Showing posts with label Revolutionaries not Reactionaries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Revolutionaries not Reactionaries. Show all posts

27 September 2018

Party Slogans can say more than they want to!

The main parties of the British Isles all have slogans which they feel convey a message of what their intentions are.  The slogans tend to be short and to the point, but they often convey more than the authors desire.

The Liberal Democrats are, for some unfathomable reason, considered important players in Westminster.  There slogan is: 'Demand Better!'  We couldn't agree more - Demand Better than these sad deluded degenerate middle class idiots!  The 'rats have taken to cosying up to the would be dictator, Gina Nadira Singh - Miller: an egomaniacal individual, born in South America to Asian parents, she lost a court case trying to block the will of the British People to leave the European Union, and now uses the Lib Dems as a vehicle to thwart the UK democracy.  The rootless, globalist, globe-trotting bigot is at home with the Lib Dems, because like her, they too have no respect for Sovereignty and the decision of the Working Class to make Britain a free nation.  Demand Better indeed!

The Greens (whoever they may be), also get disproportionate media attention, in spite of being a Brighton and Hove party, with no support outside a very strange area of England.  The trans-fascist party is all for opening the borders and ending the existence of the UK.  Of course they are anti-democracy, openly calling for Brexit to be overturned.  Their slogan is 'For the Common Good', which fits perfectly with their policies in being vague, dull and nonsensical.

The Tories have an unofficial slogan of 'A Global Britain', which is an open statement of a desire to destroy the sovereignty of the UK, and turn it into a tax haven for Global Capitalists, and a plantation for the Working Class, who will see our already pitiful standard of living, crushed as the natural protections to our well being are smashed, and our country becomes unrecognisable as a part of a Globalised nightmare devoid of Culture, Tradition or any sense of Britishness worth the word.

Labour have the equally odious slogan, 'Rebuilding Britain For the Many', Not the Few, which is designed to give the impression that they care about the Working Class and are going to weaken the power of the parasitic Ruling Class.  Labour want to throw open the borders, build on every inch of Green Belt land, and do to the UK exactly what the Tories are doing.  The vile racist, Dianne Abbott, points to the future for the Working Class if she and her trotskyite partners-in-crime became the government, and just who the 'Few' are that they are against.  Unlike the sly Tories with their pretence of respecting the EU Independence Referendum, Labour are now openly calling for a Second Referendum, to bully us into staying in the grips of the Globalist Bloc, as a stepping stone to Total Capitalism Worldwide, with all borders obliterated and all peoples reduced to servitude.

The parties in Wales, Scotland and both sides of the division line in Ireland, also have slogans, which have the same desire of hoodwinking the people into thinking that the politicians are going to stand up for the people, rather than sell us all out to Globalisation.

There is only one party with a slogan which is honest and states exactly where the party stands.  That party is the SMPBI:

13 September 2018

The English Civil War (1642-1649)

Detail from the statue of Oliver Cromwell by Sir William Hamo Thornycroft RA, unveiled outside the House of Commons on 31 October 1899. Photo Loz Pycock (CC-BY-SA 2.0).

A war unique in our history: a remaking of our country was fought not only on the field of war but also in people’s hearts and minds…

There have been power struggles before and since among rich elites or between rival aristocratic houses. The English Civil War was entirely different, actively involving whole swathes of society normally excluded from control.

In England, Charles I’s reign witnessed rising discontent almost from his succession in 1625. Costly, failed wars led to inflation and taxation. Religious reforms were unpopular and seen as taking the country towards Catholicism. And there was an underlying sense that the country was not being ruled in the best interests of its people.

Bankrupt

In 1640 Charles summoned parliament. He was bankrupt, but wanted to raise an army to suppress opposition in Scotland, where he was equally unpopular. The House of Commons in the Long Parliament (as it became known) represented a cross-section of the ruling class establishment: gentry, merchants, lawyers. But almost for the first time in English history, elections were contested on political issues.

The real strength of those opposed to the king in the House of Commons came from outside parliament, across a wide cross-section of society. Generally support for parliament came from the economically advanced south and east of England, whereas the king’s support came from the economically backward areas of the north and west. In Yorkshire, Lancashire and Sussex, there was a clear division between parliamentarian, rebellious industrial areas and royalist agricultural areas.

There is no simple reason why opposition to the king and his ministers moved from protest to armed revolt in the First Civil War (1642-46). It is likely that popular discontent over a range of different political and religious issues produced such a heady and powerful mix that trust in the king and his government totally collapsed. The “humble respect and awful reverence which is usually given to nobility, gentry and clergy”, as Edward Chamberlayne put it in 1672, crumbled in these tumultuous times.

Memorial near Skipton, Yorkshire, to one of the heroes of the Civil War. Photo Workers.

In November 1641 parliament passed the “Grand Remonstrance” setting out their many grievances against Charles. The king’s next move was disastrous and prompted open revolt. He went to parliament with a body of soldiers intending to arrest the five leading members of the parliamentary opposition. Warned beforehand, they had left the Commons by the time Charles arrived. The king’s bungled attempt at a coup made them heroes.

King Charles left London and shortly began to raise an army against the rebellious parliament. In turn, parliament decreed that they did not require Royal Assent to make laws, taking control of local militias and a growing volunteer army. And so in 1642 war began.

Dissatisfaction about the conduct of the war led Oliver Cromwell setting up the New Model Army in 1645. Its composition was unusual, including a broad cross-section of society in contrast to armies elsewhere at that time. The broader social origins of its soldiers provided literate, argumentative soldiers with easy links to friends in civilian political movements.

The first armies of both sides had been formed largely of volunteers. Although diluted by conscription from the second year of the war, this sense of fighting for a cause they believed in remained a strong factor amongst parliamentary armies, and was transferred to the New Model Army.

Organised

The New Model Army was disciplined and well organised, averse to looting. Quite soon promotions to officer rank were on merit rather than social rank. It took a major political battle in parliament to ensure acceptance of these forms of military organisation.

Parliamentarian forces eventually gained the upper hand and in May 1646 Charles surrendered to the Scottish army. He was handed over to parliament when the Scots withdrew from England in January 1647.

‘THE OFFICE OF KING WAS FORMALLY ABOLISHED ON 17 MARCH 1649.’

In April 1647 parliament tried to disband the New Model Army but failed. Soldiers refused to disband. After months of dispute with parliament, they declared, “We were not a mere mercenary army” and would not disband without settlement of both their own grievances (including arrears of pay) and the people’s political and religious liberties.

In June 1647 a troop of 500 cavalry seized the king and brought him to Newmarket where the rest of the army was. In August the army occupied London. That October the Council of the Army, with representatives of the rank and file as well as officers, debated the settlement of the kingdom, known as the Putney Debates. They even discussed An Agreement of the People, a manifesto produced by radical Levellers.

The escape of Charles from detention brought the debates to an end and opened the Second Civil War. The New Model Army had to put down scattered mutinies and then fight a Scots army enlisted to support Charles. That was defeated in August 1648, ending the war.

Tyrant, traitor

Charles I was put on trial in January 1649. Condemned as a “tyrant, traitor, murderer, and public enemy to the good people of this nation”, he was executed on 30 January. The office of king was formally abolished on 17 March.

After the Putney debates the heyday was over for the Leveller cause. The momentum of the republican side veered towards the wealthy, anxious to protect the interests of property. Gradually the New Model Army became ever more a professional body and the days of sermons, lectures, leaflets, agitators and citizens in uniform passed.

The Levellers, Diggers and Ranters disappeared from view and lost their impact on the public arena. But the English people’s view of the world had changed forever.

Related Content
Capital vs. workers
Devolution – a failed idea from a failed era
Let's get on with leaving
The NHS at 70: all to play for
The great betrayal? Don’t let the EU steal our fish

Re-published with Permission from, and Thanks to, the CPBML

21 August 2018

The Fight Against Trans-Fascism is a Fight For Decency


Trans-Fascism is a serious danger to Society.  Lesbians have rightly pointed out that the obscene 'Cotton Ceiling' ideology is a misogynistic (potentially rapist) attack on Women who do not want to have sex with Men - putting pressure on them to do so with the threat of accusation of 'transphobia'.  Transphobia is a nonsense word, but like so many before it, is destined to become a punishable 'hate crime' in the liberal dystopia we live under.  There is a very real possibility that Lesbians who do not submit to sex with men in dresses, could be hounded from jobs, and even arrested as hate criminals for not allowing themselves to be raped.


Children are the target of Trans-Fascists, with the liberal indoctrination system of 'school' sending in trans terrorists to corrupt their minds, and the media pumping brainwashing propaganda into their minds via the TV and 'music' industry - all of which, of cause, is designed to create more confused individuals, who declare themselves to be 'non-binary' (another nonsense term) and ready for genital mutilation.


Effeminate Gay Men are Men, just as Butch Lesbians are Women.  To say that people with traits associated with the opposite sex are trapped in the wrong body and need surgery to become aligned with the right one, is profoundly homophobic.


Men suffering from autogynephilia get aroused by cross-dressing, and/or fantasise about having sex as a woman.  This fetishism usually is expressed as transvestism, and it harms no-one.  The Trans-Fascists have appropriated Transvestites into their 'spectrum' of 'transgenders', promoting the idea that if a man likes to dress as a woman (usually in clothing associated with prostitutes, and hardly flattering to women), then he IS a woman, and needs surgery to align him to the right body!


Lesbians, Gays, Transvestites, Children - all are under attack.  The sexualisation of children to make profits in surgery and for hormone companies is a form of paedophilia.  Adults are being bombarded with so much propaganda that it has become normal for people to say 'they' and 'their' when speaking of a single individual.  For children, the impact of the Trans-Fascist agenda, is to break their mental health and make them easy prey to the Trans Industry - an industry which has the full cooperation of the music industry, news and entertainment media, school system, law, government, and more besides, in grooming them just as all paedophiles groom their victims.


Fight back. Educate yourself, your friends, your family, about the Trans-Fascists and what they are doing.  Stop the Trans-Fascist Paedophile Terror.


Below is a good source of literature for you to study. The folder contains a range of printable stickers and leaflets aimed at fighting the Trans-terrorists.  The UK Thought Police do not want these stickers placed in Women's spaces (Toilets, Make-up Shops, Women's Changing Rooms in Clothes Shops, Women's Refuges/Shelters, Women's Changing Rooms in Swimming Baths/Gyms) or in places such as Schools, Council Offices, Shopping Centres, Bus/Rail Stations/Shelters, or in fact anywhere at all (especially places with CCTV).  The police state mentality has now made it dangerous to distribute literature in the form of stickers, unless you are wearing a hoodie and finger-print protecting gloves and carry bottled water to apply stickers rather than DNA-rich saliva. The information below is for your own education, so with that in mind, download and make use of the material for your own interest:

Download Printable Arsenal for Education

18 August 2018

Who are the Terrorists? Mark Rowley knows...


Establishment mouthpiece, Mark Rowley (former chief of thought police at the London Metropolitan police force), has taken to the UK regime's BBC propaganda service, to declare that childish fantasists who like to meet in secret and talk about Hitler, are a threat to the UK!  Childish sad little boys with a Hitler fetish are not terrorists - they are as dangerous to the UK as Steam Railway enthusiasts, or Bird Watchers.  Their hobby is just a hobby, and the former Met Terror Chief (Terrorist Chief?) is trying to make them appear more than they are.  He is an expert in Terrorism, because he has worked for an organisation which thrives on it...

If terrorism can be defined as actions and threats which cause an individual to live in fear, terrified of what may happen, then perhaps rather than looking at people obsessed with a period of history in a far away land, we should look closer to home to find who the terrorists are.

At school we were told horror stories of the Gestapo coming for people when there were no witnesses, and spiriting them away to be held whilst systematically abusing them with threatening questions.  Is not the notorious Nacht und Nebel but a historical form of the Police's preferred method of pulling people from their beds at 3 o'clock in the morning, and taken them against their will for interrogation using a form of torture which relies on intimidation and sleep deprivation?

No, apparently, that is British democracy in action.

The Surveillance State with its highly visible CCTV, and paid informers does not deter criminals, but rather alongside boosting the sale of hoodies and sun glasses, makes the people acutely aware that they are being watched.  This is tantamount to imprisonment without charge, and the supposition that every one is 'up to something'.  Isn't this destruction of freedom a form of terrorism?

No, it is a tool for keeping us safe.  How thoughtful!


Spy planes and military drones overhead, ready to attack at a moment's notice.  Surely this is terrifying if one cares to think of the damage these drones are capable of.  The recent attempt to murder the President of Venezuela in a drone attack, highlights the potential of these new weapons.  The British State is quite happy to murder the common people, such as was the case at the Peterloo Massacre two centuries ago, in the Irish Famine, or in the deaths of over 1400 people at the hands of the Metropolitan Police alone in recent years.  The uniformed and plain clothes thugs of the State do not think twice about beating ordinary UK subjects, and are more than happy to shoot people dead in cold blood.  The taser-armed, cs-equipped, more frequently fully armed violent thugs of the UK Police do not inspire respect, they breed fear (terror).

According to the Establishment's propaganda wing, the BBC, Big Brother loves us, and we should love him, her, it (better not be 'transist', lest using the word 'Brother' brings the Thought Police a knocking).  The Police only beat us because we have been naughty children and dared to ask for more than the scraps of the table, whilst the ruling class get richer by squeezing the people into absolute penury.

If we are fighting a war against terrorism in countries which didn't have any problems with us until the Government which claims to represent us started bombing them, then surely we must live in much freer countries thanks to our military efforts?

No?  Then surely, the surveillance and draconian policing which now extends to incarcerating people for comments left on Twitter and Facebook, must have improved our lives somehow?

It has not.

The real terrorists are the ones reading posts like this from their desks in Menwith Hill and Rugby.  They are the ones who silence free speech in order to ensure no-one offends anyone by having any opinion whatsoever which hasn't been officially sanctioned in Whitehall and the City.  They are the ones who impose taxation and fines for behaviour which harms no-one, isn't immoral, and is only criminal thanks to their deciding it is.  Putting the wrong rubbish in a recycling bin is a serious offence you know.

If the real terrorists are in the service of the Crown (which they are), then just what the hell are our military doing in the Middle East, Asia and Africa?  'Our' military are training foreigners to become new terrorists in the service of the Crown and global finance.  'Our' government are making the world a more dangerous place for everyone including ourselves by a combined strategy of terrorist warfare and total surveillance and restriction on thought.  Terror at home goes hand in glove with terror abroad.

If this is true (which it is) then by doing nothing, we are accomplices to terror.  We have to say no to the Police State, NATO, and the City of London.  The horrors committed by the State which dares to use our name to hide behind, will only get worse as the enemy gains more control.  We have to fight back, using all peaceful means at our disposal.

We need to stop supporting our enemies by silently accepting their rule.  The real terrorists sit in Whitehall and the City.  If we are to escape a life of fear we have to root-out those who misrule this country.  Then the world will be a safer place, and life will be better for everyone.  Even if motivated by improving only our own lives, we have to do something.

So what can we do?

Join the SMPBI and build the Revolutionary Patriotic Socialist Movement.  Don't let gobshites like Mark Rowley get away with their lies.

The Met is pushing nonsense that hobbyists are dangerous, all the while undermining resistance to the imminent arrival of real terrorists who have been murdering in Syria for global finance imperialism.  The Al Qaeda front, White Helmets, are being brought to our shores, with the fresh blood of Syrians murdered on the orders of people who Rowley has supped tea with, still on their boots.

The terrorists we have to fear, sit behind desks in government and police stations. It is the task of Revolutionaries to clean them out and build a Socialist future where their memories will be spat upon, and where their like will never again be allowed to occupy the soil of the British Isles.

28 July 2018

Revolutionaries do not wait for a starting gun. We build the future Now.



"Give me control of a nation's money
and I care not who makes the laws."

- M Amschel Rothschild,
patriarch of the Rothschild Family.


The Rothschild dynasty are the bankers of the global elite. In little over two centuries, the family have amassed half of the wealth of the entire Earth. Clearly they are an important part of the global capitalist network, but just a part.

There is a very real globalising agenda, which, if it is to succeed, must see the end of sovereignty for every nation, replaced with the complete interdependency of every part of the world. To paraphrase Amschel Rothschild, all one needs to do to control a nation politically, is to control it financially.

In 2001, there were only seven nations in the world with central banks which were not overtly controlled by the globalist banking cartel. The seven nations which had not succumbed were Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria and the Sudan. In 2004 the globalist mafia's military apparatus, the Armed Forces of the USA and UK, oversaw the establishment of a Rothschild Central Bank in Iraq, having previously established one in Afghanistan. Having invaded and occupied both nations, the US-UK axis handed over financial power to the private banking cartel - both nations had previously had banks owned in the national interest by the State on behalf of the people. The destruction of Libya in 2011 completed the capture of the Libyan Central Bank.

As of now, in the western hemisphere, only Cuba is still free of the Rothschilds' grip. In Africa only the Sudan has control of its own central bank.. In Asia, Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Syria remain financially independent. It is no coincidence that the nations subject to hysterical propaganda and under constant military threat are the very nations which are not subject to the diktat of the globalists in the form of their financial elite, the Rothschilds.

Not every nation has a central bank, so ascertaining how far the tentacles of the global banking infrastructure reach is not a simple task. The poisonous vipers of the Rothschild dynasty have become the key economic presence in practically every nation in the world. When one considers that the International Monetary fund and Bank of International Settlements belong in the Rothschild stable, the dominance becomes almost absolute.

What are freedom loving peoples to make of this economic control grid? The professed ideologies of the nations with Rothschild central banks cover the entire left-right spectrum. The concepts of left-wing and right-wing are illusions concocted in the temples of Freemasonry to divide the people into rival camps - camps which they control. The truth of this can be seen by the fact that nations which are avowedly communist sit side by side with those which profess to be the ideological opposite. The presence of the same banking cartel in nations which are 'enemies' (at face value) betrays the reality that the political classes are mere puppets dancing to the tune of the same financiers, who themselves are little more than instruments in the force for absolute global control by the state-less corporations.

We should now be awakening to the fact that politicians are bought and sold as readily as whores in the red light district. We need to distance ourselves from people who play the political game but seek to reform the economic structure. We need to think beyond the banking system and to take positive action to disengage from the financial system wherever possible.

The ideal economic system for a free nation is one which is built upon Social Credit and Distributism, within a framework of Guild Socialism, Syndicalism and Cooperatives. This is a plausible and practical alternative economic system which considers the the well-being of the Working Class of the utmost importance. In contrast to the sticking plaster measures of those who are stuck in the Party System (whether through ignorance, naivety or self-serving egomania and greed), the economics of Distributism do not require the election of political puppets for their implementation. A system which sees the exchange of goods and labour as a fluid and natural mechanism (rather than as a Usurious exploitative act of materialistic theft), is what is needed to break the power of the bankers, and to thereby loosen the grip of the international mafia enough for us to throw off their shackles permanently.

What Distributism entails is a redistribution of ownership. Wealth based on the accumulation of money is a trick played by the banking elite. Money is created at the stroke of a key, and pursuing wealth is as futile as pursuing the wind. Certainly the illusion of the lifestyles of the rich and famous is one which has been gullibly accepted by the downtrodden masses as something to envy.

In Berkshire and Lewes, and indeed in many places across the globe, the phenomenon of local currencies is growing as people come to understand that the present banking system is simply a fraudulent mechanism for extracting money from the workforce and concentrating the real wealth of the nation in the hands of the banking mafia. Money is created out of thin air in the Fractional Reserve System, thus meaning banks take no risk whatsoever when giving out loans. However, when the banks decide to contract the economy and call in the phantom loans, those who are unable to meet the loans must pay with real goods, properties and/or businesses which are seized by the banks. The local currencies are not built upon Fractional Reserve, thus the weapon of inflation-deflation cannot be used against the public. Community banking takes the Rothschilds and their ilk out of commerce. Without usury, they have no power.

In North Dakota (USA) the State Bank is responsible for issuing currency. Unlike the other 49 States, North Dakota is not tied to the Federal Reserve and as a result the State is flourishing, whilst the rest of the USA is in economic meltdown. The fact that an entire State is functioning very well without the 'help' of the Rothschild's cartel proves that economic freedom at a national level only requires throwing the usurers out of any position of power. If North Dakota can do it, every nation in the world can do it.

Breaking free from the present system is not the stuff of fantasy. From the examples above we can see that economic freedom is not an issue of wishful thinking, but is attainable - and is in many places, for many people, a fact. We are held in our financial servitude through media manipulation. Every time we watch a current affairs programme on the Television or read a 'newspaper' we are confronted with fear mongering, and with pressure to consume more luxuries. We are conditioned to believe that economics is the reserve of an elite who are intellectually superior to ourselves, and that we should not even think of there being an alternative to the status quo. This is simply a lie. It should come as no surprise that Reuters, (which supplies the majority of the world's news) is owned by the Rothschilds. No serious criticism of the Rothschilds or of the banking system will ever be allowed by the media for as long they control it. The wall of silence regarding these matters is a calculated weapon of the globalists. People who delude themselves into thinking that by reading a variety of newspapers or watching a selection of news sources, they are getting to see the big picture free from media bias, need to think again. The entire mass media is in the pockets of the Rothschilds. A good first step in the march to freedom is to turn off your TV, and leave it off.

We have the power to take back control of our finances. We need to actively participate in local currencies, Credit Unions and Labour Exchange Trading Systems (LETS). We need to stop supporting our oppressors; we need to disconnect ourselves from their financial web. Once we have built the momentum, the economics of usury will collapse and a new system of mutual support and social justice will fall into place. By building the post-revolutionary society now, we can outflank the capitalists.  The Revolution will be complete when we have banished capitalism and the bankers from our shores, and we have to start that process now.

Let us take Amschel Rothschild's words to heart, and let it be us that control our own money, and all that stems from it.

16 June 2018

The Post-Revolutionary Society has to be built Now


Why is the world suffering from the machinations of the global capitalist mafia? What has happened to us that has allowed these inhuman monsters to gain such power over our lives? It seems that not many years ago, although intrigue was afoot, the world at large was for all practical purposes immune to the drive towards the global gulag. So what happened to weaken our natural immunity? Why did we let our mortal enemies get the upper hand?

This is indeed a tricky question to answer. It could be suggested that the reason our hidden masters have such power is that we perceive them to have this power. What has changed is that we now have a mass media which presents a false image of the world to us, and by owning that media, our enemies have convinced us that we are powerless to halt their 'progress', and that we really shouldn't waste our time trying to.

The printed word, which offered the opportunity for a great spreading of knowledge, has become a medium for the spreading of ignorance and falsehood. To an even deeper extent, audio, and visual media, have become a source of power for those who seek to control us. This is because the human brain works in sounds and pictures and absorbs more information if presented in a manner which mimics natural interaction and experience. Thus the advent of Hollywood and television has proven to be highly significant in influencing how the world is perceived and how this perception is reflected in how people behave in reality.

Our enemies control the media. They own every major outlet, either directly, or directly by being hold the purse strings through advertising. Thereby, they are the editorial power - deciding exactly which issues will be discussed, and in which manner, and which will be ignored. People who speak of revolution are deluding themselves - the media as it exists is in the hands of the globalists, and so long as they have financial power, that is where it will rest.

'Money', in the form we have come to know it, is an illusion. It is produced at the strike of a key on a computer, and from that moment on exists as a generator of debt. We cannot compete with the globalists by trying to become financially more powerful in the conventional sense, as they control the money supply and can create currency at will. What we have to do is look beyond the playing field that has been concocted for our enslavement, and work in reality, rather than in illusion, refusing to play their game and support their agenda.

How do we escape the web which has been spun for us? The media constantly tell us that we cannot. Well, we can. A key step in our struggle for freedom is to stop listening to the lies which are used to imprison us. How many people watch television from the moment they get home, to the moment they go to bed? Some may convince themselves they are 'selectively' viewing and that by filtering out what they consider the most harmful programmes, music, films etc, they are safe from the influence of the mind controllers. This is rubbish! The powers-that-be are far from stupid. They have created levels of control - some obvious, some subtle - but all designed to manipulate the viewer/listener. The obvious mind control is deliberately obvious, so as to allow the participant of the media circus to consider him or herself to have discovered the game and dodged it. 'I don't watch the soaps, I only watch history documentaries' etc - if this is you speaking, you haven't escaped the mind programming, you have actually embraced it more than those who watch all the drivel on the TV, as you believe what you watch to be fair and unbiased. the solution? Turn the machine off, put it in a cupboard, and when the withdrawal symptoms have worn off (It is an addiction - you will experience withdrawal), bin it!

Freeing your mind from the media is but one step in the march to freedom. It is, however, the most important step. Once you are 'clean' of the media poison, you will come to realise that the media are really powerless. they gain control over us because we invite their toxic propaganda into our minds. Once we no longer partake of their lies, they have no power at all. 'But what will I do if I don't have a TV?' you may ask. Think about that question - what will you do, other than stare at a box in the corner of your room? For a start you will NOT stare at a box in the corner of your room! You will Not be programmed to be a servant to the machine - eating your meals at certain times so you can watch the programmes you just MUST see! You will be free to leave your home and live in the real world. You will be free to talk to your loved ones - about things which really matter. You will be free to explore your desires, to explore the world and to enjoy your imagination. In short, you will be free to begin living in a manner of your choosing, not in the manner designed by those who seek to control you.

This is but the first step. Once you have made yourself aware that the media control is a lie, you will begin to see concrete ways to live outside the wider control of the ruling elite - and then we will take back our power from the minority who rule us, and take back our freedom. Their power is the power we give them. We have to take it back!

As Revolutionary Patriotic Socialists forging the path of Economic and Social Liberation, we have to change ourselves from victims of the system, into combatants who stand outside the system - not combatants in the stereotypical guerilla warrior style, but combatants in the manner of people who have freed ourselves from the control of the enemy.  Fighting in chains is futile. We must first of all break those chains.

The chains of forced labour can be broken by engaging in cooperative labour with like-minded people, self-employment, or other forms of labour which are not part of the trap of exploitative wage-slavery.

The chains of staring at the tv can be broken by using the tv as a monitor only, and only watching that which is not a part of the controlled media propaganda.

The chains of neediness can be broken by learning and practicing self-reliance in all areas where we can do things for ourselves - as individuals and as groups of people united in comradeship and friendship supporting and helping each other.

The first step on the road to freedom comes in freeing ourselves.  This is the beginning of Revolution. As we free ourselves, we become better able to help others onto the path to freedom, and in this way we build the resistance and create a network that exists outside the control of the liberal tyranny.  We need to build the Socialist Republic now, so that when the capitalist system implodes, we already have a better way in embryo, which will be the foundation of the future. And of course, from the strength and security of that network, we can do all we can to hasten the collapse of the hated system of exploitation.

26 May 2018

The Abortion of Ireland's Future is a Crime of Global Capitalism


George Soros is a sick and twisted individual. But more than this, he is the face of the Global Ruling Class.  Wherever there is something wrong on a national and global level, the Soros Foundation is nearly always involved.  The Irish Abortion Referendum is no exception.


In Ireland, the people were given a 'referendum', with the media using every programme, 'news' item etc to create the idea that if the people voted to keep the 8th Amendment, then it would be misery for Women in Ireland, and that if they voted to repeal it, suddenly the world would be a better place.  The 8th Amendment protected unborn Irish children and encouraged men and women to be aware of the consequences of a hedonistic lifestyle. 


The result of the referendum is to 'normalise' abortion in Ireland. Now, just as in the UK, unborn children can be murdered because they are an inconvenience. The justification for killing children is that they get in the way of a 'career', a 'lifestyle' or any other irrelevance.  The despicable Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, is crowing that just like in the UK, Ireland will now be free to slaughter at will, which will reduce the Irish population and allow the likes of Varadkar to use this to globalise the country as the fall in population necessitates an influx of new people: people with no allegiance to Ireland; people who have a global identity; people who are pawns in the capitalist war against sovereignty.


The result today is a disgrace. The Globalist Taoiseach is cock-a-hoop at the fact that Ireland has lost an extremely important defence against Globalism.  Ireland's children have lost their rights to life.  The media on both sides of the Irish Sea are painting this as a 'historic victory' - but for whom is it a victory?  Not for Children, not for Families, not for Women. It is a 'victory' for the destroyers of sovereignty, for the abortion industry, for the cell stem Burke and Hare scientists, for all who can profit from the use of dead babies and from the consumerist lifestyles which require abortion on demand. 

Today is a sad day for Ireland.  The real victories of the 1916 Easter Rising, the formation of Eire, the great patriotism of James Connolly, the Revolutionary zeal of the Irish Citizens Army, the hope for an Irish Future - all these have been betrayed by a regime led by the enemy of Ireland, Leo Varadkar, and those who have paid him well to sell the unborn children of the nation to the butchers of capitalism.


Ireland and Britain need to unite to overthrow the scum in the Dáil and Westminster, and to honour the words and deeds of the Revolutionary Patriots who fought against the Global Ruling Class.  Let Varadkar's victory be short-lived, and a lasting Revolution sweep across the Isles with the blood of the enemies of the Working Class, not the blood of the unborn.

18 May 2018

The Monarchy Are Our Oppressors: Republic Now!


The Peoples of the Isles are a hard-pressed people. In many ways we as a people are an example of what the globalists have in store for the world. We have been manipulated by our rulers to the point that we take pride in what has been done to us, and what we have done to others at the behest of our rulers. In true Orwellian style, we have come to love Big Brother.

How did this sorry state come to pass? How did the people of the Norse Eddas, mingled with Rome, Germania, and the truly magickal people of the Celtic nation, become so subservient to the Ruling Caste that not only do we not revolt against our oppressors, but we actively persecute those who can see the reality beyond the pantomime? How did the British become the engine of the globalist machine which is destroying every people and culture on the planet, replacing them with a beaten-down mass of organic robots, with no allegiance to anything except self, materialism and survival?

To understand how debased the British and Irish have become, we need to go back to a time to pre-British days.  For the purpose of focus, we need to look at England, rather than Britain, and to a time when being English was a badge of honour. The nation of England was born with the fusion of the smaller nations which had occupied the land prior to unification.  England existed as a sovereign land until 1066 when the 'Normans' invaded. Led by William the Bastard, the Norman conquest saw England reduced to a vassal of a foreign power. The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom which had gradually been forged with the admixture of Angles, Saxon, Jutes, Celts and other kindred European peoples was subjected to a new regime, which rather than blending with the general population, imposed its will by means of harsh persecution and butchery of all who refused to accept the new overlords. This tragedy in the history of the English was unparalleled in its brutality by any invasion prior or since. Even the horrors inflicted upon the Druids by the Romans paled in comparison with the slaughter unleashed by the Normans and those who collaborated with them.

Following the Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxon England was changed forever. The traditional organic moot system of government was replaced by the feudal system. Whereas before, leaders ruled with the consent and approval of a cooperative people, under the new system, rule was imposed by fear and the use of barbarity and cruelty of truly Biblical proportions. It was with the arrival of the cosmopolitan Norman ruling elite that the divisive class system was introduced. The spiritual quality of the nation was undermined with the wholesale butchery of the spiritual elders (labelled as Witches for the purpose of justifying murder). The Anglo-Saxon language was likewise attacked, with French being imposed as the official language of commerce and government. The French tongue trickled into the vernacular of the masses creating the hybrid language which evolved into the English spoken today.  It is ironic that Welsh Language activists speak of the degradation of Welsh by the Anglo-Saxons, when the Anglo-Saxon tongue itself was brutalised by the Norman Ruling Class tyrants.

The hatred for the French-speaking elite has been passed down through the generations in folklore. Anyone who knows the story of Robin hood will know that he was a native of Yorkshire who led raids upon the lackeys of the establishment, and then redistributed the wealth thus obtained amongst his impoverished Anglo-Saxon kinsmen.  His is a story of Socialist heroism in the face of an unbeatable economic occupation - which we still have to fight.  Across the channel in France, the same hated establishment so persecuted the native population that in time they rose up and beheaded those who ruled them and claimed to be French. In England, a similar uprising did not occur until it was all but too late. A hatred of all things French bedded into the popular culture, which was ironic, as the real French were as much victims of the establishment oppressors as were the English - in classic divide and rule style, the focus of animosity was targeted against a linguistic group, not against the true enemy who happened to speak their language. Certainly, the Royal Family in England were deposed, but during the short-lived Commonweal of Cromwell, the tyranny of the state was accelerated to the point that the hated Royals were given back the position of authority which they had enjoyed before the revolt. The ruling class did not experience the same justice as their brethren across the Channel and for them the English Republic was but a brief break in overt control.  Had Cromwell been a better leader, perhaps the Republic would have held, but religious obsession was the ruination of what could have been.


In the run up to the regime of the puppet Republic, the Royals ensured that their control was extended to the farthest reaches of the nation. Contrary to the romantic myth, the Royals were hated by the general population who understood them as outsiders who had stolen the Crown by massacring those who stood against them.

In the first series of English Civil Wars - Wars which has become known as the War of the Roses - the 'French' elite fought against their 'Welsh' cousins for mastery of England. The bloodshed was such that to this very day there is animosity between the counties of Yorkshire (the White Rose) and Lancashire (the Red Rose). The War served only to advance the agenda of the Royal dictators. Foolish Englishmen from Yorkshire and Lancashire still hold a burning hatred for one another for the crimes committed by the rulers they still champion. It is one thing to honour our dead ancestors, but an entirely different matter to revere the butchers whose blood lust and power-mania was the sole cause of their deaths. With the defeat of the Plantagenets, the ruling power passed to the house of Tudor. The Tudor dynasty hailed from Wales. Ironically the Tudors were as harmful to the English as the faux-French monarchs they replaced, and even more harmful to the Welsh, who they subjugated entirely.

Akin to all the despots who have ruled England, Henry VIII was a cruel and twisted tyrant, infamous for splitting the Church to satisfy his lust. A man obsessed with his own selfish interests, this gluttonous oaf was a serial adulterer and murderer. Married to Catherine of Aragon, he allowed his lust for Ann Boleyn to go before the needs of the nation he ruled over. Confronted by a woman who refused to allow her body to be used as he saw fit in an adulteress manner, the sex-obsessed egomaniac ordered his lackeys to annul his marriage - in spite of the fact that there were no acceptable grounds for this. The Pope had no choice but to excommunicate Henry the heretic. The despicable Monarch soon tired of his new 'wife' and in due course ended his officially sanctioned cohabitation ('marriage'). Ann Boleyn was, unlike Catherine of Aragon, not the daughter of a powerful Monarch, so he had no need to fraudulently annul the arrangement - he simply had her beheaded - ostensibly for incestuous adultery which ironically was classed as treason. Henry VIII went on to divorce another 'wife', and behead another. Such was the glorious beginning of the Church of England.

Henry VIII may have been the man responsible for rift between the English Monarchy and the Roman Catholic Church IN England, but it was his daughter, Elizabeth, who created the Church OF England as a separate entity. The entire justification for the founding of the Church was to legitimise the adultery, divorce and remarriage of Henry VIII. From this one event followed centuries of persecution of Catholics, across every part of the Isles, but notably in Ireland.  There was stiff resistance in the early days of the C of E, and it took the insane tortures ordered by the Ruling Class (Royal and Cromwellian) to break the will of the people and make them submit to the Monarchy as 'divine' heads of the State.  From this brutal beginning, the power of Monarchy, the value of goods and money above the common people, paved the way for the descent into Capitalism and all the suffering that abomination was to cause.

Queen Elizabeth was in every way as evil as her namesake of modern times. It was during her reign that the pirate ships of her criminal navy terrorised the high seas, murdering and stealing for the benefit of the Crown. It was also during her reign that the Francis Bacon led a team of writers who wrote the plays attributed to the actor, William Shakespeare. These plays are a perfect example of political censorship, in that they falsified history in order to create a positive image of the ruling elite. These plays which are celebrated as masterpieces of English literature and art unfortunately also have obliterated knowledge of our true history. George Orwell's description of the revision of history with the truth disappearing down the memory hole was not merely a pseudo-prophetic analysis of the potential for manipulation by a coming elite, it was actually describing events which have already unfolded. The Elizabethan era saw the Establishment of the English Empire, and its accompanying Secret Police as created by John '007' Dee. We have been mis-educated in the school system to look back at this period as a great time for England. In truth it saw the birth of a despotic empire which murdered generations of Englishmen in the pirate navy, and the slave fields. If any point in history can be seen as the moment when the English became nothing more than cannon fodder and slaves to the ruling class, the Elizabethan era was that point. The descendants of the Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Celts never recovered from the Norman occupation and the capture of the State by the Tudors. They allowed a false jingoist patriotism to pervert them from being a family-centred people, into Empire-worshipping materialistic bigots.

As England and then Britain was turned from a natural society into a materialistic sewer, those who dissented were beaten into submission by a tyrannical Army and Police State. The natural reaction of the people should have been to revolt against an armed force killing our brothers and sisters. Instead the people rallied behind the troops at massacres such as Peterloo. When the Luddites who protested against the mechanisation of production and the destruction of childhood (with children dying in massive numbers in mills unfit for any human presence), were murdered by the establishment, the people did nothing. As the industrial era progressed and the English Empire became the British Empire, the common people rallied to the rag of their oppressors, proudly flying the Union Jack and celebrating the butchery in Ireland and across the globe. Press-ganging, slavery (first of Englishmen, then of the Irish, then of Africans) was treated as nothing to complain about, the rule of the elite via barbaric punishments such as exiling the hungry to prison colonies in Australia for the crime of trying to feed themselves and their families - these and other signs of the sickness of the elite were ignored, and later celebrated.

During the reign of the insane butcher, Victoria, and into the Twentieth Century the establishment fought a succession of Imperialistic wars of aggression, against the Dutch and German farmers (Baueren/Boers) in southern Africa, and against continental Europe in the Great War and Second World War. The people, so befuddled by generations of subservience to the Ruling Class tyranny raced to 'join-up' to increase the wealth of the Royal and Bourgeois classes. Those who had the wisdom to see that the wars were acts of pure evil, solely for the enrichment of an inhuman elite, were slandered as cowards and shot for refusing to participate in the carnage which destroyed the humanity of those who fought.

The demise of Britain and Ireland was finalised with a cowed and despondent public sheepishly embracing the post-war Europe and allowing themselves to be stampeded into the EU prison state. Why did they allow this? Simply because being the product of generations of psychological and physical abuse at the hands of a criminal elite, it was all they knew. Just as an abused child expresses its love for the abuser, so the abused British express their devotion to the Monarchy and their hatred for those who expose this diseased family and seek its overthrowal.

Pity our damaged nation. Nothing short of a revolution will save us now.  This weekend, the Ruling Class are having another wedding which the cowed monarchists will celebrate.  They are unwittingly celebrating a brutal oppression which has lasted nearly a thousand years.  In Ireland, our Brothers and Sisters are being stampeded into voting to murder their own children as the 8th Amendment of the Irish Constitution is almost certain to be repealed.  On both sides of the Irish Sea, the Ruling Class are mocking us.  The problem is the same - it is the submission to the Capitalist distortion of humanity; it is the failure to realise that we have to stand up and build a unified Proletarian Republic in which People Matter and Money is a tool, not a master.   We can make a difference by highlighting the lies of the Ruling Class, and building a United Republic of the Isles where Monarchy no longer exists, and where the idea of a family with untold wealth having its wedding paid for by people who have to struggle to feed themselves and their children, is never tolerated again.

17 May 2018

Royal Wedding? A Parasitic Celebration Paid for by Us

Even though the majority of the people of the Isles are bored rigid by the 'royal wedding' of Meghan Markle and Harry Whodunnit, the media are pushing the wedding of a pampered posh-lad and an actress (who is acting the role of her life to get her snout in the trough) as if it matters to the entire world!  The only part of it that matters to the Working Class is the cost - which we will have to pay through taxation, even though the groom is part of the Ruling Class family which has more money than many entire nations.

At this occasion, it is worth re-visiting the great Patriotic Socialist, James Connolly, in a speech he made on the visit of George Windsor (not related to Harry, but Great-great Grandfather of Harry's half brother, William) to Ireland in 1911.

5 years after making the following speech, although mortally wounded fighting for the People, he was judicially murdered by the regime of George V for the 'crime' of wanting to be free.  What he said was correct in 1911, and is correct now; What he did in 1916 was heroic, and even though under the Taosieach, Leo Varadkar, his courage is spat on through the deliberate crushing of the Irish Working Class, it remains an inspiration.  Bring on the Republic!



Fellow-Workers,

As you are aware from reading the daily and weekly newspapers, we are about to be blessed with a visit from King George V.

Knowing from previous experience of Royal Visits, as well as from the Coronation orgies of the past few weeks, that the occasion will be utilised to make propaganda on behalf of royalty and aristocracy against the oncoming forces of democracy and National freedom, we desire to place before you some few reasons why you should unanimously refuse to countenance this visit, or to recognise it by your presence at its attendant processions or demonstrations. We appeal to you as workers, speaking to workers, whether your work be that of the brain or of the hand – manual or mental toil – it is of you and your children we are thinking; it is your cause we wish to safeguard and foster.

The future of the working class requires that all political and social positions should be open to all men and women; that all privileges of birth or wealth be abolished, and that every man or woman born into this land should have an equal opportunity to attain to the proudest position in the land. The Socialist demands that the only birthright necessary to qualify for public office should be the birthright of our common humanity.

Believing as we do that there is nothing on earth more sacred than humanity, we deny all allegiance to this institution of royalty, and hence we can only regard the visit of the King as adding fresh fuel to the fire of hatred with which we regard the plundering institutions of which he is the representative. Let the capitalist and landlord class flock to exalt him; he is theirs; in him they see embodied the idea of caste and class; they glorify him and exalt his importance that they might familiarise the public mind with the conception of political inequality, knowing well that a people mentally poisoned by the  adulation of royalty can never attain to that spirit of self-reliant democracy necessary for the attainment of social freedom. The mind accustomed to political kings can easily be reconciled to social kings – capitalist kings of the workshop, the mill, the railway, the ships and the docks. Thus coronation and king's visits are by our astute never-sleeping masters made into huge Imperialist propagandist campaigns in favour of political and social schemes against democracy. But if our masters and rulers are sleepless in their schemes against us, so we, rebels against their rule, must never sleep in our appeal to our fellows to maintain as publicly our belief in the dignity of our class – in the ultimate sovereignty of those who labour.

What is monarchy? From whence does it derive its sanction? What has been its gift to humanity? Monarchy is a survival of the tyranny imposed by the hand of greed and treachery upon the human race in the darkest and most ignorant days of our history. It derives its only sanction from the sword of the marauder, and the helplessness of the producer, and its gifts to humanity are unknown, save as they can be measured in the pernicious examples of triumphant and shameless iniquities.

Every class in society save royalty, and especially British royalty, has through some of its members contributed something to the elevation of the race. But neither in science, nor in art, nor in literature, nor in exploration, nor in mechanical invention, nor in humanising of laws, nor in any sphere of human activity has a representative of British royalty helped forward the moral, intellectual or material improvement of mankind. But that royal family has opposed every forward move, fought every reform, persecuted every patriot, and intrigued against every good cause. Slandering every friend of the people, it has befriended every oppressor. Eulogised today by misguided clerics, it has been notorious in history for the revolting nature of its crimes. Murder, treachery, adultery, incest, theft, perjury – every crime known to man has been committed by some one or other of the race of monarchs from whom King George is proud to trace his descent.

We will not blame him for the crimes of his ancestors if he relinquishes the royal rights of his ancestors; but as long as he claims their rights, by virtue of descent, then, by virtue of descent, he must shoulder the responsibility for their crimes.

Fellow-workers, stand by the dignity of your class. All these parading royalties, all this insolent aristocracy, all these grovelling, dirt-eating capitalist traitors, all these are but signs of disease in any social state - diseases which a royal visit brings to a head and spews in all its nastiness before our horrified eyes. But as the recognition of the disease is the first stage towards its cure, so that we may rid our social state of its political and social diseases, we must recognise the elements of corruption. Hence, in bringing them all together and exposing their unity, even a royal visit may help us to understand and understanding, help us to know how to destroy the royal, aristocratic and capitalistic classes who live upon our labour. Their workshops, their lands, their mills, their factories, their ships, their railways must be voted into our hands who alone use them, public ownership must take the place of capitalist ownership, social democracy replace political and social inequality, the sovereignty of labour must supersede and destroy the sovereignty of birth and the monarchy of capitalism.

Ours be the task to enlighten the ignorant among our class, to dissipate and destroy the political and social superstitions of the enslaved masses and to hasten the coming day when, in the words of Joseph Brenan, the fearless patriot of '48, all the world will maintain:

'The Right Divine of Labour
To be first of earthly things;
That the Thinker and the Worker
Are Manhood's only Kings.

12 May 2018

The Atomisation of Capitalism Must be Swept Aside for the Unity of Socialism


Capitalism is wrecking the World.  Whether it is in the form of the military destruction of far-off (and not-so-far-off) lands, or the undermining of Workers' Rights and theft of pay (through hidden taxes and higher cost of living), Capitalism is a destructive force.  The decline of a balanced human-centred world hasn't happened over night, but it certainly has accelerated in recent years. Apologists for the modern malaise will argue that those of us who object to the replacement of the mixed economy with pure vicious capitalist misery, are 'dinosaurs' who yearn for a golden age which never existed. They are wrong. We object, not out of some misplaced romanticism, but out of an understanding of the bigger picture. We understand that the death of our way of life is not a natural and inevitable event, but is rather a carefully calculated assault on us which aims to remove all obstacles to the complete globalised slave state which the ruling class have been constructing for hundreds of years and which they foolishly believe they are near to realising.

The assault on our society and our ability to defend ourselves is the more pernicious because it comes from within. To be more accurate, the assault is organised by the self-serving bourgeois class who have manipulated an entire sub-section of society so that it carries out the work which they are numerically unable to do. Social engineering has wrought more damage than any foreign invasion or war ever has. Our demise has been stage managed by those who consider themselves to be in authority, but are mere lap-dogs of the real Ruling Class.

How have the mis-rulers forced their agenda upon us? There are many methods they have used, but most notable have been the campaigns to control people economically, spiritually, and mentally, all of which are inter-weaved.

Economically, the Establishment have taxed the population to the point where those who work are financially crippled. The income tax system punishes those who work more many hours in the futile attempt to gain enough money to be comfortable.  By taking more and more money from the workers, the Establishment ensures that the vast majority of them are denied financial independence. The Establishment, of course, create 'money' and thereby are separate from the rest of us who must work until we die, just to survive. Certainly some people are able to retire at a relatively young age, but they must still sacrifice most of their lives in order to achieve a semblance of financial security - and this is only for themselves; the following generation is pulled back into the work-trap and must live in economic serfdom.

At the lower end of the economic spectrum are the shiftless underclass. These come in different forms. There are the involuntarily unemployed, and those who choose to live at the expense of the workers. The very term unemployed means unused - and points to the thinking of the Establishment. Employment has become synonymous with manipulation. In the past, people worked in order to provide for their own. They worked the land on small-holdings and bartered with artisans for luxuries. This noble and honourable form of living is mocked as the lifestyle of the peasantry.  The Peasants have been replaced by wage-slaves and the Lumpenproletariat - the latter of whom are a growing burden on the hard-taxed former.

The Lumpenproletariat are a thorn in the side of the majority. This is by design. By reducing the character of the Working Class to a mockery of its true self, the need to live in compassion and cooperation has been replaced by a completely unhealthy and destructive ethos of greed and selfishness.  The Lumpens exist because they have been deliberately nurtured in order to destroy those who hold true to our real values and sense of worth.

The process of smashing the self-respect and mutual support which has been the strength of all humanity, has been a long one. The healthy system of the Guilds was shattered with the coming of industrialisation and 'the Protestant Work Ethic', which made a virtue out of wage-slavery. With the ascension of Capitalism to a position where those who suffered under it were so manipulated as to see it as a positive thing, the next stage was to implode the economy and remove the comfort afforded by the economic system which - imperfect as it was - was still responsible for the addressing the ills afflicting the people.

Through manufactured war and the globalist agenda of relocating industry and other forms of work to far-flung parts of the world, the self-sufficiency of every nation was smashed. Accompanying this was the massive movement of people across the globe, removing a sense of belonging, and making people interchangeable units in the capitalist machine. This reduced people from members of a distinctive nation, with a strong sense of culture, spirituality, family, and kinship, into atomised consuming individuals. The final stage was to destroy any sense of pride in personal achievement, and replace the dignity of labour with a pride in idleness. This was achieved via the Welfare State which was officially created to protect the masses from hardship, but, as with all political phenomena, in true double-speak, served to drag people into a dependent state of subsistence living, with a harsh taxation system making it economically senseless to attempt to live by working, rather than on benefits.

With an entire strata of society being born into the Welfare system, it then became necessary to destroy any respect for civilised behaviour and decency. To this end, the legal system has been turned into a mockery of justice. Punishment for crime was gradually reduced in severity, under the lie of 'human rights', to the point where all deterrents were removed. Pop music, films, and the news media were manipulated to glorify violence and crimes against people. In contrast, crimes against the Establishment are ceaselessly pushed in the popular media as abhorrent and unacceptable. To this end, anything which can be twisted into being misrepresented as an attack on Zionism has become a focus of evil, with the recent ludicrous case of Mark Meechan being arrested for making a video of his girlfriend's dog responding to words which can only be considered offensive when taking out of the context of a comedy video. 

The legal system attacks those who attack or mock the Ruling Class, but it lets those who attack the People go unpunished. Bleeding hearty liberals employed as Probation workers, Prison Governors etc have made prisons so lax that they no longer are a deterrent. The prisons are now so overcrowded that Courts are ordered by the State to only remand people in exceptional circumstances. Instead, criminals are tagged electronically and given curfews - thus allowing them to continue their criminal activities hindered only by having to be at home for set periods (usually night-time). They may also have to give urine samples for drug analysis once a week, and undertake a couple of hours unpaid work per week. It really does prove how lax the Prison system is that criminals will offend over and over whilst on a non-custodial Court Order in order to be incarcerated for a couple of weeks to quash the Probation requirements! They WANT to go to prison! But why wouldn't they? In prison they have access to more heroin, crack etc than they could dream of outside, they do not have to do any work at all, and must be provided with leisure and educational facilities. For many people, Prison accommodation is preferable to that which they have in the real world, and it is a great place to network with other criminals.

This year, London has seen more people murdered than New York.  A city where guns and knives are illegal, is awash with both.  Due to the laxist liberal 'justice' system, people are being murdered every week, and the media comments in passing, because this is a symptom of the atomisation of the nation, and this lack of respect for humanity is the new norm.

The Lumpen class which has emerged as a visible strata of society did not appear over night. However, since the 1960s when the Trotskyite Frankfurt School Revolution really began to bite, the rise of the dregs of humanity to prominence has proceeded at an alarming rate. The Frankfurt School has attempted to destroy nations by destroying people.  It has succeeded in creating generations of liberals, but it has largely failed in the Working Class, and it is us who will overthrow the bourgeois despots with a Revolution of Sanity.

Those who have become trapped in the Welfare System by no fault of their own must be helped by being encouraged to work outside the system - indeed we must all find ways to trade with one another and work without exchanging the fiat money which feeds the Capitalist machine.  Capitalism has ruined our lands; it has ruined every land.  The fight against Globalism has to be fought - ironically - globally, by reaching out to Socialists Worldwide.  We don't need or want a Trotskyite Internationalism, but a real Socialist Inter-Nationalism, which will put family, security, self-reliance, and respect at the heart of everything.  The days of liberal dominance are coming to their end, and we must do all we can to speed their demise.  A Socialist Future awaits us.

27 March 2018

Yes to Assimilation, No to Invasion


Immigration is an emotive issue. Amongst the indigenous peoples of Europe, the rapid influx of non-Europeans as a result of the EU's porous borders encouraging people to flee from the terrorist atrocities of NATO and the IMF, has become an issue which has created a lot of anger - both on the part of those who oppose immigration, and those who welcome the newcomers.

Immigration has resulted in the break-down of social cohesion as wholly different cultures have arrived en masse. A common argument by the defenders of immigration is that countries such as the UK and Ireland were built of waves of immigration. This is true. However, the immigrants arriving from the European mainland tended to arrive in small enough numbers to be absorbed by the country as a whole. That is not to say that they did not impact upon the culture of the British Isles.  One only has to look at the regional differences across and within every part of the Isles to see the result of the blending of the original Britons with the European mainlanders.  However there is a unity which binds us all together. We are descended from different branches of the same European stock. The people of the British Isles were moulded over centuries of limited incursions, gradually adapting and building upon the new influences.

Immigration post World war Two has none of the qualities of the productive immigration which preceded it. Whereas the immigration of the past was gradual, the immigrants since the 1950s have come in huge numbers. The make-up of the immigrants has also been radically different. Whereas in the past the invaders shared a common European culture and common religion (Pagan or Christian), the new immigrants have none of this commonality. They come from across the globe, having their own distinct cultures, identities and religions. Another difference is that due to the scale of the new types of immigration, the newcomers have had no need to adapt to the country to which they have come; they establish self contained communities which do not integrate or even attempt to assimilate with the host population.

Why has this come to pass? Is mass immigration proof of how wonderful the Capitalist system is in the British Isles that everyone wants to live here?  Hardly! Is life that hard outside Europe that people are fleeing to wherever they can? No, that isn't the case either. Certainly there are countries where life is tough, but as can be seen with many of the so-called refugees who divide their time between living in the British Isles and in their hoe countries, fleeing from destitution, war or persecution is not the reason for the majority of those who come to our shores. What is it then?

Money! The reason immigrants are coming to our lands in their millions is financial. How can this be? Quite simply, the Governments of Europe (the UK and Ireland included) are subsidising the invasion. Newcomers are given preferential treatment in housing. They are allowed to work within their own communities, paying less tax then the indigenous population, in some case no tax at all and claiming benefits as well as working. Not all of the newcomers indulge in tax-dodging and benefit fraud, but a sizable proportion do. This is not because they are 'dishonest thieving tax-dodging scroungers', as the hysterical media would have one believe; it is because they are allowed by government to live that way.

The media are happy to sell their 'news'papers by putting stories of immigrants taking advantage of the good-will of the nation. This fuels feelings of hostility in the indigenous population. This in turn creates protest. How do the government deal with this? They enact legislation forbidding people to question the presence of alien ghettos. They classify anyone who objects to the breakdown of societal cultural cohesion as a 'racist', then using manufactured and controlled 'Nationalist' Parties they focus upon how evil are those who do not want their country to be balkanised. The likes of Globalist billionaire, George Soros fund faux anti-racist groups (AFA) to fight the fake Nationalists created to discredit resistance to Government manipulation of immigration as a means of destroying services and cutting living standards. Using the tired propaganda of the Holocaust, they whip the anti-racist groupings into wild hatred of anyone who declares him/herself an opponent of the cuddly one-world agenda. When people point to the fact that the Holocaust is as big a piece of state propaganda as the 9/11 lie, the government have them arrested and incarcerated. On top of this, they radicalise the newcomers to manufacture race-riots.

Why would the Government do this? Why do the British Government fund, train and arm the Islamic State / Al Qaeda terrorists who they then let back into the country after ensuring they are practised killers?  Why did the Government of the USA murder 3,000 Americans in New York, 11/09/01? Why did Zionists orchestrate the bombing of supply lines to the Concentration Camps in war-time Europe to kill interned Jews by starvation and disease? Why did Israel create Hamas to murder ordinary Jews going about their daily business? The answer is, to further the agenda of Open Borders Globalisation.

When there were individual free nations of Europe, the populations had a common identity and an instinctive national pride. National Pride is a safeguard against globalism. The Zionist elite orchestrated the World Wars to break the cultures of the individual nations.  They created a feeling of guilt for the days of Empire, even though the people at home were as oppressed, if not more so, than the people in the colonies. Then they used all the false guilt of Empire and Holocaust to make the indigenous populations accept mass immigration. Anyone who objects, we are told, is a Nazi and an Imperialist.

The new immigrants to Europe were brought here by government deliberately to be used to create social disunity. Colonies of culturally distinct people being seen to be given preferential treatment over the tax-paying indigenous people, have been used as pawns in a global chess game. Nationalists and Anti-Fascists have been duped into attacking one another over the presence of these colonies. All the while, legislation upon legislation has been passed to restrict freedom of speech. Ostensibly this has been to protect 'minorities' from 'discrimination'. In reality it has been to condition the population to understanding that the Government has a right to dictate what one is allowed to say or think.

For the Reactionary Racist Right, Immigration is about 'Johnny Foreigner' coming to our shores to steal our women and our wealth.  This is fantasy.  Immigration is really is about dividing the people and rendering them unable to defend themselves against Globalism. The immigrants are not to blame for taking advantage of circumstances which allow them to live better in our countries than at home.  This is especially the case when the terrorists of NATO/Al Qaeda/Islamic State are destroying the countries they leave behind. It is the Ruling Class who have used them who are behind the problems immigration has contributed to. The presence of culturally distinct in our midst is dangerous. The anti-Islamic red-herring is being used to whip the Muslim communities into a murderous frenzy against the non-Muslim host. When the bombs drop in Pakistan, the blood of Muslims and non-Muslims alike will flow in the streets in Europe. This is already occurring with the rape epidemic, which is really a culturally-charged assault of people who are deemed inferior and deserving of such sickening abuse.  The ideology of multiculturalism ensures that the foot-soldiers of Antifa and their children will suffer the same fate as the Nationalists and theirs.

We must stop the Globalists. The solution to Globalism is Social Nationalism/Patriotic Socialism  This is a world apart from the skinhead racist stereotype which is used against all who believe in Sovereignty.  Racial hatred is a tool of the Globalists, used to make opposition to their goal appear to come from hatred of others, not love of freedom.

Gradual immigration leads to assimilation and to newcomers adding to the culture of the motherland they come to join.  Mass immigration creates distinct colonies which sit physically in our lands but act as barracks of an invading force which if allowed to grow becomes capable of undermining our culture and potentially wiping us away.  We cannot and will not tolerate the manipulation of immigration by Global Capitalists and liberal idiots as a means of breaking down Sovereignty and making the creation of profit for the Ruling Class the be-all and end-all of existence.

We must help the masses of the alien colonies in Europe cannot assimilate to resettle in their own homelands.  Gradual Immigration is a natural thing which can be genuinely beneficial, but until the mass immigration invasion has been reversed, the borders must be closed.  We must reject all those who would encourage hatred due to differences. The Global Diversity of Free Sovereign Nations is the only cure for the disease of anti-culturalism /multi-culturalism.  Only Socialism in One Country can bring Freedom to us all.

23 March 2018

A Question of Administrative Organisation for the Isles

Question
What about Parliaments and Assemblies will you abolish them or will England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland each have their own Parliaments?

Answer
The entire administrative organisation of the British Isles is a mess. Tinkering with the structure is pointless.  What is required for the old system to be junked and a new system put in its place.

So what are the alternatives?

  • Devolution with overall authority resting in London
  • A Yugoslav-style Rotation of Capitals
  • Syndicalist Popular Assemblies feeding into a Central Government
Devolution

Devolution is the current system.  This method has seen the rise of separatists in Scotland and of wannabe separatists in Wales.  It has also encouraged the anti-English bigotry of the ridiculous Mebyon Kernow fanatics.

Devolution weakens the centre and creates divisions based on geography.  In the British Isles there has long been a toing and froing across areas which were historically distinct nations. 

The people of Ireland were once known as the Scotti, and through their migration the land of Alba became known as Scotland.  Of course the Picts remained and became intermingled, making it futile to claim that there is a 'pure' Scotsman, whether of Pictish descent of of Irish. 

The border between England and Scotland has shifted many times. Edinburgh was once a city in the old country of Northumbria, akin it a part of the north of England. The old country of Strathclyde stretched through the Lake District and included an area which is now called Lancashire.  Try telling Edinburgh folk they are really English!  Try telling Lancastrians they are not! 

Wales as it is today includes areas which were populated by the Irish (ironically the anti-English fanatics in Plaid Cymru's northern strongholds have more in common with the Irish who came before the English, than the Welsh to the south of them). Chunks of Wales were populated by the Normans.

In the areas known as England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland, people have intermingled so that if any such thing as a 'pure' angle, saxon, jute, norman, norseman, pict, briton existed, that is no longer the case.  We are all inter-related.  To divide us by geography is pointless, yet that is exactly what Devolution does.


A Revolving Yugoslav-style Administration.

In Yugoslavia, the Presidium ruled.  There was no single President - although in practise under Tito, it was he - and the leadership moved from region to region, with each part taking its turn to be the centre.

Kosovo was one of the regions (the others were Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Vojvodina, Serbia, Macedonia). Kosovo was always a flash-point, and following the death of Tito, it became a place plagued by riots. The structure of Yugoslavia held together only for as long as there was no opportunity for it to change. When Slovenia split away, the other regions quickly followed, with the resulting wars and the NATO interference which wrecked that part of Europe.  Yugoslavia was organised in a manner not dis-similar to Devolution, and it fell apart rapidly when the bonds of unity were finally dissolved. 

A Yugoslav style system for the Isles, with the capital shifting from city to city, would be Devolution on a higher scale, and would inevitably see the country fall apart.


Syndicalist Popular Assemblies - Our Preferred Option

A system is possible in which the people select one from amongst them at street level, to act as delegates to represent them all. The delegates at that level form the next tier of representation as district/parish level, and from these a delegate is represented to go to the next level; the process repeated until a National Popular Assembly is formed in which the system of delegated representation means that the people at street level from everywhere, have a say.  At every level, a delegate who does not represent the people, but acts for himself, can be removed instantly.  This can be considered Syndicalism outside the Workplace and of course would be joined by Workers' Councils set up in the same manner.  A Centrally-focused Syndicalist Popular Assembly constructed in such a way could be the embodiment of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat which we need to banish exploitation and division.

This model does not allow for divisive regionalism. Every area has the same worth as every other. The idea of the people of Gwynedd demanding from government at the expense of the people of Lincolnshire, or the politicians of Ulster getting more due to a corrupt deal with London, becomes unthinkable.  The people work as one, each contributing according to ability, each receiving as according to need.

But where would the Capital be?

Regionalism has created many problems. The people of Ireland would not tolerate the Capital of the Isles being London. For that matter, to close down the Assemblies in London, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Parliaments in Dublin and Edinburgh, but leave the Parliament in Westminster in operation, would be unacceptable to everyone.  People outside London resent all the wealth and power being concentrated in the southeastern corner of the country. People in the very southeast (Kent) resent their county being impoverished even as it sits next to the capital.  Government in London has to be ended.

Oddly, the administrative centres of Scotland (Edinburgh) and Wales (Cardiff) are in the southeast of each region, and in Ireland Dublin sits on the eastern coast, as indeed does Belfast. Coincidental of course, but still odd.  What is not a matter of irrelevance, is that the people of England resent London, the people of Wales despise the concentration of wealth in Cardiff Bay, and the same goes for the others.  None of these places are suitable for an Administrative Centre for the region they sit it, let alone for the Isles.

The system of Assemblies requires a centre - a single centre, not a rotating one, not a collection of devolved ones.  As we have seen, the current cities which have Assemblies or Parliaments are no good as locations for a central administration. They are resented locally and to give them more authority would be a grave injustice.

We propose that the Central People's Assembly be located in an area which is geographically central for all the peoples of the Isles.  That area is the Isle of Man.  The Island sits between England, Scotland and Ireland, and is only a short trip from Wales.  The Island would benefit from having the Administration of all the Isles moved there, and no-one in the Isles across the sea in any direction has any problem with that area.