly the Catholic intelligentsia, decided to formulate an alternative to socialism which would emphasise social justice without the radical solution of the abolition of private property. The result was called Corporatism.
'The basic idea of corporatism is that the society and economy of a country should be organised into major interest groups (sometimes called corporations) and representatives of those interest groups settle any problems through negotiation and joint agreement. In contrast to a market economy, which operates through competition, a corporate economic works through collective bargaining..
'Under corporatism the labour force and management in an industry belong to an industrial organisation. The representatives of labour and management settle wage issues through collective negotiation. While this was the theory in practice the corporatist states were largely ruled according to the dictates of the supreme leader.'
Examples: 'Fascist' Italy, Nazi Germany, Franco's Spain, Peron's Argentina, New Deal USA (under Roosevelt).
“Freedom of the press… is a kind of beauty, which one must have loved to be able to defend. It is something which I love truly, whose existence I feel to be essential, to be necessary to me so that without it I cannot live at peace, or live a full life”.
But does this follow?
“ Hence we not only opposed censorship of the workers’ and radical press, but would also have ‘made objections no less earnestly’ to bans on the reactionary, monarchist and anti-Semitic press. “
The press, for Marx, was to be of the people, for the people, by the people. Most of what masquerades as the press today would be rejected as a mockery of the term. To quote Lenin:
““Freedom of the press” … is a deception while the best printing presses and the biggest stocks of paper are appropriated by the capitalists and while capitalist rule over the press remains, a rule that is manifested throughout the world all the more strikingly, sharply, and cynically, the more democracy and the republican system are developed, as in America for example.
“The first thing to do to win real equality and genuine democracy for the working people, for the workers and peasants, is to DEPRIVE CAPITAL OF THE POSSIBILITY OF HIRING WRITERS, BUYING UP PUBLISHING HOUSES AND HIRING NEWSPAPERS. And to do that the capitalists and exploiters have to be overthrown and their resistance suppressed.
"In capitalist usage, freedom of the press means freedom of the rich to bribe the press, freedom to use their wealth to shape and fabricate so-called public opinion.
“In this respect. too, the defenders of ‘pure democracy’ prove to be defenders of an utterly foul and venal system that gives the rich control over the mass media. They prove to be deceivers of the people who, with the aid of plausible, fine-sounding, but thoroughly false phrases, divert them from the concrete historical task of liberating the press from capitalist enslavement.
“Genuine freedom and equality will be embodied in the system which the communists are building and in which there will be no opportunity for amassing wealth at the expense of others, no objective opportunities for putting the press under the direct or indirect power of money, and no impediments in the way of any working man (or groups of working men, in any numbers) for enjoying and practising equal rights in the use of public printing presses and public stocks of paper.””
In a Marx/Lenin sense, what we mostly have in the UK is a press more akin to a capitalist state-controlled one, than a free one. It needs replacing, rather than regulating. Creating a free press would require proactive, revolutionary and sustained effort.
The architects of the globalised tyranny which is being built around the sleep-walking masses are fond of their slogans. They bandy around phrases such as 'Equality and Diversity', 'Multi-Culturalism', 'Democracy', and 'Hate Crimes' in the knowledge that the masses will accept these nonsense slogans without thought. These, and the other phrases pushed by the high priests of political correctness, are more than just nonsense terms, they are in fact psychological weapons. The media and other agents of the Ruling Class do not use an armoury of slogans simply because the words sound good to those who use them, but rather because in depth research has found that words have more than a conscious impact. Politically Correct slogans are used as a part of the mind control technique of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. We need to fully appreciate this fact in order to defend our minds from the concerted assault which our enemies are conducting via the manipulation of words and the repetition of concepts.
Accelerating under Theresa May and Leo Varadkar, the parasites who sit in Government have enacted laws to combat 'Hate Crimes'. As well as the obvious impact upon freedom of speech that is obtained by incarcerating anyone who objects to the social engineering being carried out against the will of the people, there is a deeper and more dangerous result of such legislation. Far worse than the legislation itself is is the censorship which people have come to self administer. The statement 'you can't say that' is bleated at anyone who broaches serious matters in a manner which is not politically correct. Conversations for many of the self-policing populace have become nothing but trivia, such as what one has watched on the television. For those who have removed the accursed mind control box from their homes, the inability of many to speak without reference to the media, is truly exasperating. The television is by far the most powerful medium for mind control, as the programming it issues is absorbed into the sub-conscious, regardless of how selective the viewer may be.
There are people who hold the media at arms length, but are held in submission to the globalising agenda by their inaction. Rather than formalise a plan to deal to expose our enemies, and deal with the results of their machinations, people who are enraged by the destruction of their culture, by their economic enslavement, and by the obliteration of a future for their children; people who should be in open revolt in defence of all they hold dear, are making the intolerable situation temporarily go away with drugs and alcohol. Why? Because they have subconsciously accepted the lie that they are powerless and that they may as well indulge themselves in unbridled hedonism rather than fight an enemy they cannot hope to beat.
Partly as a result of the controlled media constantly repeating the lie that nations which have a 'democratic' system of political administration are 'free', the people who live in those countries have come to believe that their Governments would never do anything to undermine their freedom. What is not realised is what exactly is meant by 'free'.
People in the west have for a long time believe they can speak and act as they see fit, so long as no law is broken. This is a dangerous assumption. The existence of laws forbidding speech on a whole raft of issues gives the lie to the idea that the people have freedom of expression. In reality, the laws curbing free speech are such that one has to be constantly on one's guard that one doesn't inadvertently make a remark (even a joke) which could lead to prosecution. The recent prosecution of 'Count Dankula' for his video of a dog responding to a joke - which admittedly was in poor taste, but was nevertheless just a joke - is a case in point.
Due to the media programming, the brainwashed masses who believe they are 'free' react with hostility to those who know that the freedom which the Establishment allows is illusory. People who are arrested for thought crimes are dæmonised by the media, and as a result are regarded as the enemies of the people by the very people whose freedoms the Establishment have removed. This is problematic. The conditioning of the masses is such that a herd mentality exists, with people who stand out and 'rock the boat' being viewed with suspicion and hatred. Fear of not being popular, is enough for many people who can see that there is a concerted effort to destroy individuality and sovereign society, to force them to acquiesce.
We are now in a position where people are being arrested for opinions. At the moment, it is mainly people on the 'right' who are being locked away, but that doesn't mean that we are safe. Anti-Zionists from the Labour Party are losing their council seats, being kicked out of the party, and being hounded in the media. It is lazy to think that the liberal witch-hunt is going to leave us alone. People from across the spectrum are finding their lives turned upside down as the liberal bigots flex their muscles (or more accurately, as their pet police are set loose on dissenters who dare to speak forbidden truths.)
In order to halt the march of globalism, we need to awaken the people, and do so in a manner which is tailored to the situation which confronts us. We have to break down the programming and to discuss issues of importance which the people have been conditioned to close their minds to - but we must do this without triggering the fear and hatred strategy of the parasitical pre-programming. This requires a disciplined and analytical approach to the problem; an approach which will ultimately result in the mental emancipation of others who will become an unstoppable force which will be victorious in our struggle. We must be the vanguard which will be unstoppable once the 'Hundreth Monkey' is awoken.
The first step to freedom comes with an understanding of the nature of our enslavement. We are not held in bondage by physical chains, but by mental ones. We need to study the various forms of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, with a focus upon Neuro-Linguistic Programming. We need to make ourselves experts in the understanding of subliminal imprinting and other techniques of mind control.
Recognising the symbolism used by the agents of the Ruling Class is a part of the process to self-liberation, but only a part. Of a deeper importance is the understanding of the techniques currently in use to keep the people in a state of unquestioning and unknowing servitude.
We are fighting an enemy which is multi-faceted, but guided by a common purpose. Our enemy uses techniques which are complex, but not incomprehensible. Studying the programming techniques is essential if we are to deprogramme ourselves. Appreciating that the enemy is not an immovable force but rather is a paper tiger gives us strength. When we become fully cognisant of the psychological weaponry which is being used against us relentlessly, we will achieve immunity to this level of attack. An analogy could be for a European to fully learn Hebrew or Chinese - the previously meaningless characters once learnt in their entirety within the context of the particular language, will never again pass un-noticed and bereft of understanding. Right now, for the majority of us, the 'characters' themselves are only vaguely evident, but with a concerted effort they will become so plain that their usage will not only fail as a method to enslave us, but will actually become a valuable tool for us to turn against our oppressors.
The Global power structure is taking shape because we are fighting the wrong battles. We are fighting the battles they have prepared for us. We need to study their techniques, and to arm ourselves with the weaponry of their making - we need to become masters of psychological warfare. Once our eyes are fully open, we will be able to open the eyes of others. Disengaging from the mind control of the Establishment is a prerequisite for victory, but it is not enough without action to awaken others. The House of Cards will fall once we stop propping it up - but that will require stopping others propping it up too.
We have to educate ourselves in the techniques of the enemy. Neutralise their weapons by making ourselves fully conscious of them. Then use this knowledge to awaken others, and to bring their tyranny crashing down. It is only fear which is stopping us - fear which the Establishment have programmed into us. Deprogramme and reprogramme yourself. Eliminate the fear and sense your inner strength.
Unity in the struggle is vital. Right now there is a temptation to cherry-pick the victims of persecution that we care about, and to ignore the prosecution of people who have ideological positions we do not share, or even ones we oppose. This is a big mistake. We are in the days where it does us well to re-visit the sentiment of Martin Niemöller:
First they came for the comedians, but I wasn't bothered about what was really a pretty crap joke, so I said nothing, then they came for the (add list here) but I wasn't affected so did nothing, then they came for the Revolutionary Patriotic Socialists, anti-Zionists and Defenders of Sovereignty, and by that time the liberal tyranny was complete and there was no one to speak up for me.
We have to stand together, regardless of that which divides us. The only division which matters is Globalist versus Freedom. By learning their tricks, and refusing to play their divisive games, we will take the battle to the enemy, and destroy them. We have to.
The written word is a useful tool in reaching people who accept that all is not well with the world. Sadly, due to the detrimental impact of television, so many people now have such reduced attention spans, that skim reading has become the norm, rather than the vital practice of repeatedly reading material and considering the points made in depth. The 'dumbing down' of education has, of course, exacerbated this problem.
Video is a useful tool in the modern age, but it suffers from the tendency to be used as a medium of entertainment. Comrade Pietro is going against the stream by finding good videos which are informative, and this work has to be commended. In the mainstream however, the so-called 'news' is deliberately distorted, and in the controlled alternative media, the distortion may be angled differently, but it is the same dumbed-down sensationalism, which educates and liberates no-one. The alleged antagonists of alternative and mainstream media (fake and even faker news) both use graphic imagery to appeal to the emotions of viewers in order to push their propaganda. By appealing to emotion, the intention is to bypass the rational thought processes required to analyse what is being presented. This is the same suspension of disbelief employed in the entertainment industry, and that is not coincidental by any means. Video is useful, but the temptation to entertain has to be avoided. The only useful videos are those which present information which can be verified by independent research; this may make them problematic for the television generation who have come to expect high-tech presentations which require little or no thought on the behalf of the viewer.
Sound is a medium which is often overlooked by many people fighting global capitalism; this is unfortunate. When we think, we think in words. There has been a wealth of fascinating research into the ability of sound waves to influence our feelings, and even to alter physical shapes. Indeed, those who care to read J.R.R. Tolkien's Silmarillion cannot fail to see how his description of sound as a creative (and destructive) force can be applied to the religious texts which many people hold dear. The science of Cymatics gives evidence to the importance of sound in the natural world, and thus as a means of imparting knowledge so that it is retained. Sound differs from visual information insofar as although video has a more immediate impact, it is a temporary one, which dissipates much as do our dreams. Only the most powerful imagery we are exposed to tends to linger, as with our nightmares and with horror imagery such as the fabricated 'atrocities' of Assad, and the Zionist Shoah business; imagery which loses its potency as it is debunked.
When one considers the vast resources pumped into the degenerate music industry in order to control how those who listen to 'pop' music think, the importance of sound is clearly something the Ruling Class understand. The debased lyrics which are repeated as an internalised self-destructive mantra have caused damage to our people which can be seen in sexual debauchery, abandonment of self-respect and a perpetual victim mentality - in short all manner of corruptions of humanity which render the listener into an active liberal. An understanding of the deep impact of sound may offer a valuable tool to educate ourselves and to help those who have been poisoned by the globalists to recover from the harm intentionally done to them.
The music which is used to pollute our youth uses the repetition of degenerate lyrics, sang (well, spoken really), in the first person. Those who sing the carefully prepared spiritual toxins vomited forth by the 'entertainment' media, unwittingly import ideas which then become the basis of their subsequent degenerate behaviour. Why is the trans-epidemic exploding? Why is a decent family-centric Socialist Morality giving way to the Capitalist Hedonistic Self-absorbed Social Alienation which is tearing the fabric of society apart and leaving in its wake individuals who live as commodities, rather than People? Because the media spoon feed our children with immorality, which they first encounter in the songs they sing as boastful glorification of all that is sick and debased. Of course the reinforcement of the liberal sickness in the school system only helps embed the disease in the minds of the youth. Perhaps if we had more first person music glorifying our Class, our Culture, our Nation, we could deflect some of the damage at least in our own children. But then we would be labelled as 'extremists' by the liberal fanatics who control the media. We are labelled anyway, so why should we care!
Sound is a weapon, as can be seen by the negative impact of the majority of individualist 'feelings'-focused commercial music - for which a cursory search of the internet will bring up vast numbers of songs which are truly stomach churning. Music without lyrics can be uplifting and inspiring. Music with positive lyrics could also be - so long as the lyrics are positive and not a cover for a sectarianist/supremacist/divisive agenda. Music is not the only means by which we can make an impact; educational and inspirational radio is also a tool which we should utilise.
We have many tools at our disposal. Imagination and work is required to embrace and utilise the weaponry which can awaken our people and upset the agenda of liberal tyranny. Radio could be added to our arsenal as a means of reaching more people and awakening them to the undeniable truth that there is something very wrong with the way in which the Isles are governed, and that only Revolutionary Patriotic Socialism can defeat the Globalists.
This is an appeal to all who have the ability to open up a new front in the struggle. We need to take the fight to the enemy, using all means at our disposal. Anyone who has advice in this area - such as how to go about creating a Radio/Podcast presence; any existing stations we can make use of; the technical requirements of such a venture - please get in touch by email so that this can be achieved.
Is this a venture worth pursuing? If so, can you help? If not, why not? Let us know.
The UK regime is Globalist to the core. The wishes of the City of London (a state within a state beholden only to the guiding forces of Capitalism), are always obeyed. The wishes of the people of the UK are only obeyed if they happen to coincide with those of Big Business.
The liar in chief, Theresa May, has sold the people out on Brexit. We demanded immediate and total independence, but we are getting no real independence, and even the scraps of sovereignty are being delayed for as long as is possible. Some of her treasonous actions include:
Keeping the UK tied to the EU military through snide policy deals which the people have no chance to oppose.
The acceptance of the arrival of as many EU nationals as possible until the end of the 'transition' period, which is a kick in the face for those who voted Leave in order to stop the Capitalist abuse of cheap labour. All who come will be allowed to stay permanently, ensuring wages are depressed, working conditions undermined, and unemployment kept high enough to scare people into taking even the worst jobs that can be found.
Giving away our fishing waters, effectively handing over massive amounts of our territory
Leaving the north of Ireland in the EU in all but name, but having no Irish Sea border, so in reality having a completely open border with the EU for anyone to stroll through, with nothing we can do about it.
The servile May regime is not only a lackey to the City and EU, it is a complicit poodle working for the Global War Criminals.
The recent Novichok fabrication in which the Russian Federation was libelled as having killed injured an 'ex'-spy in the UK, is being repeated over and over so that people will associate Russia with WMDs, just in time for the latest lie that the Syrian Arab Army has used comparable WMDs on the so-called Rebels, all with Russian blessing.
The fable which is being weaved together is that Bashar Al-Assad likes to kill his own people, just because. And the evil Russians love to help him to do so, again, just because. That is it, no reason, no logic, just lies. No-one is told that the Damascus area of Douma was captured by Jaish al-Islam (a terrorist organisation which has massacred vast numbers of civilians, enslaved and raped many women) and that the SAA drove out the terrorists in order to liberate the area and rescue those who survived the brutal JAI occupation - a fraction of those who were captured. Perhaps this forgetfulness on behalf of the media and UK regime is due to JAI being funded by the Zionist Saudis, which the Zionist UK regime is more than happy to sell arms to, making them directly culpable for the crimes of JAI?
The US puppet president, Donald Trump, has declared that he wants to bomb Syria. Theresa May has hinted that she is willing to issue an executive order, bypassing the democratic process in Parliament, to add the UK military to the Coalition of Zion, to murder more Syrians, and make more profits in armaments sales and post-war reconstruction contracts (not forgetting Oil profits when the natural resources of Syria can be plundered).
May is parroting Tony Blair's infamous Iraq WMD lie, just substituting Syria for Iraq and Bashar al-Assad for Saddam Hussein - a heroic man, lied about (in the same way as Gaddafi after him), and a man who kept his country safe from the globalist parasites and the religious idiots (again like Gaddafi and al-Assad)
Theresa May is a liar and a scoundrel. She is a willing Globalist. She is more than happy to be a War Criminal. There is not much we can do to stop her. What we can do is inform people of the mendacity of the UK regime. The May elections are an opportunity to send the regime a clear message that it is hated and opposed. We need to get the message out that the UK is complicit in crimes against humanity, and mobilise the people to hit the politicians where it hurts. If people vote tactically for anyone at all who has a chance of knocking the tories out of local government, they will lose control of council after council, and with that the loss of the purse strings of the people at local level. The Tory members will be outraged if their party is wiped out at the elections - even if only in terms of control of councils, rather than total loss of councillors. This is the best way of forcing change in the Tory party and stopping Mad May. It isn't much, but we have to do what we can.
To listen to the UK propaganda, one would be forgiven for believing that the White Helmets operating in Syria also have White Wings and fly around in the manner of angels. The presentation by the maintream media of the White Helmets in such glowing terms, is pure mendacious propaganda.
Funded by us tax-payers, through direct taxation as well as through the bogus carity of dead MP, Jo Cox (a war criminal, married to a sexual predator, yet according to the media, no less than a saint), the UK (that means us) funds the White Helmets, alongside the Working Class from all over the EU and other countries in the thrall of the Zionist menace.
The White Helmets are Al Qaeda repackaged. They are terrorists who have been employed in Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Kosovo (Serbia) and many other places, to destabilise sovereign states as a prelude to invasion by NATO terrorists. The media lies about the WH/AQ vermin, claiming they are heroes saving the people of Syria! Were it not for their presence, Syria would be at peace and there would be no-one in need of saving.
It is the duty of all of us to expose the White Helmets and the treacherous filth who use money extorted from us to pay for their crimes. Good places to gain information about these anti-humans, include the following sites:
Don't let the terrorists win. Stand with the legitimate Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad against the criminal zionist regimes in London, Washington, Brussels and Tel Aviv. If the White Helmets are not crushed and wiped out to a man, they will be redeployed in Iran, and anywhere else the Capitalist War Criminals seek to ruin. The fight against AQ/WH is the fight against globalism; it is the fight for Freedom and Sovereignty worldwide.
Further political and philosophical notes and reflections
Part 3. The Question of ‘Rootlessness’ - and ‘Identity Politics’
“Thus, both [the imperialistic-bellicose and humanitarian-pacifistic way of thinking] can be used by “international Jewry” to proclaim and accomplish one as a means for the other [their common end of a rootless, leveled, homogeneous, technological mass civilization] — this machinational “history”-making entangles all players equally in their webs.” Heidegger
The association of the Jews in particular with a “rootless cosmopolitanism” has a long history, which Heidegger here reaffirms. But it was after WW2, which resulted in the displacement, driving out and uprooting of so many Germans - both from and within their homeland - that Heidegger came to consider rootlessness (loss of ‘autochthony’) as something “caused not merely by the circumstance and fortune, nor … only from the negligence and superficiality of man’s way of life” but from “the spirit of the age in which all of us were born”. More significantly, he came also to associate this rootlessness with a growing attachment not just to financial calculation but also to technology, “which everywhere and every minute claim, enchain, drag along, press and impose upon man under the form of some technical contrivance or other”, and “whose accomplishments come speedily to be known and publicly admired”.
At a time when information technologies, computers and the now ubiquitous ‘smartphone’ had not even begun to encroach upon human life and activity, this was an extraordinary example of Heidegger’s historical prescience.
“What we know now as the technology of film and television, of transportation and especially air transportation, of news reporting, and as medical and nutritional technology, is presumably only a crude start. No one can foresee the radical changes to come. But technological advance will move faster and faster and can never be stopped. In all areas of his existence, man will be encircled ever more tightly by the forces of technology.”
Heidegger did not seek to deny the usefulness or even necessity of technical devices, but warned of the way in which they threatened the complete extinction of another type of thinking to the dominant mode of “calculative thinking”. It was in his Memorial Address on the death of the composer Konradin Kreutzer that he called this other type of thinking “meditative thinking”. Indeed he spoke of man as being literally “in flight” from thinking in this meditative sense.
“Yet you may protest: mere meditative thinking finds itself floating unaware above reality. It loses touch. It is worthless for dealing with current business. It profits nothing in carrying out practical affairs. And you may say, finally, that mere meditative thinking, persevering meditation, is ‘above’ the reach of ordinary understanding. In this excuse only this much is true: … meditative thinking requires a greater effort. It is in need of even more delicate care than any other genuine craft. But it must also be able to bide its time, to await, as does the farmer, whether the seed will come up and ripen. Yet anyone can follow the path of meditative thinking in his own manner and within his own limits. Why? Because man is thinking, that is, a meditating being. Thus meditative thinking need by no means be ‘high-flown’. It is enough if we dwell on what lies close and meditate on what is closest - on that which concerns us, each one of us, here and now … now, in the present hour of history.”
Heidegger goes on to ask a fundamental question:
“Even if the old rootedness is being lost in this age, may not a new ground and foundation be granted again to man, a foundation and ground out which man’s nature and all his works may flourish in a new way…?”
For if not:
“Then there might go hand in hand with the greatest ingenuity in calculative planning and inventing an indifference towards meditative thinking - total thoughtlessness. And then? Then man would have denied and thrown away his own special nature - that he is a meditative being. Therefore the issue is the saving of man’s essential nature. Therefore the issue is keeping meditative thinking alive.”
To all this we might add that it would have come as no surprise to Heidegger, that within all the New Age cults and literary trash that would come to promote ‘meditation’ as a practice, one will never once come across the term ‘meditative thinking’. Instead ‘thought and meditation’ are treated in New Age culture as total opposites. Hence the pathetic degree of dumbed-down thinking - if not complete thoughtlessness - that finds its expression in the jargons of New Age literature, as it does also in both empty corporate jargons and the worship of technological science - what Heidegger called “THE new religion”. Nor is it a surprise that Twitter alone has become a principal technological instrument for the dumbing-down of human thinking - promoting unthought, knee-jerk reactions to the latest bits of informational ‘news’ that can be used to confirm with the existing beliefs and prejudices of its users without any deeper thinking or research.
That said, is there an answer to Heidegger’s quest for a new form of rootedness - one no longer reducible to the old fetishes of ‘Blood and Soil’, ‘Race’ and ‘Tradition’? For as a result of the now almost total dominance of calculative thinking:
"The world now appears as an object open to the attacks of calculative thoughts - attacks that nothing is believed able any longer to resist. Nature becomes a gigantic gasoline station, an energy source for modern technology and industry...The earth now reveals itself as a coal mining district, the soil as a mineral deposit … Agriculture is now the mechanized food industry. Air is now set upon to yield nitrogen, the earth to yield ore, ore to yield uranium … uranium is set upon to yield atomic energy.
Heidegger’s own answer to the question of technology was that:
"We can affirm the unavoidable use of technical devices, and also deny them the right to dominate us, and so to warp, confuse, and lay waste our nature. We let technical devices enter our daily life, and at the same time leave them outside, as things which are nothing absolute but remain dependent upon something higher. I would call this comportment toward technology releasement toward things."
Further reflections come from the English philosopher Simon Glendinning:
… Flourishing, I want to say with Heidegger, does presuppose some kind of milieu which provides what we might call a “racinating function”. However, what we need to take our leave from is the disastrous temptation to represent every “nativisation” in “blood and soil” terms. Against Heidegger, I will want to affirm another nativisation – the being-at-home … that belongs, as Nietzsche stressed, to a human being who has achieved “independence of any definite milieu”.
This suggestion is given a further and even more pointed signification by Harvey Requiem:
“… there will always be outcasts who will find their autochthony and therefore pursue meditative thought simply through the necessity of it, because they cannot find an anchor in mainstream calculative society. They are not permitted a place in the calculative 'herd', which is how most people seem to find their meaning, therefore they must find their meaning elsewhere and are forced to meditate lest they lose their minds.”http://harveyrequiem.blogspot.cz/2012/02/on-martin-heideggers-memorial-address.html
Neither of these quotations are an answer in themselves. Yet they contain the seed of an answer. We need only rethink Nietzsche’s attack on the “herd mentality” in a new way - as the cultivation of human beings who are not in any way bound or constricted by group identifications of any sort - whether ethnic, racial or gender-based, religious, political or ideological, regional, national or supranational. Such group identifications express a weakened and insecure sense of self, and with it a need to bury and confine the truly autarchic self - what I call ‘the deep self’ - within the restrictive and outworn baggage of group ideological languages and their symbolic ‘identifiers’. Thus I see no essential difference between, for example, the identity politics of the liberal and Trotskyite Left, and that of both Islam on the one hand and ‘ethnonationalism’ or ‘identitarianism’ on the other (including the ultra-identitarianism of World Jewry). Similarly, it makes no essential difference whether one seeks a basis for one’s sense of self by identifying as a feminist, gay, transgender, black, white (or even as a ‘socialist’) or doing so through a ‘them and us rejection’ of groups one does not identity with - which is just a form of negative identification and negative identity politics in which identity is entirely constituted by what one negates.
There is a dialectical relation between positive and negative identifications and identity politics, one which not only makes them inseparable but also serves globalist interests - through the ever-increasing polarisation and fragmentation of society into groups based on opposite identifications: feminism versus patriarchy, gay or lesbian identity versus ‘straight’ heterosexuality, traditional genders versus ‘trans-genders’ etc. etc. Such multiple identity polarisations are a globalist strategy of the 1% - and a useful distraction from focussing on it. It is important also to understand the connection between polarising group identifications and ‘self-identification’ in the sense defined by Gilad Atzmon. This is what he calls ‘ASA’ - for example the need to identify oneself primarily and fundamentally AS A ‘gay’ and AS A part of the ‘gay community’ - rather than just being homosexual, and not making a fuss of it or turning it into the core of one’s selfhood. Do ordinary workers need to identify themselves AS workers? No, they simply find themselves in the position of having to be workers. In this sense, the common essence of all identity politics lies in the need to find a substitute for an authentic and autarchic sense of self in group identifications and identities, whether positively or negatively. I am not of course suggesting that identities, groups and communities of all sorts, including ethnic groups, are invalid or redundant. What I am saying is that groups and communities need to be composed of authentically autarchic individuals - those whose native soil lies in their own innermost soul - which both embraces and transcends identities and identifications. Only the ego and egotism, long cultivated in the Judaic tradition, thinks of itself as possessing identities as a form of private property. In contrast, the soul is awareness as such - a universal awareness field of which we are each an individualised portion and embodiment. The ‘deep’ self, as this pure, knowing awareness, includes an awareness of multiple roles and identities - but it is not itself an identity. That is why those insistent outsiders - foremost among them the German writer Ernst Jünger, close friend and correspondent of Martin Heidegger, - consistently refused to be bound by group identifications but embodied a truly sovereign individual. He himself called such an individual an ‘anarch’ - in contrast to the revolutionary ‘anarchist’. ‘Anarchs’ are simply aware, truly autarchic and self-rooted individuals without whose inner sovereignty there can be no free and sovereign groups, communities, states, societies or nations of any sort at all.
Further political and philosophical notes and reflections: Part 2. On 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' Some extracts:
Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy. The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game…
Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgment, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interest? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable; for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.
The part played by the Press is to keep pointing our requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. ...through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade...
NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
What is it to the proletariat labourer, bowed double over his heavy toil, crushed by his lot in life, if talkers get the right to babble, if journalists get the right to scribble any nonsense side by side, … once the proletariat has no other profit out of the constitution save only those pitiful crumbs which we fling them from our table in return for their voting in favor of what we dictate…
It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the "goyim" the very principle of god-head and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.
In order to give the GOYIM no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus, all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the GOYIM, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.
Economic crises have been produced by us for the GOYIM by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals ....
We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the GOYIM, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any GOYIM who oppose us by deed or word.
Commentary:
That the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a Russian ‘forgery’, full of plagiarisms from many earlier texts, is irrefutable. What is less remarked upon is their clearly Russian character, expressed by a hatred of both the landed (Tsarist) aristocracy and also by the ‘plan’ to replace it with a Stalinesque-type “despot” in full control of the State and all property - and who would be deified like a God. What is also not remarked upon enough is the failure of the Protocols to promote or anticipate the success of the Zionist movement - with its aim to reclaim Jerusalem. Then there is the clear lack of knowledge presented in the Protocols of the Judaic holy books themselves - which in themselves contain ample material of an even worse sort than that presented by the Protocols themselves - and which already declare that the Jews are destined to be global rulers of mankind and non-Jews their slaves. Instead the Protocols simply seek to re-contextualise elements of Jewish scripture and of the historical roles of the Jews in a more modern context.
From this point of view - and as Goebbels himself recognised - the whole question of the ‘authenticity’ of the Protocols is, in the end, wholly irrelevant - since most of what they are purported to ‘forge’ was already a reality at their time of writing - for example the reign of liberalism, Jewish control of the press, of speculative finance capital - and also of socialist and Bolshevik movements etc. But the biggest mistake of the Protocols was the perceived need of their authors to present Jewish supremacism as a carefully crafted conspiracy of a single directorate. It is better described as an international tribal network of diverse political and economic groupings elites - a ‘worldwide web’ - one with no central headquarters or leader, but with a clear history, direction and agenda (albeit one of which most Jews, even those participating in and supporting it, are largely ignorant).
“The locusts have no king, yet they advance together in ranks.” Proverbs 30:27.
Does this all mean that, in truth, Jews are indeed to blame for all the ills of this world, and have worse in store for it? Such a claim rests on a wholly impoverished understanding of history and historical developments. It is like claiming that the rise of capitalism was ‘planned’ and executed by a secret elite. To be sure, there were countless individuals, financial elites and also ‘secret societies’ like the Masons - all of whom did indeed vigorously participate in and furthered the rise of capitalism under the slogan of ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’. But to attribute the rise of capitalism to these individuals, elites and societies - rather than understanding them all as an expression of this rise - is to turn the dynamics of history on its head. Man does not make history. History makes man. This was the understanding that both Marx and Heidegger brought to expression.
“...the conspiratorial theory of history, which is based on the assumption that whatever happens is intended to happen, i.e., it is the result of conscious planning and deliberate action. Since Heidegger rejects this premise, he also rejects such anti-Semitic conspiracy theories as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as naively humanistic in their understanding of history. Heidegger does not, however, deny that human thought and action play important roles in history. But he believes that they are not the ultimate forces. Thus Heidegger does not deny that the Jewish community world-wide actively pursues its perceived collective interests. But he does believe that Jewish policies are not the cause or explanation of modernity, but instead that modernity arises from deeper, broader, and ultimately inscrutable forces. Heidegger sees the rise of Jewish power — in both Anglo-American capitalism and Bolshevism — as a product of the Jews’ unique adaptation to the spirit of modernity, which is an age of rootlessness and calculation. Jews, therefore, appear to be both subjects and objects of the modernization process. Primarily they are objects, since history is ultimately outside of human control. But since world Jewry is already characterized by rootlessness and calculation, it is capable of accepting the “world-historical task” of driving modernity toward its consummation: a rootless, homogeneous, technological mass society, which will ultimately ensnare and destroy the Jews as well. So, in the end, they are objects as well.” Greg Johnson
In other words, Jews are as much an object - indeed a slave and also a victim of their own ‘chosenness’ and supremacism - as they are its subject or ‘agent’. Similarly, the financial speculator or billionaire is as much a slave to speculation and money as he is master of it. Mammonism is no more a creation of money owners than capitalism, as an international economic system, was the planned creation of owners of capital.
In what then, lies the uniqueness of the power of international Jewry? The answer is simple and plain to see - and ever more so. Namely that it has become, like the fake gas chambers of Holocaust mythology, something totally outside the realm of ‘politically correct’ discussion and rational critique among leading statesmen and politicians of all colours or parties - not least the ‘far Left’. As Gilad Atzmon put it, Jewish power is the power to prevent any discussion or critique of Jewish power. As for Zionism in particular, far from being merely a response to anti-Semitism, its philosophy was, from its very inception, itself rabidly anti-Semitic. Herzl was an anti-Semite of such virulent extremism that his remarks puts the ‘Protocols’ in the shade. His aim was nothing less than to eradicate what he saw as disgusting and dirty Eastern Jews - and turn them instead into virile Gentiles with their own land, state and racially pure nation.
“Leon Ritter von Bilinski — the man whose memoirs were to expose the Disraeli origins of Herzl's ideas — told Herzl bluntly that the Zionists’ ideas and assumptions were exactly those of the worst anti-Semitic racists.” Mark Burdman
Martin Heidegger was perhaps the deepest philosophical critic of biological racism - both that of the Jews and its mirror image in Hitler’s biologism - and indeed Hitler’s Anglophilia:
“The idea of an understanding with England in terms of a distribution of imperialist “prerogatives” misses the essence of the historical process, which is led by England within the framework of Americanism and Bolshevism and at the same time world Jewry to its final conclusion. The question of the role of world Jewry is not racial, but the metaphysical question of the type of humanity that can accept the world-historical “task” of uprooting all beings from Being.”
Today this type of humanity is exemplified in Silicon Valley, with its principal and on-going project of creating machine-like human beings whose thought and perception are linked directly - digitally and electronically - to a singular Artificial Intelligence called ‘The Singularity’. What is here called ‘intelligence’ however, is nothing but the technological expression of what Heidegger called “machination” and “calculative thinking”, i.e. a type of ‘intelligence’ than can only calculate (previously associated with specifically Jewish financial talents - but which knows no dimension of living, meaning or being outside ‘the virtual’. But it is also not difficult to guess who the main financiers of research into this wholly artificial ‘intelligence’ are.
Global Capitalism is a sickness which is destroying the entire world. It is a sickness which only survives because of a mendacious propaganda which links criticism of an economic system with a racist genocidal mania. This is a difficult subject to broach, but it is one which must be. As Socialists opposed to the Liberal Left and the Racist Right, the temptation to shy away from such a controversial topic as the 'holocaust' is a very strong one. But to do so is the politics of cowardice. On this day, we have to look at the propaganda, who it benefits (the Ruling Class, Banking system and multinational capitalist corporations), what impact it has on free speech and freedom in general, and to grasp the nettle and openly discuss an area which is forbidden in many countries and which will result in attacks by devotees to a new religion which only continues to hold sway due to the willingness of the 'faithful' to use physical violence and the full weight of the law to attack 'foul blasphemers' who do not share their devotion.
Everyday, without fail, there will be mention in the media of the genocidal gas chamber-operated, human soap-creating, miraculously efficient (at least temporarily) killing machine of Nazi Germany. In conventional schools, every opportunity presented will be used to bring up the evil of Europeans who did 'nothing' to stop the murder of the Jewish people - including the nasty Brits who waited until 1939 to destroy their country, their people, and their future, by going to war with the Germans; nearly a whole three years before the fictitious annihilation of European Jewry began. The evil Poles are especially focused upon for their failure to save the Jews; being selfish enough to be more pre-occupied with the German and Soviet occupation of their homeland, and the war which ravaged their nation.
There are those who have looked into the Holocaust story and found strange anomalies in the story. There is the bizarre fact that the alleged Gas Chambers could not have been operated as described, without killing the guards of the internment camps. Then there is the whole issue of the work-load of the camp crematoria, which achieved such efficiency that they defied the laws of physics; miraculously disposing of more bodies in two and a half years than they could have been reasonably expected to process in over a century. The marvels of German engineering are so amazing, that one wonders how they managed to lose the war. If the Nazis were so efficient at killing human beings, then how did the inmates of the concentration camps manage to survive at all. The global Jewish population was higher after the war than before it. If the Germans had been as efficient as propaganda maintains, this would have been impossible.
Whether it is the revision of the Auschwitz death toll from 4 million to 1.5 million (and lower) by Israeli officials, and the outrageous stubborn refusal to lower the total 6 million figure; the lack of real evidence to prove that any of the 'crimes' happened, except that procured by through torture or given by witnesses who have been proven to be, ahem, untrustworthy; the fabled tales of geysers of blood, electrocution swimming baths, shrunken heads, Human Skin lampshades and soap, or any of the other amazing tales, which have been thoroughly debunked, the Holyhoax is still taught as fact. The Flat Earth Society is laughed at for clinging to the Biblical idea that the Earth was created in Six Days, and that it is possible to fall off the edge if one sails too far. The Holyhoax is founded on the same religious claptrap, yet is solemnly taught to school children, and is repeated incessantly to the mind-controlled masses of all ages; with legal penalties in several countries for those who refuse to have faith in the impossible tales of Gentile evil and Jewish victimhood.
Does any of this matter? Is it really important that the fairytale be debunked? Is it only nice and polite to allow those who witter on about the evil Nazis to indulge in their fantasies? Is it the duty of all who do not wish to be labelled as 'anti-Semites' to stay silent as all Gentiles are libelled and slandered as psychopathic butchers, and homicidal maniacs? Is it acceptable to allow the defamation of all non Jews, but especially the European people, to go unchallenged?
Europe is in trouble. Our cities have been turned over to peoples from across the globe who do not share our traditions, our culture, our heritage, or our identity. These new-comers have been wrenched from their homelands by the economic destruction wrought by the international corporations and their proxy armies. The initial waves of non-European immigration came soon after the catastrophic Second World War, when the work required to rebuild our devastated lands was such that those working on the restoration programmes were able to demand higher wages, and better working conditions. The ruling Establishment needed to create mass unemployment in order to keep wage demands down, and to keep the indigenous common people in their place - as obedient and cowering wage slaves. The newcomers were used as Scapegoats to divert attention from the real destroyers of the nation who brought the immigrants into the European lands; the spectre of the Holyhoax was used to reinforce a prohibition of any criticism of the hidden Zionist ruling power.
Immigration in Europe is a real and growing problem; a problem which must be dealt with if the European nations are to survive. The relocation of the immigrants to their home countries can only be achieved if the factors which caused their dislocation are dealt with; namely the economic system which has turned their homelands into economic wastelands. It is far easier to focus upon the immigrants themselves, than to look for the reasons they have migrated across the globe. For this reason, knee jerk anti-immigrant parties are tolerated (albeit half-heartedly abused by the media), but those which question the cause of mas migration are crushed. The Holyhoax is a useful tool of our enemies; it make criticism of the Zionist mafia synonymous with a desire to exterminate the Jewish people in toto - ignoring the fact that ordinary Jewish people are not represented by the Zionist Ruling Class and nor are all Zionists Jewish.
There are Hollywood Nazis who shout ridiculous slogans such as 'Six Million, Not Enough', and who call for people who are physically different to them to be killed. These types are a gift to the Establishment, and in most cases the organisations to which they belong, are created and guided by the Establishment. The existence of those who wear Nazi regalia and chant slogans calling for genocide, is a continuation of the Holyhoax propaganda. Whereas this sort of behaviour should be passed off as an irritating diversion from serious efforts to resolve our problems, it has a damaging impact which helps to reinforce the popular image of anti-internationalists as anti-humans. The Hollywood hobbyists are a part of the problem, not a part of the solution.
The Holyhoax has been used to halt criticism of Israel. By accepting the lies of the Holyhoax, the people have been conned into accepting the ongoing lies of genocide by heretics who fail to accept Globalism as innevitable. In Serbian Bosnia, the fabricated Srebrenica Massacre fable drew on the Holyhoax tales; in Syria, the lies about Houla, and the foul anti-Libyan stories about a government massacre in Benghazi, were also echoes of the Holyhoax propaganda. If the people only knew that the Holyhoax has as much truth in it as the lies of German soldiers bayoneting babies during the Great War, then they would be less likely to believe the lies of the modern era. The Holyhoax propaganda has pre-programmed the masses who have not questioned it, to accept the lies against Serbia, Libya, Syria, and of course the 9/11 World Trade Centre Massacre. From these outrageous calumnies have come wars of aggression by the NATO terror machine, and millions of deaths - not illusory 'gas chamber' deaths, but real deaths of people of all manner of ethnic and cultural backgrounds, including a number of Jewish people who the Zionist terrorists are just as happy to sacrifice in order to achieve their goals - all organised for the benefit of the internationalist corporations.
There are laws prohibiting research into the Holyhoax. Why? Because without this evil propaganda, the entire edifice of the globalist war machine would collapse, and with it the wage slavery it enforces. The Holyhoax defames Europeans. It paints us as murderers who must be eliminated as a race, lest the Jews be liquidated 'again'. The fact that the Capitalist system is not controlled by or headed by a single ethno-cultural group, is ignored by the promoters of the Holocaust story and of their pain-staking linkage of 'holocaust denial' to anti-Semitism. More than this, the neo-nazi groups who chant racist slogans against the Jewish people, help to keep this link alive. Ordinary Jewish people have become a collective human shield behind which the Global Ruling Class of all ethnic backgrounds, sit in smug safety.
The Holocaust does matter. It matters because it is the rationale for our destruction. It matters because it keeps the ordinary Jewish people in the grips of their leaders who have lied to them just as they lie to us. Without the Holyhoax, perhaps the Jews could escape from the mind control of the Zionists, and renounce their vile supremacist Talmudic creed, which is used as a divine excuse for the subjugation of the Palestinians. Then, maybe, the pariah nation could return to the fold of humanity, and without the likes of the Rothschilds to mislead them into the path of tyranny, they could live in peace side by side with everyone else.
The Holyhoax is the cornerstone of Internationalism. To destroy the greatest threat humanity has ever faced, we must expose the lies upon which the very real evil facing us, is founded.
Today in the UK, and in many other countries, is Holocaust Remembrance Day. The 27th January is the holiest day for the Cult of Holocaustianity.
In our schools, all year round children are spoon-fed lie after lie about the treatment of Jews in wartime Europe, and about the 'guilt' they must feel because their grandparents and great-grandparents didn't do enough to stop a piece of fiction dreamed up by the victors of the Second World War. The deaths of countless Britons in the suicidal war for Global Capitalism means nothing to the Ruling Class. The Zionist media devotes its entire schedule to the brain-washing of gullible viewers into accepting the lies of the Holocaust as a means of countering criticism of the brutal occupation of Palestine. The legal system criminalises all objections to the brain-washing of the school system and media. Everything the Establishment is doing to destroy Working Class European life in our unhappy lands, is celebrated in its purist form on this day; Holyhoax day.
Politicians across the land have been attending services presided over by corrupted clergymen and professional liars lamenting the demise of 6 million Jews; failing to mention that the global Jewish population actually rose in the alleged Holocaustian years. The media-numbed masses have been listening intently to Jewish Germans telling fantastic tales which would make the worst fiction authors blush. How many will pause to consider the fact that had the Jewish population of Germany been annihilated as the lying propagandists of the Holyhoax maintain, rather than simply relocated to the USA and elsewhere, then there would be almost no Jews with German names, rather than the majority, as is the case? Of course, the Cult of Holocaustianity is built on blind faith, and its devotees can no more consider questioning the trustworthiness of those who preach to them, than they could allow room for doubt even when confronted with the blatant absurdities of the fables themselves.
Those of us who have survived the genocide of rational thought which is laughingly referred to as 'education', are duty bound to ensure that we too mark the festival of self-abasement with a defiant defence of the Truth. We will be called 'Holocaust Deniers' but we should not be cowed by such a label. Of course we deny the ridiculous lies of our oppressors, and we should do so with pride. Submitting to a lie out of fear of the repercussions of upholding the truth, is the worst kind of cowardice; a cowardice which emboldens our enemies and tightens the mental shackles which hold our children in a position of servitude.
The Holyhoax is a faith which can easily be disproven. There are the fantastic tales of lamp shades and soap made of human skin, which even the High Priests themselves have admitted are false. There are the fabricated statements of 'survivors' which attest to information they cannot have been privy to at the time of their detainment; although such fraudulent 'evidence' was sufficient for the Zionist victors to judicially murder those defeated in conflict. There are the stories of mobile diesel vans, electrocution swimming pools, gas chambers disguised as telephone boxes, gas chambers masquerading as shower rooms (built in such a way that should gas have been used, not only would the inmates have died, but also those removing them, inmates and staff alike), and indeed so many other ridiculous tales as to make belief in the Holocaustian nonsense impossible but for the power of media manipulation.
Holocaustianity is crafted in such a way that any criticism of anything in which Jewish people have a leadership role is automatically reacted to as an expression of anti-Semitism which can only the lead to the Gas Chambers. Criticism of Usury is not allowed, thus giving the Rothschild Bankers and the likes of George Soros absolute power in the West. The genocide of Palestine is only half-heartedly spoken of (or in the case of the BBC, treated as self-inflicted and no fault of the Israelis at all).
More Germans died during the Zionist-orchestrated RAF terror bombing of Dresden than the total number of Jews who perished throughout the entire Concentration Camp system. In the case of the latter, the majority of those who died, did so after contracting Typhus, which should have been curable had it not been for the military actions of the powers under Zionist control. In the case of the former, old men, women, children, the disabled and those wounded in battle who were no longer fighting, were deliberately murdered in a carefully crafted fire-storm, calculated to murder as many human beings as possible as a means of instilling fear of the Zionist War Machine - in a real Holocaust of fire.
There are people who consider opposition to Holocaustianity as a pointless exercise, akin to discussing the nonsense of the Flat Earth Society. However, whereas both articles of faith have their origin in the Bible, the Flat Earth Society has never harmed anyone, let alone been used as a justification for the genocide of entire peoples. Holocaustianity excuses the crimes of Israel against the Palestinians with the childish logic that because the Jews suffered in the early 1940s, that somehow makes their decades-long persecution of Arabs acceptable. This argument is of the level of a school child fighting in a playground arguing that the other child 'started it'. Two wrongs do not make a right - especially when the first 'wrong' is the product of a disturbed imagination, and didn't occur to begin with.
Perhaps the greatest lie of the Holocaust is that the Jews were a people without a land, and therefore had to be given Palestine as a homeland where they could 'never again' be Holocausted. Palestine was already populated, and the Jewish Homeland of Birobidjan had been in existence for decades before the Zionists stole the land on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean.
The name of Auschwitz has become synonymous with suffering. We all know the stories of the 4.5 million Jews who were done to death by the evil Nazis in Shower Rooms which had inside them carefully hidden Gas Chambers. We all know how the wicked Germans destroyed all evidence of their crimes against humanity, including making the ashes of their millions of victims disappear without trace. The super efficient Nazis removed all traces of their murderous death industry, even to the point of making the Showers Rooms appear as nothing but Shower Rooms - even removing any indication of the use of Prussic Acid (Cyanide), which would have stained the walls of the 'Gas Chambers' with an unmistakable blue tinge which could never be removed. We all know the stories of the endless number of 'survivors' who escaped the murderous Nazis in such numbers that they almost outnumber the entire Jewish population of Europe at the time of the Second World War. We know the stories because for seventy years we have had them rammed down our throats and have been prosecuted and beaten (some people have even been killed) if we ever dare to consider that they may not be entirely true.
The Auschwitz legend of the 4.5 million murdered Jews has so many flaws in it that even the official Holocaustian narrative has had to be toned down, with the number of dead revised to 1.1 million Jews done to death at the infamous camp. The 6 million total has not been reduced to take into account the reduction at Auschwitz. According to the religion of the Holocaust, 6 million minus 3.4 million does not make 2.6 million (which would still be a tragic figure if it was true), rather it still makes 6 million. Such absurdities only help to throw doubt upon the entire story of the sufferings of the Jews in wartime Europe. In Germany it is a criminal offence to point to this obvious mathematical discrepancy. The Holocaust story has to be protected by law because it is far more than an account of a period of history; it is the justification for the anti-borders globalist nightmare which is destroying the entire planet.
Auschwitz was an internment camp and a labour camp. Neo-Nazis claim that the Jews didn't suffer; that they had swimming pools, brothels, bands and all the amenities one would expect of a holiday camp - the neo-nazi argument is of course absurd. Being interned for a long period of time is doubtless not a pleasurable experience; no matter how relaxed a prison is, it is still a prison; being forced to work for the benefit of those who have imprisoned you is an insult and an affront to one's dignity, no matter how easy the work. Those who like to compare Auschwitz to Butlins are idiots, and they make real research into that period in history all the harder. The inmates of Auschwitz and all the other internment camps (regardless of whether they were Jewish), did suffer the indignity of being incarcerated. Some of the inmates died of sickness which they would not have endured had they not been incarcerated. At the end of the war, as typhus ravaged Europe, the camps were not spared by the sickness and people died in large numbers inside the camps, just as ordinary people did outside them. With the exception of the unavoidable outbreaks of sickness which created intolerable conditions, the inmates of the internment camps in German-controlled Europe suffered the same indignities as those in the internment camps in the countries controlled by the Allied powers. The Auschwitz experience was not unique, and until the final days of the war when sanitation broke down, the inmates experienced conditions no harsher nor easier than those in camps in any of the countries involved in the war.
We are told that the Nazis gassed the Jews - they did not. We are told that the Jews were tortured, raped, experimented upon and brutalised - they were not; in fact in the rare instances when camp guards mistreated the inmates, the guards were harshly punished, including the use of the death penalty for the worst offenders. We are told that the Holocaust was a unique tragedy in which humans suffered more than at any time before or since - it was not. The internment camps were simply internment camps and of no significance to anyone other than those who were in them at the time.
The propaganda of the Holocaust was used to justify the partition of Germany and the outlawing of any political expression of a desire for nations to exist as sovereign entities. This political action was extended to every nation on the globe outside of China, Israel and a very small number of independent nations - the number of which has been reduced steadily in the last 70 years, but rather more rapidly since the contrived propaganda which was the massacre at the World Trade Centre on the 11th September 2001.
The Holocaust is the justification for globalised capitalism. According to the official narrative, Europeans murdered 6 million people simply because they had a different ethno-religious background. This is an act of defamation which paints ordinary Europeans as murderers or as callous individuals who will turn a blind eye to the murder of innocents. If Europeans have a trait which defines us, that trait is compassion and empathy. We are naturally a kind and welcoming people who abhor injustice and cruelty. Our famed fondness for animals is an extension of our desire for people to be treated fairly. That we are labelled as murderers and uncaring bigots is offensive and inaccurate. The Holocaust propaganda has resulted in our natural desire to see people treated in the same manner as we would like others to treat us, turned into a weapon to bring about our own demise.
In Europe, the Holocaust has been used as a stick to beat us into submission to Globalism. Because the Germans in the 1930s dared to attempt to break away from the Global Banking System, Germany was smashed. Anyone who suggests that Globalisation is bad for the ordinary people and only benefits the Ruling Class and multinational corporations, is automatically labelled a 'Nazi' who wants to gas the Jews, who we are led to believe (with neo-Nazi collusion) are the top Bankers and the heads of the largest corporations. The Zionist machine carefully keeps this narrative alive while making noises about anti-Semitism. Capitalism is multi-ethnic, but it serves the Ruling Class to keep opposition to Globalism focussed upon one specific people.
Anyone who suggests that we should have border controls to keep the number of people in our own country at a level which doesn't harm the land, the infrastructure, the environment, the wildlife etc, is labelled as a 'Nazi' who hates people who are different and wants to halt mass immigration as a first step towards committing genocide. Anyone who suggests that multiculturalism is bad for our own culture is labelled as a 'Nazi' who has a bigoted supremacist hatred of others, which (yawn) must lead to genocide. The example of the Holocaust is used to show what happens when people want the seurity of Sovereignty, to live in peace with nature, free from the diktat of the Global Financial Elite, to enjoy their own culture, traditions, land and environment. The fact that the Holocaust is nothing more than 1940s propaganda is the reason that it has to be protected by law to stop people realising that there is nothing wrong with wanting to be free and not wanting to be a part of a Global Plantation in which we are cattle to be used and abused by the Ruling Class as they see fit.
In Palestine, the Holocaust had the impact of taking a country from its then occupiers and giving it to the Zionist criminals under the lie that the Jews needed a special homeland lest they be holocausted out of existence. Collective European Guilt was used as a means of giving over territory to the Zionists - or more specifically, the Banking Financial elite - to use as a centre of operations in their criminal plan for the creation of a Global Order in which all countries paid allegiance to the Usurious Order. The Arabs in Palestine lost their land and the Jewish people who moved into that territory did so in complete ignorance of the fact that they were being used as a human shield to hide the criminal elite within.
The Holocaust has brought nothing but misery to the world. It has been used to justify the obliteration of nations, endless wars of aggression for financial gain, mass immigration with the inevitable (and planned for) destruction of cultures and peoples. It continues to be used to silence all who can see the ruination of the planet at the hands of greedy Capitalists. Its promotion by collaborators in high places, such as the Pope, celebrities and politicians of all conformist hues, gives it an air of respectability which it does not deserve. The enforcement of acceptance of lies upon lies by the cowardly media, civil servants and police of many countries, who would rather destroy the lives of their fellows than lose their positions of authority, maintains the Holocaustian dogma and enslaves us all.
Yes, some Jews suffered during the Second World War, but their suffering was no worse than the suffering of non-Jews. We are told that in all 80 million people died during the War, but that the 74 million have to be forgotten and the 6 remembered forever. The 6 million figure is a lie. At most, maybe a quarter of a million Jews died in mainland Europe during the war; most of them through natural causes, the rest as a result of the war itself. More Germans died in the destruction of Dresden than Jews died in the camps - and most appallingly of all, the photographs of dead Jews in Auschwitz which we are all familiar with, contain a good number of pictures of the victims of the RAF terrorists, murdered in Dresden whilst the interned Jews were kept safe from the war by the kin of the Germans who perished. No Jews were gassed. The Holocaust is a lie from start to finish.
On this seventy third anniversary of the entry into Auschwitz of Allied forces, let us have the courage to speak the Truth. We Europeans are not monsters. Wanting to be free does not mean wanting to enslave others. It is time to say NO to the propagandists and to tell our children that what they are bombarded with in the Schools, Churches and Cinemas, is a vile fiction to make them feel guilty for existing. This evil propaganda has to be confronted and the minds of our people liberated.
We cannot leave this issue in the hands of the racist bumbling Hitler-worshipping skinheads, who would have had no place in the nazi state they revere. We have to expose the Holocaust lie as a means of bringing freedom to Palestine, of stopping the NATO aggressors who justify their murder of Africans, Asians and Europeans by referring to the hackneyed propaganda, and of defending the Working Class from the machinations of the globalisers who hate our defence of Socialism and Sovereignty, because it stands in the way of their theft of the land and wealth of the Working Class worldwide.
