Liberal-extremism is a Disease of the Mind

Psychology is a much mocked science.  Captured early on by the charlatan, Sigmund Freud, Psychology will forever be tainted by its association with the plagiarist and sexual deviant, and by those who followed in his wake.  However, whereas the presence of shysters is undeniable, the willingness to reject the study out of hand, is a reaction we undertake at our peril.  The motley collection of cranks and politically correct psycho-social engineers hiding behind the claims to be academic researchers, have done much to aid the advance of liberal extremism, but this truth only underlines the validity of the science itself.

Carl Gustav Jung began in the shadow of Freud, but soon realised that the entire direction of psychology was wrong, and that an understanding of the workings of the mind could not be generalised to everyone, regardless of cultural background.  Understanding that at our very essence we are spiritual creatures, Jung's greatest gift to our understanding was his emphasis on the inner psychic/spiritual unity of culturally kindred peoples.  Absolutely rejecting the imposition of Freudian Psychological analytical techniques on anyone except people raised under the debilitating conditions of a neurosis founded on a persecution AND superiority complex, Jung understood that each culture can be said to have a distinct soul - its very own collective unconscious - and that attempts to analyse others through the looking glasses of our own origins, are futile.  Whereas Freud is a key tool of the Globalists, Jung stands as a staunch defender of freedom in a multipolar world.

The deliberate muddying of the science of Psychology, by elevating the theories of certain personalities, and ridiculing those of others, has been a part of the politicisation of science.  Just as social anthropologists and ecologists can be bought to serve the globalisers, sadly, so can a significant number of scientists of every discipline.  The internal debates and the public mockeries which shroud our perception of the study of ourselves, masks the most fundamental fact; that the Bourgeois Ruling Class fully appreciate how the scientific method can be applied to understanding how we think, and to using that knowledge against us.  The deliberate denial of a biological basis in how we think, is pure politics, and whilst demanded of the masses, is not practised by the ruling parasitic class.

The basic psychological predisposition of the British Working Class is towards fairness, and tolerance of ideas.  One of our most clearly identifiable traits is our love of freedom.  We espouse Freedom of Speech, Thought, Expression etc; not because we are ideologically conditioned by our leaders to do so, but because we internally know that Freedom is right.  We sense it at a level which is beyond intellectual; it is a part of our spiritual outlook.

Liberal extremism has perversely corrupted our inner sense of fair play.  Our inner desire to see real justice for everyone, has become the tool by which to make us weak.  Liberal extremism only exists because our enemies have taken a wholesome desire for everyone to be treated with respect, and turned it into a way of beating down those who oppose the replacement of all we hold dear with a 'culture' of bland consumerism .  The sense of fairness which opposes the exploitation of those weaker than ourselves, has become the sick diseased liberalism which promotes all manner of degeneracy and social suicide.  The enemy has studied us, and found a weak spot by which to undermine us, whilst simultaneously appealing to our inner soul.

The vipers who are destroying us, have cunningly corrupted the foundations of our societies by attacking the very core of how we feel.  They have attacked us at a level which undermines our ability to obey our instincts and to fight back.  Rather than expending energy trying to accommodate people who are clearly not a part of the majority society, we need to accept that they cannot be - nor should they.  We need to use the Science of Psychology as Jung intended; to understand ourselves, and to defend and develop our own culture as a Class; to harness and embrace our own collective unconscious.  Psychological manipulation has been used to turn us against ourselves.  Once we can see this attack, we can protect ourselves from it.

Liberal extremism is a bourgeois sickness. Once we see it as a mental disease, we can understand that there is as no point in trying to reason with those who suffer from it. Rather, we must quarantine those who have fallen victim to this toxin, in psychiatric institutions where they can be contained.  In the cases of members of our class who have fallen victim to the machinations of the anti-reality media and educational indoctrination system, it is possible that some of them may be rescued from the sickness - through intensive re-education / deprogramming - and be helped to reach a level of mental health where they are no longer a danger to society, and may have the potential to re-enter it as useful contributing members

David Parry on 'Valentinus'

David Parry on 'Valentinus'
In esoteric circles, Valentinus is considered as one of the great mystics and thinkers of early Christian history — even if his Gnostic ideas would later brand him a heretic by the nascent orthodox church. Yet his theologies are gradually being embraced today in the halls of mainstream churches, even by some of the most rigid Catholic orders. We welcome the return of Valentinus, from his transcendent philosophy to his meditative rituals, more needed than ever in a civilization losing hope for meaning and a higher purpose. We also discuss related topics for alternative Christianities of old like sacred theatre, occult sacraments for altered states, shamanistic Gnosis, and much more.
http://aeonbyte.libsyn.com/david-parry-on-the-return-of-valentinus-gnostic-priesthood

Who was Valentinus?
http://www.gnosis.org/library/valentinus/index.html



Highly recommended work in this field...

www.thenewgnosis.org

and From New Age to New Gnosis
https://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Age-Gnosis-Contemporary-Significance/dp/1904519075
Peter Wilberg

Christianity is Pagan. The pope wants to jettison the Pagan. Pagans must jettison the pope

With the 'pope' befouling the streets of Ireland, what better time than to look into the cult of the Church of Rome, and the broader christian ideology which has come from it.  This pope has overseen massive changes in dogma, but so have the previous ones over the past century.  When the Church changed a series of 'set-in-stone' rituals (such as penance for confession), that made many sit up and notice that what they had been told was an institution created by God, was very much one ruled by Men and subject to change as politics, fashion and other factors dictated.  The rapid shift of direction which has made the policy-makers in the Church of Rome almost indistinguishable from their counterparts in the Protestant sects must raise questions about the entire faith of Christianity.  Roman Catholicism is a mixture of indigenous and alien mythology, weaved together in a web of fabrication, with truths embedded in a great tissue of fiction.  The Pagan aspects are the strength of the religion, but without them, Catholicism becomes just another branch of the fantasy of the ancient Hebrews, and totally alien to the British mindset.

The Ancient Druids knew a spirituality which included many aspects of the Christianity which was to follow. The Druids believed in a Holy Trinity of Creator of the Past (Beli), Saviour of the Present (Taran) and Recreator of the Future (Yesu); these three were as one and were the ways in which the Supreme Higher Power was understood by humanity.  The Hebrews of Palestine/Judæa/Israel traded with the peoples of Europe and so would have come into contact with the Druidic traditions.  The theory that the Druids adopted Christianity because of the similarities such as the Trinity, is one which Christian Israelites hold dear.  It is a desperate argument of a cult of people absolutely obsessed with the Bible, to the point that they will twist and distort history to 'prove' that the Israelites settled in the west of Europe, becoming the Celts, and thus took to Christianity because of the similarities it had with their own faith.   This ideology, which borders on insanity, can be dismissed by simply pointing out that the Trinity of the Druids predated that which the Roman Church sanctified many centuries after the time of Christ, when the Gospels were voted upon (and rewritten) for inclusion in the Bible by the Imperial Church of Rome.

We now know for a fact that the Ten Commandments were a part of the Code Law of King Hammurabi in Babylon and that it is obviously from this man-made legal system that the authors of the Old Testament/Torah stole the 'Commandments' of their god.  The falsification of the entire Jewish 'religion' insofar as the person of Moses is concerned, is such that only the blindly faithful will deny it.  According to the Jewish mythology, 'Moses' led 600,000 Jews out of Egypt, after his 'god' massacred the first born of that land and brought great suffering to the common people.  This drivel is taught as fact, yet nowhere is it recorded except in the Jewish supremacist propaganda sheets of the Torah/Talmud/Old Testament.  One would have thought that the plagues and the scarpering of 6,000,000 600,000 workers would have merited some comment by Egyptian historians, but apparently it wasn't important enough for that!  The idea that the Jewish 'slaves' (to use their own pity-seeking word) built the pyramids is laughable, considering that they are far older than the entire 'history' of the Jewish people and were long finished before the mythical figure of Moses is supposed to have walked the Earth.  We know that the Elders of Organised Jewry made up the story of Moses and his amazing travels across the Sinai and his spectacular walks up and down the mountain with great slabs of rock after chatting with his god, so it really isn't a stretch of the imagination to see that the similarities of Christianity and the Trinitarian branch of Druidism are more than likely the result of more Rabbinical theft of other peoples' ideas and ways.

The theft of ideas doesn't make the ideas themselves wrong.  The Code of Hammurabi is a valid document, protecting people from the selfish and vile behaviour of all too many people.  Realising that it was not crafted by the diabolical entity, Jehovallah - a deity whose adherents happily claim ordered the destruction of new born children because they didn't bow and scrape to its chosen pet people - if anything gives the document more credibility, not less.

The concept of the Trinity is one which is found in nature.  The Earth is divided into land, sea and air; the very essence of everything can be expressed by the trinity of space, time and matter.  These can be broken down into three more trinities:

• Space: Depth, Width, Height
• Time: Past, Present, Future
• Matter: Solid, Liquid, Gas

The idea of a Higher Being existing in the form of a Trinity, is one which predates Christianity and could very easily have been 'borrowed' from the Europeans who the authors of the Bible came in contact with.  In the Asatru/Odinist faith, there is a pantheon of deities, but they exist in a subordinate position to the Creator, just as the lower divine beings in Christianity are subordinated to the Creator.  The Christian Trinity very much resembles the Asatru one: Father, Son and Holy Spirit equate to the Jaffnharr, Harr and Thridi.  Indeed, the Three Spheres in the Angelic Hierarchy of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite's work, 'De Coelesti Hierarchia' (with each of the three spheres subdivided by three), make yet another trinity of trinities.  It could be argued that the far earlier Asatru concept of the Nine Worlds fits this pattern.

Wherever we look in Christianity, we see Pagan spiritualism with the toxic addition of Judaism.  As the Church is now hell-bent on removing the ancient spiritualism of Christianity and stripping it of all that is palatable, isn't it time for Christians to consider that the attraction to the religion is due to it being based upon our ancient ways?  The Christian Israel movement is right to see links between Paganism and Christianity, but they are looking in the wrong direction.  The Trinitarian Odin of Asatru may have inspired the Church to write of the Trinitarian Holy Father/Son/Spirit.

It is wonderful to see the Church discrediting itself by cosying up to Judaism and Islam, preaching a globalist universalism which erases the Pagan core of itself.  This gives us the opportunity to reunite with our own ways; to look back to the Golden Age before the coming of the infiltrators who have lied to us about our own spirituality and have made us persecute those of our own kin who have held true to the forbidden beliefs.

If everything good that exists in Christianity also existed in pre-Christianity, then what purpose does Christianity serve!? Paganism is closer to the golden age we seek than Christianity is, and Christianity has overseen the destruction of Europe where Paganism had protected it.

Stripped of the middle eastern Hebraic toxin, Christianity is Pagan.  Let the Church of Rome and the Organised Protestant Churches forge ahead with their descent into a global religion where Bible, Talmud and Koran sit side-by-side as indisputable books of lies.  Let us reject these outlandish works of propaganda, enforced on us by a Ruling Caste which despises us in every aspect, and return to the ways of our ancestors; to a time before the liberal disease, when we would not tolerate those who attack us spiritually, mentally or physically.  Wake Up all Britons on both sides of the Irish Sea, and cast off the cult of Christianity, returning instead to our Pagan roots.  The reign of the proto-Zionist Roman system is more obvious than at any prior time; now we must ensure it falls.

David Parry's departure from the reactionary OCHSA

Comrades, I have been asked to share some of my reasons for recently resigning as a bishop with the Old Catholic Holy See of Antioch and, subsequently, preparing to transfer my clergy credential to the Liberal Catholic Church (LCC).

With hindsight, a far from easy decision, although if one sincerely believes that their are points of reference above ideology, a necessary step for me to have taken. Stated so, I have come to understand the Old Catholic Movement as "reactionary" - albeit in an extremely innocent and Romantic sense.

Indeed, while they reject clearly manipulative doctrines such as "Papal Infallibility," the Old Catholic aim is to return to an "idealised" Church as it "existed" before the 1850's: a manifestly nostalgic aim. However, the Liberal Catholic Church legally broke away from the Old Catholics some time ago to form a much more culturally active, socially progressive and, dare one say. deeply mystical body, with the sole purpose of raising humanity to ever-greater heights of consciousness - at the same time as discovering an innately perennial outlook, whereby each religion is seen as a stepping stone to increasingly expansive metaphysical truths.

Hence, as these issues clarified for me personally,(not to mention being unexpectedly caught between the various warring factions inside the Holy See), I felt the Angels were calling me to stand firm by an openly theosophical tradition seeking to unify humankind at the most fundamental level of our lives. Confessed thus, please pray for me.

Boris Johnson, Tommy Robinson: Smoke and Mirrors Merchants Deflecting from the Real Danger to the People

If anyone has any doubts at all about the demise of the nation, one need look no further than the pathetic morons who support the ex-leader of the English Defence League. Comprised every conceivable type of brain-dead reactionary, the EDL was a gift to those who wish to see all opposition to globalism silenced. Far from existing to defend Englishness, these malcontents were the epitome of everything which is wrong with England.  Tommy Robinson is a hero to the people who think that people who follow the Koran are the greatest threat to the UK.  The EDL is now a mere shadow of what it was in its heyday, but even though small in numbers, its influence continues, as can be seen by Boris the toff Johnson's public statement that Women in Islamic dress resemble bank robbers.  The spirit of the EDL is still worthy of attention.

The EDL claim to oppose Sharia Law. Their opposition to Islam is a mindless unthinking hatred of a religion they have no understanding of. The reactionaries of the EDL get their information about Islam from the war-mongering tabloids. Following the Establishment propaganda that there is a War on Terror as a result of Muslims destroying the World Trade Centre, these 9/11 devotees are little more than boot-boys for the Crown and the globalists who seek to destroy all sovereign nations so to more easily rape them financially and culturally. That the EDL believe the 9/11 lie should be adequate evidence of their sub-normal level of intelligence.

The EDL do not exist to defend England, but rather to attack Islam. They argue that Sharia Law denies women the right to dress as they wish. The EDL's propaganda features women dressed as whores. The notion that it is a good thing for a woman to dress like a prostitute and behave as one (albeit having anonymous sex for free) highlights the mental illness of the EDL - and, one would suspect, indicates that these 'men' are unable to maintain a relationship with a woman and so due to sexual inadequacy and lack of respect for women, these verminous excuses for men seek to turn all women into whores in the hope that they may procure sex from the women who have absolutely no standards, and will stoop so low as to have sex with even the lowest of all low lifes.

Is Islam really the enemy of the British way of life? Traditional British society is founded on the supremacy of the family - Women are respected and motherhood is honoured. One of the most fundamental aspects of Britishness is a belief that women are to be protected and that sex is something to be cherished within marriage, not something which is cheap and to be considered with as much thought one would afford the choice of sauce on a fast food takeaway meal. Women have always been valued as the cornerstone of the family, and thus of society. To this end, in order to protect women from predatory ego-centric materialistic males, it has been a requirement that women dress modestly. This requirement is borne of a desire to protect women from those who see them as nothing more than sex objects - people such as the cretinous materialists of the EDL.

The EDL tenet that women should go around dressed in the manner of prostitutes is anti-British. The sexual revolution of the 1960s which overturned the natural decency of society was ushered in by globalists opposed to the all culture. It was not Muslims who smashed our families and turned our people into sex-crazed lunatics. Muslims did not push a toxic liberal belief system into our schools and public sector, creating an anti-society of respectless and valueless consumer-producers. No, this atrocity was instigated at the behest of a minority group which has been striving to take over the entire economic system of the world: the Ruling & Corporate Class are to blame, most of whom are not in fact Muslim!  The EDL take pride in supporting the architects of the destruction of Tradition. The moronic EDL are complicit in the destruction of Britain, which they blame on Islam. Traditional Christianity and Islam are almost identical as regards the protection of women through dressing modestly. Dressing as whores is not the British way, but rather the anti-British way of the people who view Money and Power as everything.

Christianity and Islam are based on the primacy of the spirit, as they see it. The EDL despise the notion of faith in a higher power than humanity. Christianity and Islam are opposed to promiscuity, abortion, and all manner of sexual degeneracy. The two religions are ardent defenders of the individuals right to live without the fear of having one's possessions taken away by the State of by thieves. Real Christianity enforces the Ten Commandments with a vigour which equals that of so-called fundamental Islam. Christianity and Islam differ in respect of how Jesus and Mohamed are considered. The EDL are not campaigning to have Jesus honoured as more than a Prophet, nor are they campaigning for the status of Mohamed to be reduced from such. The EDL attack Islam without examining it. Their ignorance of the true nature of Christianity is astounding. If the EDL were to examine the religious influences impacting upon life in Britain they would realise that the perverted liberalism which is breaking the back of our country comes from a diabolical cult which is dedicated to the overthrowal of Christianity as well as Islam.

The EDL are fervent supporters of the Israeli occupation and brutalisation of Palestine. A true patriot has no choice but to support the Palestinians in their struggle for sovereignty. Freedom from the globalist menace can only be accomplished by mutual support for all who are under the yoke of globalism. The EDL are simply following the Establishment agenda by labelling as terrorists and extremists anyone who takes a stand against Zionism. The greatest menace in Britain is the financial oppression of the banking and financial system and the elite who sit atop it. When the EDL chant 'God save the Queen' they are chanting for one of the financial elite and a key enemy of our nation, and in fact of all nations.

The British Isles ARE in danger, but the likes of the EDL are aiding those who are brutalising our way of life. Multi-culturalism (anti-culturalism), Liberal Feminism (anti-Female-ism!), Trans-Fascism (child abuse/denial of nature), Sexual Liberation (promiscuity/abortion), and all the other ills which afflict our nation are liberal in origin, not Christian nor Islamic. The EDL are too stupid to see that they are being used to further that cause. If they were to look back at the impact of Islam in Europe they would see that countries such as Spain fell to Islam but later freed themselves. Nations which fall under the heel of the culture destroyers never recover. If the EDL really wanted to defend Britain they would campaign against banks, rather than mosques, and they would support Gaza rather than insult the victims of Zionism. If Britain was to adopt Sharia Law it would not remain Islamic for ever. If the British Isles fail to stop the liberal globalism so favoured by the EDL we will lose everything and never return to sanity.

Britain does not need the EDL. We do not need Islam either. However, with analysis, the danger of the creed being pushed by the EDL is far more dangerous than Islam. The Islamic posters which demand that those who insult Islam be beheaded may appear extreme, but in reality it is not long ago that Christianity was of a similar vein. SMPBI calls for a return to Tradition which throws off all the Abrahamic faiths. SMPBI takes no sides in the Judaeo-Christian / Islamic power struggle - we oppose them all.

David Parry's podcasts on Alan Cox's Understanding Spirit Radio Show

David William Parry (born 25 August 1958), is a published author, poet, dramaturge, Fellow of The Royal Society of Arts, active Libertarian and Wiccan.[1] He was the founder and chair of Gruntlers' Group.

In the early eighties he moved to London from Fareham in Hampshire.[2] After living in South London for a few years, he graduated in religious studies at King's College London (1990). Later, in 1996, he obtained a Master's degree in Pastoral Theology at Heythrop College, London.

Parry was teaching contemporary English literature, drama, language and semantics. He has given readings as a poet and practising Pagan; delivered lectures, offered sermons and performed public rituals across the United Kingdom since 1996.

Parry founded Gruntlers' in 2008 as a loosely connected group of "Imagist" writers. By November 2009 this group had developed into "Gruntlers' Arts Group", which staged regular multimedia events at the Poetry Place in Covent Garden.

Also, as producer, director and an actor in Gruntlers' Cabaret, he helped to develop Gruntlers Theatre, which performed the "The Botanist Monsieur Jordan and The Sorcerer-Dervish Mastali Shah", written by Mirza Fatali Akhundov, in 2010 at the "Arts Educational School", where he played the character of "Lord Hatamkhan".[4][5] In the late autumn of the same year, Gruntlers' introduced Imadaddin Nasimi to the English speaking public at Pushkin House, London.[6] In December 2011, he directed the first English language production of "Shakespeare: a comedy in ten scenes, both serious and tragic" (by the Azerbajiani playwright Elchin Afandiyev).[7] Gruntlers' were a three pronged Arts Collective, consisting of a Theatrical Company, a literary salon and an international multimedia cabaret. In the tradition of DaDa, Absurdism and Surrealism, the principal intention of Gruntlers' Theatre was to promote Fringe arts in a contemporary setting.[8]

Gruntlers' finished in 2012 and Parry started "Allting UK", to promote Literature and the Arts. Following financial problems, however, this company has now become Theo-Humanist Arts Ltd.[9]

Recently, he wrote "A preface with smoke and mirrors" as an introduction to Elchin's first collection of plays in English.[10]

Since 2013, David started additional career as a producer at The Azerbaijan Russian State Theatre.

On 3 June 2013 David Parry co-convened an academic conference "Quest of the Heart" with Dr. Minna Koivuniemi, where he read an academic paper, entitled "Henrik Ibsen, Love and the Staging of Kierkegaard's World View".[11] The conference was co-sponsored by the University of Helsinki and University of London.

In July 2013 David Parry produced Elchin Afandief's theatre play "Citizens of Hell", which was reviewed by Digital Journal.[12]

In January 2014, David was made a celebrant for the Fellowship of Independent Celebrants (FOIC).[13] This makes him the first recognised Godhi in United Kingdom with authority to officiate at weddings, funerals, and Child Namings.

On top of this, David has recently extended the reach of Theo-Humanist Arts by co-hosting on the alternative podcast show THA Talks with Paul Obertelli.[14] Furthermore, reviving his credentials in British Surrealism, David has started to co-produce, occasionally write, and direct, for Inlight TV, internet television station.

In December 2014, Parry made history by staging a scene from his play "A Day in the Light" (based on the meeting between Albert Schweitzer and James Cameron) at the British House of Lords.

On top of all this, he has hosted and appeared on Alan Cox's Understanding Spirit Radio.  Here are the podcasts:

• Talk with Norway Based Father Johan Alstad about Gnosticism and it's future development.  https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2016-11-06T03_29_56-08_00
• Talk about Easter with guest Johan Alstad from Trondheim, Norway.   https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2016-03-27T03_28_38-07_00
• About being a Gnostic and what it means.   https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2018-08-02T15_31_49-07_00
• With Security espionage expert Daniele Hab Irandoost about how nations use spy's to protect their country or to overcome others.   https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2018-07-19T15_17_56-07_00
• Emanuel Swedenborg and what this great man bought to the world in the 18th century. His enlightenment of spirit.  An interview not to be missed.   https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2018-07-12T15_18_29-07_00
• Gnosticism and Christianity.         https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2018-07-05T15_23_14-07_00
• CLASSICAL MUSIC: Peace Pieces v.2 by Qool Marv Aural Memoirs and Buttamilk Archives // MusiQuarium Of Wonder // Instruments Of Mass Construction // Music4Winners //...           A continuation of:                                                                                                                P&Q1: http://djqoolmarvsounds.podomatic.com/entry/2008-07-01T13_45_08-07_00      P&Q2: http://djqoolmarvsounds.podomatic.com/entry/2009-07-02T17_23_23-07_00,     P&Q3: http://djqoolmarvsounds.podomatic.com/entry/2010-08-12T03_16_10-07_00,       PPv1:   http://djqoolmarvsounds.podomatic.com/entry/2012-03-20T13_04_15-07_00,  https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/djqoolmarvsounds/episodes/2012-04-06T12_15_46-07_00
• Paying tribute to their mutual friend Cyrus Yavneh the Hollywood film producer who sadly passed away on the 25th January 2018. Also bringing attention to the plight of the homeless in the UK this winter.                                 https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2018-02-08T16_15_28-08_00
• Understanding Spirit Radio Show incorporating Paranormal Galaxy Radio   https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2015-06-12T02_46_16-07_00
• Talk with Holy See of Antioch Bishop Oona May Carrick about her incredible life and ongoing Charitable work.                                     https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-11-12T02_20_02-08_00
• Interview with Kazakhstan statesman and leader of the opposition, world renowned author and poet Mukhtar Shakhanov. David Parry talking about his connection and friendship with Mukhtar Shakhanov and Gnosticism.    https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2015-12-11T01_31_29-08_00
• David Parry OSB Talk To Nigerian Pastor Saviour Ukobong            https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-10-29T15_53_28-07_00
• Spirituality within religion and theatre and how it affects us all in day to day life.     https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-10-26T15_33_36-07_00
• Talk with UK based Barry Frankish; paranormal investigator.             https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-10-15T02_22_17-07_00
• With Alyson Dunlop, host of ADX-Files Radio Show, on the subject of the paranormal, UFOs and unexplained phenomena, subjects which she investigates as Lead Researcher with SPI Scotland".                                          https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-10-08T02_20_33-07_00
•  With UK based paranormal investigator Ian Varrow. Ian talks about his psychic experiences and the dubious legacy of occultist Aleister Crowley.     https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-10-01T07_28_20-07_00
• With author and conspiracy theorist Alexander Baron about his work and his thoughts on our societies.                                            https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-09-10T02_20_18-07_00
• Talk about his spiritual and theatrical work.                    https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-09-07T15_31_54-07_00
• With "Sage Paracon" founder M J Dickson,                       https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-09-03T02_17_53-07_00
• With UK based Spiritual medium George Wyllie,                      https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/alancox/episodes/2017-08-20T02_20_53-07_00

Family as the Socialist Foundation

Family is the fundamental building block of society. A real family consisting of a Husband, Wife and Child (or Children) provides a barrier against the intrigues of the State. Fidelity is the keystone of the family. In order for the Establishment to destroy all opposition to its machinations, Family must be destroyed.

The natural role for a man is to protect his wife and offspring. The natural role of a woman is to look after her husband and any children. The media have pushed the lie that adultery is OK, in order to weaken the bonds between man and wife. Women and Men who seek sexual gratification outside the family are enemies of society.

Hugh Hefner introduced Playboy in the 50's. While most women were still trying to full fill their traditional roles, this toxic magazine had men wanting the whore, linking as a way to to their own sucess to have a tart instead of wife (or in some cases both - Mad Men) Unless we men and women find common ground instead of finger pointing, we will never defeat the "powers that be". Women are jealous of other women, if we see one getting all the attention we want to be her. So shame on the men for elevating the whore to her status and leaving real women who refuse to plastic themselves up in the lurch.

Women have been especially targeted by the Establishment. The media teaches that women are merely objects and that every concern should be material. Whether it is buying clothes which fit a prepared stereotype (trendy, Goth or other), or spending hours studying make-up and 'perfecting' a certain look, women have become victims of a system which reduces us to consumers and to little more than showroom dummies. Men are not immune from this. The trans madness is mainly men who are obsessed with what they look like (or what they think that they are supposed to think they should look like!)

Girls are conditioned to emulate pop stars, who are nothing more than glorified prostitutes. Modern pop music (whether R&B, Goth or whatever) is built upon the use of repetitive lyrics which act as a form of mind control. Lyrics which speak of sexual promiscuity implant in the mind of the listener the acceptance of promiscuity. Lyrics which speak of hatred of men and of the desirability of self-harm, condition the listener to self hatred and hatred of others. These sick distortions of normality push the listener into a position of confusion and split identity. It is from such evil that schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder take root. Whether the medium used to break the spirit and mind of the individual is in musical form or in visual form, the result is an undeniable destruction of the self.

By implanting a diseased outlook in the minds of men and women, and undermining the traditional roles of both sexes, the Establishment has lain the seeds for the crushing of the family. By creating the conditions in which friction becomes inevitable, the door is open to further State interference for the breaking of the family. It is at this point that the Establishments role in destroying the Family takes a lead overt role - in steps Social Services, the Family Courts and all the other atomising institutions.

Men and women need to unite and fight this assault on the natural masculine man and feminine woman. The only solution to our sick society is a return to traditional Socialism, to the sanctity of marriage, and to the overthrowal of so called Social Services. Adultery is not a right, but a disease created by the Establishment, and for this evil the Establishment must pay the ultimate price.

There is a tendancy to whitewash the likes of Hefner and the types of men who happily go after the whore archetype. Men like this need to be exposed, and their anti-female attitude addressed. People yearn for a society where men are men, women are women, family is the highest achievement, and the peddlars of pornography, adultery and materialism are physically eliminated for all time.

This is why more and more turn to Islam. To return to morality and work. Islam is not a solution which is suitable for a Free Socialist Republic of the British Isles.  We have suffered under the yoke of Bible cults for so long, that we are susceptible to another Bible spin-off.  Traditional Socialism harks back to the days of nature-based spiritualism, and does not need a hierarchy of Ruing Class appointed clergy to act as links between the physical and the spiritual.  A return to a natural order IS a return to a way of life where we are self-sufficient in all matters, and where we reject priestcraft.

Trans-fascism is the next step in the break down of family.  It denies nature.  It denies the unity of men and women and the foundation of society.  It attacks homosexuality with the lie that Lesbians and Gays are really 'trapped in the wrong body' and can be 'cured' by radical surgery.  The T attached to LGB is an abhorence.

A return to sanity cannot occur within a Capitalist framework.  As Revolutionary Patriotic Socialists, we affirm that individualism is a major problem, and that the damage of this selfish mentality will take a massive amount of deprogramming.  We are aware of the brain-washing of the pornographers, the 'gender' dictators, the psychological warfare against the family structure.  This will require a Socialist System which rejects the divisiveness of feminism and masculism, putting focus instead on mutualism and the need for everyone to work together for what is best for all of us.  We reject liberal decay. Working Class Socialism is for Family, Tradition, and Biological Reality.  Liberal individualism has brought us to the brink, and we will not tolerate it, nor those who push it and profit by it.

On Vanatru, Wicca and Tradition - David Parry

David Parry's speech concerning Vanatru heathenism at the Inaugral meeting of the Frithgard Fellowship in London at the time of the solar eclipse on the Spring Equinox 2015.

A segment from a talk on Neo-Paganism given by David Parry at the Devereux, London.

The Rev'd David Parry - Odinism & The Tradition of Dissent

A fascinating speech. David talks about  the revival of the natural religion of Heathenry as a potent weapon for opposing corporate globalisation,.  A return to nature - to the Pagan Heathenry - as a means of moving away from the Globalised Monotheism which is the justification of Capitalist Exploitation and the Hierarchical Class System.

The Rev'd David Parry on Gnosticism

David graduated in religious studies in 1990 and obtained a Master’s degree in Pastoral Theology in 1996, he is the founder of “Theo-Humanist Arts” a creative group that centres on new thought, art, music, invited speakers and eco spirituality, the group was formerly known as “Gruntlers” which was created in 2008.

He is an author, poet, dramaturge, A Fellow of The Royal Society of Arts, and an active Libertarian.

David was a universal lay minister and while spending over 30 years in Pagan practice and studies he became one of the few Heathen Godies in the UK and is also a Gardinerian Wicca initiate and recently a Valentinian (Gnostic) Bishop.

In the following podcast for THA Talks he will speaks about his experiences and knowledge from Ancient Paganism, Christianity and gnosticism.

Podcast link

Originally this was added as a youtube video, but the video has been taken down.  This does seem to be a recurring issue, which highlights that David is talking about matters which ruffle the feathers of the self-appointed liberal bigots.  Obviously a good thing!!

Charities are Tax-exempt. Shouldn't the work of SMPBI also be?

Throughout Europe - with the exception of Iceland - the people are being forced to pay for the 'mistakes' of the Bankers.  Iceland has proven that the only way to deal with the Banking criminals is to let their businesses fail, and to arrest them for crimes against the people.  Sadly, in the rest of Europe, the grip of the Bankers is so complete that the people are being made to pay with their own money, to make up the profits lost by the greedy Banking cartels.  If any other businesses lose such vast amounts of money that they cannot operate, they close - and so should the Banks.  Indeed, the entire immoral system of usury should be closed, regardless of whether it is in debt or profit.

The Bankers' puppet governments introduced Austerity measures in the British Isles with interest rate freezes, tax hikes, and cuts in services.  Free Banking has all but ended, so now we have a situation where it is nigh on impossible to pay for one's utilities, or to receive pay from an employer, without having a bank account, but not only does it cost money to have one; the greedy profiteers no longer pay a level of interest which covers the costs of having an account!  That is theft, pure and simple.

The Bankers hide behind the governing regimes; deflecting anger from the financiers of the Ruling Class who are the real source of policy, regardless of the espoused politics of the government of the day.  The present government has made much of the idea of closing tax loopholes, and of preventing people who are not entitled to Welfare Benefits from receiving them.  As has become the norm in the UK, the spotlight of scrutiny has not fallen evenly across all those resident in the UK.

People in the UK are taxed more than any other nation in Europe, and for that matter most of the world.  We have to pay tax on every penny we earn, and every penny we spend.  The State even has the audacity to take a cut of any money we may have saved for our children, with its outrageous Inheritance Tax and Death Duties. 

As well as taxation at national level, we have local taxation.  Every household in the country has to pay 'Council Tax', which amounts to around £1000 per annum per dwelling in the least affluent areas, increasing with the value of the property.  Council tax is allegedly to pay for services provided by the local administrative authorities, but considering that almost every service has been contracted out to profit-making companies, the reality of Council tax is that it is yet another way to rob the people, and transfer what little money we have into the hands of the private companies which rule over us.  It is illegal to not pay Tax, thus the system is tantamount to an extortion racket - either we pay those who exploit us, or we are punished by their legal system, in terms of fines (more extorted money), or imprisonment.

There is an exception to the Council Tax rule.  Those who claim to live in accommodation which is used as a place of worship, do not have to pay the tax.  What this means in effect, is that all one has to do to escape the attention of the tax mafiosa (and dodge the tax system) is to register as a religious leader.  The people who benefit from the tax loophole which the Establishment refuses to close, are the liberal clergy who happily push the neo-con sjw policies of the governing regime.  In addition there are newer religions to the Isles who are happy to jump on the band-wagon, thus allowing the organisers of the religious populations to keep hold of the money they generate through extortion of the collecting tin, whilst those less inclined to listen to the organised theists - whether atheist of spiritual in a sense which doesn't rely on designated places of worship, become economically impoverished.  It is understandable that people who are aware of the tax loop-holes will take advantage of everything which they are given, and they should not be blamed for that.

Why should religion be a reason for tax exemption?  If we lived in a theocracy, and there was one religion enshrined by the State, then there would be no reason for places of worship to be given preferential treatment, as they would be an integral part of society.  We do not live in a theocracy.

If people wish to worship in an organised manner, let them pay for the costs of the places they use; it is beyond arrogant for people of any faith to expect their beliefs to be paid for by others.  Without tax exemption for religious places, those which flourish would provide income to the local authorities, and those which did not, would die.  Any religion which cannot survive without grandiose displays of material wealth, deserves to fail. 

Education centres are - like religious places - tax exempt.  The ludicrous situation exists where the state education system keeps children in  ignorance of anything which matters, and where the only real education which can be obtained is in the fee-paying sector.  The Ruling Class and their bourgeois collaborators have enough money to pay for their children to be educated away from the proletarian masses, but then the schools to which they send their children, have charitable status, and so contribute nothing to the economy.

If all so-called public (private) schools had to pay into the tax system, that would greatly enrich the coffers of the exchequer.  The existence of a two-tier education system in which the Working Class receive nothing but indoctrination and knowledge sufficient only for servitude, in institutions which the parasitic rich wouldn't consider sending their children to, is offensive to the nation as a whole.  If the State sector is not good enough for the Rulers, then it is not good enough for anyone.  SMPBI will abolish fee paying schools, faith schools, charitable schools, and nationalise all of them so that everyone gets equal education, and no-one can pay for 'better' education.

So what can we do?  We can home school and thus keep the state away from our children.  Those who can afford to send their children to the elite schools, should refuse to as a matter of principle.  There is no excuse for the class system, and anything which props it up is repugnant. 

How should we deal with the tax loop-hole?

We can register our homes as places of worship, and with-hold taxes from the Capitalist regime.  SMPBI does have a spiritual dimension, so why shouldn't we be able to meet together for reflection in the same way as the organised religious groups do?  If they refuse to accept our expressions of belief as valid, then surely that amounts to prejudice and discrimination on spiritual, political and cultural grounds?  It is worth considering, for reasons financial and moral. 

It is possible to buy religious titles from (unsurprisingly), the USA, at an initial cost which is a fraction of the annual saving.  The legal protection and financial exemptions afforded to the majority faiths should apply to everyone.  This isn't tax evasion, but common sense.  Why pay a penny to the enemy regime, if we can legally avoid it? 

New World Order’? ‘Globalisation’? A Marxian-Heideggerian Analysis - Wilberg on Wednesday

‘New World Order’? ‘Globalisation? What, in essence, are they? A conspiracy on the part of global elites? The final stage of capitalism? The work of extraterrestrial beings or dark hidden powers lurking in other dimensions - the David Icke phantasy? According to the German philosopher Martin Heidegger, they are none of these things - and nor are they reducible merely to any type of human conspiracy to create a World Government, army, currency etc. Instead their essence is what Heidegger understood as the hidden essence of technology itself - namely a purely calculative and exploitative mode of thinking of the sort which idealises the total orderability, exploitability, surveillability, controllability, plannability, exploitability, manipulability, commodifiability, and monetisation of all things - including human beings and the earth itself.

In Heidegger’s terms, all things are, through this purely “calculative thinking”, reduced to what he called “standing reserve” (Bestand). Forests become a ‘standing reserve’ for the supply of timber, the sea becomes a standing reserve for the fishing industry, the soil a standing reserve for mechanised agriculture, the earth becomes a standing reserve for the forced extraction of minerals and energy sources, rivers become a standing reserve for hydroelectric power production etc. But in this process man too becomes ‘standing reserve’. Thus the accumulation of technology weapons is not merely a standing reserve for engagement in war - for governments, leaders and armies become, in turn, a standing reserve for the manufacturing of wars which realise the power of such weaponry. Similarly, oil and gas engineers become a standing reserve for the employment of surveying, prospecting, and resource extraction technologies such as drilling and fracking. IT workers become a standing reserve for the creation of ever more advanced forms of Artificial Intelligence. Workers in general become a standing reserve for the production, distribution and sale of technological devices to a standing reserve of consumers. Even capitalist corporations serve as a standing reserve of ‘human resources’ - and this not just for the exploitation of workers but for the unrestricted utilisation of the very technologies they employ. The transformation of human beings into ‘standing reserve’ can be nothing than what Marx saw as the inevitable creation of a globally homogeneous proletarian slave class - but one in which the human being is also reduced to a biological machine - a mere tool-making and tool-using tool of the very technological tools he uses - and in this way their slave rather than their master. In this context, the seemingly radically divergent modes of thinking of Marx and Heidegger actually converge - for Marx also recognised the decisive role of new types of tools and technological developments in generating different modes and relations production - including the capitalist mode of production itself - and all the new forms of social and economic relations that arose with it. Few Marxists, however, recognise that Marx did not associate what he called the ‘alienation’ or ‘estrangement’ of labour only with the capitalist mode of production, but with the way in which, through the very activity of labour, the product of human labour comes to appear as an object external and alien to the labourer, i.e. as an ‘alien’ or ‘foreign’ object or power.

“If the product of labor is alien to me, if it confronts me as an alien power, to whom, then, does it belong? To a being other than myself. Who is this being? The gods? To be sure, in the earliest times the principal production (for example, the building of temples, etc., in Egypt, India and Mexico) appears to be in the service of the gods, and the product belongs to the gods… Not the gods, not nature, but only man himself can be this alien power over man.

Thus, if the product of his labor, his labor objectified, is for him an alien, hostile, powerful object independent of him, then his position towards it is such that someone else is master of this object … an activity performed in the service, under the dominion, the coercion, and the yoke of another man … The relationship of the worker to labor creates the relationship to it of the capitalist (or whatever one chooses to call the master of labour). Private property is thus the product, the result, the necessary consequence, of alienated labor, of the external relation of the worker to nature and to himself.”

What Marx calls here an “external relation of the worker to nature” corresponds also with the essence of technology as Heidegger saw it - a relation to nature in which it is “challenged forth”, i.e. forced to reveal itself only in the terms that science itself constructs - and forced also to make itself available as “standing reserve” for technological exploitation. In contrast, neither windmills, wave power nor the natural seeding of the soil force nature to reveal herself and become manipulable in the way that leads to the production of GM seeds and foods, fracking, the plundering of the earth and the products of nuclear sciences and technologies.

From both a Heideggerian and a Marxist frame of reference, the distinction between capitalism on the one hand, and the command economy of Soviet-style ‘socialism’ collapses. This is because, irrespective of property relations, both relate to nature and humanity in a purely “external way” - reducing them to a standing reserve for calculative thinking and technological exploitation. Capitalist corporations of course, have always themselves been command economies. The only difference between capitalism and Soviet command economies lay (1) in the nature of the elites whose function it is to act as a dominant and coercive “master of labour”(Marx), and (2) the nature of the cultures and ideologies who maintain the illusion that technology is something that man has complete mastery over. The great paradox of the USSR was that an expanded and enslaved ‘proletariat’ became a mere standing reserve of forced labour to enable a rapid technological industrialisation of the sort thought necessary to prevent the proletariat from being enslaved by capitalism! The official religion of ‘Marxism-Leninism’ was also and essentially a soulless, radically atheistic worship of science and industrial technology applied on a giganticist scale. But in almost all respects, conditions for workers and farmers in the ‘socialist’ USSR paralleled those that prevailed during the miserable centuries of capitalist industrialisation in England - not least through the disastrous fall in agricultural production through forced ‘collectivisation’ of the traditional peasant communes that were so much praised by Marx. And in contrast, under Putin, Russia has become the world’s leading exporter of wheat.

Heidegger saw the essential ‘religion’ of both atheistic Soviet-socialism and ‘Christian’ Western-capitalism as science. He saw also that this seemingly secular religion was essentially Judaic - its principle being that man is destined to command nature as God commands man - and as the human ego is commanded in Judaism to rule strictly over the human body and soul. As for today’s ‘liberal’ West, it is now ‘identity politics’ and its worship of superficial cultural ‘diversity’ that is the new religious ‘opium of the masses’ - one which tolerates no politically incorrect ‘enemies of the people’. Paradoxically however, this ideal of identity diversity both serves and conceals (as it did in the multi-ethnic Soviet Union) a complete ideological homogenisation of a slave proletariat. The difference is only that in the West today, individuals can replace an authentic sense of self with any self-identification of their choice - identity as such having been reduced to a cultural or political ‘brand’ and become an exchangeable commodity - whilst the real, concrete individual remains a slave to their own forced capitalist labour. Identity politics therefore does nothing to prevent the individual being reduced to a mere indivisible quantitative unit or ‘atom’ of capitalist production and consumption. It reduces individuals to a homogenous mass bound only by the sacrifice of their individuality to diverse and divisive forms of narrow group or collective identification.

“Liberal society, which puts itself in opposition to the collective societies of socialism and fascism, has itself become a collective, a standardised and stereotypical one. The more an individual aspires to be unique with the liberal paradigm, the more he becomes similar to everyone else.” Dugin

New technologies exercise the same powerful, driving role in this process as they did in the process of industrialisation. To take but one example, social media such as Twitter have become a veritable hive of discrete identity-political echo chambers in which each individual can be fed with bytes of highly selective and filtered ‘information’, all of which - far from genuinely educating people or expanding the horizons of their thought and consciousness - merely echo, confirm and amplify a set of narrowed down opinions and political identities. People think they are expressing themselves freely or even radically - when in fact their thinking is actually and increasingly imprisoned in such technologically created online echo chambers. Symbols, usernames and online ‘profiles’ become empty ‘avatars’ of individuality and a vehicle for purely ‘virtual’ association with others. At the same time, a new type of mass illiteracy has become the norm. For after all, who needs to read books or even be able to write more than a line or two of text when, even if they had the time to do so, all they need to do is tweet some shallow opinionating or retweet a piece of totally decontextualised journalistic ‘news’. But then ‘globalisation’ does not in any way require a broadly or deeply educated proletariat - only a standing reserve of people who are at best ‘trained’ in narrow technological ‘skills’ all of which need only purely calculative forms of thinking - even in medicine and science. The only real job of a proletariat is thus to remain mindless and unthinking wage slaves - whether by performing unskilled or skilled labour, sitting in front of a computer all day in corporate offices, acting as man-machines giving manual assistance to robotic production lines - or just serving and servicing the continued output of coffee machines in Starbucks.

Fundamental Science and Theology - Wilberg on Wednesday

The idea of reincarnation is so foreign to the conceptual framework of Western science and religion, because the fundamental nature of identity, and with it, the nature of incarnate existence has not been adequately addressed. Incarnate human existence is viewed as a correlation of one self with one body. The self is seen as a localized subject bounded by the physical body. Science acknowledges that the body we possess now is not even composed of the same matter it had at birth. The very atoms and molecules that constitute our bodies and constitute, in this sense, our material identity, were all once elements of other bodies - mineral, vegetable and animal. They are transmigrating fragments of material identity, united only by their bodily patterning and interrelationships. But the question of when and in what manner the air you breathe or the food you digest becomes you (or ceases to be you) is more than just a question of when and in what manner its material elements become part of your bodily constitution and patterning. For what applies to the material elements of the body applies also to the psychic elements that compose the self. As Seth puts it: "Each identity is itself and no other, and yet it is composed of myriad fragments of other identities." It is these fragment identities that manifest, mix and merge in our dreams, but perhaps not only in our dreams. "All consciousness is interrelated. It flows together in currents, rises and falls, eddies and breaks, mixes and merges."

If identity is fundamentally a pattern of identification, as Seth suggests, then the fundamental nature of identity - of beings - cannot be conceived of as static but hinges on the nature of identification itself as an activity, the activity of be-ing. The psychoanalytic understanding of identity and identification rests on specular metaphors - we 'see' ourselves 'reflected' or 'mirrored' in others or 'project' aspects of ourselves 'onto' others. There is no concept of awareness paralleling our understanding of matter - as something that can flow in currents, that has both a particle and a wave character. Nor is there any concept of the self as something with a non-local or field character, the self-expression of a field of awareness through the actualization of potential field-patterns or gestalts of awareness. A more fundamental understanding of identity would recognize that awareness not only forms itself into patterned figures but flows into and out of these figures, which in turn can affiliate to form more complex patterns or gestalts of awareness. The identity of any being as such an awareness gestalt is not fixed however. Its overall boundary or psychic envelope is permeable in the same way that a cell membrane is, allowing flows of awareness in both directions.

We have no difficulty acknowledging that an actor's awareness can flow in and out of different parts, and that he or she, despite 'having' only a single body, can embody different 'selves' - those aspects of themselves in tune with the parts they play. These aspects consist of different actual or potential patterns of bodily self-expression, of speech and movement, each with their own overall tone or resonance. The expression of these aspects in performing a particular part, in turn in-forms those aspects, expanding and enriching them with new elements drawn from others. But once performed, a part becomes easier to play again, having formed up its own enduring field-pattern in the psyche of the actor, and stabilizing itself through morphic resonance with this field pattern. The actor need only attune to this pattern, and allow their awareness to once again flow into it, for them to achieve the level of identification with the part necessary to embody it in performance - to translate it into patterns of speech and movement, gesture and facial expression which convey its overall tone or resonance. So it is, that on a less dramatic scale, we all act out different aspects of ourselves in different situations and with different people, on different stages and with different casts - and with different intensities of involvement, different degrees of identification. It is in this sense that the self we know is indeed a pattern of identifications, or a pattern of patterns - some so familiar or relatively unchanging that we do not consciously and actively identify with them - moving in and out of role in the way an actor does - but instead are passively identified with them. To an extent therefore, our primary identity is not a conscious identity at all but as Freud suggested, an unconscious one. This is not because this identity is buried deep in a hypothetical 'unconscious' but rather the opposite, because we are totally identified with it in our conscious life.

These reflections on the relation between potential form or pattern and embodied per-formance, on conscious acts of identification on the one hand and unconscious patterns or identities on the other, are crucial if we are to understand the fundamental nature of identity, and 'incarnation' and 'reincarnation', in a new way. Actors do not simply make calculated use of their bodies to enact a part. They body that part, allowing aspects of themselves to incarnate through it. As a result these aspects or expressive potentials are both actualized and added to, both given form and transformed in performance. The newly formed field-patterns however, do not disappear or 'die' when the show comes to an end, when they cease to find bodily expression and the stage is abandoned. They endure as stronger, more highly stabilized field-patterns or selves within the field of awareness or self-field of the actor.

The question of whether the self or soul survives the death of the physical body begs the other, more fundamental question - the nature and identity of this 'self' or 'soul'. From a field-phenomenological perspective, there is no single self or identity in the first place. Instead identity is a dynamic grouping or gestalt of 'aspect selves', each of which in turn is one expression of a larger field of awareness - the word 'soul' being a name for this larger identity or field-self.

It is because all potentialities that we embody and express in a given life are the self-actualization and self-manifestation of this field-self or soul that we can be said to have an identity - a self or soul. But that is not to say that the identity of this self or soul can be reduced to its embodiment or incarnation in any one life - just as it cannot be reduced to its embodiment or incarnation in any one role or persona we adopt in that life. The 'life after life' can be compared to the off-stage life of an actor, whose actual personality can as well be narrower or broader, less or more vivid and colourful, than those parts they have performed - but whose larger identity and soul-life will indeed have been enriched by them, and bear within it the potential to perform many new parts. In our life after 'death', as in our life before birth and as in 'life' as we know it - between birth and death - everything hinges on the relationship between the self as we know it, and the soul - between the self we are identified with and that larger field of possible identities whose self -manifestation we are.

The Western concept of incarnate existence is a myth of singularity - one self, one body, one life, one physical world or universe. The Eastern concept of reincarnation also retains a notion of singularity, with the important difference that the one self can express and experience itself in different ways in many bodies, many lives, many worlds, fields or planes of reality, physical and non-physical. The central difference between them hinges on the nature and identity of this 'one self'- whether it is identified with the personal self we know in this life, with some deeper 'inner self', with God or a god, or whether it is understood in a deeper way: not as any bounded identity, inner or outer, but as a soul in the broader sense - a dynamic and patterned field of identifications. This soul or field-self includes not only potentia l and actual identifications but past ones that persist as dormant identifications, and future ones that exist as latent identifications - potential identifications with a higher probability of manifestation than others.

Neither the Western nor the Eastern model of incarnation and identity fully acknowledge the fundamental equivalence of incarnation as identification. Understanding this equivalence, the concept of reincarnation does not appear in any way esoteric. For then we see that our lives between birth and death involve a constant process of reincarnation - understood not as the survival into eternity of a single identity but as a constantly shifting pattern or cycle of identifications that centres now on one, now on another identity, role or persona. We are all constantly aware of a field character to our own identity, if not the unbounded reality of our own soul or field-self, then at least of our own self-field - the field of possible identifications that we draw on in every decision we make, no matter how minor. For our every word and deed, our every act, mental or physical, involves at some level an act of identification with a particular pattern of action, a particular identity, one that implies the existence of other possible patterns of action, other possible identifications and identities.

Acts of identification, by their very nature, alter the identity of the agent. Whenever we identify with a particular pattern of action, a part our awareness flows into and fills that pattern, whilst other parts flow into alternate possible patterns of action. The self that identifies with one course of action is not the same as the self that then finds itself identified with that course of action, and knows itself only as the self that came about through that course of action. Nor is it the same as other alternate selves that came about through identification with alternate courses of action. For the self that has chosen a given course of action (X) these alternative selves are purely imaginary - selves that might have done Y or Z. But from the point of view of the selves that chose Y or Z, it is the self that has chosen X that is the 'imaginary' self, the self that might have been. Alternate selves occupy parallel alternate realities. They are alternate possible actualizations of a field-self that is the source of all potential actions. As such they are also connected to one another through this field-self, and aware of one another through their own self-field. The self-field is the very foundation and very fabric of our inner life, for every moment of our lives, in every situation, at every point and in every place, we are aware of pregnant potentialities. We no sooner identify one of these potentialities as a possible course of action (whether a simple action such as getting up to make a cup of tea or divorcing from a partner) that other alternate courses of action become possible at the same time (not getting up or not divorcing). Every possible course of action will affect not only our lives but our very identity, for actualizing it will involve an act of identification. The self that chooses X becomes a different self to the self that chooses Y or Z. The self-field includes past as well as future possibilities. Within it, we retain an awareness of actions we could have undertaken as well as those we could still undertake. And what applies to possible actions applies also to possible events. Our self-field is an awareness both of different events that could yet occur, those could have occurred and those that did occur - but were experienced only by alternate selves in their own alternate realities. It also includes actions and events that remained merely potential - did not become occasions of conscious choice. All actions constitute events in themselves, bring events about, and bring other possible actions and events in their wake. The diagram below is adapted from those in Jane Roberts book on 'Aspect Psychology'. The inner circle is a schematic representation of a life-moment as one portion of a self-field of actual and possible events, represented by crosses. The larger circle around this self-field is the event horizon that defines our life between birth and death. The dark line represents the life-line of events we will have followed at death. The other lines represent alternate life-lines, each defined by the actualization of alternate possible events in a given life-time. The centre of the circle is the moment-point, which is itself an event of emergence always defined by an intersection of different possible life-lines.


The inner meaning or felt sense of a word can be likened to its soul -irreducible to its physical 'incarnation' as ink marks on a page, pixels on a screen, or sound vibrations in the air. The felt sense or soul of a word - or of a life - does not dissipate or 'die' when the last breath of sound leaves our lips or the last page of our life is turned. The felt meaning of the spoken word preceded its birth in sound, and lives on in the listener after the speaker passes into silence - to be reborn at other times, and reshaped in other words. It lives on in the speaker's soul too, for as the Christian mystic Meister Eckhart put it: "It is a remarkable thing that what flows out remains within. That the word flows out and yet remains within." In these two connected statements, Eckhart discloses mysteries so profound as to be fundamental to both science and theology - namely that inwardness or intensional reality is essentially inexhaustible, no matter how many forms it 'flows out' into. The soul, like the inwardness of the word, is not something to be found within its extensional, physical form, but belongs to an unbounded non-extensional realm of inwardness as such. It belongs to the realm of intensional reality, not to the insideness of extensional bodies.

Understanding the nature of inwardness or intensional reality provides the bridge between Fundamental Science and Fundamental Theology, allowing us to understand Fundamental Science as Fundamental Theology and vice versa. God is no actual thing, nor even every-thing, but an awareness of boundless inner potentiality - of an inexhaustible realm of inwardness that flows out into every actual thing and from which all things flow out. Potentiality has reality only in awareness. Intensional reality, scientifically and theologically, is the reality of potentiality in awareness. Awareness as such is not, in the first place, awareness of any actual thing, but awareness of potentiality. It is only through awareness of potentiality that potentiality can be actualized. Potentiality, possessing its own reality in awareness and knowing itself through awareness is power. God is therefore indeed an all-powerful knowing awareness, one that is ontologically prior to any actual being, but constitutes the inexhaustible inwardness or intensional reality of every being. The power of God is indeed within us all, for it is not a power over beings but a power within all beings. Through our own awareness of potentiality, not specific human potentials but pure potentiality, we are linked directly to God. Through it we know God intimately - not as an actual being, an object of knowledge, but as that fundamental knowing awareness that is the source of all beings. Scientifically speaking, agnosticism is not an option. For that intimate knowing awareness gnosis is itself the source of any and every thing and being that can be known. True gnosis is not knowledge of or about God. It is God. As the awareness of inexhaustible potentialities of Being, it is a Knowing that is the source of all beings.

The Question of 'Rootlessness' - and 'Identity Politics' : Wilberg on Wednesday

Further political and philosophical notes and reflections

Part 3. The Question of ‘Rootlessness’ - and ‘Identity Politics’

“Thus, both [the imperialistic-bellicose and humanitarian-pacifistic way of thinking] can be used by “international Jewry” to proclaim and accomplish one as a means for the other [their common end of a rootless, leveled, homogeneous, technological mass civilization] — this machinational “history”-making entangles all players equally in their webs.”  Heidegger

The association of the Jews in particular with a “rootless cosmopolitanism” has a long history, which Heidegger here reaffirms. But it was after WW2, which resulted in the displacement, driving out and uprooting of so many Germans - both from and within their homeland - that Heidegger came to consider rootlessness (loss of ‘autochthony’) as something “caused not merely by the circumstance and fortune, nor … only from the negligence and superficiality of man’s way of life” but from “the spirit of the age in which all of us were born”. More significantly, he came also to associate this rootlessness with a growing attachment not just to financial calculation but also to technology, “which everywhere and every minute claim, enchain, drag along, press and impose upon man under the form of some technical contrivance or other”, and “whose accomplishments come speedily to be known and publicly admired”.

At a time when information technologies, computers and the now ubiquitous ‘smartphone’ had not even begun to encroach upon human life and activity, this was an extraordinary example of Heidegger’s historical prescience.

“What we know now as the technology of film and television, of transportation and especially air transportation, of news reporting, and as medical and nutritional technology, is presumably only a crude start. No one can foresee the radical changes to come. But technological advance will move faster and faster and can never be stopped. In all areas of his existence, man will be encircled ever more tightly by the forces of technology.”

Heidegger did not seek to deny the usefulness or even necessity of technical devices, but warned of the way in which they threatened the complete extinction of another type of thinking to the dominant mode of “calculative thinking”. It was in his Memorial Address on the death of the composer Konradin Kreutzer that he called this other type of thinking “meditative thinking”. Indeed he spoke of man as being literally “in flight” from thinking in this meditative sense. 

“Yet you may protest: mere meditative thinking finds itself floating unaware above reality. It loses touch. It is worthless for dealing with current business. It profits nothing in carrying out practical affairs. And you may say, finally, that mere meditative thinking, persevering meditation, is ‘above’ the reach of ordinary understanding. In this excuse only this much is true: … meditative thinking requires a greater effort. It is in need of even more delicate care than any other genuine craft. But it must also be able to bide its time, to await, as does the farmer, whether the seed will come up and ripen. Yet anyone can follow the path of meditative thinking in his own manner and within his own limits. Why? Because man is thinking, that is, a meditating being. Thus meditative thinking need by no means be ‘high-flown’. It is enough if we dwell on what lies close and meditate on what is closest - on that which concerns us, each one of us, here and now … now, in the present hour of history.”
Heidegger goes on to ask a fundamental question:

“Even if the old rootedness is being lost in this age, may not a new ground and foundation be granted again to man, a foundation and ground out which man’s nature and all his works may flourish in a new way…?”

For if not:

“Then there might go hand in hand with the greatest ingenuity in calculative planning and inventing an indifference towards meditative thinking - total thoughtlessness. And then? Then man would have denied and thrown away his own special nature - that he is a meditative being. Therefore the issue is the saving of man’s essential nature. Therefore the issue is keeping meditative thinking alive.”

To all this we might add that it would have come as no surprise to Heidegger, that within all the New Age cults and literary trash that would come to promote ‘meditation’ as a practice, one will never once come across the term ‘meditative thinking’. Instead ‘thought and meditation’ are treated in New Age culture as total opposites. Hence the pathetic degree of dumbed-down thinking - if not complete thoughtlessness - that finds its expression in the jargons of New Age literature, as it does also in both empty corporate jargons and the worship of technological science - what Heidegger called “THE new religion”. Nor is it a surprise that Twitter alone has become a principal technological instrument for the dumbing-down of human thinking - promoting unthought, knee-jerk reactions to the latest bits of informational ‘news’ that can be used to confirm with the existing beliefs and prejudices of its users without any deeper thinking or research.

That said, is there an answer to Heidegger’s quest for a new form of rootedness - one no longer reducible to the old fetishes of ‘Blood and Soil’, ‘Race’ and ‘Tradition’? For as a result of the now almost total dominance of calculative thinking:

"The world now appears as an object open to the attacks of calculative thoughts - attacks that nothing is believed able any longer to resist. Nature becomes a gigantic gasoline station, an energy source for modern technology and industry...The earth now reveals itself as a coal mining district, the soil as a mineral deposit … Agriculture is now the mechanized food industry. Air is now set upon to yield nitrogen, the earth to yield ore, ore to yield uranium … uranium is set upon to yield atomic energy.

Heidegger’s own answer to the question of technology was that:

"We can affirm the unavoidable use of technical devices, and also deny them the right to dominate us, and so to warp, confuse, and lay waste our nature. We let technical devices enter our daily life, and at the same time leave them outside, as things which are nothing absolute but remain dependent upon something higher. I would call this comportment toward technology releasement toward things."

Further reflections come from the English philosopher Simon Glendinning:

… Flourishing, I want to say with Heidegger, does presuppose some kind of milieu which provides what we might call a “racinating function”. However, what we need to take our leave from is the disastrous temptation to represent every “nativisation” in “blood and soil” terms. Against Heidegger, I will want to affirm another nativisation – the being-at-home … that belongs, as Nietzsche stressed, to a human being who has achieved “independence of any definite milieu”.

This suggestion is given a further and even more pointed signification by Harvey Requiem:

“… there will always be outcasts who will find their autochthony and therefore pursue meditative thought simply through the necessity of it, because they cannot find an anchor in mainstream calculative society. They are not permitted a place in the calculative 'herd', which is how most people seem to find their meaning, therefore they must find their meaning elsewhere and are forced to meditate lest they lose their minds.”http://harveyrequiem.blogspot.cz/2012/02/on-martin-heideggers-memorial-address.html

Neither of these quotations are an answer in themselves. Yet they contain  the seed of an answer. We need only rethink Nietzsche’s attack on the “herd mentality” in a new way - as the cultivation of human beings who are not in any way bound or constricted by group identifications of any sort - whether ethnic, racial or gender-based, religious, political or ideological, regional, national or supranational. Such group identifications express a weakened and insecure sense of self, and with it a need to bury and confine the truly autarchic self - what I call ‘the deep self’ - within the restrictive and outworn baggage of group ideological languages and their symbolic ‘identifiers’. Thus I see no essential difference between, for example, the identity politics of the liberal and Trotskyite Left, and that of both Islam on the one hand and ‘ethnonationalism’ or ‘identitarianism’ on the other (including the ultra-identitarianism of World Jewry). Similarly, it makes no essential difference whether one seeks a basis for one’s sense of self by identifying as a feminist, gay, transgender, black, white (or even as a ‘socialist’) or doing so through a ‘them and us rejection’ of groups one does not identity with - which is just a form of negative identification and negative identity politics in which identity is entirely constituted by what one negates.

There is a dialectical relation between positive and negative identifications and identity politics, one which not only makes them inseparable but also serves globalist interests - through the ever-increasing polarisation and fragmentation of society into groups based on opposite identifications: feminism versus patriarchy, gay or lesbian identity versus ‘straight’ heterosexuality, traditional genders versus ‘trans-genders’ etc. etc. Such multiple identity polarisations are a globalist strategy of the 1% - and a useful distraction from focussing on it. It is important also to understand the connection between polarising group identifications and ‘self-identification’ in the sense defined by Gilad Atzmon. This is what he calls ‘ASA’ - for example the need to identify oneself primarily and fundamentally AS A ‘gay’ and AS A part of the ‘gay community’ - rather than just being homosexual, and not making a fuss of it or turning it into the core of one’s selfhood.  Do ordinary workers need to identify themselves AS workers? No, they simply find themselves in the position of having to be workers. In this sense, the common essence of all identity politics lies in the need to find a substitute for an authentic and autarchic sense of self in group identifications and identities, whether positively or negatively. I am not of course suggesting that identities, groups and communities of all sorts, including ethnic groups, are invalid or redundant. What I am saying is that groups and communities need to be composed of authentically autarchic individuals - those whose native soil lies in their own innermost soul - which both embraces and transcends identities and identifications. Only the ego and egotism, long cultivated in the Judaic tradition, thinks of itself as possessing identities as a form of private property. In contrast, the soul is awareness as such - a universal awareness field of which we are each an individualised portion and embodiment. The ‘deep’ self, as this pure, knowing awareness, includes an awareness of multiple roles and identities - but it is not itself an identity. That is why those insistent outsiders - foremost among them the German writer Ernst Jünger, close friend and correspondent of Martin Heidegger, - consistently refused to be bound by group identifications but embodied a truly sovereign individual. He himself called such an individual an ‘anarch’ - in contrast to the revolutionary ‘anarchist’. ‘Anarchs’ are simply aware, truly autarchic and self-rooted individuals without whose inner sovereignty there can be no free and sovereign groups, communities, states, societies or nations of any sort at all. 

On 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' - Wilberg on Wednesday

Further political and philosophical notes and reflections:

Part 2. On 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion'

Some extracts:

Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy. The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game…

Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgment, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interest? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable; for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.

The part played by the Press is to keep pointing our requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. ...through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade...

NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

What is it to the proletariat labourer, bowed double over his heavy toil, crushed by his lot in life, if talkers get the right to babble, if journalists get the right to scribble any nonsense side by side, … once the proletariat has no other profit out of the constitution save only those pitiful crumbs which we fling them from our table in return for their voting in favor of what we dictate…

It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the "goyim" the very principle of god-head and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.

In order to give the GOYIM no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus, all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the GOYIM, we must put industry on a speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.

Economic crises have been produced by us for the GOYIM by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation. Huge capitals have stagnated, withdrawing money from States, which were constantly obliged to apply to those same capitals for loans. These loans burdened the finances of the State with the payment of interest and made them the bond slaves of these capitals ....

We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the GOYIM, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any GOYIM who oppose us by deed or word.

Commentary:

That the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a Russian ‘forgery’, full of plagiarisms from many earlier texts, is irrefutable. What is less remarked upon is their clearly Russian character, expressed by a hatred of both the landed (Tsarist) aristocracy and also by the ‘plan’ to replace it with a Stalinesque-type “despot” in full control of the State and all property - and who would be deified like a God. What is also not remarked upon enough is the failure of the Protocols to promote or anticipate the success of the Zionist movement - with its aim to reclaim Jerusalem. Then there is the clear lack of knowledge presented in the Protocols of the Judaic holy books themselves - which in themselves contain ample material of an even worse sort than that presented by the Protocols themselves - and which already declare that the Jews are destined to be global rulers of mankind and non-Jews their slaves. Instead the Protocols simply seek to re-contextualise elements of Jewish scripture and of the historical roles of the Jews in a more modern context.

From this point of view - and as Goebbels himself recognised - the whole question of the ‘authenticity’ of the Protocols is, in the end, wholly irrelevant - since most of what they are purported to ‘forge’ was already a reality at their time of writing - for example the reign of liberalism, Jewish control of the press, of speculative finance capital - and also of socialist and Bolshevik movements etc. But the biggest mistake of the Protocols was the perceived need of their authors to present Jewish supremacism as a carefully crafted conspiracy of a single directorate. It is better described as an international tribal network of diverse political and economic groupings elites - a ‘worldwide web’ - one with no central headquarters or leader, but with a clear history, direction and agenda (albeit one of which most Jews, even those participating in and supporting it, are largely ignorant).

“The locusts have no king, yet they advance together in ranks.” Proverbs 30:27.

Does this all mean that, in truth, Jews are indeed to blame for all the ills of this world, and have worse in store for it? Such a claim rests on a wholly impoverished understanding of history and historical developments. It is like claiming that the rise of capitalism was ‘planned’ and executed by a secret elite. To be sure, there were countless individuals, financial elites and also ‘secret societies’ like the Masons - all of whom did indeed vigorously participate in and furthered the rise of capitalism under the slogan of ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’. But to attribute the rise of capitalism to these individuals, elites and societies - rather than understanding them all as an expression of this rise - is to turn the dynamics of history on its head. Man does not make history. History makes man. This was the understanding that both Marx and Heidegger brought to expression.

“...the conspiratorial theory of history, which is based on the assumption that whatever happens is intended to happen, i.e., it is the result of conscious planning and deliberate action. Since Heidegger rejects this premise, he also rejects such anti-Semitic conspiracy theories as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as naively humanistic in their understanding of history. Heidegger does not, however, deny that human thought and action play important roles in history. But he believes that they are not the ultimate forces. Thus Heidegger does not deny that the Jewish community world-wide actively pursues its perceived collective interests. But he does believe that Jewish policies are not the cause or explanation of modernity, but instead that modernity arises from deeper, broader, and ultimately inscrutable forces. Heidegger sees the rise of Jewish power — in both Anglo-American capitalism and Bolshevism — as a product of the Jews’ unique adaptation to the spirit of modernity, which is an age of rootlessness and calculation. Jews, therefore, appear to be both subjects and objects of the modernization process. Primarily they are objects, since history is ultimately outside of human control. But since world Jewry is already characterized by rootlessness and calculation, it is capable of accepting the “world-historical task” of driving modernity toward its consummation: a rootless, homogeneous, technological mass society, which will ultimately ensnare and destroy the Jews as well. So, in the end, they are objects as well.” Greg Johnson

In other words, Jews are as much an object - indeed a slave and also a victim of their own ‘chosenness’ and supremacism - as they are its subject or ‘agent’. Similarly, the financial speculator or billionaire is as much a slave to speculation and money as he is master of it. Mammonism is no more a creation of money owners than capitalism, as an international economic system, was the planned creation of owners of capital.

In what then, lies the uniqueness of the power of international Jewry? The answer is simple and plain to see - and ever more so. Namely that it has become, like the fake gas chambers of Holocaust mythology, something totally outside the realm of ‘politically correct’ discussion and rational critique among leading statesmen and politicians of all colours or parties - not least the ‘far Left’. As Gilad Atzmon put it, Jewish power is the power to prevent any discussion or critique of Jewish power. As for Zionism in particular, far from being merely a response to anti-Semitism, its philosophy was, from its very inception, itself rabidly anti-Semitic. Herzl was an anti-Semite of such virulent extremism that his remarks puts the ‘Protocols’ in the shade. His aim was nothing less than to eradicate what he saw as disgusting and dirty Eastern Jews - and turn them instead into virile Gentiles with their own land, state and racially pure nation.

“Leon Ritter von Bilinski — the man whose memoirs were to expose the Disraeli origins of Herzl's ideas — told Herzl bluntly that the Zionists’ ideas and assumptions were exactly those of the worst anti-Semitic racists.” Mark Burdman

Martin Heidegger was perhaps the deepest philosophical critic of biological racism - both that of the Jews and its mirror image in Hitler’s biologism - and indeed Hitler’s Anglophilia:

“The idea of an understanding with England in terms of a distribution of imperialist “prerogatives” misses the essence of the historical process, which is led by England within the framework of Americanism and Bolshevism and at the same time world Jewry to its final conclusion. The question of the role of world Jewry is not racial, but the metaphysical question of the type of humanity that can accept the world-historical “task” of uprooting all beings from Being.”

Today this type of humanity is exemplified in Silicon Valley, with its principal and on-going project of creating machine-like human beings whose thought and perception are linked directly - digitally and electronically - to a singular Artificial Intelligence called ‘The Singularity’. What is here called ‘intelligence’ however, is nothing but the technological expression of what Heidegger called “machination” and “calculative thinking”, i.e. a type of ‘intelligence’ than can only calculate (previously associated with specifically Jewish financial talents - but which knows no dimension of living, meaning or being outside ‘the virtual’. But it is also not difficult to guess who the main financiers of research into this wholly artificial ‘intelligence’ are.

See also: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-capitalists-high-technology.html