Socialism is the past, Socialism is the future.
It is an aberration that Socialism is not the present.
We are here to correct this tragedy.
We fight for a Free British Isles: a Socialist British Isles.
Our vision is the British Isles of Social Justice: the British Isles of National Freedom.
It is the British Isles freed from Capitalism, Liberalism & Trotskyism.
The main parties of the British Isles all have slogans which they feel convey a message of what their intentions are. The slogans tend to be short and to the point, but they often convey more than the authors desire.
The Liberal Democrats are, for some unfathomable reason, considered important players in Westminster. There slogan is: 'Demand Better!' We couldn't agree more - Demand Better than these sad deluded degenerate middle class idiots! The 'rats have taken to cosying up to the would be dictator, Gina Nadira Singh - Miller: an egomaniacal individual, born in South America to Asian parents, she lost a court case trying to block the will of the British People to leave the European Union, and now uses the Lib Dems as a vehicle to thwart the UK democracy. The rootless, globalist, globe-trotting bigot is at home with the Lib Dems, because like her, they too have no respect for Sovereignty and the decision of the Working Class to make Britain a free nation. Demand Better indeed!
The Greens (whoever they may be), also get disproportionate media attention, in spite of being a Brighton and Hove party, with no support outside a very strange area of England. The trans-fascist party is all for opening the borders and ending the existence of the UK. Of course they are anti-democracy, openly calling for Brexit to be overturned. Their slogan is 'For the Common Good', which fits perfectly with their policies in being vague, dull and nonsensical.
The Tories have an unofficial slogan of 'A Global Britain', which is an open statement of a desire to destroy the sovereignty of the UK, and turn it into a tax haven for Global Capitalists, and a plantation for the Working Class, who will see our already pitiful standard of living, crushed as the natural protections to our well being are smashed, and our country becomes unrecognisable as a part of a Globalised nightmare devoid of Culture, Tradition or any sense of Britishness worth the word.
Labour have the equally odious slogan, 'Rebuilding Britain For the Many', Not the Few, which is designed to give the impression that they care about the Working Class and are going to weaken the power of the parasitic Ruling Class. Labour want to throw open the borders, build on every inch of Green Belt land, and do to the UK exactly what the Tories are doing. The vile racist, Dianne Abbott, points to the future for the Working Class if she and her trotskyite partners-in-crime became the government, and just who the 'Few' are that they are against. Unlike the sly Tories with their pretence of respecting the EU Independence Referendum, Labour are now openly calling for a Second Referendum, to bully us into staying in the grips of the Globalist Bloc, as a stepping stone to Total Capitalism Worldwide, with all borders obliterated and all peoples reduced to servitude.
The parties in Wales, Scotland and both sides of the division line in Ireland, also have slogans, which have the same desire of hoodwinking the people into thinking that the politicians are going to stand up for the people, rather than sell us all out to Globalisation.
There is only one party with a slogan which is honest and states exactly where the party stands. That party is the SMPBI:
In the struggle for freedom, it is vital that we fight the real enemy, and do not get drawn into attacking those who are used as human shields. We need to distinguish between the real architects of our plight, and those who may be associated through kinship or locality. Our enemies have no qualms about sacrificing the common people in order to gain more control.
A particularly problematic issue is how to differentiate between our active enemies, the sleepers, and those who are genuinely not a part of the problem. There is an undeniable Zionist dimension to our problems, discussion of which invites accusations of anti-Semitism. This is a trap for to silence criticism of the Ruling Class, and it is a trap we must be careful to not fall into. There are those who regard appealing to ordinary Jews to join in the resistance to the globalist order, as nothing short of treason. Those who believe that all Jews are intrinsically bad, and all Gentiles good, have obviously watched too many films of the Cowboys and Indians variety. There are many Zionist megalomaniacs who are not Jewish, and there are many Jews who do not seek to enslave humanity. It is important to not accept the way of thinking which the media, and those who would lead us, would like to spoon-feed us.
As British citizens, we must appreciate that the deeds of the Establishment do not reflect the will of all the people. The Ruling Class method of silencing those who oppose the rulers has the ridiculous result of labelling those who oppose the tyrants who sit in power over us, as self-haters, and terrorists. We do not hate ourselves or our people; only the vermin who misrule in our name. The label 'self-hating' conjures imagery of a mirror-smashing, possibly self-harming, loathsome creature who is wracked with feelings of inferiority and disgust, and who probably is justified in these feelings. This label works well in preventing ordinary people associating with, or even listening to, someone they perceive as ill, and possibly as contagious. However, when one looks behind the character assassination, more often than not, one can find someone who loves his (or her) own people to the point of no longer being able to accept the actions of a ruling minority who besmirch the national character through their selfish deeds.
There are good Israelis who should not be spoken of in the same breath as the likes of Netanyahu, the MOSSAD, and the MOSSAD-created Hamas rocketeers in Gaza. The same goes for many ordinary Britons in relation to war criminals such as all recent Prime Ministers, the MI6 architects of the 07/07/05 London Bombings, and to the MI5 murderers who created the IRA as a method of dividing the peoples of the Isles against one another, with the people in the north of Ireland taking the brunt of the propaganda campaign. The temptation to see everything in black and white, as good or evil, is human, but it is not realistic. It is unpleasant to have to admit that some of one's own kind are such foul specimens that their existence is an affront to human decency. we in the SMPBI love our people, but we are not blinkered to the fact that the world is a more dangerous and unhappy place due to the actions of people who are of our nation and country.
It is not self-hatred to fight against internal domestic enemies; indeed the enemy within is more dangerous than the enemy without. The Monarchy are at the heart of the globalist agenda, and have been instrumental in the destruction of Europe. If supporting the Monarchy is patriotic in the UK, then UK patriotism is in more desperate trouble than one would fear.
The UK Establishment murdered over One Million people in the Great Hunger of the 1840s, and caused a further Two Million to flee their Irish homeland. The Monarchy did nothing to stop the murders, but rather sent in police and army units to crush a much needed revolt. The resentment against the British is still evident today, but as reasonable as it is to despise the British Establishment for its murder of the Irish (by stealing their food and manufacturing starvation), it is not acceptable to blame all the British for this crime.
At the time of the Great Hunger, life for ordinary Britons was no picnic; the industrial revolution had destroyed the peasantry. The Establishment had stolen their land and forced them into soul-destroying work in which life expectancy was low and wages lower. Child labour, press-ganging (naval slavery), murder of trade unionists, unsanitary urban slum dwellings, work houses, police brutality, exile or execution of dissidents, malnutrition, and even the right of the Establishment land owners to take the virginity of all girls (in other words to rape children); these and other horrors were the lot of the common people. Those who label the British as evil, really need to take a moment to reflect on the brutalisation of the British people by the Establishment. The crimes of the rulers against the world outside the UK mirrored those against the people of these Isles.
For the Jewish people, the same situation presents as for the British. The Second World War is often cited as an anti-Jewish war, but the truth differs from the propaganda. There were no Homicidal Gas Chambers in Nazi-controlled Europe, and until the end of the War when food and medical supplies were cut, the occupants of the transit (concentration) camps were actually less likely to go hungry or to perish than those outside the camps. The Jews were terrorised and forced to leave their homes; often they had assimilated and in some cases were unaware of their Jewish ancestry. The Jews were put into the camps in order to fulfil the Zionist goal of populating Palestine with Jews and turning it into a hub for global Zionist rule. Whereas the propaganda of the 6 million is an outright lie, the suffering of the common Jews was genuine. Indeed, it would not be surprising to find that the deaths of around 700,000 (not 6,000,000) Jews at the end of the war were allowed by the Zionists who controlled both sides, in order to make their propaganda more realistic. Ordinary Jews - like the Working Class of all origins - have always been pawns to be sacrificed as needs be. All that matters to the Establishment is that their wealth and power increases. The ordinary people are insignificant.
It is said that the life of every Palestinian isn't worth a single Jewish fingernail. If this was the genuine policy of the Israeli State, then from the perspective of national preservation, (its location in Palestine aside), this is laudable. However, the policies of the Zionist regime are now steering Israel to war; a war in which millions of Israelis could perish. A Zionist policy for the defence and strengthening of a Jewish homeland, kept distinct of all others and secure within its borders is a reasonable objective, when one understands the ethnic-solidarity of the Jewish people. Without the Talmudic hatred of the Goyim, there would be no problem with the Jewish State. The Talmudic infiltration of Europe and much of the non-Jewish world has proven that there is no worthy National Zionist ideal but only the programme of Zionist Imperialism.
Zionist Imperialism utilises the following weapons: Political Correctness; Multi-Culturalism; Mass Migration; Pro-Transgenderism; Anti-Indigenous Rights; Supremacy of Materialism over the Spiritual. National Zionism rightfully keeps these poisons away from the nation. It would be naïve to think that Zionism has been hijacked by imperialists. Zionism is the political expression of the Talmud, and at its core is based on the lunatic notion that the Jews are God's Chosen People and have a right to rule over the whole world, with the non-Jews existing only to serve them.
The idea that opposition to evil is self-hatred, highlights just how far our enemies have progressed in turning from a virtue to a vice, allegiance to what is morally right. The British Establishment has been thoroughly Zionised since at least the time of the arrival of William Stadholder (1748), although the roots of the decay can be traced to William the Bastard (1066). With the next William soon to take the throne, this process is now so far developed that the UK would be unrecognisable to the people living under the previous despotic Williams.
There is a tendency to view the people of a country and its ruling elite as one and the same. This is certainly not the case in the UK. In Israel, the rulers may at least be of the same stock as the people, but are their aspirations the same? The 'self-hating Jews' who love their people so much that they are willing to endure the venom of Organised Jewry, in order to expose the evils of the Israeli regime, are an asset to the struggle for freedom worldwide. Those who vilify them are as much enemies of humanity as those who sing God Save the Queen and wave their shiny red white and blue rags. We need to accept the fact that loyalty to the Establishment is treason to the people, and the only loyalty which matters is loyalty to the people.
The British ruling class of Monarchy, Financiers, Freemasons and Bankers have trodden on the people for centuries. They are the ones who created Israel as a base for the transformation of the world into a fully controlled mass of producer-consumers, ruled by unseen depots. There is a level of Zionist control over the British Establishment which makes an attack on the Establishment an attack on Talmudism. In these days of political policing, it is dangerous to point to the enemy, and clearly state that it has an identity. But to cower in the face of danger is to allow our enemies to win. Much of the Establishment of the UK is Zionist by politics. Herein lies the problem: it is often assumed that Israel controls the UK, but the relationship is not so simple; the same Establishment controls both countries.
Due to the rôle of Zionism in the UK, criticism of Israel is forbidden. The attacks on Jeremy Corbyn for 'anti-Semitism' are attacks against a decent human being who understands the nature of Zionism, and who until recently, had the courage to stand up to it. He has weakened and bowed his head in submission to the global financial ruling class. We have stood firm. Our attack against the Establishment cannot avoid attacking certain Jews, but there are Jews by radition who have awoken to the lies of their self-appointed leaders and should be fighting alongside us.
There is a natural knee-jerk reaction to go on the defensive when one feels one is being attacked. For the reactionaries in Britain, this manifests as a rallying to the Monarchy, jingoistic support of the soldiers who are killing for the multi-national corporations. For Jews, it is Israel to which they rally, and the IDF butchers who they defend. It doesn't have to be this way.
In the UK there are growing numbers of people who can see how evil the Establishment is. When such people are attacked as a part of a general attack on Britain, this only harms the opposition to globalism. We who live inside the beast are as much victims of the globalist cabal as those who are openly attacked outside our borders. And so it is with Israel.
In an ideal world, Israel would return the land stolen from Palestine and relocate to Birobidjan. The best that we can realistically hope for is that decent Jews who rightly wish to live amongst their own will either relocate to the real Jewish State, or at least put pressure on the Tel Aviv regime to make peace with Israel's neighbours.
Maybe one day the Talmudists will be defeated, then National Zionism can become a reality and the Jewish State can thrive as a distinct land in which lunatic religious bigotry is contained (or better still vanquished), and can no longer threaten the rest of the world. We can but hope. For this possible outcome, we need to take the serious step of focusing our attacks on the globalist Establishment in Tel Aviv and London, and not on the ordinary people, who by and large just want to get on with their lives and look after their families. We need to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with all who oppose globalism and all who believe in a free world of independent, self-sufficient, ethnically-distinct, culturally-strong nation-states.
Attacking all Jews or all Britons only serves to bolster the support for the Establishment of those who are neutral in this conflict, or are only partly aware of the internationalist menace. We cannot afford to strengthen our enemies in any way.
Detail from the statue of Oliver Cromwell by Sir William Hamo Thornycroft RA, unveiled outside the House of Commons on 31 October 1899. Photo Loz Pycock (CC-BY-SA 2.0).
A war unique in our history: a remaking of our country was fought not only on the field of war but also in people’s hearts and minds…
There have been power struggles before and since among rich elites or between rival aristocratic houses. The English Civil War was entirely different, actively involving whole swathes of society normally excluded from control.
In England, Charles I’s reign witnessed rising discontent almost from his succession in 1625. Costly, failed wars led to inflation and taxation. Religious reforms were unpopular and seen as taking the country towards Catholicism. And there was an underlying sense that the country was not being ruled in the best interests of its people.
Bankrupt
In 1640 Charles summoned parliament. He was bankrupt, but wanted to raise an army to suppress opposition in Scotland, where he was equally unpopular. The House of Commons in the Long Parliament (as it became known) represented a cross-section of the ruling class establishment: gentry, merchants, lawyers. But almost for the first time in English history, elections were contested on political issues.
The real strength of those opposed to the king in the House of Commons came from outside parliament, across a wide cross-section of society. Generally support for parliament came from the economically advanced south and east of England, whereas the king’s support came from the economically backward areas of the north and west. In Yorkshire, Lancashire and Sussex, there was a clear division between parliamentarian, rebellious industrial areas and royalist agricultural areas.
There is no simple reason why opposition to the king and his ministers moved from protest to armed revolt in the First Civil War (1642-46). It is likely that popular discontent over a range of different political and religious issues produced such a heady and powerful mix that trust in the king and his government totally collapsed. The “humble respect and awful reverence which is usually given to nobility, gentry and clergy”, as Edward Chamberlayne put it in 1672, crumbled in these tumultuous times.
Memorial near Skipton, Yorkshire, to one of the heroes of the Civil War. Photo Workers.
In November 1641 parliament passed the “Grand Remonstrance” setting out their many grievances against Charles. The king’s next move was disastrous and prompted open revolt. He went to parliament with a body of soldiers intending to arrest the five leading members of the parliamentary opposition. Warned beforehand, they had left the Commons by the time Charles arrived. The king’s bungled attempt at a coup made them heroes.
King Charles left London and shortly began to raise an army against the rebellious parliament. In turn, parliament decreed that they did not require Royal Assent to make laws, taking control of local militias and a growing volunteer army. And so in 1642 war began.
Dissatisfaction about the conduct of the war led Oliver Cromwell setting up the New Model Army in 1645. Its composition was unusual, including a broad cross-section of society in contrast to armies elsewhere at that time. The broader social origins of its soldiers provided literate, argumentative soldiers with easy links to friends in civilian political movements.
The first armies of both sides had been formed largely of volunteers. Although diluted by conscription from the second year of the war, this sense of fighting for a cause they believed in remained a strong factor amongst parliamentary armies, and was transferred to the New Model Army.
Organised
The New Model Army was disciplined and well organised, averse to looting. Quite soon promotions to officer rank were on merit rather than social rank. It took a major political battle in parliament to ensure acceptance of these forms of military organisation.
Parliamentarian forces eventually gained the upper hand and in May 1646 Charles surrendered to the Scottish army. He was handed over to parliament when the Scots withdrew from England in January 1647.
‘THE OFFICE OF KING WAS FORMALLY ABOLISHED ON 17 MARCH 1649.’
In April 1647 parliament tried to disband the New Model Army but failed. Soldiers refused to disband. After months of dispute with parliament, they declared, “We were not a mere mercenary army” and would not disband without settlement of both their own grievances (including arrears of pay) and the people’s political and religious liberties.
In June 1647 a troop of 500 cavalry seized the king and brought him to Newmarket where the rest of the army was. In August the army occupied London. That October the Council of the Army, with representatives of the rank and file as well as officers, debated the settlement of the kingdom, known as the Putney Debates. They even discussed An Agreement of the People, a manifesto produced by radical Levellers.
The escape of Charles from detention brought the debates to an end and opened the Second Civil War. The New Model Army had to put down scattered mutinies and then fight a Scots army enlisted to support Charles. That was defeated in August 1648, ending the war.
Tyrant, traitor
Charles I was put on trial in January 1649. Condemned as a “tyrant, traitor, murderer, and public enemy to the good people of this nation”, he was executed on 30 January. The office of king was formally abolished on 17 March.
After the Putney debates the heyday was over for the Leveller cause. The momentum of the republican side veered towards the wealthy, anxious to protect the interests of property. Gradually the New Model Army became ever more a professional body and the days of sermons, lectures, leaflets, agitators and citizens in uniform passed.
The Levellers, Diggers and Ranters disappeared from view and lost their impact on the public arena. But the English people’s view of the world had changed forever.
Seventeen years ago on what was an incredibly hot and sunny day in the UK, the weather was not the major topic of discussion for the weather-obsessed Brits, but rather what was on practically everyone's minds was the horrific events unfolding across the Atlantic Ocean in New York.
On the 11th of September 2001, aeroplanes were crashed into the two World Trade Centre towers, with massive loss of life and with the collapse of not only the towers, but other buildings not hit by the aeroplanes. The massacre was immediately blamed on Saudi Arabian CIA agent, Osama Bin Laden, and his Al Qaeda (Al CIAda) network of terrorists.
Interestingly, although the blame was lain on a Saudi, the USA did not take the logical step of attacking Saudi Arabia, in order to bring down the brutal regime which sponsors Wahhabi/Salafi terrorism world-wide - and which has since been proven to have been guilty of funding the WTC massacre - but rather, the USA launched an attack upon the nation of Afghanistan, under the pretext that Bin Laden was in that country at the time of the attack! One man was focused upon. The organisation he fronted (Al Qaeda) had been created by the USA to undermine the USSR's attempt to defend itself from Islamic terrorists operating on its borders, but was now redefined as a terrorist threat to the USA. Afghanistan was duly invaded and seventeen years later is still occupied by Yankee imperialists working for the benefit of the global capitalist corporations. The Taliban had never been a threat to the USA, other than a threat to its criminal trade in heroin, which they had began to disrupt before their country was invaded. Heroin production and the resulting human misery thus caused is at an all time high thanks to the US occupation - as are the profits of the scum who put money before people and see nothing wrong in the despicable trade in death.
After the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, came the great lie that Iraq was a terrorist menace and that it too had to be 'liberated' from its legitimate government. The infamous Weapons of Mass Destruction lie was created - along with the War Criminal Tony Blair's 'dodgy dossier' to justify the destruction of a safe secular country, which seventeen years on is a wasteland, recovering from the US-created Islamic State terrorist regime, which began there as a staging post for the attack on Syria. Iraq under Saddam Hussein had been a rich and peaceful country, which policed Islamic extremists with the rigour necessary to keep their insanity from corrupting the masses. After Saddam Hussein was illegally judicially murdered by the puppet regime serving the US imperial occupiers, the fundamentalist lunatics were encouraged to grow in strength, and the new bogeyman of IS was the result.
Between the brutal genocidal invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the US quietly moved to attack the nation of Yemen for the benefit of the brutal madmen in Saudi Arabia (the kingdom behind 9/11!) The genocide of the Yemen is ongoing although there is virtually a media black out on this tragedy, with most people not even knowing that the country is being obliterated by the House of Saud and its US allies.
The US terror train did not stop in the Middle East, but next went to Africa, interfering in country after country, to ensure that the economic power of the USA was upheld, making a string of African countries vassals of the US Empire in all but name.
Using the pretext of the environmental disaster in Haiti, the USA invaded Haiti in order to 'help' the country to deal with the 'natural' catastrophe besetting it. Haiti has not since gained real autonomy from the US Empire. The natural disaster saved the USA from having to create a political pretext for invasion. In Venezuela, the legitimate Socialist system has been undermined to create great profits for the globalist capitalists, at the same time as great misery for Venezuelans.
Returning to their War OF Terror, the USA returned (although they never left!) to Africa in 2007 to invade Somalia. The result was the fracturing of the country and the explosion in Islamic (Wahhabi) extremism. Somalia became the Islamic State of Africa, all thanks to the supposedly anti-terrorist US intervention!
In 2011, the brutal butchers of the USA, under the order of puppet president Obama, invaded the rich and friendly nation of Libya, the bread basket of Africa and great hope for the continent. The much beloved father of Libya, Muammar Gadaffi, was murdered by the cold blooded butchers of Al Qaeda - the ones hated by the USA for 9/11 but now loved by them as liberators of Libya's oil(!) - and the country ruined. The Gold Dinar proposed as a currency for an Africa free from the IMF was scrapped, and secular rule was replaced by rival religious terrorist lunacies. The on-going invasion of Europe by economic migrants and wahhabi terrorists claiming to be 'refugees' was unthinkable with Libya acting as a barrier to them, but under US control it is accelerating for the benefit of global capitalist filth, who trade in human misery and in the destabilisation of the planet to make their misrule harder to fight against.
Since 2014, the USA has been aiding Al Qaeda terrorists (back in the good books, all is forgiven, 9/11 is in the memory hole!) in their barbaric assault of the free people of Syria. The US creation of Islamic State was spread into Syria from the US base in Iraq.
Seventeen years after 9/11, the US terror machine has broken country after country, creating Islamic terrorist states across the globe. Poverty and the power of the IMF has increased. Manufactured waves of 'refugees' have made Europe unsafe, creating job insecurity which the globalist corporations have exploited to boost their own profits whilst making the indigenous Working Class fear for our futures. Austerity is a part of the War OF Terror.
In the Ukraine, the US puppet regime has murdered vast numbers of Russians and Free Ukrainians as the US Empire spreads its terrorist army of NATO to the borders of Russia and Belarus.
The world in 2001 was a happier and safer place. The Saudi/US/Global Capitalist menace has destroyed, or is destroying, the following countries using 9/11 as the excuse:
Afghanistan
Yemen
Iraq
Somalia
Sudan
Chad
Libya
Syria
Ukraine
Cameroon
Kurdistan
Palestine
It is occupying by stealth many other nations, impoverishing and brutalising vast areas of Asia, Africa, South America and Europe. The stateless globalist Empire is destroying free countries everywhere. The spread of fear in the EU and UK is a result of the combined terrorist weapons of economic Austerity and fake Refugees created by the puppet Islamic State in occupied Iraq and Syria.
The War OF Terror has created Islamic terrorism on a scale unthinkable before, yet curiously, just as with the fortuitous failure of Israelis to go to work in the WTC on the day of the massacre, Israel itself has not been attacked by the alleged enemies which encircle it! Israel is the centre of operations of Global Banking Capitalism, adding another dimension to the US terror machine.
There is an undeniable wealth of evidence to prove that 9/11 was contrived to justify the creation of an unofficial Global Corporate and Finance Capitalist Empire. The following are a sample of videos which cover some of the material concerning the atrocities of and since 9/11. These videos have so far survived the Youtube purge, although that may change:
Those who fell on '9/11' were the first of many many thousands more to die at the hands of the Globalist tyrants. It will take a Global Revolution to overthrow the capitalist system and the foundation ideology which hides behind it.
Seventeen years have passed since the World Trade Centre Massacre on the 11th September 2001. The atrocity has been referred to as an event which changed the world, and that certainly is the case.
The world of 11.9.01 was a happier place than the world we live in now. There were problems, but none as extreme as the ones we accept today as part of normal life. In Afghanistan, the Taliban government had just scorched all the Opium Poppy fields and it looked as if the scourge of Heroin and its associated crime would become a thing of the past, or at least reduced. Things were looking good.
Following the 9/11 murders, President Bush Jr announced that a mysterious group known as Al Qaeda had carried out the attacks, and that their leader, a certain Osama Bin Laden, was hiding in Afghanistan. He maintained that the Taliban were supporters of Bin Laden and that the USA would deal with these killers once and for all. The problem was that this story was a lie. Unbeknownst to the world at large, the Taliban had warned the USA about the 9/11 attacks before they occurred. They were also implacable enemies of Bin Laden who did not trust the man or his version of Islam. The idea of them harbouring the man the USA claimed was responsible for the attacks was ludicrous. There must have been an ulterior motive for targeting the Taliban.
The world only had to wait until the next month for the USA to attack Afghanistan, and not much longer to discover the real motive behind the libelling of the Taliban as the 9/11 butchers. It was, in a word, Opium. In 1999, NATO had bombed the European nation of Serbia in order to establish the criminal vipers nest of Kosovo. Kosovo was established to facilitate the importing of Heroin into Europe. The mercenaries used to defeat the people of Serbia were the terrorists used to undermine the Soviet forces in Afghanistan in the 1980s. They were designated by their CIA handlers, 'The Cell', or to use the Arabic term, Al Qaeda. Given their own criminal state in Europe, these vile creatures were responsible for ensuring that Europe was flooded with Heroin; the sale of which would be laundered through the banks. The destruction of European lives and the vast profit made thereby was interrupted by the Taliban's burning of the Opium fields.
The Taliban had initially made use of Al Qaeda to eject the Soviet imperialists from their country. As long as they played along with the demands of the criminals in London and Washington DC, the Taliban were left alone to conduct their affairs as they saw fit. Football stadia were turned into public execution centres for undesirables but the hypocrites of the liberal-Establishment said and did nothing. As long as the Heroin flowed out of Afghanistan, the rulers could behave as they pleased. Seventeen years after 9/11, Afghanistan is certainly a different place. The soil is littered with more dead foreign soldiers than the total number murdered in New York City as an excuse to invade that country, and there are well over twelve times that number of dead Afghans. The country continues to be a battleground with the Afghan Resistance fighting on to liberate their land. In contrast to 2001, Heroin production is running at near capacity, protected by internationalist servicemen to benefit the political-economic elite and to destroy the home nations.
In 2003 the elusive Bin Laden was forgotten for a while, with the spotlight of the US-UK aggressors being focused on Saddam Hussein in Iraq. It was alleged that the Iraqi nation was preparing to use 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' against poor little Israel, and maybe even against targets in Europe . This was a display of the most outrageous chutzpah by the war-mongers in the internationalist alliance centred on the UK and USA. The infamous 'dodgy dossier' used by Prime Minister Blair to justify attacking Iraq was a complete forgery. Even after the forgery was finally admitted, the aggression continued.
Iraq was an advanced nation which could trace its civilisation back to Babylon and Sumeria. It was rich in culture and had vast oil reserves. President Saddam Hussein had fought against Islamic extremism in Iraq, maintaining near secular rule, and even having Christians such as Tariq Aziz in his Government. As part of his campaign against extremism he had waged war in the Kurdish Northwest of Iraq, murdering 182,000 people in the 1980s. Alike to neighbouring Turkey where Kurds were also butchered, these crimes against humanity were conducted unhindered by the UK-USA cabal. Turkey continues to this day to butcher the people of Kurdistan, but like Iraq was, Turkey is an ally of the USA and allowed to murder at will.
Saddam Hussein prevented the rise of Wahhabi/Salafi Islam in Iraq, understanding that it would threaten the balance of Sunnis and Shi'ites. He had commissioned research into the origins of the Wahhabists and found evidence proving they were a sect of non-Muslim origin which had infiltrated Islam with the objective of perverting and destroying the religion. They were proscribed in Iraq and the Baghdad government had begun circulating information exposing the truth of the sect, and of Al Qaeda's ties to the USA. Attempts to link Bin Laden and Hussein were as ridiculous as the WMD story, and equally deceitful.
The UK-USA coalition have systematically stripped Iraq of anything of economic value. They have stolen the invaluable ancient Cuneiform Library (much still to be translated). They have also taken control of oil production, which was the major reason for the invasion, rather than the nonsense of phantom WMDs. Much has changed in Iraq since 11.9.01. In 2001 Iraq was a vibrant modern nation, rich in culture and resources, with a tough ruler but one who maintained order for the majority; much of it now resembles a wasteland with depleted uranium scattered across the country from coalition artillery. The death toll for the invaders runs to nearly 5000; for the inhabitants of Iraq, the death toll stands at a staggering quarter of a million ordinary Iraqi civilians murdered by the invaders or killed as a consequence of the invasion. Is it any wonder that the people in neighbouring Iran are wary of the USA? Donald Trump's intermittent slandering of Iran and thinly veiled threats, do not help!
Public opposition to the Iraq invasion saw massive protests across Europe and elsewhere. In order to keep people terrified by the spectre of Islamic extremism, on the 12th March 2004 Madrid was bombed (exactly 911 days after 9/11), followed on the 7th July 2004 by another copycat atrocity in London and then on the 1st October 2005 in Bali, bringing the fear of Islamic extremism to Australians. Every case mirrored the 9/11 massacre insofar as Muslim extremists were blamed and ordinary civilians were murdered by agents working for their own governments.
As well as fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, the 'internationalist brigade' of the USA/UK and others, has been active in Somalia, the Sudan and other nations. Using the pretext of fighting a War on terror, the globalists have no compunction about invading sovereign nations and initiating 'regime change' to replace governments who resist the globalist cabal, with compliant stooges. This is done in the name of democracy, and scarcely anyone in the mainstream media remarks on the total hypocrisy of the rulers in London and their partners-in-crime.
Public dissent has become all but a criminal offence in many countries. It has become common place for whistle blowers to die in mysterious circumstances, such as was the case with Dr David Kelly who questioned the London regime's WMD fantasy and was found dead shortly after. His case has become one of many. In 2001, one could be forgiven for believing that the UK was a free country; only a fool would believe that now.
Our streets are covered by a sea of CCTV cameras; our Police are armed with every non-lethal gadget imaginable (although many have died from Police use of these weapons); the everyday happy-go-lucky Briton of 2001 is a shadow of his or her former self, replaced by a timid and fearful soul who dare not use politically incorrect language or offer a serious opinion on any matter lest he or she be dragged off in the night. This is not an exaggeration, if anything it downplays the tyranny in the UK.
In 2001 it took a contrived tale of a bogeyman in a cave to scare people into accepting war. As we have seen by the invasion of Libya, and the involvement of UK military forces in attacking free Syria, the people will now accept any aggression without anything more than a tabloid færytale. In Libya, tens of thousands of people have been murdered by NATO and their NTC stooges; this figure is an estimate from the NTC and certainly will not include the Black Africans butchered by the racists allied to NATO. Ironically, the NTC contains Al Qaeda mercenaries. Yes, the very same people who we are still told we are at war with. In topsy turvy post 9/11 reality, what would provoke outrage in 2001 barely raises a murmur. People have learnt to keep quiet and only have interest in trivial matters such as Reality TV, Celebrities and Sport.
Another result of the 9/11 New York Massacre has been the dæmonisation of Muslims. Every Muslim is now perceived as a potential extremist. There is no understanding that the Wahabbists of Al Qaeda (our allies in Libya!) are loathed by decent Muslims and are far from representative of Islam as a whole. Groups such as the pro-Israel, English Defence League were created post-9/11 as anti-Muslim distractions, ramming Zionist propaganda into the minds of dis-satisfied English youths. The EDL is all but gone, and in its place there are myriad grouplets of competing fantasists who imagine themselves as soldiers winning the Battle of Stalingrad, and Muslim-hating Zionists who cannot defend European Culture because they do not understand it.
In 2001 Europe and the USA were respected by the world, and the people were generally free to speak as they found. As a direct result of the 9/11 Massacre, our nations have become Police States with total surveillance in all matters. Criticism of authority has become equated with terrorism. Fearful self-censorship has replaced freedom of expression. Perpetual War has become a reality. The upshot for the economy? The richest people in society have profited massively from the theft of resources and commodities in occupied lands; the rest of us are suffering economic hardships which we would not have imagined possible in 2001.
2018 is not only seventeen years after 2001, it is a world apart, and not for the better. Imperialist wars have made the world a much more dangerous place. The global cabal could not have achieved the occupation of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya without the staged 9/11 attacks; nor could Israel have continued its occupation of Judea and Samaria, and its siege of Gaza. The prospect of a One World State is becoming a reality; bombed into place by NATO. Without the 9/11 justification all this would have been much harder to accomplish.
Lest we forget the human face of the soldiers killed to further the interests of global finance, pictures of the British dead in Afghanistan and Iraq can be found here. These are joined by fellow Britons in the wars in Libya and elsewhere. Others have died, not to mention servicemen from the USA and around the globe. They died not in vain, but worse, for the global Ruling Class to gain more control over the Working Class worldwide.
Dying in vain is bad enough, but these men and women have died in order to extend the grip of power of the global financial parasite class; they have died as casualties in a war to crush freedom the world over, and they were unwittingly on the side of the enemies of humanity. They are victims of globalism in a similar manner to the people they were fighting. Similar, but not the same, as the people attacked by the globalist forces died fighting for freedom, or were simply murdered in cold blood without any justification. 'Our' soldiers are fighting for capitalism, and anyone who supports them in any way except demanding they come home, is an accomplice in the global march to serfdom for all except the self-perpetuating Ruling Class.
2.4 million people have been murdered as a result of the initial 9/11 massacre. That is the reality of Capitalism. Millions have been displaced, including those who have entered Europe as refugees and economic migrants.
Theresa May, Tony Blair, David Cameron, and the rest of the crocodile tear politicians, have the blood of millions on their hands. The attack on freedom through the IHRA definition of anti-semitism, serves to criminalise criticism of the forces behind 9/11 and the resulting wars.
On this day, the SMPBI stands in defiance of the parasites, and calls out the enemies of humanity. The Tories, Labour, Lib-dems, UKIP, Greens etc are happy to take the pay of the Globalist Capitalists and parrot the lies of the official 9/11 fable. The deaths of millions and destruction of lives of many millions more, is the result of towing the line. We will smash the Capitalist system in the Isles, destroy Zionist power and bring in a Socialist order which will not tolerate a single lie mouthed by the global enemy of humanity. We have no doubt that this will provoke the ire of the global enemy, but we are sure that an educated and armed population of the British Isles, united with revolutionaries across the globe also throwing off the shackles of the capitalist system, will prevail. Capitalism has slaughtered millions since 9/11 alone. It has to be wiped from the globe. SMPBI is a part of the international fight for freedom.
1. “Our Party is opposed to the racism which targets people because of their origins or origins of their forebears.” An important and necessary statement which I entirely agree with.
2. “We identify Global Zionism as an ideology of terror, built on a sickening appropriation of a religious system which is ardently ethno-nationalist, turning it into a dogma of supremacist hatred.”
To talk about Zionists “turning” Judaism into a “dogma of supremacist hatred” is historically incorrect. Jewish holy books, the Talmud and Torah both contain “a dogma of supremacist hatred”. Hence not only demanding interest on loans (...but only on loans to Gentiles) but also killing, robbing and even committing acts of genocide and paedophilia against Gentile “cattle” are NOT considered to be against Jewish Law. It is also clearly stated in the Jewish scriptures stated that Jews are destined by God to rule over all non-Jewish peoples, who will serve as their slaves. Judaism provided the very model of Hitler’s supremacist biological racism.
3. Long before Zionism became a powerful movement, Jews played a central role in the development of modern capitalism - arguably even more so that Lutheranism or Calvinism. For a thorough account and analysis of this role (which contains not one iota of racism) see Werner Sombart’s classic work entitled The Jews and Modern Capitalism.
NB Friedrich Engels himself stated that Sombart was the only economist who had fully understood Marx’s Capital. Sombart’s book should absolutely be a part of the SMPBI literature page.
4. Why no reference to Marx’s own essay “On the Jewish Question” - which makes no reference to Zionism at all? Or to the views of Disraeli - who believed in both a Jewish and an Aryan ‘master race’.
5. “Would the Zionist elite take a natural hostility of Europeans to usury and turn it into a vehicle of repression and discrimination against the Working Class Jews of Europe, in order to achieve their long sought after goal of the creation of Israel as a base to gain mastery of the world?”
Question: just how many “Working Class Jews” were there - if by this is meant proletarians? Not that many. Their preferred trades were petit-bourgeois mercantilism, tax collection for rich landowners, wholesaling and retailing, banking and the professions. But the Zionists explicitly encouraged Hitler to increase repression of the Jewish population of a whole, following Herzl’s maxim that “Our best friends are the anti-Semites” (i.e. they serve our purposes best).
6. “German Socialism under leaders such as the Strassers, was the ideology of a radical republican workers movement.” I suggest doing a bit more research about the Strasser brothers - both of whom were members of the Freikorps - which fought to bring down Germany’s first workers’ republic (the Munich Council Republic). They were also both anti-semitic, albeit for anti-capitalist rather than racist reasons. But their opposition to usury and Jewish finance capitalism was completely shared with Hitler - who was the first leader in modern history to nationalise the country’s central bank and pay workers with labour certificates - an idea supported by Marx. Nevertheless, it is of course true that there were those in the NSDAP who wanted to go further in a socialist direction and nationalise the big industrial concerns.
7. Reference is made to the Hitler’s “National Capitalist NSDAP war machine”. A ‘war machine’ that was massively outnumbered by Germany’s neighbours, and even more so by its combined war enemies (...by a factor or 97 to 1) can hardly have been intended for aggressive purposes. See the important video by Gerd Schultze Rhonhof based on his book: 1939 - The War That Had Many Fathers Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof
8. “After the 1934 murders of the Socialist leaders, the NSDAP moved from a movement for the social well-being of the people into a military formation.” In fact Hitler accomplished, in just 4 years, the most massive and rapid improvement in the “social well-being of the people” in history. But faced with an army whose loyalty could not be relied upon, an SA that wanted to replace it with street fighters who picked on Reds and Jews - but were seen as wholly ill-equipped to fill important military functions, Hitler saw no alternative but to create a high-quality “military formation” - the SS. The SS were regarded with absolute contempt by both the army and SA alike - but proved to have such necessary loyalty and soldierly qualities to defeat vastly superior enemy forces, saved the German army from numerous defeats - and whose officers always went first in battle. Yet since the SA were three times bigger than the standing army and more politically conscious, it can be hypothertically argued that Hitler was wrong to block Röhm’s attempt to take it over - and also to reject Strasserist demands for a ‘second revolution’ of a more socialist nature. But all this would have been difficult in practice and is a bit to easy to say in retrospect - given that the economic blockade of Germany had already begun and war preparations against it were already in motion. In this sense Germany at that time can in this sense be compared to Russia today - simply resisting Imperialism. And World Jewry had already declared war on and imposed trade boycotts on Germany good and shops in 1933 - resulting in counter-boycotts of Jewish businesses.
9. Ernst Jünger was neither a socialist, National Bolshevik or a Nazi, but a uniquely original thinker and writer whose main value - despite his anti-liberalism, but like that of Marx - was “free individuality”. He also had a close relationship with Martin Heidegger. I recommend also his novel Eumeswil for the literary section of the SMPBI site.
10. “Corbyn has spoken about the machinations of Zionism. Now the Zionists are coming for him. They are liars who are scared of a Labour Leader who is willing to discuss the Zionist deals with the Hitlerist Nazis.”
Note: Hitler ended up seeing exactly where Zionism would lead, broke his ‘deal’ with the Zionists - and instead enlisted Arabs into the SS.
“The Zionists WILL destroy Corbyn. His weakness will see to that. When he is gone, a neo-Blairite will be put in charge and Zionist rule will be back with a vengeance.”
Agreed.
My main point. I believe it is just as important - if not more important - to distinguish individual Jews from Judaism as it is to distinguish anti-Semitism from anti-Zionism. For without the total assimilation of Jews, which Marx argued for (and which many German Jews wanted in opposition to the Zionists) Zionism is a natural outgrowth of Judaism - and correctly understands itself as such (a tiny and irrelevant minority of eccentric rabbis notwithstanding).
Marx himself was the very epitome of a decidedly anti-Judaic ‘Jew’ - and was also not innocent of making ‘anti-Semitic’ remarks of such a ‘politically incorrect’ nature that today they would have him hauled before a court. And anti-Judaism - like anti-Zionism - is no more a form of ‘racism’ than being anti-Islamic or anti-Christian. Judaism, like Islam or Christianity, is not a race but a religion, albeit one whose secular form - as Marx pointed out - is capitalism itself.
First Comment:
Thank you Peter. This raises a lot of good points. The idea that it is 'racist' to oppose the RELIGION of Judaism, is of the same level of lunacy as the argument that it is 'racist' to oppose Islam. One might as well throw in the other Desert Superstition, Christianity, and call criticism of that RELIGION, 'racist' (although, for some reason that one doesn't fit the pattern!) According to political correctness, anything which goes against globalism, is racist, and anything which supports nature is inherently evil - eugenics (not wanting to create life which suffers when gene theraphy can cure the ailment before it takes effect); the fact that having a Penis is a pretty strong indiction you are a Man, no mater how much make-up you put on; the extended family etc. We fall into their traps at our peril....
The so-called 'royal' family are the most ungrateful of all parasites. They sit in their palaces, getting fat from the riches extorted from the Working Class by the Middle Class tyrants who work hand-in-glove with the Ruling Class to wrench every penny from us to support their obscene decadent and degenerate lifestyles.
The newest member of the clan, Rachel 'Meghan' Markle, has complained to the media (!) that she is tired of getting so much media attention. The ACTRESS who has lived her adult life in the spotlight, getting paid to show her wares to the camera, is now suddenly shy. Bless her hypocritical bones. The new bride of Henry 'Harry' Hewitt, the half-brother of future king, is happy to live like a pig, getting her designer clothes, palaces, permanent luxury holiday lifestyle, etc, but whilst she is content to piss away the taxes of the Working Class - leaving many of us literally wondering how to feed and clothe our families after our incomes are taxed to pay for the parasites - she isn't happy that the media want to take her picture. Aw, shame. Well, the good news for Rachel, Henry, and the rest of the royal rats, is that when the Socialist Republic dawns, they won't have to worry about the media intruding in their lives. They will join the rest of us in living a normal life, where ancestry and class mean nothing - either that or they can take their ungrateful over-privileged selves out of our lands. Either way, their days of sponging are numbered.
Since at least 1066, the Monarchy of this country have acted in a manner which can only be described as arrogant betrayal of the needs of the non-Ruling Class population.
Under the First Queen Elizabeth, ordinary people (including children) were press-ganged into the Queens Navy. They were enslaved to make the Royals rich. The English Empire, and the British Empire which followed, were built on the exploitation of the native people.
The Royal Family claim the ‘divine right’ to rule over us. For religious people, this is blasphemy. There are no chosen people, and the idea that 'god' has a special affinity for the royal rubbish comes from King James who ordered the rewriting of the English translation of the Bible to give him non-existent God-given authority. It is from the foul Henry VIII and his murderous daughter that the heresy known as the Church of England arose. It is a consequence of Henry VIII's selfish and cowardly actions that the Church was split and it is thanks to the Royal family that all the troubles and sectarianism in Ulster, Belgium, Germany and elsewhere have come.
The British Monarchy has pushed the globalist agenda relentlessly. It was the Royal Family who encouraged General Kitchener in his policy of murdering farmers and their families in Southern Africa. The tyrannical Queen Victoria presided over the invention of Concentration Camps, the burning of Pretoria, the rape and murder of entire Working Class farming families – men, women, children and babies – all for the pursuit of increasing her despotic family’s wealth.
The young Princess Elizabeth, (now Queen) proudly posed with her parents as the RAF, under their direction, committed unprecedented atrocities including the wholesale slaughter of civilians in Dresden, Hamburg and other cities. The present Queen once knighted Robert Mugabe for his contribution to majority rule in erstwhile Rhodesia. Mugabe's achievements amounted to the brutal murder of Rhodesian civilians of British and European descent, which were really but a continuation of the crimes committed at the whim of the 'royals' in the Boer War.
The present wars for oil and empire in the Middle East. Asia and elsewhere all fit the Globalist agenda, which the Royals not only support, but revel in. Prince Charles has proclaimed his desire to be 'defender of All Faiths'. This is sheer lunacy, which even manages to make a mockery of the King James farce which the royalty cling to as justification of their domination over us. The royals are not only parasites, they're a bit thick too!
The Monarchy have profited immensely from globalism. Their profit is gained purely at the loss of all the people they have subjugated. How can anyone support the focal point of this 'elite' mafia and their figurehead, the monarchy? There is no justification for anyone, especially those who want the best for their people, giving any loyalty to a family who have been demonstrably disloyal to the people of this nation, a people they purport to serve.
Let Rachel, Henry and the rest cry over the loss of privacy which goes with a lifestyle of plenty at the expense of the Working Class who have a life of struggle and poverty. Perhaps the new 'princess' should consider returning to Hollywood, taking all of the in-laws with her? One thing is certain, unless they change their ways and become ordinary citizens of the coming Republic, none of them will be tolerated to remain in these Isles a moment longer.
In London today people have been using its 70th anniversary as a focal point for marching to save the NHS from privatisation. Considering the decay of the NHS and the culture of shoddiness which has pushed out the traditional caring approach to the people who need health care, this march - as well intentioned as the marchers may be - has come too late. There are many professional staff in the NHS who genuinely have the best interests of the people at heart, but that they have been joined by careerists who do not see their roles as a vocation, but rather as a means of paying bills - and no more than that.
The UK's National Health Service was created as a socialised system of care for the British people. It was funded from the outset by the British people, and its intended usage was for the British people. Not only was the NHS for and of the people, it was staffed by the people as well. Now in these days of multi-culti political correctness, this has all changed; this is to the detriment of the service as a whole.
To experience an NHS hospital is to experience the carnage of globalism. A vast number of the staff have very poor spoken English, thus making diagnoses much harder for the patients who do not share their languages. It is truly outrageous to see the Working Class who cannot afford private healthcare treated like cattle; left in corridors with absolutely no privacy or means to call nursing staff, should they need help. Even more galling, is that whilst our own people lay ignored in public spaces, free-loading healthcare tourists and economic migrants (illegals) who have paid nothing into the system, receive full medical care on wards paid for by the British Working Class whose beds they are occupying.
Do the illegals and healthcare tourists even consider for a moment that it is immoral for people to use a service which they have not paid into? Do they give a damn that their presence is crippling the NHS? Do they have any remorse about their part in depriving the British Working Class of treatment which can literally mean the difference between life and death? Considering that they have no qualms about displacing our culture, perverting our legal system in their favour, sponging off the tax-payer to fund their livelihoods whilst contributing nothing, it would be very surprising if they even considered the harm they are doing to our country.
The presence of staff who are not 100% fluent in English is not only a danger to patients who do not share their language, it is also detrimental to the countries from which they have come. It is unforgivable that at a time in which the UK is suffering from mass unemployment, rather than train our own people to take up health-care provision, the government would rather import immigrant labour to not only take jobs that our own people could do, but at the same time condemn the home countries of those who come to work here, to poor healthcare due to taking from them people who could improve their own countries if they were not snatched by the unscrupulous globalists, resident in Westminster.
The NHS has been transformed into an International Ill-Health Service. For the benefit of all people everywhere, the theft of health care staff from countries which desperately need them must be stopped; so must the free access to services for anyone citizens of the Isles. If nothing is done, the NHS will further deteriorate. Of course, the destruction of the NHS is a deliberate policy of the traitors who brought us liberal globalism in the first place. No amount of tinkering will restore to us a service which genuinely is for the benefit of our people; the salvation of the NHS must be seen as part of a wider restoration of the British Isles. Those who created this sorry state of affairs must be made to pay for their treachery. Radical surgery is called for to fix the NHS; the Ruling Class and their bourgeois partners-in-crime must be cut out, root and branch.
The NHS is collapsing under the weight of patient abuse. The illegals and healthcare tourists are a part of the problem. But what of the politically trendy ailments which take up beds, operating theatres and resources? FGM, Circumcision, other forms of Genital Mutilation on patients who think they have a right to cosmetic surgery to suit their media-induced feelings - none of this is necessary. Yet at a time when medicines on prescription are being reduced, and surgery is being withheld for a growing number of ailments, liberal fetishism and outlandish absurdities are not only not being stopped, they are being promoted.
The NHS was founded on the principle of free healthcare for all who were eligible to be part of the scheme by virtue of being British. Over the years, Dentistry has been privatised, Opticians have gone the same way, Private Healthcare has sprung up even in the form of Hospitals. SMPBI would reverse this, by re-socialising all healthcare, and banning private medicine. We would of course see mental health provision improved so that people with identity issues can have their minds readjusted to suit their bodies, not the lunatic other way around as at present!
The NHS is a marvellous thing. And once the sjw liberal rubbish is done away with, and t goes back to being a NATIONAL Health Service, which all British people and only British people, rely upon for treatment and preventative care, it will be a marvel once more.
SMPBI has come under criticism for being a Trotskyite-Fascist organisation, like its parent, the SWP! This is nonsense. The SMPBI was previously called the SWPE (Socialist Workers' Party of England), but it has at no time been a part of, or splinter from, the SWP (Socialist Workers Party). The confusion with the name isn't helped by the main website and some of the others still having the SWPE name. This is something which admittedly we do need to sort out.
In the UK, there is a political party which is always present at industrial disputes and protest gatherings. This party is the SWP.
Laughingly claiming to be against the Establishment, the Socialist Workers Party is very much a part of the Establishment. It has front groups such as United Against Fascism which exist for the sole purpose of libelling all opponents as Nazis, and thereby silencing criticism. The SWP, far from being a party for the 'Workers' is a party which advances the interests of international finance, and uses the genuine grievances of the people as an excuse to push its globalist agenda.
The Socialist Worker is always a good source for anyone who cares to look into the damaged mind of the trotskyite materialistic pseudo-anti-Capitalists. The underlying opposition to economic deprivation is laudable, however, the solutions offered only bolster the stranglehold of the common enemy.
Immigration is touted as a solution to the economic problems of the world. According to the ideology of the SWP, the exploitation of the poorer nations by the richer ones has created the economic hardship the people therein endure. So far so good; global imperialism is indeed a key factor in the destruction of the conquered nations (is rather than was, because it still goes on under corporate rather than national banners). However, the ideology then falters by ignoring the fact that migration away from the conquered nations has been a result of economic imperialism, and goes on to argue that the movement of people is a good thing.
In the SWP's 'Where We Stand' section, can be found the following pearls of wisdom:
Workers create all the wealth under capitalism. A new society can only be constructed when they collectively seize control of that wealth and plan its production and distribution according to need.
Yes, the people do create the wealth, but it is the materialist system itself which has to be overturned. As the people of China can testify to, the replacement of a monopoly of private owners by a monopoly of bureaucrats has not made their plight any easier. The increased efficiency of the means of production has allowed for the creation of ever more junk products, by an army of slaves. The SWP argue that this is due to the Chinese states being State Capitalist, but this is a purely semantic argument. The refusal to respect culture, tradition, race and faith, inevitably leads to the depersonalisation of the people. This is one of the inherent flaws of Trotskyism.
We oppose all immigration controls and campaign for solidarity with workers in other countries.
How exactly are the people to gain, when they have to compete for resources with unlimited immigration? The SWP would doubtless claim that there would be no need for immigration controls after the global revolution; this in itself highlights their failure to get beyond academic theories and deal with the real world. Certainly supporting all people who strive for freedom is vital, but the SWP are not fighting for freedom, but for economic control; they seek to replace the corporate despots with themselves, and that has nothing to do with freedom.
We support the right of black people and other oppressed groups to organise their own defence and we support all genuine national liberation movements.
This point betrays the mentality of the SWP. They view Black people as oppressed in a way that White people are not. For all the talk of being anti-racist, the SWP do treat the races differently. It is interesting that Blacks and 'other oppressed groups' are encouraged to organise separately. So the SWP envisage Black groups, homosexual groups, and all manner of exclusive groups, but Heterosexual Whites must be organised as parts of mixed groups (mixed with whom, remains a mystery!)
The notion of 'genuine' national liberation movements is also one which we share. However, as supporters of borders, SMPBI accepts the right of individual nations to exist, and to work together Inter-Nationally as free sovereign entities. The issue is problematic for the SWP as their borders-abolishing globalism does not support a future in which any nations exist.
We campaign for real social, political and economic equality for woman and for an end to all forms of discrimination against lesbians, gay men, bisexual and transgender people.
The 'right to work' is a common theme of the SWP. This is because, production is the sole purpose of the individual in the Trotskyite mind. Social equality is simply globalist multi-cultural dogma; Economic equality means the right to work. Women are especially singled out due to a fanatical hatred of the family structure. To the SWP, it is a woman's right to be a part of the servile labour force. The traditional role of women as the principle child nurturers is viewed as patriarchal tyranny; indeed the idea of families raising their own children is a threat to the State. Women have the right to have their children raised by the State whilst they work to produce and consume as good wage-slave robots. The lumping together of women and people separated due to sexuality is a variation of the more common linking of women and 'ethnic minorities', but continues the theme of splitting women away from their menfolk. Men and women together form a strong natural bond which the SWP seeks to break apart. The horrific protection of the rapist, 'Comrade Delta' Martin Smith, was only possible due to this unhealthy obsession with treating women as being a special class of Comrades - sadly, a class which can be patronised, objectified and abused. SMPBI has a membership requirement that all prospective members declare any sex offences - these automatically bar anyone from membership. The SWP could do well to adopt a similar policy.
The Socialist Worker presents itself as fighting for the workers. As can be seen in their Where We Stand summary, their policies, if ever implemented, would reduce the worker to the level of a slave. The attack on everything wholesome and natural is identical to the tactics of the Capitalist entity they purport to oppose. The objective of the people who control the SWP is to establish a single global materialist State in which all people are the same; a State in which there is no place for culture, family, sovereignty, tradition, customs, or indeed any of the many aspects of humanity which make us more than economic producer-consumers. They claim to oppose the current drive to a global State ruled by a financial oligarchy, but only because they do not understand that the people who control them ARE the financiers they protest against.
The SWP exist to herd anti-Capitalists into fighting for the very oppressors they instinctively oppose. Social Justice cannot exist except within a strong and free nation. A nation is more than an economy; it is a people unified by experience and by kinship. To ignore the bonds of land and people is to ignore nature. Genuine Socialists put their own people first; globalism is anti-society, and therefore anti-Socialist.
Supporters of the SWP have been lied to by their leaders. They have swallowed all manner of trotskyite drivel, but just as humanity as a whole is awakening to the lunacy of globalism, so too will the genuine and decent Socialists awaken to the lies of those who would lead them. SMPBI has no dealings with the SWP, other than to hold out a hand to Working Class SWP members and ex-members who know deep inside that Socialism Needs Borders; it serves us well to exploit those doubts and break the good few away from the middle class trotskyite enemy. To be classed alongside the bourgeois trots is not helpful, and we have to work on ways of making it clear that this lumping together is counter-productive.
A fascinating speech. David talks about the revival of the natural religion of Heathenry as a potent weapon for opposing corporate globalisation,. A return to nature - to the Pagan Heathenry - as a means of moving away from the Globalised Monotheism which is the justification of Capitalist Exploitation and the Hierarchical Class System.
Africa is a troubled continent. From the time of the recent European Empires, it has been economically ravaged. Much has been written of the African Slave Trade, with blame for the human suffering being laid squarely at the feet of Europeans - all Europeans, not just the Ruling Class! - but as with most contemporary propaganda, the truth is somewhat different.
At the time of the Black Slave Trade, ordinary Europeans were also subjected to unspeakable horrors. There is a tendency to blame all British people for the suffering endured by the African Slaves, but this is inappropriate. Even if it was acceptable to blame people for crimes committed by their ancestors (which it is not), the Slave Owners were not Working Class people, but people from the Ruling Class and especially the financial class of banking parasites, and those who caught and enslaved them in the first place, were despotic Africans, many of whom have descendants today who still profit from the cruelty of enslaving human beings..
Those who say that the British should feel guilt and shame for the Slave Trade, conveniently forget that the same people who treated the Africans as sub-humans, also treated Working Class British and Irish people in the same way. Indentured Service, Press-ganging, Child-labour, Starvation etc were all common place in Europe, and all to the benefit of the same tyrants who raped Africa.
The Slave Trade contributed to an economic enfeebling of parts of Africa. The greed of some of the rulers was sufficient to allow them to sell their own people with no care for their welfare. This attitude was helpful to the gradual occupation of the continent by regimes based across Europe, and not just in the British Isles. In the case of Great Britain especially, it was easy for the ruling class to treat the people in their charge as less than human. It must not be forgotten that the entire class structure in the UK was created to prevent the dilution of the ruling class bloodlines with that of the lowly oppressed peasantry. The arrogance of the bourgeois mindset made the denigration of African culture, tradition and way of life, almost inevitable.
As Imperialism gave way to Globalism (the same thing but differently dressed) puppet regimes were created to administer a fake home rule in the place of open dictatorship.
Africa is rich in minerals. If the nations were ruled by and for Working Class Africans, the continent could be wholly self-sufficient. Much of the land is abundantly fertile, and there is no logical reason why anyone should go without food. In a free and Socialist world, Africa left to flourish, could be a shining example to the rest of us, and her people would have no desire to emigrate from their homelands. This natural situation is quite the reverse of the contrived reality, and this is deliberate.
The administrative division of Africa into the imperial territories paid no heed to cultural, linguistic, tribal or any other authentic natural divisions. The imperialists had as much regard for Africa as the globalists have for Europe - lines drawn on a map replaced natural territorial divisions which mattered to the people, and this crime is still having repercussions. Forcing incompatible people to live in the same space, sharing the same resources, goes against nature. Hostility is inevitable, and when the resources are so scarce that sharing with an outsider means your own kin going without even the most basic commodities, such as food, violence is not only understandable, but right. The transfer of power to servile and corrupt despots ensured that the natural wealth of Africa was kept away from the people. For the successor to imperialism, Globalism, to work, the breakdown of countries was the first stage, with the free movement of people a vital part of the plan, and nothing encourages people to move, more than to escape hardship.
In Africa, war and poverty were (indeed still are) used to drive people from their lands, and coupled with the fantasy of the European Union being a rich land which literally owes them a living, the conditions for mass migration were set.
By supporting despotic regimes which would put greed above people, the internationalists engineered the unthinkable; mass starvation in the most fertile land in the world. The best educated Africans were driven to emigrate, thus depriving their home nations of the best minds. Military hardware was poured into the continent to ensure that war was a constant danger, and of course to enrich the war manufacturers. When starvation came, the response was to televise the suffering and to ram home the propaganda that this was the fault of Europeans because centuries ago the transatlantic slavery industry had existed. Never mind that the Working Class of all races were butchered by the ruling class parasites. The SJW trots successfully used the lie of racism as a means of making people accept that people fleeing the destruction of Africa should of course be welcomed into Europe. Of course the bourgeois bastards made sure that they kept themselves away from the newcomers, proving their hatred for the Working Class both new and old.
In 1985, the images of starvation in Africa prompted the Live Aid concerts. Millions were raised to provide food and healthcare, but the underlying reasons for the starvation were not addressed; those being the greed and corruption at the heart of the regimes put in place by the corporate entities fronting for the globalised ruling class. As a result, most of the money donated by sympathetic people from across the globe, was syphoned off by the governments in Africa, and by their globalist overlords. Contrary to the vile anti-European propaganda of the SJW trots, vast numbers of Europeans contributed to the cause of helping Africans. Live Aid essentially achieved very little, and the manufactured hunger continued.
The light at the end of the tunnel came for the people of Africa with the great works of Muammar Al Gaddafi. After turning Libya into the richest nation in Africa, with the highest standard of living, and such riches as free energy for all, Gaddafi turned his attention to helping the rest of the continent. His plan to use the vast reserves of gold built up from oil sales to produce a single currency for Africa, would have freed the continent from the stranglehold of international finance. To prevent the Gold Dinar, which would have killed the hated IMF and World Bank, Libya was invaded and the potential saviour of Africa was martyred. Death and debt are big business and the capitalist menace is more than happy to murder millions to hold onto power. Sadly the treacherous Arab League are also only too happy to aid their Jewish paymasters, as they proved when they refused to help Libya; they have been equally despicable in their inaction and effective selling out of Syria.
If the Libyan plan had not been bombed into oblivion, Africa would have become self-sufficient. The exodus of Africans would have been reversed as all reasons for living outside the homeland would have faded into insignificance. This would have ended the nightmare of mass migration which has wreaked so much havoc on the ordinary people of Europe. The momentum towards self-sufficient regions would have been unstoppable, and the entire globalist criminal enterprise would have fallen. With the murder of Gaddafi, our strongest chance for freedom died in cold blood.
The irrational hatred of foreigners which has increased as a result of the mass migration from Africa (the so-called 'Syrian' 'refugees') is a part of the globalist agenda being fulfilled. Immigrants are treated as the cause of all our ills, not as victims of the globalist despots, who have been brought into our lands by our common enemy. This thinking only aids the enemy, by focusing our anger on symptoms of the problem, not the cause.
For the British Isles to be free, it is vital that we struggle for all people to be free: not in the way of open borders globalists, but as free Inter-Nationalist Socialists who respect the right of everyone to self-determination, and the sanctity of closed borders. The rape of Africa took a new turn with the American imperialist occupation spearheaded by AFRICOM. Yet again, African culture is being stamped on, war is being escalated, hunger is being spread, and more people are fleeing for the chance of any life, even a harsh one in Europe.
The Mass Migration which is crippling the NHS, the Housing and Transport Infrastructure, destroying the Green Belt and seeing Law and Order, Education and all areas of Society crumbling, is contrived. We need to see beyond the migrants to the cause of their migration. Ending the suffering of the Working Class in Africa is the only solution to the suffering of the Working Class here. Populist calls for the migrants to be sent back, which do not call for the People of Africa to become truly self-governing, are not real solutions. The longer Capitalism survives, the more all of us will suffer. We have to attack the problem, not the symptoms, and stand by our Working Class brothers and sisters worldwide in a fight to permanently destroy the global ruling class and their economic system - a system which is slavery for the twentyfirst century for everyone.
