Wednesday, 25 April 2018

Fight Zionist Lies with Scientific Truth - Wilberg on Wednesday

[When it comes to discussing the 'holocaust'] sticking to the forensic facts and scholarship is all-important. Unfortunately that alone will land you in prison in Germany! On the other hand it makes it all the more important to protect the mostly highly scholarly  series - produced in the UK by Germar Rudolf and his Hastings-based Castle Hill publishers.

Germar hasn't got a racist or 'antisemitic' bone in his body and would like to see nothing more than a new German-Jewish symbiosis. But he's already done time in German jails and paid the price, big time, for his scientific work. And his personal story makes very interesting and touching reading: 

But with all their scientific and scholarly books already having been axed by Amazon, Barnes and Noble etc. (even though one can still buy Mein Kampf, the Protocols etc. and loads of other overt antisemitic material from them), clearly it is the really high-level, detailed critical scholarship and science that is feared the most. And despite their huge loss of revenue from Amazon, [Castle Hill / Codoh] are now allowing all their books to be downloaded for free as pdfs. Videos too.

So I think it important that everyone - including other comrades - takes advantage of this - so that the truth can be protected,  Samizdat-style, even if Codoh/Castle Hill are eventually shut down.

Editor's note:

The entire Codoh Holocaust Handbook library can be downloaded in a 415MB zip file at this link:

For an overview of what is in the library, have a look at the PDF of the catalogue at this link:

The documentary library is also free, and at time of posting this article, has 17 titles to download and distribute electronically or by handing out freely of dvds or memory sticks. The link for the videos is:

There is nothing racist about the truth, about facts, about historical information.  Spread the information freely to everyone with a mind open to see through the lies of the holocaust industry.  Many good people have suffered to get this truth out, including many good Jewish people.  This information knocks away one of the pedestals of Zionism, and for that reason, it matters that it is not censored out of existence.

Visit the links, take what you are happy to take, and if possible, maybe make a donation to help the brave defenders of independent research, in this time of Zionist Oppression.

Tuesday, 24 April 2018

Alfie Evans vs the 'royal' sprog: The Class Divide in Action

In Liverpool, a Working Class Family is going through hell. Their son, Alfie Evans, has effectively been condemned to death by judicial decree. The Judge covering his case, Paul Hayden, has forbidden that the boy be taken to Italy for treatment - even though he has been granted Italian Citizenship and it is his only hope of survival.

Alfie Evans has been subjected to some very dubious treatment at Alderhey Children's Hospital. Now, he has the chance to leave the clutches of the NHS and go to Italy or Germany for treatment.  The judicial system has decreed that he is forcibly kept in the country, and that he be denied any further treatment.  Just as with the judicial murder of Charlie Gard last year, the NHS is snuffing out another life, when there is a chance of treatment - but that chance is being legally denied.

Contrast the handing out of the death penalty to sick Working Class children, with the pampered tax-payer-funded lifestyle of the parasitic Ruling Class.  The only legitimate son of the next king Charles, has had a third child.  Like the other two, this one will never want for anything, and in the unfortunate case of ill-health, no expense will be spared to find him treatment.

SMPBI demands an end to the Monarchy, with the 'royal' family stripped of their ill-gotten wealth and made to live as the rest of us do.  We wish the royal family no ill. A Classless society would be beneficial to everyone, and successfully rehabilitated, there is no reason why the former royals could not become constructive members of society.

It is an outrage that people with money can afford good health care, whereas the rest of us have to put our lives and the lives of our loved ones in the hands of a system which is guided by political principles based on saving money, unless dealing with favoured identity groups, in which case no expense is spared.  We would abolish private health care, and scrap all the liberal lunacy - such as the 'trans' agenda - and make health care precisely the provision of care to help those afflicted by physical aiment (not by delusions, which would become the remit of re-opened asylums for the mentally impaired).

The Class Divide is killing Alfie Evans, just as it killed Charlie Gard.  We want everyone to have the same level of healthcare, with excellence for all. What is not good enough for the 'royals' is not good enough for the rest of us.  A Socialist Republic of the Isles would not allow patients to be condemned to death when there is even the smallest possibility of treatment - even if that does require assistance from overseas.  Our people deserve better. 

Monday, 23 April 2018

Cultural Capitalism

Cultural capitalism is the application of capitalist theory in cultural affairs. It is defined as the production of symbols, knowledge, and information as the guiding principle of wealth creation. It is distinguished from industrial capitalism in the sense that it focuses on cultural attractions and activities as the primary motivating factors underpinning consumption. Slavoj Žižek (2009) refers to cultural capitalism as the sale of attitudes or lifestyles. It is “global capitalism with a human face.” Žižek gives as examples how Nike “sells” the culture of physical achievement with is slogan “Just Do It” and how Starbucks convinces its customers that they are actually doing something good by drinking fair trade coffee: “You are buying something  bigger than yourself. You are buying into coffee ethics…. It’s good coffee karma.” Consumers would therefore feel that could buy their own redemption – they become not just consumers, but also environmentalists, social activists, philanthropists, etc. Žižek, however, warns that by participating in this system, consumers are actually "prolonging the disease ... rather than curing it." He promotes changing the structure rather than this sort of charitable act: "The proper aim is to try and reconstruct society on such a basis that poverty would be impossible and the altruistic virtues have really prevented the carrying out of this aim." Jeremy Rifkin (2001) likewise explains cultural capitalism as “the commodification of human culture itself.” Commerce has now become the primary institution, and culture, coopted and commercialized, is derivative. The key players in this new type of capitalism are transnational media companies that exploit cultural resources and re-package them as cultural commodities – “short-lived commercial entertainments, paid amusements, and purchased spectacles” (Rifkin 2000).

Yoshio Sugimoto (2010) discusses how cultural capitalism affects the social formation and the work-style of the Japanese. He notes that because of cultural capitalism, consumers begin to look for products that suit their personal preferences. The differentiation of consumer motivations therefore reflect the changes in class formation in the sense that social divisions derive not so much from the unequal distribution of industrial goods as from that of cultural goods. Cultural capitalism also affects the work-styles of the Japanese as cultural workers have come to predominate the workforce as much as industrial workers. However, unlike industrial workers, cultural workers are not bound in a particular physical place of work. They do not belong to labor organizations, are fragmented, and self-centered (individualistic). Cultural capitalism therefore offers little or no job security, and the casualization of labor increases the precarity of those in the quaternary sector (information and communication, finance and insurance, education and learning, healthcare and welfare, etc.).

Related concepts:

Cultural capital

Cultural capital is the ideas and knowledge that people draw upon as they participate in social life. Everything from rules of etiquette to being able to speak and write effectively can be considered cultural capital.

Cultural deprivation theory

The cultural deprivation theory implies that the middle/upper class are better off in all areas when compared to the working class and this is especially seen in education and schools. Proponents of this theory argue that working class culture (regardless of race, gender, ethnicity or other factors) inherently differs from that of people in the upper/middle class. This difference in culture means that while upper and middle-class children can easily acquire cultural capital by observing their parents, working-class children cannot, and this deprivation is self-perpetuating. The theory claims that the middle class gains cultural capital as the result of primary socialization, while the working class does not. Cultural capital helps the middle class succeed society because their norms and values facilitate educational achievement and subsequent employability. Working class members of society that lack cultural capital do not pass it on to their children, reproducing the class system.


Rifkin, J. (2000). “The New Capitalism is About Turning Culture Into Commerce.” Los Angeles Times, 17 January. Retrieved from

Rifkin, J. (2001). The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where all of Life is a Paid-For Experience. New York: Tarcher.

Sugimoto, Y. (2010). An Introduction to Japanese Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 107.

Žižek, S. (2009). “First as Tragedy, Then as Farce.” The RSA, 24 November. Retrieved from


Sunday, 22 April 2018

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 7


Tory "Brexit".....

1. No intention of stopping immigration which provides cheap labour for their fat cat big business paymasters

2. "Free trade" with countries that employ workers on sweated labour wages, which our manufacturing industry either has to mimic to survive or go under.

Populist Brexit.....

1. No more immigration from countries with a national average wage that does not either equal or exceed our own....

2. Import tax on goods made in countries where the national average wage that does not either equal or exceed our own.... (exceptions made for goods we cannot grow or make here).

Russell White, Populist Party, 2018


Authentic nationalism is not a patriotic or chauvinist disposition but quite simply the will of a people to live according to their own laws, this nationalism is and will always be the real enemy of imperialism.

Ernst Von Salomon


But yet this is the struggle against capitalism! Let’s become the communists! Our fight is socialism in its purest form! - Perfectly, socialism in its Prussian form. A socialism on every front, which will not only break the tyranny of economic laws ... but moreover a socialism through which we will rediscover the internal firmness, the spiritual unity that eluded us in the 19th century. We fight for this socialism ... If there is a power we must destroy, it’s the power of the West and the German milieus that have allowed themselves to be overwhelmed by it.

Ernst Von Salomon


"The U.S. government’s global boot print is no post- 9/11 phenomenon. The United States has been in a state of permanent war for decades, and the U.S. government has intervened in global affairs for centuries. No consensus exists on how many times the U.S. government has employed military force throughout the country’s history; nevertheless, attempts to catalog historical foreign interventions, beginning in the 1790s, have documented hundreds of cases. Each list varies depending on the relevant time frame under consideration and how the author defines foreign intervention. An exact number, however, is not important for our purposes. What is important is that no matter how one cuts the data, the U.S. government has used military force abroad a significant number of times. The historical prevalence of the U.S. government’s activist foreign policy is captured by economist Deepak Lal, who concludes that “[t]he United States is indubitably an empire. It is more than a hegemon, as it seeks control over not only foreign but also aspects of domestic policy in other countries.”

The militarism that characterizes U.S. foreign policy is a central tenet of the country’s national identity. As historian Andrew Bacevich notes, “[t]oday as never before in their history Americans are enthralled with military power. The global military supremacy that the United States presently enjoys— and is bent on perpetuating— has become central to our national identity. More than America’s matchless material abundance or even the effusions of its pop culture, the nation’s arsenal of high tech weaponry and the soldiers who employ that arsenal have come to signify who we are and what we stand for.”"

Christopher J. Coyne and Abigail R. Hall, "Tyranny Comes Home: The Domestic Fate of U.S. Militarism", 2018, pp. 4-5


The Fourth Political Theory proposes a totally new understanding of the three political ideologies of Modernity. This understanding could be qualified as existential Mit-sein [being-with]. But in this existential understanding of the presence (Dasein) [being-there], there is neither atom (parties, individual) nor sum of individuals (totalitarianism). In the Fourth Political Theory, being together means to exist, to constitute a presence - a living presence in the face of death. We live together only when we face our own death. Death is always deeply personal and, simultaneously, there is something common, something that effects each of us. So, we must not speak of totalitarianism (a mechanical concept linking parts and the whole), but an organic existential holism. And it’s name is the People. “Dasein exists in the people” [“Dasein existiert völkisch”]. In complete opposition with a “third totalitarianism.” For “being facing death.” Mit-Sein. We are the People.

Alexandr Dugin


"QUESTION: You have read many of the works of philosophers, statesmen and literati. Which of them has influenced your thinking? And which has influenced your emotions? In your youth did you have an exemplary ideal amongst any historical and political figures? What do you read now and when?

SADDAM HUSSEIN: From the deep intellectual and political point of view, Lenin was actually the person who attracted my attention most as a thinker and profound-thinking revolutionary. When one reads Lenin, one is reading life with its living movement and warmth. Gamal Abdul-Nasser influenced me, despite our party's sensitivity to his experiment and his sensitivity towards our party. I was particularly interested in his personality, as well as De Gaulle's. Both had their ways of dealing with things, but each had a prominent nationalist stand in his country, and a particular nationalist role in his nation with a touch of heroism. It was a great thing when De Gaulle said to the English: "Make a record of what you give to France so we can repay it after independence." De Gaulle played his part in reviving France after it had fallen to its knees, Abdul Nasser in his personality, and Lenin in his thought and political eminence."

Dr. Amir Iskandar, "Saddam Hussein: the fighter, the thinker and the man"


Saturday, 21 April 2018

We have to fight to keep our beloved countryside: we cannot allow the globalists to wreck it

The British Isles contain some of the most amazing and beautiful land in the world.  We have vast lakes, splendid plains, rolling hills and mountains.  Our forests and woodlands are home to an amazing richness of native wildlife.  Our coastal areas are breath-taking.  The diversity of life to be found upon our sacred soil is truly astounding.  This soil is ours, not to exploit and to corrupt, but to care for and pass on wholly intact to future generations.  The union of the people and the land and our glorious indigenous wildlife, is of such profound importance that protecting it must be seen as the absolute highest task of all of us.  Economics must take second place to the sanctity of our land itself and of the inhabitants of human and non-human variety.

The capitalist mentality which has so poisoned our people, has allowed for a shift in attitude towards the land upon which we live.  We are guardians of the land whose task is to conserve and nourish that which we are privileged to be a part of.  Too many people regard their personal gain as the be-all and end-all, seeing their life in terms of what they can get for themselves, rather what they can leave to generations to come.  We need to return to the true understanding of our place in time and space.  We have to treat our beloved land with the utmost respect and care; we are not its owners, we are merely borrowing it from those yet to come.

The perversion of our natural union with the land into a relationship of unbridled exploitation, is a symptom of an underlying sickness which must be eradicated.  In every country under the yoke of capitalism, the same materialism is at play, but behind it all is a power which understands the sanctity of the land, and for that reason seeks to destroy it.  Those who guide the policies which break the people from the land are globalists who hold that there can be no territorial divisions, and that borders are a barrier to commerce - which to them is the only thing of value.

The British Isles are experiencing the same exploitation and globalist materialism as the rest of the western capitalist world.  There are, of course, differences in the detail, but as far as the overall impact of material corruption is concerned, the demise of the Isles is no different from that of Spain, Sweden, Serbia or any other land in which money is king.

All of the countries in Europe are experiencing a level of non-European immigration which can only realistically be referred to as invasion.  The terrorists of NATO and the IMF have ruined far off lands The increase in population is being used as an excuse to concrete over our land.  Only those who are wilfully blind can fail to notice that our agricultural land is vanishing at an alarming rate.  Due to excessive building, the UK can not sustain the current population and has to import food and other vital resources.  Should there be a natural or economic disaster which prevents food reaching the UK, we will see mass starvation within our borders.  This is all quite contrived, and planned for.


The UK government is a supporter of Genetically Modified (GMO) food.  The liars in Westminster and the Dail pontificate about the virtues of GMO technology, yet in typical hypocritical fashion, they ensure that their own restaurants are GMO-free.  The Ruling Class enjoy real organic food undoctored by toxins, yet the Working Class are constantly told that we must eat food they wouldn't give to their dogs.  Such is the owner-slave relationship of the Rulers and the Ruled, in the country which calls itself the Mother of Democracy and the neighbouring land which achieved independence from the corrupt tyrants in London in name only.

The scoundrels in government would have us believe that there is no alternative to GMOs for the UK.  Their twisted logic points to the fact that the land cannot provide for the settled population plus the armies of outsiders who are entering our lands.  This is indeed true, but the solution to over-population is not to industrialise the land, but to re-organise it in a manner which would make the country self-sufficient with regards to food.  GMO fanatics would argue that the use of intensive agriculture with scientifically altered seeds is precisely the way to solve our food crisis.  However, that is to miss a very important point: GMOs have not been created by benevolent organisations who only seek to end global hunger; they have been created by multinational corporations as a means of generating obscene profits through the total control of the food supply. 

GMO seeds have been engineered to be non-reproductive, thus forcing the food-growers to buy new seeds for each subsequent crop.   From a purely logistical point of view, for island-based countries such as those in the British Isles, the danger of mass starvation through an interruption to the food supply, is increased, rather than decreased, by the use of GMO technology.  GMO advocates are more than happy to ignore the growing weight of evidence that the food produced in this way is harmful to health, but they cannot argue with the undeniable fact that if for any reason the supply routes to our lands were cut, then once the stores of seeds were exhausted, we would indeed starve.

As a means of social control, GMO technology is astounding.  Should the traitors in government be allowed to hand over our farms to the likes of Monsanto, then any future revival of our country by people opposed to globalism and servitude, could be crushed quickly by cutting off access to the basic requirements to grow food.  This nightmare scenario is well on its way to becoming a reality as the paid enemies of the people who sit in Parliaments and Assemblies on both sides of the Irish Sea are using every means at their disposal to push through GMOs - even though across the globe there is mounting resistance from the people, and even from a number of governments.

The only way to deal with GMO technology is to destroy it.  Sitting down in fields and singing protest songs against the scientifically-wrecked food supply will not stop the GMOs growing and thus pushing nature out of our soil.  The style of protest so favoured since the advent of the hippies of the 1960s may work well when it comes to spreading degeneracy and all manner of decadence, but when it comes to fighting that which is against nature, it is useless.  Combating GMOs is not a matter for protracted discussion, marches and letter-writing; the only way to halt this evil is to burn it from the soil.  Rural-loyalist Farmers have largely been replaced by Corporate Farm Managers who are motivated solely by the pursuit of profits.  A field burned to the ground will yield no profits.  A farm sabotaged so that no machinery can be operated, cannot survive.

There is a romantic view of farmers as custodians of nature.  This was true of the peasantry of the past, but the modern farm manager has more in common with a stock-broker or accountant than a guardian of the land.  Just as we rightly hold the profiteers in the city with contempt, so should we view their counterparts in the country.  There are good farmers who need our support, which we can give them by making use of farm shops in preference to super markets.  However, we should not let our ideals cloud us from the reality that many farms have become corporate-controlled and are operated with no regard for the people, or for nature.


Another attack upon the countryside is fracking.  Fracking requires 30 million litres / 6.6 million gallons per operation.  Each well can be fracked 18 times.  The waste of water alone is enough to cause droughts - which has indeed occurred across the Atlantic in Texas exacerbated by the fracking process.  The waste of water is nothing when compared with the dangerous usage of toxic chemicals which cannot but be leached into the soil beneath our feet.  The fracking process has been proven to contaminate the water table, thus introducing materials which are hazardous to health into the food chain.  There has been a wealth of research into the correlation of fracking and phenomena such as earthquakes and polluted water catching fire.  Again, as worthy as the activist protests against this criminal process are, unless the businessmen involved lose money as a result of imaginative and unpredictable disruption of fracking, they are ultimately useless.  In Lancashire, the local council listened to the people and banned fracking, only for the UK regime to impose it anyway, for the benefit of corporate share holders, against the wishes of the people directly affected.  A good analysis of the dangers of fracking can be found at:

Mass migration

The powers-that-be are destroying our ability to feed ourselves by means of bringing ever-more immigrants into our lands, and then using their presence as an excuse to concrete over arable land.  With the reduction in farm land comes the pre-prepared solution to this crisis, GMO technology.  This is no solution other than as a solution for the depots to the problem of free people who are able to feed themselves.  Fracking, of course, further industrialises the countryside, and no doubt will lead to a new era of land enclosures to remove the peasantry from our sacred soil.  There is a reactionary tendency to view the destruction of our land as the fault of immigration, but in truth, the immigrants are being used to divert attention from the economic powers who gain by our forced urbanisation.

In the UK there used to be a legal protection of fair land usage in the case of absentee landlords and owners.  This was known as 'Squatters' Rights'.  These rights have been stripped away, to the point where it is now illegal for a vacant property to be used as a living space.  In towns and cities up and down the UK, a staggering numbers of properties lay empty and in many cases they are falling into disrepair.  The numbers of properties are such that it would only take an Act of Parliament to compulsorily purchase these properties and then rent them out as social housing, to solve the so-called housing crisis in the UK.  This is something SMPBI wants to see.  There is no need for a single new home to be built in the UK.  With the number of properties lying vacant, even the armies of immigrants who are waiting at Calais, could be accommodated. Not that allowing further immigration is something anyone but the most insane bed-wetting liberal would consider a good idea, but nevertheless full use of the vast number of empty properties in our country would be sufficient to ensure there would be no homelessness in the UK.

Concreting over the land

Why then, is our land disappearing under concrete, as our town centres crumble?  Simply because the corrupt leaders in Parliament, Local Authorities and the Establishment, make a vast amount of money from new buildings, and consolidate their control over our lives in the process. 

Our land is sacred.  We are guardians of the soil, who have the duty to ensure it passes on to those who come after us, untainted.  We cannot tolerate GMO farming, Fracking, Building on green land, or any other action which further urbanises our country.  We need to reverse the process and ruralise the towns and cities by tearing down much of the urban sprawl and instead creating sections of farming land and recreational countryside.  That, however, can only be a long-term objective.  Right now we have to stop all attacks on the countryside which are currently under-way.  We have the power to do this, if only we can break-free from our subservience to the self-granted authority of the legal-financial rulers.  Imagination and determination will effect change; sit-down protests are as useless as the failed marches of yesteryear.

If we do not protect our land, the Ruling Class will do everything in their power to industrialise and urbanise every part of it (except the protected land where they reside).  They will continue to bring in more immigrants to make our territory a cosmopolitan fraction of the global materialistic superstate.  The total cultural genocide of our people can only be averted by fighting to not only halt the assault on all that is sacred, but taking the fight to the enemy, and defeating them in the only way they understand; financially.

The Spirit of General Ludd

The 'Luddite' approach to GMO farming is the only real alternative for 'rural protest'.

Hypothetically speaking, a neo-Luddite campaign would not only target the fields themselves, but also the buildings and machinery of the 'farms' in question.  Activists could resort to direct intimidation of the management and workers ('farmers') in a manner that was not uncommon in the late 18th and early 19th century.  Animal rights activists closed down an infamous 'Guinea Pig farm' a few years ago.  This sort of activism needs to be increased to protect the land itself - after all the countryside is still poorly policed and there is a distinct lack of CCTV, for now!

We are not advocating dragging hapless farm labourers from their tractors or running down beloved farm dogs, let alone opening every farm gate possible and cutting barbed wire or tearing up fence posts, but it could be imagined that some of our more 'creative' protesting folk would not refrain from such activity.

No doubt, the height of the harvest season would not be a good time for lanes to be blocked by chopped down trees; the needless killing of a mature tree would be senseless in the extreme. But it will be interesting to see what develops in the coming years. SMPBI cannot and will not condone any illegal acts, although the dire situation faced by our countryside is likely to inspire some to actions of a dubious nature.

Friday, 20 April 2018

It's Hitler's Birthday. Time for some Strasserism

Hitler was born on the 20th April 1889, making him 129 years old today. To mark the day, it is time to learn a bit more about the real National Socialists who were replaced by the Nazis under the direction of the birthday boy.

Our way is the Socialism of the Isles. But that does not mean we cannot have an interest in ideas from further afield.

Read the following to get an understanding that Social Nationalism / Strasserism / authentic National Socialism has nothing to do with the Nazis or the sad caricatures of today, the neo-nazis:


Gregor Strasser
Thoughts about the Tasks of the Future
1926 June 15

Lying on a sickbed for a few weeks and months does have its good side . So much that in the trivialities of everyday life does not get a hearing now has the chance to rise slowly from the unconscious to the conscious mind where it is tested and is winged by imagination, so that it acquires form and gains life . In general, people often make the mistake of assuming that practical action—the incessant preoccupation with daily necessities—is not founded in the mind . They therefore like to set up an invidious comparison between the thinker and the doer ! It is true that the currents of the mind and the soul do not become conscious when one is resolutely grappling with the tasks of the day and trying, by freshly setting to work, to solve all questions in a practical way !
So it is a comfort every now and then to have the leisure to look beyond the tasks of the day and of the near future and to plumb the depths of the question toward whose solution we are resolutely dedicating our life's work . When would this be better than during the many lonely hours of the sickbed, when the hands of the clock seem to stand still and the night never to end—until it becomes finally, finally morning again ! This new dawn, the fact that again and again the dawn comes, is the deep consolation, is the blessed certainty which makes the night of the present bearable for us—and even if the hours, years, never seem to end—the dawn does come, my friends, and the sun comes, the light !

Such thoughts of the lonely nights, thoughts about the National Socialist tasks of the future—I will briefly survey them here—such thoughts have surely occurred to most of our friends in similar hours and in a similar way—thoughts which at the moment are not yet the subject of our work, but whose undercurrents are flowing, whose blood runs through our work .

I. The Spirit of the Economy
We are Socialists, enemies, mortal enemies of the present capitalist economic system with its exploitation of the economically weak, with its injustice in wages, with its immoral evaluation of individuals according to wealth and money instead of responsibility and achievement, and we are determined under all circumstances to abolish this system ! And with my inclination to practical action it seems obvious to me that we have to put a better, more just, more moral system in its place, one which, as it were, has arms and legs and better arms and legs than the present one !
And yet it is not enough to change a system, to replace one economic system by another— necessary above all is a CHANGE OF SPIRIT ! The spirit which is to be overcome is the SPIRIT OF MATERIALISM ! ! We must achieve an entirely new kind of economic thinking, a kind of thinking which frees itself from the present conceptions rooted in money, in property, in profit and false success ! It is an indication of the Marxist, the false Socialism, that its way of thinking is exactly that of capitalism . For this reason I have said for years that the two form a spiritual unity, only with reversed signals ! National Socialism, which stems from organic life itself, casts aside the mendacious words of a theory remote from the world, as well as the dead ideas of a declining civilization !

We have to learn that in the economy of a people it is not profit. not gain, which are important—but only satisfying the needs of the members of this people ! ! This and nothing else is the task of a "national economics ! " We have to learn that the ideas "world trade"—"balance of trade"—"export surplus" are ideas of a declining epoch which have in the end reduced themselves ad absurdum, because they violate the eternal law of organic life and were born out of speculation, not out of necessity, not out of the soil ! We have to learn that it is a betrayal when speculative production, with all its means of touting and advertising, creates an artificial need, a betrayal of human labor, of human life ! For artificially stimulated covetousness creates ever-increasing aspirations, and increased aspirations double human slavery, which is slavery of the mind, which instead of the soul has taken up mastery over life ! What do people know today about life ? ! They run around and tire themselves out, torment themselves, strive and drudge like galley slaves—in order to lead a life of horrifying emptiness ! It is not that this new economic system which we want produces more. What is at stake is certainly not higher production, which Marxism demands, but the human soul ! ! And production, economy have only the one task: to meet the economic needs of individuals, rejecting goods which owe their demand only to artificial stimulation, rejecting also the prodding of "profit and gain" !

We have to learn that WORK IS MORE THAN PROPERTY ! ACHIEVEMENT IS MORE THAN DIVIDENDS ! ! It is the most unfortunate heritage of this capitalist economic system that all things are evaluated according to money, according to wealth, property ! The decline of a people is the inevitable result of the application of this standard, since selection according to property is the mortal enemy of race, of blood, of life ! We have never left a doubt that our national Socialism breaks this prerogative of the owner and that the liberation of the German worker shall also extend to SHARING PROFIT, SHARING PROPERTY AND SHARING ACHIEVEMENT! ! But it would mean measuring again with the old standards if one left it at that and did not stress that revolution of the spirit which guides us against the spirit of the present system ! We consciously oppose valuation according to property with VALUATION ACCORDING TO ACHIEVEMENT . This is the only valuation which we recognize ! ! We consciously place WORK higher than PROPERTY ! We focus on ACHIEVEMENT not dividends, and we recognize RESPONSIBILITY, not riches or splendor, as the crowning of human striving . That is a new world view, a new religion of economics . It establishes with certainty that the horrid rule of the golden calf is at an end and that the differences among individuals and the differences among rights—are differences in achievement, differences in degree of responsibility, differences which come from God and which are sacred ! !

II. The Spirit of Society and of the State

And just as our fight against the form of the capitalist economy is at the same time a fight against the spirit of this capitalist economy, which must he rooted out in its outward expression and in the heart of every individual; so our fight against the form of society and of the present state is also a life or death struggle against the SPIRIT of this society, this state : AGAINST LIBERALISM AND FALSE DEMOCRACY !

The spirit of our National Socialist idea has to overpower the spirit of liberalism and false democracy if there is to be a third Reich at all ! Deeply rooted in organic life, we have realized that the false belief in the equality of man is the deadly threat with which liberalism destroys people and nation, culture and morals. violating the deepest levels of our being ! National thinking gnaws at the basis of life itself, destroys the blood, destroys the sacred order which is based on the distance which is created by inequality and which has nothing in common with the present social structure ! For hierarchy, of which I am speaking here, depends exclusively on the achievements of the individual for the community . We have to reject with fanatical zeal the frequent lie that people are basically equal and equal in regard to their influence in the state and their share of power ! People are unequal, they are unequal from birth, become more unequal in life and are therefore to be valued unequally in their positions m society and m the state ! But this inequality in turn has only one standard can and must have only this one standard : the achievement of the individual for society, for the nation, for the state .

And thus I reach a demand which at first glance may seem utopian, but which results inevitably from what I have said, and which has occurred to various friends in a similar way . The demand for unequal distribution of rights according to achievement for the state requires the elaboration of a process of selection according to which such achievements are to be measured . In the folkish movement there is much talk about the emergence of a new group of leaders, and this demand touches what I said, but the ways which are recommended for a solution : these blood tests, Nordicization, and so forth, and so forth, appear to my practical mind somewhat dubious as to possibility, value and even effect ! Another way, however, a thoroughly German, Prussian way of which my friend Pfeffer reminded me on one occasion, is suited as no other : selection by the army !
This requires that military service be voluntary, a right and not a duty . The practical way would be that by law every German Citizen would have to serve the state for one year during this year he would not, as the supporters of a compulsory year of labor service want, build roads or do other mass work, but would learn a trade, so that there would not be a single German who had not had at least a year's training in a trade ! The selection of the best . however, would be reserved to the trade of arms, which would last for TWO years and therefore attract only those most willing to sacrifice and which would bring with it the mortal danger of war and therefore demand all the heroic virtues. Entrance is voluntary and not dependent on any force . Who doubts that those Germans who voluntarily apply for the army, which removes them from private life twice as long the civil service, which further does not, like the latter, include practical advantages for practical life, but on the contrary, after an infinitely more severe service, means danger to life in war-who doubts that these Germans would be the best of their people, the racial best, whose achievements for the state now and in the future would ...

Otto Strasser

I. The German Revolution denies before God and the world and obligation toward the "peace treaties" of Versailles and Saint-Germain, treaties based on the lie of Germany;s guilt and instituted through brute force, The German Revolution wages ceaseless and fanatic war, with all means, until it brings about the complete abrogation of these dictated treaties and all agreements based on them.

II. The German Revolution proclaims the freedom of the German nation in a strong German state which embraces all the German peoples of central Europe, and which, from Memel to Strassburg, from Eupen to Vienna, embraces Germans of the motherland and of the unredeemed territories, and because of its greatness and ability, for,s the backbone and the heart of white Europe.

III. The German Revolution refuses to rule over and exploit foreign peoples and nations. It wants no more and no less than sufficient living space for the young nation of Germans, and insofar as the fulfillment of this deepest natural right of life conflicts with the same right of other peoples and nations, the German Revolution recognizes the decision of war as the will of fate.

IV. The German Revolution declares that it is the sole purpose of the state to gather together all the forces of the nation and to employ them uniformly in guaranteeing the life and the future of this nation. It accepts every means which furthers his purpose an denies every means which hinders it.

V. The German Revolution therefore demands the harshest use of a strong central authority against all disruptive or disturbing organizations, whether political, party, or religious. The centralized state of the German nation binds together in the most powerful unity those forces which grow out of regional and particularist traditions.

VI. As an appropriate extension of the high tasks of the state, the German Revolution gives free scope for the development to the forces of occupational self-government, which have been inhibited and suppressed by a lifeless liberal system. It values the living organization in professional and occupational chambers above an artificial parliamentarism, just as in anything and everything, it values the personal responsibility of leadership over the irresponsibility of an anonymous mass.

VII. The German Revolution proclaims that the German nation is a community of fate. But it is aware that a community of fate is not only a community of need but also a community of bread and therefore affirms all of the demands which follow from this recognition according to the fundamental principle: "The common good before the individual good."

VIII. The German Revolution therefore rejects the individualistic economic system of capitalism; and the overthrow of capitalism is the prerequisite to the success of the German Revolution. With the same decisiveness of the German Revolution affirms the corporative economic system of socialism, processing from and concluding with the knowledge that the purpose of any economic system is solely the satisfaction of the needs of the nation, not riches or gain.

IX. The German Revolution therefore declares its superior property right in all land and mineral rights. Landowners are only leaseholders of the nation, and are accountable to the nation and to the state, because the nation as a whole defends the property.

X. On the basis of the same right, the German Revolution proclaims the right of all workers to share in ownership, profit and management of the economy of the nation, which every folk comrade serves. His personal share in property, profit and management id either earned or limited by increased output, greater responsibility. The German Revolution knows ad recognizes the motive force of personal interest, but incorporates this force into a larger machinery for the good of the nation.

XI. The German Revolution sees this good of the nation neither in the accumulation of material goods, nor in a limitless improvement of the standard of living, but exclusively in the recovery and maintenance in the health of that God-given organism, the Nation. Only thus can this German nation fulfill the task entrusted to it by fate.

XII. The German Revolution sees this task as the full development of the unique folkish character and therefore fights with every means against racial degeneration or foreign influence in culture, and for folkish renewal and purity, for German culture. This fight applies particularly to the Jews, who, in combination with the international powers of freemasonry and ultra-Montanism, are destroying, partly compelled by their nature, partly internationally, the life of the German soul.

XIII. The German Revolution therefore also fights against the rule of Jewish Roman law and for a German law which has the German and his honor as its axis and consciously affirms and values the inequality of man. This German law recognizes as citizens only folk comrades and measures all according to the good of the whole.

XIV. The German Revolution overthrows the world view of the great French Revolution and shapes the face of the twentieth century. It is nationalistic - against the enslavement of the German people; it is socialist - against the tyranny if money; it is folkish - against the destruction of the German soul - but it is all of these only for the sake of the nation. And for the sake of those nation for the German Revolution recoils from no battle, finds no sacrifice too great, no war too bloody, for Germany must live!Thus we youths feel the heartbeat of the German Revolution pounding, thus we front soldiers see the face of the near future before us and experience, humble-proud, the role of the chosen ones, to fight, to win the battle of the twentieth century, satisfied to see the meaning of the war, the Third Reich.


And of course, it would to be remiss to leave out the man who replaced national SOCIALISM with the form which ended in the destruction of Europe in 1945.
Hitler: Founder of Israel

Thursday, 19 April 2018

The Windrush Generation: Hated by the Tories for being a committed section of the Working Class

by Saxbey

We must stand shoulder to shoulder with those  that have contributed towards our national working class  institutions, our trades unions, our football clubs, our health service as opposed to those that mock the very idea of our society.

In the neo-liberal society that Thatcher created and has increasingly taken hold since the 1980s in these isles, particularly in the urban areas, atomised individualism has wrought havoc.

Enhanced by the destruction of the manufacturing base of the economy, working class collective institutions were denied their relevance and meaning. The family unit is now openly mocked, traditional parenting seen as "uncool" as the self indulgent musings of the Hampstead crowd filtered down to the less expensive parts of town. This  has denied our youth the support is needs. Along with this, the gun culture travelling across the Atlantic  has introduced a poisonous ingredient to the dysfunctional brew from which our present society. is forced to drink.

This has unfortunately particularly manifested itself amongst the young of the black working class because big city kids of any background have always had the winner/loser capitalist dichotomy thrust under their noses in the severest form.  This has historically been tempered by the institutions of family, locality, class. Yet no longer. However, urban youth in the metropolis has sought it's own collective institutions, ones far less positive than those of their parents and grandparents in nature, the results have been heart breaking to witness.

Now this! Further proof, if any were needed that Britain is not a community, but a "people mill", continually churning, a revolving door where if you don't conform  to the neo-con geopolitical agenda, goodbye.

The future of this country must be the healing of this country, it will not be found in the boardrooms of corporations, or the offices of foreign governments, but in our own autonomous institutions.