The Anglo-Zionist Ruling Class: The Enemy of the Working Class Everywhere

In the struggle for freedom, it is vital that we fight the real enemy, and do not get drawn into attacking those who are used as human shields.  We need to distinguish between the real architects of our plight, and those who may be associated through kinship or locality.  Our enemies have no qualms about sacrificing the common people in order to gain more control.

A particularly problematic issue is how to differentiate between our active enemies, the sleepers, and those who are genuinely not a part of the problem.  There is an undeniable Zionist dimension to our problems, discussion of which invites accusations of anti-Semitism.  This is a trap for to silence criticism of the Ruling Class, and it is a trap we must be careful to not fall into.  There are those who regard appealing to ordinary Jews to join in the resistance to the globalist order, as nothing short of treason.  Those who believe that all Jews are intrinsically bad, and all Gentiles good, have obviously watched too many films of the Cowboys and Indians variety.  There are many Zionist megalomaniacs who are not Jewish, and there are many Jews who do not seek to enslave humanity.  It is important to not accept the way of thinking which the media, and those who would lead us, would like to spoon-feed us.

As British citizens, we must appreciate that the deeds of the Establishment do not reflect the will of all the people.  The Ruling Class method of silencing those who oppose the rulers has the ridiculous result of labelling those who oppose the tyrants who sit in power over us, as self-haters, and terrorists.  We do not hate ourselves or our people; only the vermin who misrule in our name.  The label 'self-hating' conjures imagery of a mirror-smashing, possibly self-harming, loathsome creature who is wracked with feelings of inferiority and disgust, and who probably is justified in these feelings.  This label works well in preventing ordinary people associating with, or even listening to, someone they perceive as ill, and possibly as contagious.  However, when one looks behind the character assassination, more often than not, one can find someone who loves his (or her) own people to the point of no longer being able to accept the actions of a ruling minority who besmirch the national character through their selfish deeds.

There are good Israelis who should not be spoken of in the same breath as the likes of Netanyahu, the MOSSAD, and the MOSSAD-created Hamas rocketeers in Gaza.  The same goes for many ordinary Britons in relation to war criminals such as all recent Prime Ministers, the MI6 architects of the 07/07/05 London Bombings, and to the MI5 murderers who created the IRA as a method of dividing the peoples of the Isles against one another, with the people in the north of Ireland taking the brunt of the propaganda campaign.  The temptation to see everything in black and white, as good or evil, is human, but it is not realistic.  It is unpleasant to have to admit that some of one's own kind are such foul specimens that their existence is an affront to human decency.  we in the SMPBI love our people, but we are not blinkered to the fact that the world is a more dangerous and unhappy place due to the actions of people who are of our nation and country.

It is not self-hatred to fight against internal domestic enemies; indeed the enemy within is more dangerous than the enemy without.  The Monarchy are at the heart of the globalist agenda, and have been instrumental in the destruction of Europe.  If supporting the Monarchy is patriotic in the UK, then UK patriotism is in more desperate trouble than one would fear.

The UK Establishment murdered over One Million people in the Great Hunger of the 1840s, and caused a further Two Million to flee their Irish homeland.  The Monarchy did nothing to stop the murders, but rather sent in police and army units to crush a much needed revolt.  The resentment against the British is still evident today, but as reasonable as it is to despise the British Establishment for its murder of the Irish (by stealing their food and manufacturing starvation), it is not acceptable to blame all the British for this crime.

At the time of the Great Hunger, life for ordinary Britons was no picnic; the industrial revolution had destroyed the peasantry.  The Establishment had stolen their land and forced them into soul-destroying work in which life expectancy was low and wages lower.  Child labour, press-ganging (naval slavery), murder of trade unionists, unsanitary urban slum dwellings, work houses, police brutality, exile or execution of dissidents, malnutrition, and even the right of the Establishment land owners to take the virginity of all girls (in other words to rape children); these and other horrors were the lot of the common people.  Those who label the British as evil, really need to take a moment to reflect on the brutalisation of the British people by the Establishment.  The crimes of the rulers against the world outside the UK mirrored those against the people of these Isles.

For the Jewish people, the same situation presents as for the British.  The Second World War is often cited as an anti-Jewish war, but the truth differs from the propaganda.  There were no Homicidal Gas Chambers in Nazi-controlled Europe, and until the end of the War when food and medical supplies were cut, the occupants of the transit (concentration) camps were actually less likely to go hungry or to perish than those outside the camps.  The Jews were terrorised and forced to leave their homes; often they had assimilated and in some cases were unaware of their Jewish ancestry.  The Jews were put into the camps in order to fulfil the Zionist goal of populating Palestine with Jews and turning it into a hub for global Zionist rule.  Whereas the propaganda of the 6 million is an outright lie, the suffering of the common Jews was genuine.  Indeed, it would not be surprising to find that the deaths of around 700,000 (not 6,000,000) Jews at the end of the war were allowed by the Zionists who controlled both sides, in order to make their propaganda more realistic.  Ordinary Jews - like the Working Class of all origins - have always been pawns to be sacrificed as needs be.  All that matters to the Establishment is that their wealth and power increases.  The ordinary people are insignificant.

It is said that the life of every Palestinian isn't worth a single Jewish fingernail.  If this was the genuine policy of the Israeli State, then from the perspective of national preservation, (its location in Palestine aside), this is laudable.  However, the policies of the Zionist regime are now steering Israel to war; a war in which millions of Israelis could perish.  A Zionist policy for the defence and strengthening of a Jewish homeland, kept distinct of all others and secure within its borders is a reasonable objective, when one understands the ethnic-solidarity of the Jewish people.  Without the Talmudic hatred of the Goyim, there would be no problem with the Jewish State.  The Talmudic infiltration of Europe and much of the non-Jewish world has proven that there is no worthy National Zionist ideal but only the programme of Zionist Imperialism.

Zionist Imperialism utilises the following weapons: Political Correctness; Multi-Culturalism; Mass Migration; Pro-Transgenderism; Anti-Indigenous Rights; Supremacy of Materialism over the Spiritual.  National Zionism rightfully keeps these poisons away from the nation.  It would be naïve to think that Zionism has been hijacked by imperialists.  Zionism is the political expression of the Talmud, and at its core is based on the lunatic notion that the Jews are God's Chosen People and have a right to rule over the whole world, with the non-Jews existing only to serve them.

The idea that opposition to evil is self-hatred, highlights just how far our enemies have progressed in turning from a virtue to a vice, allegiance to what is morally right.  The British Establishment has been thoroughly Zionised since at least the time of the arrival of William Stadholder (1748), although the roots of the decay can be traced to William the Bastard (1066).  With the next William soon to take the throne, this process is now so far developed that the UK would be unrecognisable to the people living under the previous despotic Williams.

There is a tendency to view the people of a country and its ruling elite as one and the same.  This is certainly not the case in the UK.  In Israel, the rulers may at least be of the same stock as the people, but are their aspirations the same?  The 'self-hating Jews' who love their people so much that they are willing to endure the venom of Organised Jewry, in order to expose the evils of the Israeli regime, are an asset to the struggle for freedom worldwide.  Those who vilify them are as much enemies of humanity as those who sing God Save the Queen and wave their shiny red white and blue rags.  We need to accept the fact that loyalty to the Establishment is treason to the people, and the only loyalty which matters is loyalty to the people.

The British ruling class of Monarchy, Financiers, Freemasons and Bankers have trodden on the people for centuries.  They are the ones who created Israel as a base for the transformation of the world into a fully controlled mass of producer-consumers, ruled by unseen depots. There is a level of Zionist control over the British Establishment which makes an attack on the Establishment an attack on Talmudism.  In these days of political policing, it is dangerous to point to the enemy, and clearly state that it has an identity.   But to cower in the face of danger is to allow our enemies to win.  Much of the Establishment of the UK is Zionist by politics.  Herein lies the problem: it is often assumed that Israel controls the UK, but the relationship is not so simple; the same Establishment controls both countries.

Due to the rôle of Zionism in the UK, criticism of Israel is forbidden.  The attacks on Jeremy Corbyn for 'anti-Semitism' are attacks against a decent human being who understands the nature of Zionism, and who until recently, had the courage to stand up to it.  He has weakened and bowed his head in submission to the global financial ruling class.  We have stood firm.  Our attack against the Establishment cannot avoid attacking certain Jews, but there are Jews by radition who have awoken to the lies of their self-appointed leaders and should be fighting alongside us.

There is a natural knee-jerk reaction to go on the defensive when one feels one is being attacked.  For the reactionaries in Britain, this manifests as a rallying to the Monarchy, jingoistic support of the soldiers who are killing for the multi-national corporations.  For Jews, it is Israel to which they rally, and the IDF butchers who they defend.  It doesn't have to be this way.

In the UK there are growing numbers of people who can see how evil the Establishment is.  When such people are attacked as a part of a general attack on Britain, this only harms the opposition to globalism.  We who live inside the beast are as much victims of the globalist cabal as those who are openly attacked outside our borders.  And so it is with Israel.

In an ideal world, Israel would return the land stolen from Palestine and relocate to Birobidjan.  The best that we can realistically hope for is that decent Jews who rightly wish to live amongst their own will either relocate to the real Jewish State, or at least put pressure on the Tel Aviv regime to make peace with Israel's neighbours.

Maybe one day the Talmudists will be defeated, then National Zionism can become a reality and the Jewish State can thrive as a distinct land in which lunatic religious bigotry is contained (or better still vanquished), and can no longer threaten the rest of the world.  We can but hope.  For this possible outcome, we need to take the serious step of focusing our attacks on the globalist Establishment in Tel Aviv and London, and not on the ordinary people, who by and large just want to get on with their lives and look after their families.  We need to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with all who oppose globalism and all who believe in a free world of independent, self-sufficient, ethnically-distinct, culturally-strong nation-states.

Attacking all Jews or all Britons only serves to bolster the support for the Establishment of those who are neutral in this conflict, or are only partly aware of the internationalist menace.  We cannot afford to strengthen our enemies in any way.

Socialism And Sovereignty belong together: Just as Globalism and Capitalism do

Mention that you are a Socialist, and the automatic assumption is that you are an Open Borders fanatic.  The idea that opposition to Capitalism means opposition to Sovereignty, is as widespread as it is idiotic.  Capitalism thrives on open borders: it needs for borders to be eroded so that it can make profit out of the free movement of goods and people.  Socialism promotes the well being of the Working Class, and by doing so, promotes self-sufficiency in all areas where that is possible.  Socialism promotes understanding between Sovereign Nations, with absolute control of the borders, and of all that crosses them (or doesn't).  Internationalism is the very opposite of Globalism, and it is only through the manipulation of the media and mis-education system, that the two have become confused.

When people think that Socialism means an end to Nations, they are confusing authentic Socialism with the liberal impostor pushed by the George Soros funded SJW lunatics.

Those who have fallen for the liberalist propaganda which links Socialism with the Globalist policies of Capitalism that are destroying the lives of the Working Class, consider the following words of great Socialists who fought for International Understanding, and against any erosion of our beloved borders:

A Chinese Perspective (Mao Tse Tung)

"Chinese Communists must therefore combine patriotism with internationalism. We are at once internationalists and patriots, and our slogan is, "Fight to defend the motherland against the aggressors." For us defeatism is a crime and to strive for victory in the War of Resistance is an inescapable duty. For only by fighting in defence of the motherland can we defeat the aggressors and achieve national liberation. And only by achieving national liberation will it be possible for the proletariat and other working people to achieve their own emancipation. The victory of China and the defeat of the invading imperialists will help the people of other countries. Thus in wars of national liberation patriotism is applied internationalism."

-  "The Role of the Chinese Communist Party in the National War" (October 1938), Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 196

A French View (George Marchais)

An interesting article that makes reference to the anti-immigration stance of George Marchais, former leader of the French Communist Party. Here are some of Marchais' quotes from the article:

"Due to the presence in France of almost four and a half million immigrant workers and their families, the pursuit of immigration is a serious problem today. We must stop official and illegal immigration, " said Georges Marchais, January 6, 1981.

"We think that all workers are brothers, regardless of the country where they were born (...)" But "in the current crisis, it [immigration] is for the bosses and the government a way to aggravate unemployment , low wages, poor working conditions, repression against all workers, both immigrants and French. That is why we say: we must stop immigration, or we will throw new workers out of work. "

"We must solve important problems posed in the French local life by immigration [...] are piled up in what we must call ghettos, workers and families to traditions, languages, ways to live different. This creates tensions and sometimes clashes between immigrants from different countries. This makes their relations with the French difficult. When the concentration becomes very important [...], the housing crisis worsens; HLMs are badly needed and many French families can not access them. The social welfare burdens for impoverished immigrant families are becoming unbearable for the budgets of communes populated by workers and employees. Education is unable to cope ... "

A British Take (Bob Crow)

A Russian Perspective (V.I. Lenin)

”You make the cause of the nation the cause of the people and the cause of the people will become the cause of the nation.”

A View from Burkina Faso (Thomas Sankara)

"Imperialism is a system of exploitation that occurs not only in the brutal form of those who come with guns to conquer territory. Imperialism often occurs in more subtle forms, a loan, food aid, blackmail . We are fighting this system that allows a handful of men on earth to rule all of humanity....We must learn to live the African way. It's the only way to live in freedom and with dignity....Without patriotic political education, a soldier is only a potential criminal."

Thoughts from Cuba (Ernesto Che Guevara)

Each time a country is freed, we say, it is a defeat for the world imperialist system, but we must agree that real liberation or breaking away from the imperialist system is not achieved by the mere act of proclaiming independence or winning an armed victory in a revolution. Freedom is achieved when imperialist economic domination over a people is brought to an end.

Thoughts from a certain German

"The proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must itself constitute the nation."
Karl Marx


To the liberal SJW idiots who have misappropriated the Red Flag, and promote Globalism, Open Borders, Mass Migration and all the other deeds of Capitalism, the above quotes must be unpalatable.  Socialism is unique in each country, and is unique for each people.  Those who try to universalise it, are the coca cola fakers who would be happy for a world in which no countries exist; McDonald's poison shops are in every town; where everyone dresses the same, watches the same TV, listens to the same music, has the same 'culture'; where nothing exists apart from a mass of consumers buying the same shit and slaving for the same global corporations - that is where Capitalism is taking us.  Globalism IS Capitalism.  The secure borders and absolute sovereignty of an Inter-national cooperation of free independent states, adhering to their own unique variations of Revolutionary Patriotic Socialism, is the only way of stopping it.

Separatist antics fail to derail Brexit - Guest item by CPB-ML

Editor's introduction:
The SMPBI shares the CPB-ML belief that separatism is divisive and must be stopped.  We go further than the CPB-ML, in our belief that the entire British Isles need to stand together as one Nation.  We share the optimism of our Comrades in the CPB-ML that the agents of globalism - seeking to tear our people apart by pitting region against region - are failing.  United we stand....

Uniting Britain and defeating separatism are essential for securing our nation’s independence. And as class struggle spreads in public services, transport and energy, support for separatism weakens…

In a boost to Brexit and the quest to achieve a fully independent Britain, defeats and afflictions on several fronts are beginning to weaken the SNP government and the wider separatist movement in Scotland. While the Welsh Assembly accepted the EU Withdrawal Bill, the Scottish Parliament did not, voting by 93 to 30 to reject consent.

The area of contention is a group of 24 areas – out of 157 devolved areas – that need to be kept under central control in order to safeguard integrity of the UK's own internal single market. This is necessary to properly negotiate trade deals outside the EU after Brexit. The 24 items cover such activities as fisheries, agriculture, food labelling, environmental protection and public procurement.

The SNP dramatised this into a “power grab by Westminster”, staged walk-outs in Parliament during June and threatened to frustrate the Brexit process by copying the tactics used by the Irish nationalist Charles Parnell in the 19th century.

It was not long before there was a growing perception around Scotland of the SNP’s antics as hypocritical. Being all-supportive of the EU and demanding membership of both Customs Union and Single Market, they would, if their break-up of Britain were to be achieved, abandon control of all 157 powers back to the European Union anyway.

No veto

The SNP case was further weakened when the architect of the devolution convention, Lord Sewel, intervened to point out that it had never been intended that any constituent part of Britain could hold an ultimate veto over matters that need to be resolved by Britain as a whole. Neither was the repatriation of Britain’s powers from the EU meant to be part-distributed to Holyrood – as if the 2014 referendum to keep the UK together had never happened.

Over 40 years ago this Party fought against separatism with its pamphlet Unity not Devolution showing a united working class as the backbone of the nation. Several bodies are now coming onboard to seek to reverse devolution.

Of course, the SNP antics were part of a strategy to use the Brexit process to create circumstances in which the party could demand and win a second Scottish independence referendum. Hence the launch in May of an “economic blueprint”, the Sustainable Growth Commission report. But it was roundly condemned from all sides – including by proponents of separatism.

At the SNP annual conference in Aberdeen in June over 250 people attended a fringe meeting where loud applause was given to strong criticism of the “blueprint”. As well as embracing “austerity”, it comes firmly down on the side of globalised capitalism – perhaps as an entrance essay for EU membership.

The leadership of the Scottish TUC – who frequently bow in reverence to the EU – could only complain about being excluded from contributing to the document while praising its call for “the need for government, businesses and trade unions to work together”.

Having trotted off to Brussels the week before, SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon remarked that the SNP conference “marks the start of a new chapter on Scotland's road to independence”.

She had gained direct access to the EU's chief negotiator, Michael Barnier, to pledge allegiance to, and seek ways for Scotland to remain in, the EU Customs Union and Single Market, despite Brexit. While Barnier complained in a speech in Lisbon that Britain was refusing to spell out exactly what it wanted, he was no doubt hearing in Brussels exactly what the Scottish separatists wanted.

It took a former SNP deputy leader, Jim Sillars, who had tirelessly campaigned for Brexit, to voice the thought that arises from this by accusing his own party of “acting like a fifth column for the EU”.

In a bout of wishful thinking, the separatist movement resorted to inflating the numbers on its rallies. A body monitoring the recent SNP and “Yes” movement marches showed this conclusively. The Union City campaign in Glasgow counted the numbers as the march passed. Combined with aerial footage they demonstrated a crowd total nearer to 8,000 rather than the 80,000 claimed.

A similar exercise was carried out in Dumfries in south west Scotland. On both occasions the counter demonstration – for a united and independent Britain – was well received by the public.

Farming

The Scottish government's proposals on farming in its Climate Change Bill were described in late June as “devastating for farming” by Quality Meat Scotland chairman Jim McLaren, speaking at the Royal Highland Show. This came just as Nicola Sturgeon and Carwyn Jones (her Welsh counterpart) addressed a conference of the British-Irish Council, calling for staying within the EU Customs Union and Single Market.

Undermining their deliberations, too, was Michael Gove's timely intervention pledging financial assistance to Scottish agriculture to ease the cessation of EU subsidies following Brexit.

Then came a joint statement from the Scottish Fishermen’s Association and the National Farmers’ Union urging Scottish ministers to get on with ensuring they devote enough money and manpower to implement trade and export policy following Brexit. Campaigning continues by Fishing for Leave from its HQ in Glasgow.

A steady stream of negative publicity and unrest has hampered progress for the separatists. Failings in dealing with the NHS, policing and education in Scotland are ongoing. A 5 per cent cut from central government became an 11 per cent cut to local authorities from the Scottish government.

Action by trade unions against this is beginning in earnest as we now see in the strikes organised by Unison, Unite and GMB (see Services: Dunbarton strike). The RMT, Aslef and TSSA continue their agitation against the ongoing privatisations carried out by the Scottish government, as in the cases of Northlink Ferries and train sleeper services (now run by Serco), and ScotRail (now run by Abellio).

 In services, nearly 80,000 jobs have gone, while in college education 140,000 places have gone. In the year to June a total of 30 libraries closed down, up from 15 in the year before. For the previous decade such annual closures had been in single figures. The campaign Library Matters is gearing up to fight this.

In education, members of Scotland's largest teaching union, the EIS, voted in June to escalate a pay dispute to “strike readiness” and began preparing a ballot for August when summer holidays end.

Transnational energy companies have received the bulk of subsidies while smaller community energy projects get tiny loans. On 22 June Unite Scotland announced a yes vote for industrial action at Total E&P Shetland Gas Plant. Enthusiasm for this was shown by the 96.8 per cent yes with 96.9 per cent participation. Offshore members were expected to follow suit. The enforcement of three-week shift rotas was among the terms and conditions being reviewed by the company across its North Sea operations. Balloting on a separate dispute over hours was ongoing as Workers went to press (see page 5).

Still in the north, some success for RMT as well as Nautilus International was reported at the STUC annual conference. While presenting the motion on support for seafarers on the Orkney Ferries, speakers from these unions outlined how they had achieved good results after a long campaign of solidarity and perseverance for better pay and conditions. They had broken the “pay cap”, resulting in increased membership.

An earlier campaign by the RMT had highlighted the need for more attention to be paid to moving heavy freight by rail. This is a particular necessity in Scotland with the long distances involved. The RMT’s General Secretary Mick Cash laid out the overwhelming case, citing the problem as being “a lack of strategic planning and integration as a result of our fragmented, privatised railways”.

In the face of the Scottish government buying Chinese steel for the new River Forth bridge, the Community union received unanimous support from the STUC conference for its Save Our Steel campaign. They demanded the reintroduction of high quality steelmaking and slab casting facilities in Motherwell, at the Dalzell and Clydebridge plants.

Fiasco

In late June the fracking fiasco continued when the Court of Session in Edinburgh, Scotland's supreme civil court, ruled that the long perceived Scottish government ban on fracking for shale gas was not a ban at all. Ministers had to admit that despite proclaiming a ban, they had been merely been expressing a preference.

 Ineos, meanwhile, had been forced to import shale gas by sea from the USA. With a proper evaluation and solving of safety concerns, this operation based at Grangemouth could play a major role in Britain's quest for energy self-sufficiency.

The disputes within Scotland encourage a turning away from separatist thought and EU dependency. Polls reveal a steady support for a united Britain, with the “No” answer to the question “Should Scotland be an independent country?” staying at a constant 50 per cent. The question was asked between January and June by Survation, Ipsos Mori and YouGov. The “yes” reply received 42 per cent in January, 46 per cent in March and 41 per cent in June, with the rest being “don’t knows”.

...
Article reproduced with thanks to the CPB-ML

British Working Class Socialism is the Answer to Globalism

If one had to ponder what is the greatest lie of the 'Multi-culti Politically Correct' era, one would be hard-pressed to do so, as every aspect of Political Correctness is a lie.  From the 'Feminism' which speaks of liberating women from the 'chore' of Motherhood, and into the servitude of the wage slave, to the anti-Racism which promotes the notion that we must cherish our equal opportunities to become slaves in a materialistic Hell-on-Earth, political correctness leads invariably to economic bondage and loss of humanity.

For many people, the conquest of Europe (at home and overseas) by those with ideologies diametrically opposed to the well-being of the people, has led to the conclusion that Europe and much of the European world has succumbed to socialism.  This is perhaps the greatest lie of all.  What people tend to view as Socialism is nothing of the sort; it is Trotskyism, and the greatest deception of those who misrule us is that Trotskyism and Socialism are one and the same.  In truth, they are opposites.

What is Socialism?

Socialism is the natural desire to protect one's own.  It is identical with Working Class Nationalism.  Those who call themselves Socialists, but argue against sovereignty and borders, are not Socialists, but Globalists.  Likewise those who profess to fight for the people, yet endorse Free Market Capitalism, are but another variety of Globalist.  Free Market Capitalism and Open Borders Socialism belong in one camp; they both embrace the central pillars of the cosmopolitan materialistic ideology, and whether they call themselves left or right is really of no consequence.  By virtue of refusing to face up to the reality that the Nation is the People, and that the economy must serve the people, rather than the people serve it, they cannot in any way justify using the interchangeable terms of Nationalism and Socialism, which define everything they stand against.

Socialism is an ideology which by its very goes beyond mere economics.  The essence of Socialism is the belief that people matter, and that the economic system under which they live, must be tailored so as to give them the greatest practicable amount of freedom and contentment.  To this end, Socialism is the pursuit of happiness through self-reliance and mutual support; it is not a belief in an all-powerful State directing the lives of the people, which, of course is what the corruption known as Fabian Socialism is all about.

The great confusion concerning the use of the term Socialism for its ideological opposite, arose with the Marxist takeover of the joint French and British Trades Union initiative, known as the International Working Men's Association, aka, the First International.  That organisation was set up with the sole purpose of preventing employers in France and Britain importing cheap foreign labour in order to lower wage demands.  The IWMA would today be labelled by modern-day Marxists as a 'fascistic' and 'xenophobic' organisation due to its demand that people in and of the respective nations, should be given absolute priority in the workplace.  Ironically, Marx himself was the General Secretary of the IWMA, although it was only after he successfully expelled his main rival, Mikhail Bakunin, that the rot set in.

Socialism is a belief that the Nation is the People, and that only that which is good for the people is permissible in the nation.  To this end, the economy of the country must be fully nationalised.  Again, the liberals and trots have used linguistic chicanery to impose their agenda whilst hiding behind the label which means its exact opposite.  The 'Socialisation of the Means of Production' has to be the transfer of power from the obscenely wealthy to the people as a whole - as the term implies -  but for the trots, it is Globalisation through bureaucratic control; giving more power, not less to the Usurers.  True Socialism unifies the Nation.  Fabianism and Trotskyism in no way undermine the Ruling Class, who retain their grip on power behind the scenes.  State Capitalism abolishes private property, giving absolute control to the State.  Socialism, in contrast, supports private property at the lowest practicable scale, and for the larger concerns employs profit-sharing amongst the workers and management, as a means of encouraging productivity.  Distributism, Syndicalism, Social Credit etc are all Socialist.

The goal of Fabianism and Trotskyism is for a Global State in which all the workers are equal; having lost their symbolic chains and having gained total servitude in their place.  For the Middle Class 'book socialists', there is no such thing as Culture, Nation, etc, only the 'right' to work as a part of the global slave plantation.  This is Capitalism.  The abolition of Trade Tariffs, the end to restrictions on the movement of labour, and the steady demise of other elements of national sovereignty are all under way in order to create more wealth for the Ruling Class, and to reduce the masses to absolute servitude.  That is not Socialism, but unbridled Capitalism, and the Trotskyite fake socialism has exactly the same aims.

Globalism is Capitalism

Karl Marx's friend and sponsor, Engels, was so sincere in his Feminism, that not only did he have servants to do his every bidding; he even raped them.  Far from liberating the oppressed classes, Engels and his cabal oppressed all who they could.  Capitalism garners wealth and power for the self-Chosen 'elite'; the Trotskyite interpretation of Marxism ensures that the masses are kept so impoverished that they cannot see through the political lies and liberate themselves. 

Liberalism walks hand-in-hand with Capitalism.  Liberalism destroys the building blocks of society, and in its wake leaves total individualists who cannot comprehend the need for a strong society, let alone take their place in it.  Margaret Thatcher notoriously stated that 'there is no such thing as society, only the individual'.  This perverse thinking is political correctness in practice and would be applauded by all who believe in the unrestricted hedonism and self-important materialism which has wrecked Europe.  Trotsky would not have used such a hideous phrase, but his ideology has led directly to that diseased view of the world becoming the norm for many people.

Freedom comes with a restoration of National Freedom, and Social Justice.  Socialism is Nationalism and Nationalism is Socialism.  Anything else is a fraud concocted to keep us in fear of our only hope of salvation.  Don't let the enemy confuse you or scare you away from ideas which will free us all.   If these ideas were not so dangerous to the global enemy, they would bother attacking them at every opportunity.

Marxism is of another time

One important thing to remember is that Marxism, at least in its original form, was a nineteenth century ideology. Much has changed in terms of living standards since the nineteenth century. We have far better standards today, at least in the West. In other parts of the world, there is still some desperate poverty. Look at this video:

Would you like to be one of those boys? It's still similar to child labour in Britain during the nineteenth century, in coal mines and so on, in the form that it takes.

British Socialism

We need to get away from the strait jacket of seeing Socialism as Marxism or derivatives of Marxism.

In Britain the first place to raise the Red flag was Merthyr in 1831: it was a symbol for 'Caws a bara' (cheese and bread) and 'I lawr â'r Brenin' (Republicanism - down with the king).  At that time the men of Wales were raising the Red Flag, Marx was a mere 13-year old! Socialism is Society-ism; what is good for the people, not what is good for the moneyed oppressors.  As Socialists fighting for the best for the Motherland of the British Isles, we can learn much by looking at our own people. We can - of course - look at examples of ideologies further afield, but nothing speaks to the soul of the British Working Class more than the British Working Class itself.

SMPBI, formerly SWPE, Never SWP

SMPBI has come under criticism for being a Trotskyite-Fascist organisation, like its parent, the SWP!  This is nonsense.  The SMPBI was previously called the SWPE (Socialist Workers' Party of England), but it has at no time been a part of, or splinter from, the SWP (Socialist Workers Party).  The confusion with the name isn't helped by the main website and some of the others still having the SWPE name.  This is something which admittedly we do need to sort out.

In the UK, there is a political party which is always present at industrial disputes and protest gatherings.  This party is the SWP. 

Laughingly claiming to be against the Establishment, the Socialist Workers Party is very much a part of the Establishment.  It has front groups such as United Against Fascism which exist for the sole purpose of libelling all opponents as Nazis, and thereby silencing criticism.  The SWP, far from being a party for the 'Workers' is a party which advances the interests of international finance, and uses the genuine grievances of the people as an excuse to push its globalist agenda.

The Socialist Worker is always a good source for anyone who cares to look into the damaged mind of the trotskyite materialistic pseudo-anti-Capitalists.  The underlying opposition to economic deprivation is laudable, however, the solutions offered only bolster the stranglehold of the common enemy.

Immigration is touted as a solution to the economic problems of the world.  According to the ideology of the SWP, the exploitation of the poorer nations by the richer ones has created the economic hardship the people therein endure. So far so good; global imperialism is indeed a key factor in the destruction of the conquered nations (is rather than was, because it still goes on under corporate rather than national banners).  However, the ideology then falters by ignoring the fact that migration away from the conquered nations has been a result of economic imperialism, and goes on to argue that the movement of people is a good thing.

In the SWP's 'Where We Stand' section, can be found the following pearls of wisdom:

• Workers create all the wealth under capitalism. A new society can only be constructed when they collectively seize control of that wealth and plan its production and distribution according to need.

Yes, the people do create the wealth, but it is the materialist system itself which has to be overturned.  As the people of China can testify to, the replacement of a monopoly of private owners by a monopoly of bureaucrats has not made their plight any easier.  The increased efficiency of the means of production has allowed for the creation of ever more junk products, by an army of slaves.  The SWP argue that this is due to the Chinese states being State Capitalist, but this is a purely semantic argument.  The refusal to respect culture, tradition, race and faith, inevitably leads to the depersonalisation of the people.  This is one of the inherent flaws of Trotskyism.

• We oppose all immigration controls and campaign for solidarity with workers in other countries. 

How exactly are the people to gain, when they have to compete for resources with unlimited immigration?  The SWP would doubtless claim that there would be no need for immigration controls after the global revolution; this in itself highlights their failure to get beyond academic theories and deal with the real world.  Certainly supporting all people who strive for freedom is vital, but the SWP are not fighting for freedom, but for economic control; they seek to replace the corporate despots with themselves, and that has nothing to do with freedom.

• We support the right of black people and other oppressed groups to organise their own defence and we support all genuine national liberation movements. 

This point betrays the mentality of the SWP.  They view Black people as oppressed in a way that White people are not.  For all the talk of being anti-racist, the SWP do treat the races differently.  It is interesting that Blacks and 'other oppressed groups' are encouraged to organise separately.  So the SWP envisage Black groups, homosexual groups, and all manner of exclusive groups, but Heterosexual Whites must be organised as parts of mixed groups (mixed with whom, remains a mystery!) 

The notion of 'genuine' national liberation movements is also one which we share.  However, as supporters of borders, SMPBI accepts the right of individual nations to exist, and to work together Inter-Nationally as free sovereign entities.  The issue is problematic for the SWP as their borders-abolishing globalism does not support a future in which any nations exist.

• We campaign for real social, political and economic equality for woman and for an end to all forms of discrimination against lesbians, gay men, bisexual and transgender people.

The 'right to work' is a common theme of the SWP.  This is because, production is the sole purpose of the individual in the Trotskyite mind.  Social equality is simply globalist multi-cultural dogma; Economic equality means the right to work.  Women are especially singled out due to a fanatical hatred of the family structure.  To the SWP, it is a woman's right to be a part of the servile labour force.  The traditional role of women as the principle child nurturers is viewed as patriarchal tyranny; indeed the idea of families raising their own children is a threat to the State.  Women have the right to have their children raised by the State whilst they work to produce and consume as good wage-slave robots.  The lumping together of women and people separated due to sexuality is a variation of the more common linking of women and 'ethnic minorities', but continues the theme of splitting women away from their menfolk.  Men and women together form a strong natural bond which the SWP seeks to break apart.  The horrific protection of the rapist, 'Comrade Delta' Martin Smith, was only possible due to this unhealthy obsession with treating women as being a special class of Comrades - sadly, a class which can be patronised, objectified and abused.  SMPBI has a membership requirement that all prospective members declare any sex offences - these automatically bar anyone from membership.  The SWP could do well to adopt a similar policy.

The Socialist Worker presents itself as fighting for the workers.  As can be seen in their Where We Stand summary, their policies, if ever implemented, would reduce the worker to the level of a slave.  The attack on everything wholesome and natural is identical to the tactics of the Capitalist entity they purport to oppose.  The objective of the people who control the SWP is to establish a single global materialist State in which all people are the same; a State in which there is no place for culture, family, sovereignty, tradition, customs, or indeed any of the many aspects of humanity which make us more than economic producer-consumers.  They claim to oppose the current drive to a global State ruled by a financial oligarchy, but only because they do not understand that the people who control them ARE the financiers they protest against.

The SWP exist to herd anti-Capitalists into fighting for the very oppressors they instinctively oppose.  Social Justice cannot exist except within a strong and free nation.  A nation is more than an economy; it is a people unified by experience and by kinship.  To ignore the bonds of land and people is to ignore nature.  Genuine Socialists put their own people first; globalism is anti-society, and therefore anti-Socialist.

Supporters of the SWP have been lied to by their leaders.  They have swallowed all manner of trotskyite drivel, but just as humanity as a whole is awakening to the lunacy of globalism, so too will the genuine and decent Socialists awaken to the lies of those who would lead them.  SMPBI has no dealings with the SWP, other than to hold out a hand to Working Class SWP members and ex-members who know deep inside that Socialism Needs Borders; it serves us well to exploit those doubts and break the good few away from the middle class trotskyite enemy.  To be classed alongside the bourgeois trots is not helpful, and we have to work on ways of making it clear that this lumping together is counter-productive.

To Stop the Mass Migration from Africa, Stop the Exploitation of Capitalism

Africa is a troubled continent.  From the time of the recent European Empires, it has been economically ravaged.  Much has been written of the African Slave Trade, with blame for the human suffering being laid squarely at the feet of Europeans - all Europeans, not just the Ruling Class! - but as with most contemporary propaganda, the truth is somewhat different.

At the time of the Black Slave Trade, ordinary Europeans were also subjected to unspeakable horrors.  There is a tendency to blame all British people for the suffering endured by the African Slaves, but this is inappropriate.  Even if it was acceptable to blame people for crimes committed by their ancestors (which it is not), the Slave Owners were not Working Class people, but people from the Ruling Class and especially the financial class of banking parasites, and those who caught and enslaved them in the first place, were despotic Africans, many of whom have descendants today who still profit from the cruelty of enslaving human beings.. 

Those who say that the British should feel guilt and shame for the Slave Trade, conveniently forget that the same people who treated the Africans as sub-humans, also treated Working Class British and Irish people in the same way.  Indentured Service, Press-ganging, Child-labour, Starvation etc were all common place in Europe, and all to the benefit of the same tyrants who raped Africa. 

The Slave Trade contributed to an economic enfeebling of parts of Africa.  The greed of some of the rulers was sufficient to allow them to sell their own people with no care for their welfare.  This attitude was helpful to the gradual occupation of the continent by regimes based across Europe, and not just in the British Isles.  In the case of Great Britain especially, it was easy for the ruling class to treat the people in their charge as less than human.  It must not be forgotten that the entire class structure in the UK was created to prevent the dilution of the ruling class bloodlines with that of the lowly oppressed peasantry.  The arrogance of the bourgeois mindset made the denigration of African culture, tradition and way of life, almost inevitable.

As Imperialism gave way to Globalism (the same thing but differently dressed) puppet regimes were created to administer a fake home rule in the place of open dictatorship.

Africa is rich in minerals.  If the nations were ruled by and for Working Class Africans, the continent could be wholly self-sufficient.  Much of the land is abundantly fertile, and there is no logical reason why anyone should go without food.  In a free and Socialist world, Africa left to flourish, could be a shining example to the rest of us, and her people would have no desire to emigrate from their homelands.  This natural situation is quite the reverse of the contrived reality, and this is deliberate.

The administrative division of Africa into the imperial territories paid no heed to cultural, linguistic, tribal or any other authentic natural divisions.  The imperialists had as much regard for Africa as the globalists have for Europe - lines drawn on a map replaced natural territorial divisions which mattered to the people, and this crime is still having repercussions. Forcing incompatible people to live in the same space, sharing the same resources, goes against nature.  Hostility is inevitable, and when the resources are so scarce that sharing with an outsider means your own kin going without even the most basic commodities, such as food, violence is not only understandable, but right.  The transfer of power to servile and corrupt despots ensured that the natural wealth of Africa was kept away from the people.  For the successor to imperialism, Globalism, to work, the breakdown of countries was the first stage, with the free movement of people a vital part of the plan, and nothing encourages people to move, more than to escape hardship.

In Africa, war and poverty were (indeed still are) used to drive people from their lands, and coupled with the fantasy of the European Union being a rich land which literally owes them a living, the conditions for mass migration were set. 

By supporting despotic regimes which would put greed above people, the internationalists engineered the unthinkable; mass starvation in the most fertile land in the world.  The best educated Africans were driven to emigrate, thus depriving their home nations of the best minds.  Military hardware was poured into the continent to ensure that war was a constant danger, and of course to enrich the war manufacturers.  When starvation came, the response was to televise the suffering and to ram home the propaganda that this was the fault of Europeans because centuries ago the transatlantic slavery industry had existed.  Never mind that the Working Class of all races were butchered by the ruling class parasites.  The SJW trots successfully used the lie of racism as a means of making people accept that people fleeing the destruction of Africa should of course be welcomed into Europe.  Of course the bourgeois bastards made sure that they kept themselves away from the newcomers, proving their hatred for the Working Class both new and old.

In 1985, the images of starvation in Africa prompted the Live Aid concerts.  Millions were raised to provide food and healthcare, but the underlying reasons for the starvation were not addressed; those being the greed and corruption at the heart of the regimes put in place by the corporate entities fronting for the globalised ruling class.  As a result, most of the money donated by sympathetic people from across the globe, was syphoned off by the governments in Africa, and by their globalist overlords.  Contrary to the vile anti-European propaganda of the SJW trots, vast numbers of Europeans contributed to the cause of helping Africans.  Live Aid essentially achieved very little, and the manufactured hunger continued.

The light at the end of the tunnel came for the people of Africa with the great works of Muammar Al Gaddafi.  After turning Libya into the richest nation in Africa, with the highest standard of living, and such riches as free energy for all, Gaddafi turned his attention to helping the rest of the continent.  His plan to use the vast reserves of gold built up from oil sales to produce a single currency for Africa, would have freed the continent from the stranglehold of international finance.  To prevent the Gold Dinar, which would have killed the hated IMF and World Bank, Libya was invaded and the potential saviour of Africa was martyred.  Death and debt are big business and the capitalist menace is more than happy to murder millions to hold onto power.  Sadly the treacherous Arab League are also only too happy to aid their Jewish paymasters, as they proved when they refused to help Libya; they have been equally despicable in their inaction and effective selling out of Syria.

If the Libyan plan had not been bombed into oblivion, Africa would have become self-sufficient.  The exodus of Africans would have been reversed as all reasons for living outside the homeland would have faded into insignificance.  This would have ended the nightmare of mass migration which has wreaked so much havoc on the ordinary people of Europe.  The momentum towards self-sufficient regions would have been unstoppable, and the entire globalist criminal enterprise would have fallen.  With the murder of Gaddafi, our strongest chance for freedom died in cold blood.

The irrational hatred of foreigners which has increased as a result of the mass  migration from Africa (the so-called 'Syrian' 'refugees') is a part of the globalist agenda being fulfilled.  Immigrants are treated as the cause of all our ills, not as victims of the globalist despots, who have been brought into our lands by our common enemy.  This thinking only aids the enemy, by focusing our anger on symptoms of the problem, not the cause.

For the British Isles to be free, it is vital that we struggle for all people to be free: not in the way of open borders globalists, but as free Inter-Nationalist Socialists who respect the right of everyone to self-determination, and the sanctity of closed borders.  The rape of Africa took a new turn with the American imperialist occupation spearheaded by AFRICOM.  Yet again, African culture is being stamped on, war is being escalated, hunger is being spread, and more people are fleeing for the chance of any life, even a harsh one in Europe. 

The Mass Migration which is crippling the NHS, the Housing and Transport Infrastructure, destroying the Green Belt and seeing Law and Order, Education and all areas of Society crumbling, is contrived.  We need to see beyond the migrants to the cause of their migration.  Ending the suffering of the Working Class in Africa is the only solution to the suffering of the Working Class here.  Populist calls for the migrants to be sent back, which do not call for the People of Africa to become truly self-governing, are not real solutions.  The longer Capitalism survives, the more all of us will suffer. We have to attack the problem, not the symptoms, and stand by our Working Class brothers and sisters worldwide in a fight to permanently destroy the global ruling class and their economic system - a system which is slavery for the twentyfirst century for everyone.

Skills Shortages? Train the People!

No matter how hard the media spin the lies of the global corporations, everyone who has to be careful with regards to how much money they spend, must be aware that there is a global economic downturn underway.  The Zionists and their bankers have engineered this economic crisis, and it is the downtrodden workers who are being bled white by the aforementioned criminals.

The only way to have a healthy economy is to be in charge of it.  That means an end to unrestricted migration as a part of breaking away from the Finance-Capitalist economy and introduction of a Socialist system based on mutual co-operation, not exploitation. Not everyone agrees with this.

The mass media is typically bleeding heart liberal and is all for open borders.  The few parts of the media which consider that there should be restrictions on who moves to the Isles, stop at arguing that economic migrants need to be vetted to weed out the unskilled who would not benefit the economy. The Socialist Party of Great Britain argues that immigration should be allowed with no limits at all. The loonies of the SPGB (people with whom we will NOT be collaborating) are kindred spirits with the mass media and global capitalists. They belong to the same globalist mindset.  Open Borders, (or No Borders as the anti-Leninist and somehow Marxist (wtf?) SPGB dream of the world future), is good for the exploiters who can use and abuse cheap labour, but for the Working Class who daily see life get harder as the money from our wage slavery gets more difficult to survive on, it is no future at all.  The SPGB believes that:

"Socialism would be worldwide, with no nation states, no borders, and the common ownership of the whole Earth by the whole of humanity.  Disputes about ideas and values would be settled solely by debate."

This No Borders bourgeois fantasy is hippy bullshit, which starry eyed Trots and mentally impaired liberals can believe in, but for those of us who have to live in the real world, bullshit is all it is.

The liberal capitalist quota issue is a red herring. So long as the EU exists, all member states will be subject to potential unlimited immigration from other member states. In theory, as one part of the Union becomes prosperous, people from areas in decline will be able to move to it en masse. In practice, this hasn't happened, as can be seen by mass unemployment getting worse daily in countries such as Greece.  But even if the design worked, the result would be to turn Europeans into rootless cosmopolitans, and to turn Europe into a cultural wasteland: a coca cola degenerated USA on the other side of the Atlantic.

So what is the solution to mass unemployment and the skills shortage problem? Simply put, Closed Borders, genuine national sovereignty, and education.  It is vital that not only Brexit happens, but that the entire EU project, as well as all other globalist collaborations, end.  Then we must have an education system which elevates the people so no job is unfilled.

The idea that we must import people with skills to fill vacant jobs, is offensive to the people of the Isles and to the people who are called to come here.  Skills migration means that other countries suffer a skills drain.  The Capitalists have stolen the minerals, oil and other wealth of countries across the globe.  A skills drain is just another example of theft and exploitation - in many ways a covert newer version of the overt slavery of olden times - and would further impoverish the countries those people leave; simultaneously it would leave the unemployed in the Isles still unemployed, and the unskilled, still unskilled.

SMPBI rejects open borders liberal fantacism.  We call for Total Socialism in the Isles. The Working Class must be given the best education, so that any work we need to do, we can do.  Automation of jobs which are not fit for human beings to do, is something we need to promote. No-one should have to work in jobs which are soul-destroying and utterly pointless.  Everyone should have the opportunity to develop his or her skills and abilities to make work a pleasure and to make society wholesome and united.  That is the essence of Socialism.

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT.

by Pietro

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF WESTMINSTER AND BRUSSELS NEVER ACCEPTED THE RESULTS OF THE REFERENDUM SINCE THE MORNING OF THE 24th OF JUNE 2016. DAVID CAMERON RESIGNED AND GOT REPLACED BY THERESA MAY.

AFTER JUST REPEATING "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT" LIKE A PARROT SHE IS TRYING HER BEST TO BE IN THE EU IN ALL BUT NAME.

DESPITE THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE ABOUT THE KREMLIN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE ATTEMPTED MURDERING OF A SPY AND HIS DAUGHTER IN SALISBURY (IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE AGAINST THEIR INTEREST) THE ENTIRE WESTERN ESTABLISHMENT AND THE SOROSES OF THIS WORLD ARE PUSHING REALLY HARD TO START A NEW WAR AGAINST RUSSIA IN ORDER TO KEEP NATO, THE UN AND THE EU ALIVE AND KICKING.

WITH THE EXEMPTION OF AUSTRIA, BULGARIA AND HUNGARY (And even these have sent home a token Russian in support of this lunacy) EVERY WESTERN COUNTRY STARTED THE MAD WITCH HUNT AGAINST RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS.

THERESA MAY, EMANUEL MACRON AND ANGELA MERKEL HAVE HAD A JOINT CONFERENCE IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE HOSTILITY. UNLIKE IN 2014 WHEN CRIMEA RETURNED HOME THIS TIME THE EU IS EVEN MORE WARMONGERING THAN THE US

IN A MOMENT IN WHICH ALL THE MAINSTREAM POLITICAL PARTIES IN BRITAIN ARE AGAINST BREXIT: I MEAN THE FAKE SOCIALISTS (IN FACT GLOBOS) OF PLAID CYMRU, THE STRASBOURG NATIONAL PARTY, LABOUR (JEREMY CORBYN DITCHED HIS PREVIOUS EUROSCEPTICISM), MOST OF THE TORY PARTY AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THE LIB DEMS - ALL WANTED TO REMAIN. THE GOVERNMENT ARE YET AGAIN TRYING TO TAKE AN EXTRA STEP INSIDE THE EU.

THE 2017 SNAP GENERAL ELECTION WAS IN FACT AIMING AT UKIP. THEY WANTED TO BRING UKIP DOWN BECAUSE AT LEAST ON BREXIT AND ON IMMIGRATION THEY HAD SOMEONE TO ANSWER TO.

UKIP HAS AT THE MOMENT GOT NO CHANCE AS LONG AS THIS CLOWN (HENRY BOLTON) IS IN CHARGE OF THE PARTY.

NOW THERESA MAY AND HER CORRUPTED CABAL ARE USING THE SCARE-MONGERING OF THE RUSSIANS IN ORDER TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT BRITAIN CAN'T HAVE IT'S FREEDOM AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY BACK.

THE EU IS NOTHING FOR THE EUROPEANS. IT WAS SET BY A GROUP OF AMERICANS DURING THE COLD WAR IN ORDER TO OCCUPY ALL THE NATION STATES THAT FELL UNDER IT AND IS THE ECONOMIC WING OF NATO.

NOW THIS GLOBALIST INSTITUTION IS ALLOWING THE MASSES OF THE THIRD WORLD IN EUROPE IN ORDER TO CREATE IT'S OWN ELECTORATE, IT'S OWN "europeans" AND GENOCIDE ALL THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES BY CREATING A GLOBALISED MAN.
...... WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE TROTZ, THE SJWs, THE MULTINATIONALS AND THE MISSIONARIES USEFUL IDIOTS.

WE NEED TO EXPOSE THE EU FOR WHAT IT IS, BRING IT DOWN TOGETHER WITH NATO AND THE UN, AND CREATE AN ALLIANCE OF FREE SOVEREIGN AND IDENTITARIAN NATIONS WITH RUSSIA AND BELARUS.

DOWN WITH GLOBALISATION!
DOWN WITH CAPITALISM!
DOWN WITH THE KALERGY PLAN!

SAY NO TO THE WHITE GENOCIDE (the first blow in a war for total ethnic genocide)!


note:
MAY AND JUNCKER ARE IN COLLUSION.THEY PRETEND TO BE BICKERING AGAINST EACH OTHER BUT IT'S ALL PART OF THE SHOW! EVEN IF JUNCKER IS NOT AS OUTSPOKEN THE ���� IS PART OF THE GLOBALIST PROJECT. MAIDAN IS THE FINEST EXAMPLE OF THE RUSSOPHOBIC ATTACK. THERESA MAY EVERYONE CAN TELL SHE FEELS MORE COMFORTABLE IN BRUSSELS THAN IN BRITAIN, AS SHE WAS A REMAINER IN THE REFERENDUM.

Yes to Assimilation, No to Invasion

Immigration is an emotive issue. Amongst the indigenous peoples of Europe, the rapid influx of non-Europeans as a result of the EU's porous borders encouraging people to flee from the terrorist atrocities of NATO and the IMF, has become an issue which has created a lot of anger - both on the part of those who oppose immigration, and those who welcome the newcomers.

Immigration has resulted in the break-down of social cohesion as wholly different cultures have arrived en masse. A common argument by the defenders of immigration is that countries such as the UK and Ireland were built of waves of immigration. This is true. However, the immigrants arriving from the European mainland tended to arrive in small enough numbers to be absorbed by the country as a whole. That is not to say that they did not impact upon the culture of the British Isles.  One only has to look at the regional differences across and within every part of the Isles to see the result of the blending of the original Britons with the European mainlanders.  However there is a unity which binds us all together. We are descended from different branches of the same European stock. The people of the British Isles were moulded over centuries of limited incursions, gradually adapting and building upon the new influences.

Immigration post World war Two has none of the qualities of the productive immigration which preceded it. Whereas the immigration of the past was gradual, the immigrants since the 1950s have come in huge numbers. The make-up of the immigrants has also been radically different. Whereas in the past the invaders shared a common European culture and common religion (Pagan or Christian), the new immigrants have none of this commonality. They come from across the globe, having their own distinct cultures, identities and religions. Another difference is that due to the scale of the new types of immigration, the newcomers have had no need to adapt to the country to which they have come; they establish self contained communities which do not integrate or even attempt to assimilate with the host population.

Why has this come to pass? Is mass immigration proof of how wonderful the Capitalist system is in the British Isles that everyone wants to live here?  Hardly! Is life that hard outside Europe that people are fleeing to wherever they can? No, that isn't the case either. Certainly there are countries where life is tough, but as can be seen with many of the so-called refugees who divide their time between living in the British Isles and in their hoe countries, fleeing from destitution, war or persecution is not the reason for the majority of those who come to our shores. What is it then?

Money! The reason immigrants are coming to our lands in their millions is financial. How can this be? Quite simply, the Governments of Europe (the UK and Ireland included) are subsidising the invasion. Newcomers are given preferential treatment in housing. They are allowed to work within their own communities, paying less tax then the indigenous population, in some case no tax at all and claiming benefits as well as working. Not all of the newcomers indulge in tax-dodging and benefit fraud, but a sizable proportion do. This is not because they are 'dishonest thieving tax-dodging scroungers', as the hysterical media would have one believe; it is because they are allowed by government to live that way.

The media are happy to sell their 'news'papers by putting stories of immigrants taking advantage of the good-will of the nation. This fuels feelings of hostility in the indigenous population. This in turn creates protest. How do the government deal with this? They enact legislation forbidding people to question the presence of alien ghettos. They classify anyone who objects to the breakdown of societal cultural cohesion as a 'racist', then using manufactured and controlled 'Nationalist' Parties they focus upon how evil are those who do not want their country to be balkanised. The likes of Globalist billionaire, George Soros fund faux anti-racist groups (AFA) to fight the fake Nationalists created to discredit resistance to Government manipulation of immigration as a means of destroying services and cutting living standards. Using the tired propaganda of the Holocaust, they whip the anti-racist groupings into wild hatred of anyone who declares him/herself an opponent of the cuddly one-world agenda. When people point to the fact that the Holocaust is as big a piece of state propaganda as the 9/11 lie, the government have them arrested and incarcerated. On top of this, they radicalise the newcomers to manufacture race-riots.

Why would the Government do this? Why do the British Government fund, train and arm the Islamic State / Al Qaeda terrorists who they then let back into the country after ensuring they are practised killers?  Why did the Government of the USA murder 3,000 Americans in New York, 11/09/01? Why did Zionists orchestrate the bombing of supply lines to the Concentration Camps in war-time Europe to kill interned Jews by starvation and disease? Why did Israel create Hamas to murder ordinary Jews going about their daily business? The answer is, to further the agenda of Open Borders Globalisation.

When there were individual free nations of Europe, the populations had a common identity and an instinctive national pride. National Pride is a safeguard against globalism. The Zionist elite orchestrated the World Wars to break the cultures of the individual nations.  They created a feeling of guilt for the days of Empire, even though the people at home were as oppressed, if not more so, than the people in the colonies. Then they used all the false guilt of Empire and Holocaust to make the indigenous populations accept mass immigration. Anyone who objects, we are told, is a Nazi and an Imperialist.

The new immigrants to Europe were brought here by government deliberately to be used to create social disunity. Colonies of culturally distinct people being seen to be given preferential treatment over the tax-paying indigenous people, have been used as pawns in a global chess game. Nationalists and Anti-Fascists have been duped into attacking one another over the presence of these colonies. All the while, legislation upon legislation has been passed to restrict freedom of speech. Ostensibly this has been to protect 'minorities' from 'discrimination'. In reality it has been to condition the population to understanding that the Government has a right to dictate what one is allowed to say or think.

For the Reactionary Racist Right, Immigration is about 'Johnny Foreigner' coming to our shores to steal our women and our wealth.  This is fantasy.  Immigration is really is about dividing the people and rendering them unable to defend themselves against Globalism. The immigrants are not to blame for taking advantage of circumstances which allow them to live better in our countries than at home.  This is especially the case when the terrorists of NATO/Al Qaeda/Islamic State are destroying the countries they leave behind. It is the Ruling Class who have used them who are behind the problems immigration has contributed to. The presence of culturally distinct in our midst is dangerous. The anti-Islamic red-herring is being used to whip the Muslim communities into a murderous frenzy against the non-Muslim host. When the bombs drop in Pakistan, the blood of Muslims and non-Muslims alike will flow in the streets in Europe. This is already occurring with the rape epidemic, which is really a culturally-charged assault of people who are deemed inferior and deserving of such sickening abuse.  The ideology of multiculturalism ensures that the foot-soldiers of Antifa and their children will suffer the same fate as the Nationalists and theirs.

We must stop the Globalists. The solution to Globalism is Social Nationalism/Patriotic Socialism  This is a world apart from the skinhead racist stereotype which is used against all who believe in Sovereignty.  Racial hatred is a tool of the Globalists, used to make opposition to their goal appear to come from hatred of others, not love of freedom.

Gradual immigration leads to assimilation and to newcomers adding to the culture of the motherland they come to join.  Mass immigration creates distinct colonies which sit physically in our lands but act as barracks of an invading force which if allowed to grow becomes capable of undermining our culture and potentially wiping us away.  We cannot and will not tolerate the manipulation of immigration by Global Capitalists and liberal idiots as a means of breaking down Sovereignty and making the creation of profit for the Ruling Class the be-all and end-all of existence.

We must help the masses of the alien colonies in Europe cannot assimilate to resettle in their own homelands.  Gradual Immigration is a natural thing which can be genuinely beneficial, but until the mass immigration invasion has been reversed, the borders must be closed.  We must reject all those who would encourage hatred due to differences. The Global Diversity of Free Sovereign Nations is the only cure for the disease of anti-culturalism /multi-culturalism.  Only Socialism in One Country can bring Freedom to us all.

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 2

"Patriotism is not an abstract concept. It begins from one's own home. It buds out from the love for one's parents, spouses and children, the love for one's own home, village and workplace, and further develops into the love for one's country and fellow people."

- Kim Jong-un, Chairman of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) and supreme leader of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).

....................

"By 'Conservative Revolution' we mean the return to respect for all those elementary laws and values without which the individual is alienated from nature and God and left incapable of establishing any true order. In the place of equality comes the inner value of the individual; in the place of socialist convictions, the just integration of people into their place in a society of rank; in place of mechanical selection, the organic growth of leadership; in place of bureaucratic compulsion, the inner responsibility of genuine self-governance; in place of mass happiness, the rights of the personality formed by the nation."
--Edgar Julius Jung, "Germany and the Conservative Revolution," 1932
.................

"The story told in this book is the story of the British empire, which by 1900, fearing the rising power of the young German Reich, contrived in secrecy a plan for a giant encirclement of the Eurasian landmass. The main objective of this titanic siege was the prevention of an alliance between Germany and Russia: if these two powers could have fused into an ‘embrace,’ so reasoned the British stewards, they would have come to surround themselves with a fortress of resources, men, knowledge and military might such as to endanger the survival of the British empire in the new century.
(…)
By 1890 (…) Bismarck himself, who was now being dismissed by the new Emperor, Wilhelm II, had been capable of identifying a ‘new course’ for Germany. He clearly comprehended, as will be emphasized hereafter, the importance of not antagonizing Russia.
(…)
By 1900 it was clear to the British that the Reich could indeed ‘pull it off’ (...) British cauchemar would come true: if Germany and Russia united in one form or another, the Eurasian Embrace would come into existence: that is, a concrete Eurasian empire at the center of the continental landmass, which would come to rest on an enormous Slav army and German technological mastery. And that, the British elite sentenced, was never to be, for it would have mortally threatened the supremacy of the British empire.
(…)
By 1922 Hitler was growing increasingly deaf to any score of Eurasian harmony: conservative ideologue Moeller van den Bruck, who longed to witness a blending of the Occident with ‘the great human poetry of the Orient’, encountered the Nazi leader and engaged him in a long discussion, at the end of which, exhausted, he confided to a friend: ‘The fellow never comprehends.’
(…)
The Strasser brothers incarnated the anti-capitalist current of Germany’s petty bourgeoisie, a movement that hearkened back to late-Renaissance German utopianism, for which land was conceived as inalienable and protected by a ‘peasant aristocracy,’ industry segmented into guilds, and national union achieved by a federation of self-governed cantons. A federated Germany, in the view of the Strassers, meant a federated Europe, and an anti-British alliance of free workers across Eurasia. There was no trace of the religious racialism of the Hitlerites in the Strassers’ outlook.
(…)
The present geopolitical policy of the United States is a direct and wholly consistent continuation of the old imperial strategy of Britain. It is that unmistakable cocktail of aggression, subversion and mass murder waged at the vital nodes of the landmass, from Palestine and Central Asia to the gates of China, in Taiwan and Korea, that seeks to undermine any movement towards a confederation of nations capable of turning the continental base into a Eurasian league of socio-political cooperation and defense against Anglo-American assault."

G.G. Preparata, "Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich", pp. XVII, 5-8, 135-136, 187-188 & 263

H/t Arslan Akhtar

................

From James Connolly’s Irish Socialist Republic - To the Irish People:

The struggle for Irish freedom has two aspects: it is national and it is social. Its national ideal can never be realized until Ireland stands forth before the world, a nation free and independent. It is social and economic; because no matter what the form of government may be, as long as one class own as their private property the land and instruments of labor, from which all mankind derive their subsistence, that class will always have it in their power to plunder and enslave the remainder of their fellow creatures. Its social ideal, therefore, requires the public ownership by the Irish people of the land and instruments of production, distribution, and exchange to be held and controlled by a democratic state in the interests of the entire community. But every Irish movement of the last 200 years has neglected one or the other of these equally necessary aspects of the national struggle. They have either been agrarian and social, and in the hunt after some temporary abatement of agricultural distress have been juggled into forgetfulness of the vital principles which lie at the base of the claim for National Independence, or else they have been national and under the guidance of middle-class and aristocratic leaders, who either did not understand the economic basis of oppression, and so neglected the strongest weapon in their armory, or, understanding it, were selfish enough to see in the national movement little else than a means whereby, if successful, they might intercept and divert into the pockets of the Irish middle-class a greater share of that plunder of the Irish worker which at present flows across the channel. The failure of our so-called ‘leaders’ to grasp the grave significance of this two-fold character of the “Irish Question” is the real explanation of that paralysis which at constantly recurring periods falls like a blight upon Irish politics. The party which would aspire to lead the Irish people from bondage to freedom must then recognize both aspects of the long-continued struggle of the Irish Nation. Such a party is the newly-formed Irish Socialist Republican Party. In its resolve to win complete separation from all connection with the British Empire, and the establishment of an Irish Socialist Republic, it embodies to the full the true Irish ideal – an independent nation with a social-democratic organization of society, thus adapting to the altered environment of the nineteenth century the vital principle of common ownership of the means of life which inspired the Brehon laws of our ancient forefathers. In its program of immediately practical reforms will be found the only feasible proposals yet formulated, either for averting from Irish farming the ruin with which it is threatened by the competition of the mammoth farms and scientifically equipped agriculture of America and Australia, for lessening the tide of emigration or for using the political power of the Irish people with potent effect in paving the way for the realization of a revolutionary ideal. We ask you then to join our ranks; to spread our ideas; to work for our success, which means your emancipation; to help us to blend the twin streams of National and Industrial Freedom into one irresistible torrent, sweeping all obstacles before it, and bearing grandly onward on its bosom the toiling millions of the Irish race, proudly enthusiastic in their desire to join the mighty ocean of lovers of Humanity who in every clime under the sun are working and hoping for the time when oppression and privilege will be no more; when “every man will be a Kaiser, every woman be a queen.”

...................

“Capitalistic economy is deeply anti-personal: it dehumanizes economic life and makes man a thing. This is expressed in the present period of decline by the fact that it is becoming constantly more anonymous. Capitalism is itself breaking down the principle of private property: it is difficult to know who is a proprietor and just what he owns. The power of the banks is a faceless, anonymous power. The trusts are anonymous, impersonal institutions. It is even uncertain who is responsible for the misery under which the world is now suffering: there is no culprit, for he has no name. The unemployed do not know who is to blame for their bitter lot. Man is crushed by a vast shapeless, faceless, and nameless power, money.” - Nicolas Berdyaev, The Fate of Man in the Modern World

.................

[50th anniversary of the My Lai massacre]

"Sometimes there were even too many civilian corpses, leading to a different sort of statistical manipulation: body-count deflation. After the My Lai massacre, the American Division claimed only 128 enemy dead, when in actuality more than 500 civilians had been slaughtered.
(...)
Soldiers realized that small groups of civilians could be killed with impunity and logged as enemy dead, but larger numbers might raise red flags if there were no U.S. casualties or few weapons captured. To avoid uncomfortable questions about skewed kills-to-weapons ratios, many patrols planted grenades, rifles, or other arms on dead civilians as a matter of standard operating procedure. They obtained these from weapons caches they discovered, or by taking arms from prisoners or enemy dead carrying more than one weapon, or sometimes even by repurposing U.S. weapons as enemy matériel. As one marine explained, “When civilians got killed, no problem, just stick a chicom [Chinese communist] grenade on ’em, or an AK[-47 assault rifle], they become VC.“
(...)
At My Lai, a number of soldiers became “double veterans,” as the GIs referred to men who raped and then murdered women. As the writers Michael Bilton and Kevin Sim reported, “Many women [at My Lai] were raped and sodomized, mutilated, and had their vaginas ripped open with knives or bayonets. One woman was killed when the muzzle of a rifle barrel was inserted into her vagina and the trigger was pulled.” In one sexual assault, three men held a teenage girl to the ground and violated her. Afterward, the girl was shot in the head and killed.

As the record of the war indicates in copious fashion, however, such crimes were hardly confined to My Lai. A marine who had served in Quang Tin Province, for example, testified that a nine-man squad entered a village ostensibly to capture “a Viet Cong whore.” The men located a woman, then serially raped her. The last one of them shot her through the head.
(...)
As with other crimes in Vietnam, the documentary record of detainee torture is sparse but exceptionally suggestive. For example, the files of the Vietnam War Crimes Working Group—the secret Pentagon task force set up to monitor war crimes in the wake of the My Lai massacre—describe 141 substantiated instances in which U.S. soldiers tortured civilian detainees or enemy prisoners of war with fists, sticks, bats, water, or electric shock. But this is the merest tip of the iceberg: most of these cases came from just one investigation of the 172nd Military Intelligence Detatchment, a single unit of fifty to a hundred men, one of many such American units in Vietnam.”

Nick Turse, "Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam"

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection

Otto Remer, former German WW2 General, became an advocate for cooperation with Russia:

“Germany must leave NATO, the Americans must get out of Germany and out of Europe, and we must develop partnership with Russia – here are the goals which stand before true German patriots now.”

“For Reagan and the Zionists ... The Soviet Union is the incarnation of evil, but for us it is a great power neighboring us with its own security requirements and a doctrine that corresponds to them.”

...........

If the state is not the powerful master, it is the slave of the bank; no middle ground is possible. - Barrès

...........

It will be red communism that realizes the old dream of the Slavophiles, to transfer the capital from Petersburg to Moscow, within the Kremlin. It will be [red communism] that reprises the formula of the Slavophiles and Dostoevsky: Ex Oriente lux. From Moscow, from the Kremlin, the light that must clear the bourgeois shadows of the West surges forth. And at the same time communism creates a despotic and bureaucratic state called to rule not only over bodies, but also over souls, conforming to the traditions of Ivan the Terrible and the autocracy of the Tsars. The Marxism reworked and re-founded by the Russians proclaims the primacy of the political over the economic, the power to modify the economic life of the country at will.

-Nicolas Berdyaev, The Origin of Russian Communism (1936)

...........

"Although I have focused on capitalist abstract clock-time, throughout this study I have kept alive notions of concrete times. I have highlighted the temporal aspect of dynamics of domination and resistance between capitalism’s tendency to commodify – and therefore alienate – time, and the concrete times of human lives and socio-natural processes that resist it. Capitalism’s drive to commodify and alienate time is relentless, and it is expressed in processes occurring all across the social field. Indeed, the drive toward the privatisation of natural resources can be read as an attempt by capital to abstract the concrete times of socio-natural cycles in order to ‘valorise’ them, i.e. to integrate these times in the logic of capital accumulation. In such processes of commodification, the complex cluster of useful labour, socio-natural cycles, human bodies and concrete temporal relationships become means to an end: capital accumulation. Privatising water, for example, entails the abstraction from all the concrete socio-natural and human times involved in the relationship between humans and water into a set of quantifiable time-units expressed in value, thus attributing a – capitalist – value to water, not in the aim of satisfy- ing human needs, but in the aim of profit making. Examples such as these with regards to the relationship between humans and a socially mediated nature, between humans and humans, and between humans and their own bodies, illustrate a struggle between capitalism and human lives, of which the temporal dimension deserves more attention from critical scholarship."

Jonathan Martineau, "Time, Capitalism, and Alienation: A Socio-Historical Inquiry into the Making of Modern Time", p. 167

...............

Michel Aflaq, co-founder of the Ba'ath (Renaissance) party, Syrian-Arab nationalist and socialist :

"If I were asked about my predilection towards socialism I would answer: with regard to this issue what I aspire to is not to increase the wealth of factories but that of life. My concern is not that people should be equal in the distribution of food but that every individual should be allowed to exploit his talents and potential. The laborer crushed by his misery may not find in socialism anything except a promise that he may take what he is deprived of, but I view it as continuous and generous giving, as giving to life many times what it has offered us."

(The wealth of life, 1936)

"He who thinks that socialism is a religion of pity is gravely mistaken. We are not hermits taking refuge in mercy to give peace to a conscience disturbed by seeing misery and suffering, so that we become great in our own eyes and sleep untroubled. Defending deprived masses is not a matter of giving them alms but demanding their rights. We are not only concerned about alleviating misery but also about increasing the wealth of life."

(The wealth of life, 1936)

"In fact this class on which the representation of the country fell in a certain period is very far from the spirit of the nation, its needs and requirements, for it is a senile and ancient class whose vitality has been exhausted and its relation to the spirit of the nation shaken. It has become so servile to economic interests and traditional ' social influence that it is impossible for it to discern the qualities of the Arab life at this stage of development in its history .The consequence of this is that it enters the national struggle unwillingly while dreaming of stability and longing for rest. How many times during the short period of the national struggle has this class deluded itself that the play has come to an end, that the trust was delivered and that the time has come for plucking the fruits and receiving the wages. But the people in their renewed vitality, awakened instinct and repeated revolutions has been warning this class from time to time of the falsehood of its illusions and violently reminding it that the struggle is not yet finished."

(The new formula for patriotism -The Baath, 4 -July 17, 1946)

#InternationalWomen’sDay - A Cynical Assault on Womanhood

Today has been designated International Women's Day.   We do not pay heed to the United Nations, and certainly we have no respect for that organisation. A Globalist body telling people world-wide that we must celebrate/mark a particular cause on a particular day, is an affront to Freedom.  We choose to comment on the issue of Women's Rights on this day, not out of any deference to the UN, but because today is as good as any day to discuss the issue.

When liberals and Trotskyites speak of Women's Rights, they speak as one with the Capitalists.  They speak of the 'right' to indulge in all manner of hedonism with no consequences.  They speak of turning Women into mere economic units, to be equals as wage slaves alongside men. The equality of the liberal is the equality of depravity and degradation.  It is the equality which can only be found in the sewer and in the ruins of society.  It is the equality of nobody having any value, of nobody mattering except in terms of their ability to spend money and to be a part of the death cycle of the economy.

When the Suffragettes fought for the vote, it was from a belief that voting matters. As we have seen with the way that the Brexit Referendum result has been distorted to the point of negation, democracy is a sham. The extension of votes to 16 and 17 years-olds in Scotland, is a ploy to give the impression of democracy, but considering the harm done to young people by the education/indoctrination system, the extension of the vote is likely to increase the power of the Ruling Class by supplying voters who have not learnt to distrust authority.  In the unlikely event of these people voting with wisdom, the results will be ignored anyway.  The extension of the Vote to Women is a false victory.  With all the main parties subservient to the Ruing Class, the Working Class of both sexes have no power, and the pitiful toadying of the Middle Classes to those they see as their 'betters' doesn't help matters.

Another false victory is Women in the workplace.  Whilst it is only right and natural for single Women and married Women without children to have equal opportunities with Men in employment, what is put across by the media as an advance for Womankind, has been nothing but the extension of Wage Slavery to everyone except those who misrule us, who ensure that only members of their own class (and the Bourgeois sycophants) get any work which allows for a decent life.

Wage Slavery is presented as the be-all and end-all, with the idea that it is a great achievement for a Woman to have a career, but to raise a family is a drudgery to be ashamed of.  As a result, Women have been encouraged to shun monogamous relationships, choosing instead a life of fruitless and futile promiscuity.  In the struggle to overcome the Patriarchy, Women have been pushed by the media into a lifestyle where they have to compete with Men in employment (by mimicking the masculine) and break up the routine with a carousel of sexual hedonism which perfectly suits the sexist egoism of men who see Women as sex objects. The Patriarchy has turned the strive to freedom into little more than cost-free prostitution, with servitude in work thrown in as an added insult.

Women in Wage Slavery who do have children have to hand their children over to 'Child Care Providers' who act as surrogate parents, while the Women work for material gains, which ironically are out of reach once child-care costs have been taken into account. Women are told that raising children isn't a proper job, and that therefore children must be handed over to strangers be paid to raise - mainly Women!

For Working Class Women, work is a dead-end. In the worst cases, Women are encouraged to abort their children so they can stay in work. The reduction in population of Working Class children, is used as an excuse by the Ruling Class to import millions of non-natives who compete for employment and by virtue of coming from countries with poorer living standards, reduce labour costs to the bosses.

When we speak of Women's Rights, we speak of the Right of Women to be Women. To be in a monogamous relationship with a partner of your choice is liberating. To have children who you can raise according to your own standards is empowering. To not have to work outside the home is to have the ability to build a life which is tailored to your own needs.  To be able to work until such time as children come (and after they are grown) is to be able to have a balanced life.  All these things are opposed by Trotskyites and their fellow Globalists liberal Capitalists.

The only way in which sexual parity will be achieved is when Nature is embraced, and when People come before Profits.  Pitting Men against Women as rivals is un-natural. We exist side-by-side as Equals in Nature, who compliment each other.  The old religious bigotry which sees Men as 'superior' has lost its power as the monotheistic religion has died.

An end to bigotry, an end to competition, a future of unity and cooperation, is the true way to achieve Rights for Everyone.  The false Men/Women divisions have to be banished forever. The Patriarchy has to go, and the Matriarchy has to be crushed before it develops. This can only be achieved by overthrowing the Capitalist system, rejecting 'no borders' Globalism, and embracing Pure Natural Socialism.