The World Turn'd Upside Down

The British Isles are in a mess.  This is a fact which only the wilfully blind can ignore.

There exists in the UK, what is laughingly referred to as a legal system.  In a sane world, the Law would serve to uphold the moral virtues which keep society working.  However, in the UK, morality is a vice which has to be crushed using all means necessary, and the Law exists to financially penalise those who dare to live a moral life.

Here are some factual examples, which will have to be kept anonymous due to confidentiality issues and potential prosecution under various restrictive legislative Acts:

• A woman feigned illness to get her husband to go to a pre-planned event alone; having insisted that he go, after he repeatedly stated his desire to stay home and look after her.  He went, but returned early to care for his sick wife, only to find her in bed with another man.  He struck the man, and was arrested for assault.  His adulterous wife was given sole right of occupancy of their house (for which he still has to pay), into which she duly moved her boyfriend.  The wronged husband lost his home, family, liberty, and as a result, his job also.  The adulteress and her boyfriend gained financially and their lifestyle is now being subsidised by the husband, at the order of the law.  In the UK, monogamy, faithfulness and honour is punished.
• A pædophile moved into an area near a park so that he could prey on local children.  His evil proclivities were discovered and he was given a well-deserved beating.  The men who beat him were arrested and imprisoned.  His house now is covered in CCTV cameras, and there are regular police patrols to protect him from further rightful punishment.  The patrols are not to protect the little boys that this disgusting pervert targets, but to protect him.  In the UK, pædophiles have rights.
• The owner of a small business had his premises repeatedly broken into and burgled.  Knowing that the police would do nothing, and that his insurance premiums would rocket, he did not report the break-ins, and instead built defences to keep the burglars out.  When the defences failed and his business looked set to go bankrupt, he was forced to report the burglars.  Upon inspection of his premises he was ordered to remove all his defences as a burglar could be injured.  Despite being clearly identified, the thieves were not arrested, and the owner has since been burgled again.  It is only a matter of time before his business closes.  In the UK, burglars have rights, and the greedy scum who embrace the capitalist ethic of doing whatever it takes to make money, can act as they please.
• Heroin dealers have a system for announcing when a new shipment of heroin has arrived; they set off fireworks during daylight hours.  The police know this but do nothing to locate the dealers, and now the dealers are so confident that they don't even bother to use different locations to release the fireworks.  At the same time, growers of cannabis in neighbouring areas are routinely prosecuted.  Why the different treatment for dealers in death and growers of a plant which is less harmful than alcohol?  The heroin dealers are a protected section of the neighbourhood, and the cannabis growers are generally British Working Class.  For all the rhetoric of being anti-racist, the police prosecute people on a racist basis - turning a blind eye to serious crimes which are committed by a demographic which if prosecuted, would bring in accusations of racism; letting newcomers whose presence here serves the agenda of globalising the country, get away with murder.  In the case of heroin dealers, this is literally the case.

These examples are part of a bigger national picture.  In the case of the soft treatment of heroin dealers, this is hardly surprising considering that the entire war on drugs is a farce.  The occupation of Afghanistan was in part to guarantee the production of the opium crops, which the Taliban had threatened.  The NATO war against Serbia which boosted the criminal Albanian mafia operation, known as KLA-led Kosovo, was mainly to provide the heroin traffickers with a distribution base in Europe.  The government make a lot of money from flooding Europe with the drug of death, and the last thing they want is their private army (the police) hampering this trade.  Home grown drugs which they cannot profit from are dealt with mercilessly; afterall, profit, not people, is all that they care about.

In the Healthcare System, victims of serious life-threatening illnesses can find themselves denied medicine which could save them, due to financial costs imposed by central government.  However, men who like to dress up as women, and allow their kinky sexual behaviour to consume them to the point where they think they are women, get un-necessary and expensive treatment free on the NHS.  Due to the liberal extremist policies of government, all manner of mental aberration is pandered to, and genuine physical illness is neglected.  This bizarre situation has reached the point where the basics of biology are ignored, and a man who has his genitals mutilated is legally referred to as a woman.  It is surely not far away when a man who likes to wear leather can marry a cow and be referred to as a bull.  It is no less ridiculous than the legal situation regarding the mentally ill who call themselves transgender.

Monogamy is no longer the norm.  The family is the backbone of society, and for this reason, the Establishment use everything in their power to undermine it.  Fetishists who take their perversion to the extreme, are called transgender and are afforded special rights and legal protection; promiscuity is encouraged as natural, with the nonsense that it is a part of the struggle for equal rights that women behave like unpaid prostitutes; adultery is no longer legally recognised as a serious offence, and those who react 'adversely' to it are seen as the real criminals.  Those who defend the rights of women are labelled as 'haters' and transphobes.  Anything which is good for the family and for society is deemed unacceptable in the new dark age we find ourselves in.

Those who should rally to the flag of freedom have been misled by the depots in charge into fighting against their natural allies.  People who have the effrontery to call themselves Socialists have incorporated into their ideology the specific aim of abolishing all immigration controls; something which could not but harm the economic and social well-being of all everyone who has to work for a living.  Likewise the 'No Platform' strategy denies those who are misled by the Trotskyite usurpers of socialism, the vital dialogue with real Socialists who understand the importance of defending the nation and all to whom it belongs.  The curse of globalism perfectly suits the Ruling Class who benefit from the ability to enslave people from every corner of the world, but it is the death knell for free workers and the owners of small and non-exploitative concerns.

Amongst those who understand the importance of the Sovereign Nation has developed the unholy idolisation of the Country as an economic beings.  Defending Capitalism at all costs, the misled Tories, UKIPers etc alike to their manipulated Trotskyite counterparts, are fighting for the Establishment which has created the conditions they instinctively stand against.  The most extreme example to date is the English Defence League which opposes Islam because Muslim women do not dress as whores and get so drunk that EDL members can have sex with them.  If Muslims were as debased, degenerate and decadent as the Establishment-loving EDL and other victims of the brain-washing which is destroying Europe, the EDL would just love them.  Sadly this is not an exaggeration of the facts.

The modern virtues of promiscuity, consumerism, globalism, abortion on demand, sexual laissez faire, libertine 'laxist' liberalism etc, are the true vices which are threatening every one of us; ironically those who embrace them, more than the rest of us.  Standing our ground and defending what is good should not be an excuse for repeating the failed tactics of yesteryear.  We need to stand firm against globalism, but to be fluid in our associations, allying ourselves with others issue by issue whenever that allows us to make advances against the real enemy.

Our battle is becoming ever more complex, as we are attacked on ever more fronts.  The larger the number of people who are attacked, the greater the possible counter attack.  Division is stifling our defence.  We have to overcome the old and failed modes of thought, and band together issue by issue, and beat this monstrosity.  SMPBI reaches out to all who share our love of our Isles, and our determination to overthrow the enemies within, creating in place of the degenerate liberal disorder, a society of Free Patriotic Socialists.  Join us.

Smash Political Correctness and the Forces of Globalism behind it

Political Correctness was designed by a man so vile that his former Comrades had no choice but to snuff out his miserable existence.  Trotsky created the terms 'politically corect' and 'racist' to control how people express themselves, and by extension, how they think. The theory is quite simple - control what words people are allowed to use, manipulate the meanings attached to individual terms, and by so doing, limit the possible linguistic expression available, thus preventing dissent by removing the ability of the individual to put into words any feelings of opposition to the establishment agenda. By controlling language, the theory maintains that the ability to think in a manner which is dangerous to the ruling regime, will become impossible, and thus opposition in any tangible form will become impossible.

This is, of course, complete nonsense! People do not think with words, but with images (consider your memories - they are like films inside your head and not akin to the words in a book). However, the politically correct mafia have such faith in their ideology that they undertake their assault on language with the zeal of unbridled fanaticism. The liberal fanatics have out-Trotted the Trotskyites with their devotion to the destruction of all which does not suit their own agenda - and all, lamentably, behind the banner of 'democrcay' and such slogans as 'hope, not hate'.  They are damaging our language, and in fact every language which has come under their scrutiny. With regards to English in particular, they are so distorting the meaning of words as to make the language barely intelligible to those who are not fully cognisant of the language as it should be used. Whether it is the niggling use of the word 'they' (plural) in place of he or she (singular), or the use of 'she' to refer to a man who has a mental illness and has had himself castrated (or not!) in the bizarre belief that by having no penis (or even just wearing make-up!) he will magically become a woman, (rather than a mutilated man/man in make-up, which is what he is), the English language in its every day use is becoming absurd. Foreigners trying to learn English must find this corruption of the language confusing and irritating.

A serious result of the politicisation of the language is the perceived danger of being ridiculed for having opinions which are out of fashion (i.e. forbidden by the media manipulators), or being unpopular and seen as an elitist for using English in a manner which doesn't pander to the lowest common denominator. It has become a badge of honour to speak and act in the way of a mental defective. Using words of more than one syllable invites reactions such as "what's up wiv you mate, dya swallow a dickshunairee?" suggesting that it is a bad thing to seek self-improvement through the acquisition of knowledge and the ability to effectively communicate using the vocabulary suited to an adult level. This, of course, is the whole point of political correctness - to 'dumb down' the population to the point where they are barely human and are thus more easily controlled, like the cattle they have become.

It is routine for the commissars of political correctness to claim that not only does political correctness not exist(!), but if it did, it would be a benevolent phenomenon, which only 'haters' and bigots could object to. By this simple ploy, all criticism of the manipulation of society is silenced - well, that is the idea at any rate. Anyone who is not totally submersed in the propaganda system which passes for the news and entertainment media cannot fail to see that the way ideas and events are presented is highly controlled, and nothing at all is left to chance which the media manipulators can control.

The English language, like all living languages, goes through changes, with some words reversing their meanings over and over. With regards to everyday words which have no real cultural value, this is of little importance. The natural development of the language contrasts with the PC agenda in that it is orchestrated by the establishment and pushed at every level. The only comparable example, (in times other than those of conquest), of the high level distortion of English in our past is that of the Elizabethan era, in which Francis Bacon created a whole array of new words, to knit together the various dialects of England into a unified national language. At the time, 'English' spoken in the North of England was as different as the Welsh in the Gogledd to that in De Cymru in our day: understandable, but perceptibly different. Bacon's deeds helped forge a national culture, in place of the regional cultures which preceded it. Whether one considers this a good or bad thing is an issue in itself. At some levels, it can be considered abhorrent that organic cultures were trampled upon in the service of the imperialism of the ruling elite, but in Bacon's defence, the vocabulary of the enhanced language was greatly increased. Try as one may, it is impossible to find any positive consequences of the modern Political Correctness sickness.

Alongside the twisting of words and the attack on basic grammar used by the PC mafia, is the assault on intelligence, with the focus upon trivia as a new source of wisdom. Turn on the TV or Radio or read a 'Newspaper' and you will be bombarded with stories of which 'celebrity' is having sex with which 'sports star', or some other such nonsense. People shout and scream like inmates of a lunatic asylum at contestants on game shows, and is if that isn't bad enough, they congratulate one another and take pride in the fact that they have learnt every tiny piece of irrelevant information that the mass media have chosen to spoon feed them. Never mind that they are sleep-walking slaves trapped in an economic system which could destroy their lives in an instant, no, they can repeat the tedious details which they have swallowed form years of obediently devouring what their masters have provided for them in the circus of TV living. This 'pride' should be a sense of pride for the establishment as it indicates just how successful they have become at controlling the masses.

The 'news' media is full of propaganda in support of the criminal wars of aggression being fought by the unthinking robots who are labelled as soldiers, on behalf of the globalist elite. There are decent soldiers who are refusing to fight and are quitting the Armed Forces in disgust at being used not to protect their nations, but to destroy obstacles to the Global Superstate which is step-by-step absorbing ALL nations. These men and women who refuse to serve are the true heroes, not the scum who blindly obey orders and murder civilians of all ages and foreign soldiers and members of the Resistance protecting their own people in their own lands. Ask any flag-waving drooling TV viewer what is going on in the world, and the reaction will be a repetition of whatever that dumbed-down individual has been exposed to. Even those who can see that politicians lie will still parrot support for 'our boys' - stating that we have to support the troops even though they are butchering the people of foreign lands and paving the way for their international counterparts to do the same to us, right here. Sickeningly, people cheer in the streets when these paid psychopaths march in the streets freshly returned from their tours of occupied lands, their flesh only recently scrubbed clean of the blood of the innocents they have hacked to pieces for the Global leadership. Such is the power of the media to make otherwise intelligent people speak and act as morons.

The greatest victory of the pushers of the Political Correctness machine is that people see the ridiculous examples of men in frocks being called women, or quota systems giving work to people unsuited to particular jobs solely because they fit a stereotype which the PC mafia maintain doesn't matter! The liberal extremists are political crackpots. They are puppets in a pantomime show and we have been directed to watch them, whilst all the while the global Ruling Class are sending their agents amongst us to pilfer from our pockets and steal us of our heritage, our present, and our future.

We have to stop the madness of political correctness, but we have to make sure that in so doing, we do not allow ourselves to become distracted into an obsession with the liberal lunatics, winning the localed battles as the likes of George Soros and the global capitalist system win the global war.

Judaism is not a Race, it is a Religion - its Secular form is Capitalism

A response to the post: http://socialistworkerspartyengland.blogspot.com/2018/08/zionism-is-anti-semitic-zionism-is-pure.html



Some historical comments

1. “Our Party is opposed to the racism which targets people because of their origins or origins of their forebears.” An important and necessary statement which I entirely agree with.

2. “We identify Global Zionism as an ideology of terror, built on a sickening appropriation of a religious system which is ardently ethno-nationalist, turning it into a dogma of supremacist hatred.”

To talk about Zionists “turning” Judaism into a “dogma of supremacist hatred” is historically incorrect. Jewish holy books, the Talmud and Torah both contain “a dogma of supremacist hatred”. Hence not only demanding interest on loans (...but only on loans to Gentiles) but also killing, robbing and even committing acts of genocide and paedophilia against Gentile “cattle” are NOT considered to be against Jewish Law. It is also clearly stated in the Jewish scriptures stated that Jews are destined by God to rule over all non-Jewish peoples, who will serve as their slaves. Judaism provided the very model of Hitler’s supremacist biological racism.

3. Long before Zionism became a powerful movement, Jews played a central role in the development of modern capitalism - arguably even more so that Lutheranism or Calvinism. For a thorough account and analysis of this role (which contains not one iota of racism) see Werner Sombart’s classic work entitled The Jews and Modern Capitalism.

NB Friedrich Engels himself stated that Sombart was the only economist who had fully understood Marx’s Capital. Sombart’s book should absolutely be a part of the SMPBI literature page.

4. Why no reference to Marx’s own essay “On the Jewish Question” - which makes no reference to Zionism at all? Or to the views of Disraeli - who believed in both a Jewish and an Aryan ‘master race’.

5. “Would the Zionist elite take a natural hostility of Europeans to usury and turn it into a vehicle of repression and discrimination against the Working Class Jews of Europe, in order to achieve their long sought after goal of the creation of Israel as a base to gain mastery of the world?”

Question: just how many “Working Class Jews” were there - if by this is meant proletarians? Not that many. Their preferred trades were petit-bourgeois mercantilism, tax collection for rich landowners, wholesaling and retailing, banking and the professions. But the Zionists explicitly encouraged Hitler to increase repression of the Jewish population of a whole, following Herzl’s maxim that “Our best friends are the anti-Semites” (i.e. they serve our purposes best).

6. “German Socialism under leaders such as the Strassers, was the ideology of a radical republican workers movement.” I suggest doing a bit more research about the Strasser brothers - both of whom were members of the Freikorps - which fought to bring down Germany’s first workers’ republic (the Munich Council Republic). They were also both anti-semitic, albeit for anti-capitalist rather than racist reasons. But their opposition to usury and Jewish finance capitalism was completely shared with Hitler - who was the first leader in modern history to nationalise the country’s central bank and pay workers with labour certificates - an idea supported by Marx. Nevertheless, it is of course true that there were those in the NSDAP who wanted to go further in a socialist direction and nationalise the big industrial concerns.

7. Reference is made to the Hitler’s “National Capitalist NSDAP war machine”. A ‘war machine’ that was massively outnumbered by Germany’s neighbours, and even more so by its combined war enemies (...by a factor or 97 to 1) can hardly have been intended for aggressive purposes. See the important video by Gerd Schultze Rhonhof based on his book: 1939 - The War That Had Many Fathers Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof

8. “After the 1934 murders of the Socialist leaders, the NSDAP moved from a movement for the social well-being of the people into a military formation.” In fact Hitler accomplished, in just 4 years, the most massive and rapid improvement in the “social well-being of the people” in history. But faced with an army whose loyalty could not be relied upon, an SA that wanted to replace it with street fighters who picked on Reds and Jews - but were seen as wholly ill-equipped to fill important military functions, Hitler saw no alternative but to create a high-quality “military formation” - the SS. The SS were regarded with absolute contempt by both the army and SA alike - but proved to have such necessary loyalty and soldierly qualities to defeat vastly superior enemy forces, saved the German army from numerous defeats - and whose officers always went first in battle. Yet since the SA were three times bigger than the standing army and more politically conscious, it can be hypothertically argued that Hitler was wrong to block Röhm’s attempt to take it over - and also to reject Strasserist demands for a ‘second revolution’ of a more socialist nature. But all this would have been difficult in practice and is a bit to easy to say in retrospect - given that the economic blockade of Germany had already begun and war preparations against it were already in motion. In this sense Germany at that time can in this sense be compared to Russia today - simply resisting Imperialism. And World Jewry had already declared war on and imposed trade boycotts on Germany good and shops in 1933 - resulting in counter-boycotts of Jewish businesses.

9. Ernst Jünger was neither a socialist, National Bolshevik or a Nazi, but a uniquely original thinker and writer whose main value - despite his anti-liberalism, but like that of Marx - was “free individuality”. He also had a close relationship with Martin Heidegger. I recommend also his novel Eumeswil for the literary section of the SMPBI site.

10. “Corbyn has spoken about the machinations of Zionism. Now the Zionists are coming for him. They are liars who are scared of a Labour Leader who is willing to discuss the Zionist deals with the Hitlerist Nazis.”

Note: Hitler ended up seeing exactly where Zionism would lead, broke his ‘deal’ with the Zionists - and instead enlisted Arabs into the SS.

“The Zionists WILL destroy Corbyn. His weakness will see to that. When he is gone, a neo-Blairite will be put in charge and Zionist rule will be back with a vengeance.”

Agreed.

My main point. I believe it is just as important - if not more important - to distinguish individual Jews from Judaism as it is to distinguish anti-Semitism from anti-Zionism. For without the total assimilation of Jews, which Marx argued for (and which many German Jews wanted in opposition to the Zionists) Zionism is a natural outgrowth of Judaism - and correctly understands itself as such (a tiny and irrelevant minority of eccentric rabbis notwithstanding).

Marx himself was the very epitome of a decidedly anti-Judaic ‘Jew’ - and was also not innocent of making ‘anti-Semitic’ remarks of such a ‘politically incorrect’ nature that today they would have him hauled before a court. And anti-Judaism - like anti-Zionism - is no more a form of ‘racism’ than being anti-Islamic or anti-Christian. Judaism, like Islam or Christianity, is not a race but a religion, albeit one whose secular form - as Marx pointed out - is capitalism itself.


First Comment:

Thank you Peter.  This raises a lot of good points.  The idea that it is 'racist' to oppose the RELIGION of Judaism, is of the same level of lunacy as the argument that it is 'racist' to oppose Islam.  One might as well throw in the other Desert Superstition, Christianity, and call criticism of that RELIGION, 'racist' (although, for some reason that one doesn't fit the pattern!)  According to political correctness, anything which goes against globalism, is racist, and anything which supports nature is inherently evil - eugenics (not wanting to create life which suffers when gene theraphy can cure the ailment before it takes effect); the fact that having a Penis is a pretty strong indiction you are a Man, no mater how much make-up you put on; the extended family etc.  We fall into their traps at our peril....

Socialist Homes, not Capitalist Accommodation

Capitalism is a creed (yes, creed!) which makes the pursuit of money all that is acceptable.  People and other living beings are only considered with regards to their worth as a part of the economic system.  The fullest expression of the lack of concern for the welfare of the people can be seen in the accommodation which the people who create the wealth have to deal with, and the contrasting living conditions of the Ruling Class and the celebrities who gain wealth by serving as propagandists for them.

We are forced to live in ever smaller flats and houses, in ever larger towns and cities.  We now live in conditions which previous generations would have been shocked by.  Cities exist for the benefit of the economic system, keeping the wage slaves in close proximity to the consumer goods which they have to purchase in order to keep the Ruling Class rich.  We wage slaves are often forced to travel vast distances to the places of their servitude, damaging our health and eroding our time away from our places of employment.  The capitalists only care about their profits and ability to hold on to power.  Our well being doesn't factor into their system of thought except with regards to keeping us distracted by their controlled entertainment system or when that fails, beaten down by their legal system.

Architects in the 1960s designed high rise blocks of flats which they referred to as vertical streets.  The idea was that they were simply streets turned on their side and made to travel upwards instead of along.  These vertical streets had no gardens, even though it would have been perfectly easy to have had each floor extended outwards to provide the residents with a small garden or yard space.  The failure to include access to nature reflected the belief of the people who commissioned the architects that the Working Class do not need gardens.  Older streets in industrial towns long ago dispensed with any connection to nature, with the fictional Coronation Street of the television being modelled on them.  Since the time of the Industrial Revolution we have been herded into accommodation which is unfit to live in.  We are treated like battery hens by the Ruling Class who see us as less than human.

To walk through any town or city is to see squalor.  A natural result of forcing people into housing which is no more than a space to sleep and to recover after a period of work (or to shelter in the absence of work) is to create a loathing of the surroundings.  Cities are places of high crime, vandalism, littering and anti-socialism (collectivised yet perversely individualistic anti-Socialist behaviour) because they are places in which humanity is a side issue.  People are a part of nature but cities are apart from nature.  Breaking the links which keep us safely anchored in the natural order can only lead to behaviour which is against the natural order.

SMPBI is agrarian in foundation.  By this we aim to hand back control of the basics of food and shelter to everybody.  But that doesn't mean that we are Pol Potists!  This point has to be clarified right now.  Our Agrarian Socialism has absolutely nothing to do with the murderous barbarianism of Pol Pot. Pol Pot was a Capitalist stooge who destroyed Cambodia in order to incorporate the nation into the US-dominated Global Capitalist menace.  His fake agrarianism has been highlighted as 'proof' that Socialism does not work.  An interesting piece on how Pol Pot was a Capitalist tool, can be found at this link: https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/pol/khmerrouge.html

Our vision of a coming Socialist Republic is one in which the cities are divided into small self-sufficient towns.  That would allow for the development of local culture within the national framework.  The Urban Working Class has become disconnected from nature.  This is a logical result of years of forcing people away from the country and in to the cities.  This began with the Enclosures Acts right back in Tudor times, but especially the Enclosures Consolidation Act of 1801. 

The Land Belongs to the People and the People Belong to the Land.

SMPBI will break up the cities, end rabbit hutch housing conditions, and in its place we will live in homes which are fit to live in, with land which reunites us with nature.  The landed gentry and the rich have homes which are conducive to good physical and mental health, but we have to live in conditions which they would never submit to.  Socialism isn't about reducing everyone to the lowest level, but of gaining the best for everyone.  The only people who benefit from city-living are the landlords who extract money from their tenants, especially those who charge ground rent and get money for literally nothing.  Council Tax isn't that different to Ground Rent, and we would abolish that too.

The Working Class have paid with our labour for all the wealth of the Ruling Class and their Middle Class agents.  We want nothing less than that wealth and the living conditions they enjoy, for ourselves.  They can hand over what they are stolen, or we will take it.  But have it, we will.

Family as the Socialist Foundation

Family is the fundamental building block of society. A real family consisting of a Husband, Wife and Child (or Children) provides a barrier against the intrigues of the State. Fidelity is the keystone of the family. In order for the Establishment to destroy all opposition to its machinations, Family must be destroyed.

The natural role for a man is to protect his wife and offspring. The natural role of a woman is to look after her husband and any children. The media have pushed the lie that adultery is OK, in order to weaken the bonds between man and wife. Women and Men who seek sexual gratification outside the family are enemies of society.

Hugh Hefner introduced Playboy in the 50's. While most women were still trying to full fill their traditional roles, this toxic magazine had men wanting the whore, linking as a way to to their own sucess to have a tart instead of wife (or in some cases both - Mad Men) Unless we men and women find common ground instead of finger pointing, we will never defeat the "powers that be". Women are jealous of other women, if we see one getting all the attention we want to be her. So shame on the men for elevating the whore to her status and leaving real women who refuse to plastic themselves up in the lurch.

Women have been especially targeted by the Establishment. The media teaches that women are merely objects and that every concern should be material. Whether it is buying clothes which fit a prepared stereotype (trendy, Goth or other), or spending hours studying make-up and 'perfecting' a certain look, women have become victims of a system which reduces us to consumers and to little more than showroom dummies. Men are not immune from this. The trans madness is mainly men who are obsessed with what they look like (or what they think that they are supposed to think they should look like!)

Girls are conditioned to emulate pop stars, who are nothing more than glorified prostitutes. Modern pop music (whether R&B, Goth or whatever) is built upon the use of repetitive lyrics which act as a form of mind control. Lyrics which speak of sexual promiscuity implant in the mind of the listener the acceptance of promiscuity. Lyrics which speak of hatred of men and of the desirability of self-harm, condition the listener to self hatred and hatred of others. These sick distortions of normality push the listener into a position of confusion and split identity. It is from such evil that schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder take root. Whether the medium used to break the spirit and mind of the individual is in musical form or in visual form, the result is an undeniable destruction of the self.

By implanting a diseased outlook in the minds of men and women, and undermining the traditional roles of both sexes, the Establishment has lain the seeds for the crushing of the family. By creating the conditions in which friction becomes inevitable, the door is open to further State interference for the breaking of the family. It is at this point that the Establishments role in destroying the Family takes a lead overt role - in steps Social Services, the Family Courts and all the other atomising institutions.

Men and women need to unite and fight this assault on the natural masculine man and feminine woman. The only solution to our sick society is a return to traditional Socialism, to the sanctity of marriage, and to the overthrowal of so called Social Services. Adultery is not a right, but a disease created by the Establishment, and for this evil the Establishment must pay the ultimate price.

There is a tendancy to whitewash the likes of Hefner and the types of men who happily go after the whore archetype. Men like this need to be exposed, and their anti-female attitude addressed. People yearn for a society where men are men, women are women, family is the highest achievement, and the peddlars of pornography, adultery and materialism are physically eliminated for all time.

This is why more and more turn to Islam. To return to morality and work. Islam is not a solution which is suitable for a Free Socialist Republic of the British Isles.  We have suffered under the yoke of Bible cults for so long, that we are susceptible to another Bible spin-off.  Traditional Socialism harks back to the days of nature-based spiritualism, and does not need a hierarchy of Ruing Class appointed clergy to act as links between the physical and the spiritual.  A return to a natural order IS a return to a way of life where we are self-sufficient in all matters, and where we reject priestcraft.

Trans-fascism is the next step in the break down of family.  It denies nature.  It denies the unity of men and women and the foundation of society.  It attacks homosexuality with the lie that Lesbians and Gays are really 'trapped in the wrong body' and can be 'cured' by radical surgery.  The T attached to LGB is an abhorence.

A return to sanity cannot occur within a Capitalist framework.  As Revolutionary Patriotic Socialists, we affirm that individualism is a major problem, and that the damage of this selfish mentality will take a massive amount of deprogramming.  We are aware of the brain-washing of the pornographers, the 'gender' dictators, the psychological warfare against the family structure.  This will require a Socialist System which rejects the divisiveness of feminism and masculism, putting focus instead on mutualism and the need for everyone to work together for what is best for all of us.  We reject liberal decay. Working Class Socialism is for Family, Tradition, and Biological Reality.  Liberal individualism has brought us to the brink, and we will not tolerate it, nor those who push it and profit by it.

Join SMPBI! Make a Difference.

SMPBI is a growing party.  Our own brand of Organic Socialism sets us apart from the many organisations which simply ape Marx, Bakunin, Lenin, Mao, De Leon, Hoxha, Tito, Strasser, and a myriad of others. We take inspiration from each of them, and so do not fall into the trap of cultist factionalism which plagues many of the organisations operating in the British Isles.  We have our own way, which is happy to explore the contributions of others, but does not limit itself to a form of historical idolatry. 

As well as those from outside our territories, we look to great thinkers from the Isles - Saunders Lewis, Robert Owen, William Morris, J Bruce Glasier, Robert Blatchford, James Connolly, Gerrard Winstanley, to name but some.

The past gives us a solid foundation to build upon, but it has to be a foundation and not somewhere to dwell upon to the point of self-defeating obsession. There are plenty of organisations which dwell in continental Europe in the period between the World Wars.  These organisations have slipped into the Live Action Role Playing mentality, which is fine for groups like the Sealed Knot, but frankly pathetic when it comes to alleged political activists roaming around wearing the uniforms of yesteryear from countries which are largely consigned to history.

SMPBI is growing while other parties are stagnating or going into decline.  We have a vision for the future and we have the will to achieve that vision.  We need good people with the ability to create literature, leaflets and other propaganda, and the ability and drive to push that material.  Such people are joining - and by so doing, others of equally high calibre will join too.  We are building steadily, but as the condition in the Isles deteriorates, we need to accelerate our growth so that we can be an effective force against those who are profiting by the ruination of our lands and people.

Do you want to be a part of SMPBI? Have you the desire to make the British Isles a better place for all of us?  Are you willing to put in some time and effort to bring in the activists we need so that we can stand in local election, building foot-holds where we can change theory into practise and create local examples of how our Organic Socialism can improve the lives of the People of these Isles?  If so, get in touch by email with the following details:

• Name
• Where you live
• The best way to contact you - including phone (skype, google hangouts) if possible
• Skills you have to contribute
• What you envision for a positive future for the Isles
• Anything else you think is relevant (including any indiscretions which we are better off being aware of)

Your details will be passed on to a local group for you to join, or in the absence of such a group, you will be contacted with a view to setting one up.

Get in touch at the contact email address at the top of the page.  We look forward to hearing from you. Join us. Make a Difference.

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 2

"Patriotism is not an abstract concept. It begins from one's own home. It buds out from the love for one's parents, spouses and children, the love for one's own home, village and workplace, and further develops into the love for one's country and fellow people."

- Kim Jong-un, Chairman of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) and supreme leader of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).

....................

"By 'Conservative Revolution' we mean the return to respect for all those elementary laws and values without which the individual is alienated from nature and God and left incapable of establishing any true order. In the place of equality comes the inner value of the individual; in the place of socialist convictions, the just integration of people into their place in a society of rank; in place of mechanical selection, the organic growth of leadership; in place of bureaucratic compulsion, the inner responsibility of genuine self-governance; in place of mass happiness, the rights of the personality formed by the nation."
--Edgar Julius Jung, "Germany and the Conservative Revolution," 1932
.................

"The story told in this book is the story of the British empire, which by 1900, fearing the rising power of the young German Reich, contrived in secrecy a plan for a giant encirclement of the Eurasian landmass. The main objective of this titanic siege was the prevention of an alliance between Germany and Russia: if these two powers could have fused into an ‘embrace,’ so reasoned the British stewards, they would have come to surround themselves with a fortress of resources, men, knowledge and military might such as to endanger the survival of the British empire in the new century.
(…)
By 1890 (…) Bismarck himself, who was now being dismissed by the new Emperor, Wilhelm II, had been capable of identifying a ‘new course’ for Germany. He clearly comprehended, as will be emphasized hereafter, the importance of not antagonizing Russia.
(…)
By 1900 it was clear to the British that the Reich could indeed ‘pull it off’ (...) British cauchemar would come true: if Germany and Russia united in one form or another, the Eurasian Embrace would come into existence: that is, a concrete Eurasian empire at the center of the continental landmass, which would come to rest on an enormous Slav army and German technological mastery. And that, the British elite sentenced, was never to be, for it would have mortally threatened the supremacy of the British empire.
(…)
By 1922 Hitler was growing increasingly deaf to any score of Eurasian harmony: conservative ideologue Moeller van den Bruck, who longed to witness a blending of the Occident with ‘the great human poetry of the Orient’, encountered the Nazi leader and engaged him in a long discussion, at the end of which, exhausted, he confided to a friend: ‘The fellow never comprehends.’
(…)
The Strasser brothers incarnated the anti-capitalist current of Germany’s petty bourgeoisie, a movement that hearkened back to late-Renaissance German utopianism, for which land was conceived as inalienable and protected by a ‘peasant aristocracy,’ industry segmented into guilds, and national union achieved by a federation of self-governed cantons. A federated Germany, in the view of the Strassers, meant a federated Europe, and an anti-British alliance of free workers across Eurasia. There was no trace of the religious racialism of the Hitlerites in the Strassers’ outlook.
(…)
The present geopolitical policy of the United States is a direct and wholly consistent continuation of the old imperial strategy of Britain. It is that unmistakable cocktail of aggression, subversion and mass murder waged at the vital nodes of the landmass, from Palestine and Central Asia to the gates of China, in Taiwan and Korea, that seeks to undermine any movement towards a confederation of nations capable of turning the continental base into a Eurasian league of socio-political cooperation and defense against Anglo-American assault."

G.G. Preparata, "Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich", pp. XVII, 5-8, 135-136, 187-188 & 263

H/t Arslan Akhtar

................

From James Connolly’s Irish Socialist Republic - To the Irish People:

The struggle for Irish freedom has two aspects: it is national and it is social. Its national ideal can never be realized until Ireland stands forth before the world, a nation free and independent. It is social and economic; because no matter what the form of government may be, as long as one class own as their private property the land and instruments of labor, from which all mankind derive their subsistence, that class will always have it in their power to plunder and enslave the remainder of their fellow creatures. Its social ideal, therefore, requires the public ownership by the Irish people of the land and instruments of production, distribution, and exchange to be held and controlled by a democratic state in the interests of the entire community. But every Irish movement of the last 200 years has neglected one or the other of these equally necessary aspects of the national struggle. They have either been agrarian and social, and in the hunt after some temporary abatement of agricultural distress have been juggled into forgetfulness of the vital principles which lie at the base of the claim for National Independence, or else they have been national and under the guidance of middle-class and aristocratic leaders, who either did not understand the economic basis of oppression, and so neglected the strongest weapon in their armory, or, understanding it, were selfish enough to see in the national movement little else than a means whereby, if successful, they might intercept and divert into the pockets of the Irish middle-class a greater share of that plunder of the Irish worker which at present flows across the channel. The failure of our so-called ‘leaders’ to grasp the grave significance of this two-fold character of the “Irish Question” is the real explanation of that paralysis which at constantly recurring periods falls like a blight upon Irish politics. The party which would aspire to lead the Irish people from bondage to freedom must then recognize both aspects of the long-continued struggle of the Irish Nation. Such a party is the newly-formed Irish Socialist Republican Party. In its resolve to win complete separation from all connection with the British Empire, and the establishment of an Irish Socialist Republic, it embodies to the full the true Irish ideal – an independent nation with a social-democratic organization of society, thus adapting to the altered environment of the nineteenth century the vital principle of common ownership of the means of life which inspired the Brehon laws of our ancient forefathers. In its program of immediately practical reforms will be found the only feasible proposals yet formulated, either for averting from Irish farming the ruin with which it is threatened by the competition of the mammoth farms and scientifically equipped agriculture of America and Australia, for lessening the tide of emigration or for using the political power of the Irish people with potent effect in paving the way for the realization of a revolutionary ideal. We ask you then to join our ranks; to spread our ideas; to work for our success, which means your emancipation; to help us to blend the twin streams of National and Industrial Freedom into one irresistible torrent, sweeping all obstacles before it, and bearing grandly onward on its bosom the toiling millions of the Irish race, proudly enthusiastic in their desire to join the mighty ocean of lovers of Humanity who in every clime under the sun are working and hoping for the time when oppression and privilege will be no more; when “every man will be a Kaiser, every woman be a queen.”

...................

“Capitalistic economy is deeply anti-personal: it dehumanizes economic life and makes man a thing. This is expressed in the present period of decline by the fact that it is becoming constantly more anonymous. Capitalism is itself breaking down the principle of private property: it is difficult to know who is a proprietor and just what he owns. The power of the banks is a faceless, anonymous power. The trusts are anonymous, impersonal institutions. It is even uncertain who is responsible for the misery under which the world is now suffering: there is no culprit, for he has no name. The unemployed do not know who is to blame for their bitter lot. Man is crushed by a vast shapeless, faceless, and nameless power, money.” - Nicolas Berdyaev, The Fate of Man in the Modern World

.................

[50th anniversary of the My Lai massacre]

"Sometimes there were even too many civilian corpses, leading to a different sort of statistical manipulation: body-count deflation. After the My Lai massacre, the American Division claimed only 128 enemy dead, when in actuality more than 500 civilians had been slaughtered.
(...)
Soldiers realized that small groups of civilians could be killed with impunity and logged as enemy dead, but larger numbers might raise red flags if there were no U.S. casualties or few weapons captured. To avoid uncomfortable questions about skewed kills-to-weapons ratios, many patrols planted grenades, rifles, or other arms on dead civilians as a matter of standard operating procedure. They obtained these from weapons caches they discovered, or by taking arms from prisoners or enemy dead carrying more than one weapon, or sometimes even by repurposing U.S. weapons as enemy matériel. As one marine explained, “When civilians got killed, no problem, just stick a chicom [Chinese communist] grenade on ’em, or an AK[-47 assault rifle], they become VC.“
(...)
At My Lai, a number of soldiers became “double veterans,” as the GIs referred to men who raped and then murdered women. As the writers Michael Bilton and Kevin Sim reported, “Many women [at My Lai] were raped and sodomized, mutilated, and had their vaginas ripped open with knives or bayonets. One woman was killed when the muzzle of a rifle barrel was inserted into her vagina and the trigger was pulled.” In one sexual assault, three men held a teenage girl to the ground and violated her. Afterward, the girl was shot in the head and killed.

As the record of the war indicates in copious fashion, however, such crimes were hardly confined to My Lai. A marine who had served in Quang Tin Province, for example, testified that a nine-man squad entered a village ostensibly to capture “a Viet Cong whore.” The men located a woman, then serially raped her. The last one of them shot her through the head.
(...)
As with other crimes in Vietnam, the documentary record of detainee torture is sparse but exceptionally suggestive. For example, the files of the Vietnam War Crimes Working Group—the secret Pentagon task force set up to monitor war crimes in the wake of the My Lai massacre—describe 141 substantiated instances in which U.S. soldiers tortured civilian detainees or enemy prisoners of war with fists, sticks, bats, water, or electric shock. But this is the merest tip of the iceberg: most of these cases came from just one investigation of the 172nd Military Intelligence Detatchment, a single unit of fifty to a hundred men, one of many such American units in Vietnam.”

Nick Turse, "Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam"

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection

Otto Remer, former German WW2 General, became an advocate for cooperation with Russia:

“Germany must leave NATO, the Americans must get out of Germany and out of Europe, and we must develop partnership with Russia – here are the goals which stand before true German patriots now.”

“For Reagan and the Zionists ... The Soviet Union is the incarnation of evil, but for us it is a great power neighboring us with its own security requirements and a doctrine that corresponds to them.”

...........

If the state is not the powerful master, it is the slave of the bank; no middle ground is possible. - Barrès

...........

It will be red communism that realizes the old dream of the Slavophiles, to transfer the capital from Petersburg to Moscow, within the Kremlin. It will be [red communism] that reprises the formula of the Slavophiles and Dostoevsky: Ex Oriente lux. From Moscow, from the Kremlin, the light that must clear the bourgeois shadows of the West surges forth. And at the same time communism creates a despotic and bureaucratic state called to rule not only over bodies, but also over souls, conforming to the traditions of Ivan the Terrible and the autocracy of the Tsars. The Marxism reworked and re-founded by the Russians proclaims the primacy of the political over the economic, the power to modify the economic life of the country at will.

-Nicolas Berdyaev, The Origin of Russian Communism (1936)

...........

"Although I have focused on capitalist abstract clock-time, throughout this study I have kept alive notions of concrete times. I have highlighted the temporal aspect of dynamics of domination and resistance between capitalism’s tendency to commodify – and therefore alienate – time, and the concrete times of human lives and socio-natural processes that resist it. Capitalism’s drive to commodify and alienate time is relentless, and it is expressed in processes occurring all across the social field. Indeed, the drive toward the privatisation of natural resources can be read as an attempt by capital to abstract the concrete times of socio-natural cycles in order to ‘valorise’ them, i.e. to integrate these times in the logic of capital accumulation. In such processes of commodification, the complex cluster of useful labour, socio-natural cycles, human bodies and concrete temporal relationships become means to an end: capital accumulation. Privatising water, for example, entails the abstraction from all the concrete socio-natural and human times involved in the relationship between humans and water into a set of quantifiable time-units expressed in value, thus attributing a – capitalist – value to water, not in the aim of satisfy- ing human needs, but in the aim of profit making. Examples such as these with regards to the relationship between humans and a socially mediated nature, between humans and humans, and between humans and their own bodies, illustrate a struggle between capitalism and human lives, of which the temporal dimension deserves more attention from critical scholarship."

Jonathan Martineau, "Time, Capitalism, and Alienation: A Socio-Historical Inquiry into the Making of Modern Time", p. 167

...............

Michel Aflaq, co-founder of the Ba'ath (Renaissance) party, Syrian-Arab nationalist and socialist :

"If I were asked about my predilection towards socialism I would answer: with regard to this issue what I aspire to is not to increase the wealth of factories but that of life. My concern is not that people should be equal in the distribution of food but that every individual should be allowed to exploit his talents and potential. The laborer crushed by his misery may not find in socialism anything except a promise that he may take what he is deprived of, but I view it as continuous and generous giving, as giving to life many times what it has offered us."

(The wealth of life, 1936)

"He who thinks that socialism is a religion of pity is gravely mistaken. We are not hermits taking refuge in mercy to give peace to a conscience disturbed by seeing misery and suffering, so that we become great in our own eyes and sleep untroubled. Defending deprived masses is not a matter of giving them alms but demanding their rights. We are not only concerned about alleviating misery but also about increasing the wealth of life."

(The wealth of life, 1936)

"In fact this class on which the representation of the country fell in a certain period is very far from the spirit of the nation, its needs and requirements, for it is a senile and ancient class whose vitality has been exhausted and its relation to the spirit of the nation shaken. It has become so servile to economic interests and traditional ' social influence that it is impossible for it to discern the qualities of the Arab life at this stage of development in its history .The consequence of this is that it enters the national struggle unwillingly while dreaming of stability and longing for rest. How many times during the short period of the national struggle has this class deluded itself that the play has come to an end, that the trust was delivered and that the time has come for plucking the fruits and receiving the wages. But the people in their renewed vitality, awakened instinct and repeated revolutions has been warning this class from time to time of the falsehood of its illusions and violently reminding it that the struggle is not yet finished."

(The new formula for patriotism -The Baath, 4 -July 17, 1946)

#InternationalWomen’sDay - A Cynical Assault on Womanhood

Today has been designated International Women's Day.   We do not pay heed to the United Nations, and certainly we have no respect for that organisation. A Globalist body telling people world-wide that we must celebrate/mark a particular cause on a particular day, is an affront to Freedom.  We choose to comment on the issue of Women's Rights on this day, not out of any deference to the UN, but because today is as good as any day to discuss the issue.

When liberals and Trotskyites speak of Women's Rights, they speak as one with the Capitalists.  They speak of the 'right' to indulge in all manner of hedonism with no consequences.  They speak of turning Women into mere economic units, to be equals as wage slaves alongside men. The equality of the liberal is the equality of depravity and degradation.  It is the equality which can only be found in the sewer and in the ruins of society.  It is the equality of nobody having any value, of nobody mattering except in terms of their ability to spend money and to be a part of the death cycle of the economy.

When the Suffragettes fought for the vote, it was from a belief that voting matters. As we have seen with the way that the Brexit Referendum result has been distorted to the point of negation, democracy is a sham. The extension of votes to 16 and 17 years-olds in Scotland, is a ploy to give the impression of democracy, but considering the harm done to young people by the education/indoctrination system, the extension of the vote is likely to increase the power of the Ruling Class by supplying voters who have not learnt to distrust authority.  In the unlikely event of these people voting with wisdom, the results will be ignored anyway.  The extension of the Vote to Women is a false victory.  With all the main parties subservient to the Ruing Class, the Working Class of both sexes have no power, and the pitiful toadying of the Middle Classes to those they see as their 'betters' doesn't help matters.

Another false victory is Women in the workplace.  Whilst it is only right and natural for single Women and married Women without children to have equal opportunities with Men in employment, what is put across by the media as an advance for Womankind, has been nothing but the extension of Wage Slavery to everyone except those who misrule us, who ensure that only members of their own class (and the Bourgeois sycophants) get any work which allows for a decent life.

Wage Slavery is presented as the be-all and end-all, with the idea that it is a great achievement for a Woman to have a career, but to raise a family is a drudgery to be ashamed of.  As a result, Women have been encouraged to shun monogamous relationships, choosing instead a life of fruitless and futile promiscuity.  In the struggle to overcome the Patriarchy, Women have been pushed by the media into a lifestyle where they have to compete with Men in employment (by mimicking the masculine) and break up the routine with a carousel of sexual hedonism which perfectly suits the sexist egoism of men who see Women as sex objects. The Patriarchy has turned the strive to freedom into little more than cost-free prostitution, with servitude in work thrown in as an added insult.

Women in Wage Slavery who do have children have to hand their children over to 'Child Care Providers' who act as surrogate parents, while the Women work for material gains, which ironically are out of reach once child-care costs have been taken into account. Women are told that raising children isn't a proper job, and that therefore children must be handed over to strangers be paid to raise - mainly Women!

For Working Class Women, work is a dead-end. In the worst cases, Women are encouraged to abort their children so they can stay in work. The reduction in population of Working Class children, is used as an excuse by the Ruling Class to import millions of non-natives who compete for employment and by virtue of coming from countries with poorer living standards, reduce labour costs to the bosses.

When we speak of Women's Rights, we speak of the Right of Women to be Women. To be in a monogamous relationship with a partner of your choice is liberating. To have children who you can raise according to your own standards is empowering. To not have to work outside the home is to have the ability to build a life which is tailored to your own needs.  To be able to work until such time as children come (and after they are grown) is to be able to have a balanced life.  All these things are opposed by Trotskyites and their fellow Globalists liberal Capitalists.

The only way in which sexual parity will be achieved is when Nature is embraced, and when People come before Profits.  Pitting Men against Women as rivals is un-natural. We exist side-by-side as Equals in Nature, who compliment each other.  The old religious bigotry which sees Men as 'superior' has lost its power as the monotheistic religion has died.

An end to bigotry, an end to competition, a future of unity and cooperation, is the true way to achieve Rights for Everyone.  The false Men/Women divisions have to be banished forever. The Patriarchy has to go, and the Matriarchy has to be crushed before it develops. This can only be achieved by overthrowing the Capitalist system, rejecting 'no borders' Globalism, and embracing Pure Natural Socialism.

Reject anti-Fascism and anti-Communism. Everything For Class And Nation

There are aspects of the fourth political theory which are disagreeable, but this excerpt is very important and very true. The anti-fascist prejudice mentioned exists to such an extent that few even realize that there were different tendencies within fascism (or even within the different forms of "fascisms"). And on the other hand the anti-communist prejudice mentioned is obviously manifest in fools who label anything they dislike as being "communist", someone like David Duke is a good example of this. He sees himself as a revolutionary against the system, but in fact unwittingly defends the system of liberal capitalism by attacking an imaginary communist boogeyman. The tendency to label everything reactionary as "fascist" (from the left perspective) and the tendency to label everything postmodern as "communist" (from the right) are identical. They fail to realize that the real enemy is capitalism and liberalism (in all of its forms).

What we need as Americans and is a near complete makeover of culture and priority. We have a government but no state as so many writers (especially Spengler and his progeny) have said before. We need to abandon capitalist economics and Trotskyist Geopolitics.

....After much trouble, Ozymandias Drakes is back on the Facebook Front. By his writings above, he has joined the fight with a determined will. Welcome back Comrade.

The British Isles - not just a matter of geography, it is our home

The Party has been in discussion over a change of name to reflect our change in position over the issue of the Nation as we envision it.  This has led to a delay in getting out literature for distribution, and to those affected by this, we can assure you that your patience is appreciated and that the issue is being resolved.

We have come to an agreement that the party must not be limited by narrow regionalism, and must not be diluted by globalism.  The party must be anchored in the Working Class of the Motherland.  This does not mean that we have any animosity to others, but that we appreciate the need to unite the Land with the People who have come from her.

The unique admixture of Peoples in the British Isles, binds us together in a way which no other European nation can claim.  Our people have been blended together over millenia, with the ancients joined by the Britons, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Norse and others.  In a sense we are the most truly European of all the peoples of Europe, which makes our love for Europe strong.  The globalisers would use this to argue that we must remain in the EU, but that is to mix a beautiful natural reality (Europe) with a political-economic construct (EU); the latter of which through its globalist policies has become a very real threat to the survival of the former in any worthwhile sense.

We have reached agreement that the Party must be a Party for the entire British Isles, on both sides of the Irish Sea and from the very farthest of the Channel Isles right up to the far north of the Shetlands, from the westermost islands of Kerry to the shores of Suffolk.  Ours is the Party of the British Isles, embracing all our peoples and fighting against divisive regionalism and any arrogant designs of domination by one part over any other. 

We reject such 'politically correct' nonsense as our homeland being the 'Islands of the North Atlantic', the 'Anglo-Celtic Islands' etc.  The term British Isles includes the two large Islands of Ireland and Great Britain, as well as the over six thousand smaller ones.  Political Correctness is a liberal fad which will die as all mindless fads do.  The British Isles will remain. We use the term British Isles because we will not bow down to the lunacy of the liberal mafia - we aim to destroy them and build a better nation when they have been swept away.

Thanks go to Bob for all the help in sorting out graphics for the name change, with particular emphasis on the design of a Party Badge for members to wear with pride.  We are nearly ready to finalise the new name, so please bear with us and be patient for a little while longer.

Against Globalist multiculturalism, For Real Cultures which can exist side-by-side (Wilberg on Wednesday)

[Editors note: The Party's objection to Multiculturalism is firmly rooted in the reality that what is called multicultural, is in truth a bland mono-culture, nay anti-culture. We affirm our desire to develop and enhance our culture, drawing on the historical roots which formed it.  The British nation has blended Roman, Celtic, Germanic, French, Greek and all manner of ancient cultures including ones which date back to the mists of time.  To Focus on music: While we have no problem with Folk Music, we see great developments coming through Neo-Folk; While we have respect for Classical Music, there is a great and under-explored growth in Neo-Classical Music. Authentic Culture pays respect to its roots, but it does not stagnate, it thrives and grows. Multiculturalism of the coca cola sex-obsessed degenerate and artistically moribund variety is what we are against, but a genuine collection of coexisting and mutually-enhancing cultures, is something we applaud. But enough of this note, over to Peter!]


Globalist multiculturalism destroys authentic culture.

Correct.

But do we want to see an ‘authentic culture’ that is tantamount to little more than dancing round rural maypoles in traditional folk costumes - or one that merely replaces commercial pop culture with folk music? What about a massive program of re-educating our own and other European peoples - starting from childhood - in the great musical, poetic, architectural, poetic, dramatic and philosophical cultural traditions of Europe - not least Britain? Do we really want to see the total eradication of that great European culture - one that spans an era stretching from Heraclitus to Hegel, from Aeschylus and Aristotle to Goethe, Shakespeare to Schiller, Bach and Beethoven to Benjamin Britten??? Do we really need to depend on the Chinese to produce new generations of great classical and romantic pianists? Do we really just want to dress up as Druids, replace crucifixes with statues of Odin - and pretend this superficial New Age mimicry of pagan rites is authentic ‘Tradition’ - a word which, as the chief philosopher of 'Traditionalism' - Rene Guenon - pointed out, means an authentic initiatory and experiential passing on (tradere) of both craft skills and profound experiences of spiritual and philosophical truths.

I think there is also another serious question to be asked in this context. The question is, were we to be able to wave a magic wand and instantly remove every single trace of ‘multiculturalism’ from England, what exactly would we be left with in terms of ‘culture’ except for the monoculture of endlessly streamed TV ads and crap American TV series? [Editors note: We want to eradicate Hollywood US Imperialist anti-culture, so there would be NO US sitcoms etc!] The ‘authentic culture’ of English Beer and Scotch Whisky? Pub chains serving up crap, microwaved imitations of traditional English food? Football, rugby and cricket? (...not that there is anything wrong with any of them at all). Brass bands and Welsh singers (albeit the best of whom, like Bryn Terfel become great and world-renowned singers)? What would happen to our great but underfunded and ridiculously overpriced theatres, opera houses, concert halls and symphony orchestras? Under National Socialism, as in the Soviet Union, truly great musicians were trained and cultivated in the classical tradition - initiated would be a better word. Great music was brought to the people and not just an elite - with even the Berlin Philharmonic playing in factories. More importantly, in both NS Germany and the Soviet Union great works of classical ‘traditional’ music were still being composed. And even the Soviet Union recognised how deeply interwoven Russian culture and music was with European culture - including both French, Austrian German and English culture and music (as shown by the great friendship of Shostakich with Benjamin Britten). Finally, why was Wagner’s ‘The Mastersingers of Nuremburg’ performed after each and every Nuremberg rally? Because the whole theme of this particular music drama (Wagner hated bourgeois 'opera') is how cherished traditions of apprenticeship and spiritual initiation in great artistic traditions such as poetry and song are not frozen in time but can be patiently and wisely handed passed on (tradere) to a new generations who will learn from, respect and conserve them even if they introduce creative innovations.

In my personal view, the great UNITY of European traditions and culture is revealed nowhere better and more deeply than in great music - to talk of ‘classical’ music here is to consign it to the past, when it is precisely that music which more than any other endures. And it is in the realm of great music that the unique and absolutely distinct flavour and feeling of, say, Russian, Czech, English or French music has never been lost came but first into its own - not despite but because of the fact that it was inseparable from Germanic music - and would not have even existed without the native pre-national Germanic homeland of European culture - the land of culture as Goethe called it, and the nation of culture he would have wished for. And to me, music education should become basis of all education - starting in pre-school. In Poland during the Soviet era they produced wonderfully mesmerising animations of classical music which put Disney's Fantasia to shame, and which I am sure even very young children would be drawn into watching - and in this way receive their first exposure to classical music.

Here are some of many:

great Polish animations

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB661A4vpEs&index=10&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dITlv3qcN80&index=5&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJnmQNpC_04&index=4&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2Ld65ZKaQ0&index=2&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3hD-O0j9C8&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U77nX1RzOw0&index=23&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k93MbPRS8po&list=PLC94B9EE33E0BDC18&index=3

music with sand drawing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go7wlUOC5dg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me9eAb9SYOU

from the classical music animation film Fantasia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMnlxYkZKaU&index=5&list=PL3WK__yMF5c6fF5aQNDxY_wEKERIeEnGY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjmI0D-uoLo&list=PL3WK__yMF5c6fF5aQNDxY_wEKERIeEnGY&index=6

abstract animations

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--ykTqoQnqI&list=PL3B39D4DC6881CF28

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idJHl9rB7Cc&list=PLCE93CB28C5827D74

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRgXUFnfKIY&index=2&list=RDljGMhDSSGFU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2y90hH4H7Q

Separatism as a Tool of Globalism. United We Stand

For map, visit: https://www.theliterarygiftcompany.com/products/literary-map-of-britain

SWPE has long had a policy of seeking an independent England.  The use of the name England in the party name is a key indication of the centrality of that policy.  After much debate internally, this policy has now been revised. More than revised, this policy has now been reversed.

Great Britain is an island nation, comprised of several sub-nations, the main ones being
England,
Cymru/Wales
Alba/Scotland. 

These main sub-nations can be broken down into the even smaller and more ancient nations which came before them, such as
Kernow/Cornwall,
Westseaxna/Wessex,
Cantaware/Kent,
Mierce/Mercia,
Norþhymbra/Northumbria,
Ēast Engla/East Anglia,
Dalriada,
Cait,
Fortriu,
Strathclyde,
Orkney,
Hebrides,
Shetland,
Deheubarth,
Gwynedd,
Powys,
Morgannwg,

But why stop there! Regional loyalty can be taken down to even smaller levels, to counties, to cities.  The historic rivalty between Yorkshire and Lancashire dates back to a dispute between rivals for the crown of England. Even today, there are a small number people on each side of the Pennines who genuinely hate those on the other, failing to appreciate that the massacres of common people during the Wars of the Roses benefited nobody except the Ruling Class families to whom loyalty was mistakenly given.  Interestingly, the modern truncated county of Lancashire (excluding Merseyside and Greater Manchester) was once (alongside Furness Cumberland and Westmorland aka Cumbria) a part of Strathclyde, which would make it reasonable to argue should exclude it from an independent England and place it inside Scotland.

To argue for separatism is to invite further spiralling into regionalism, with the end being the total disintegration of the nation, and the emergence of a vast number of little states, each with their own governments, each with their own leaders, each with their own despotisms and hidden allegiance to the same Global Ruling Class which would gain in power by virtue of the inability of any one state to have control over matters which have a Britain-wide impact.

As noted above with reference to the ancient kingdom of Strathclyde, the borders between England, Scotland and Wales have been fluid for a long time. Monmouthshire has only been in fixed in Wales by law since 1972.  And what of the northeastern border of England? The former nation of Northumbia included not only the counties of Yorkshire, Durham and Northumberland, but also the southeast of modern Scotland, including Edinburgh, the very seat of the Scottish Parliament.  Lowland Scots/Doric is a Germanic language which has no similarity at all with Scottish Gaelic. 

Culturally, ethnically, linguistically, the peoples of Britain have so intermingled that to try to separate us is pointless, yet that is exactly what the separatists and regionalists are trying to do.  The Westminster regime is the epicentre of regionalism, pushing the devolution hoax, with directly-elected City Mayors joining the rush for extra layers of government which of course have to be paid for with our taxes, and achieve nothing other than to provide centres of corruption outside of London in the manner of new hubs in a spider-like web of control.  Of note again, Lancashire has been targeted by the London regime, with its largest cities (Liverpool, Manchester and Warrington) no longer even officially recognised as being parts of Lancashire (Warrington given to Cheshire by the stroke of a pen, Liverpool and Manchester being first carved off into unitary authorites and now saddled with the expensive and un-necessary directly elected mayors so beloved by the politicians who seek to divide us in every way possible).

We formally renounce our policy of English separatism, which we now accept was a mistake. We replace this with a commitment to unity. 

The British Working Class suffer the same injustices regardless of location, we share the same hardships, we are treated by the Ruling Class with equal disdain. Over the centuries, our people have moved around the country and have intermingled. The historic divisions reflected divisions between rivals for power - and as such were of importance to the Ruling Class in terms of areas they controlled, but for us are interesting, but not reason for animosity towards our countrymen. The modern administrative demarcations have even less significance to us, being drawn up by servants of the State as lines on maps, with no care for cultural or any other ties.Who with family from these isles can seriously claim to be a 'pure' Angle, Saxon, Pict, Jute, Celt?  We all have ancestry which roots us firmly with the original inhabitants of the Isles who came before any of the recognised modern tribes. We have become a single extended family not just from Lands End to John o'Groats but also onto the many islands which surround the British mainland.

Splitting us apart is to break the family, to make us weak, to give power to hostile elements. A free Socialist Britain would throw out NATO, the US military, multinational corporations, the 'monarchy', all institutions and individuals with loyalty to any organisation, country, company, or way of life which is not, of, from and for this land.

Unity Is Strength. We need to heal the wounds caused by those who create false divisions, and to deepen and strengthen our diverse cultures which when wound together become an unshakeable foundation for a better, happier and healthier future.

For Class and Nation

Don't Play the Enemies' Game. We are Revolutionaries. Be Revolutionary!

For all the best will in the world, political activism can be something which is non-productive or worse, counter-productive.  The phrase Acta Non Verba sums up the futility of words which are employed as a substitution for action.

In the current political climate, political action has become the stuff of pantomime.  Across the spectrum, the 'revolutionary' activities tend to boil down to protest marches and demonstrations (which in every case have to be organised with the express permission of the police and state), and the usual stickering/leafleting campaigns which likewise have to be prepared with one eye on the possible legal ramifications for publishing material which does not conform to the liberal orthodoxy of the globalist Ruling Class.

Set piece activities do not work.  They have become the norm because they are the sanitised and acceptable face of rebellion. They are conformity wrapped in the smug air of dissidence.  To ensure that the people are kept in line, the liberal thugs who violently suppress any 'politically incorrect' expression of thought, have become a particularly insidious type of police by proxy.  This makes activity more difficult.  If only politically acceptable activity can be safely undertaken; if only non-threatening and easily ignored activity is sanctioned by the very state which is the problem, then what is the point in bothering?

A couple of poignant illustrations of pointless activity can be considered by looking at two organisations on opposite sides of the reactionary spectrum.  These two organisations consider themselves revolutionary, but by obeying the rules of the game, they can be proven to be just side-shows and examples of how not to engage in politics:

1.  The National Front (NF). The NF claims to have been in existence for 50 years, and takes great pride in this. Their signature activity is the march.  NF marches were at one point spectacular events attracting vast numbers. They have since dwindled to the shuffling of a few skinheads with media attention dwindling in direct correlation.  They have learnt nothing in 50 years. They have failed to grasp that the massive protest marches in London which occur ever more frequently, achieve nothing.
2. The Socialist Workers Party (SWP). The SWP set piece activity is the paper sale.  This takes the form of a handful of students badgering passers-by to buy the SWP rag (Socialist Worker). An amusing example of such a sale was the SWP setting up stall outside a Bank(!) with the full permission of the Bankers inside to sell their rag.  How very radical, how revolutionary!  Of course it is with bitter irony that the SWP has fallen into the trap of becoming a neutered Trotskyite parody, full of Social Justice Warriors who are so obsessed with bizarre fetish identity politics that they are no threat whatsoever to the Capitalist system.

Demonstrations are not always pointless. 

• Taking a stand alongside Striking Workers shows solidarity and emboldens the cause.  
• Leafleting for specific purposes and specific times is a valid course.  A flash demo outside a bank for the purpose of handing out literature to bank customers exposing the banking racket, is a worthy task (with the purpose of waking people up to the mendacity of the system being far more worthy than selling papers full of liberal drivel which wouldn't look out of place in the Guardian!)
• As long as the leaflets are concise and appropriate (not general and largely irrelevant), and as long as they are handed out personally and in broad daylight (not put through letter boxes / on car windscreens in the dead of night like a reverse burglar!), leaflets have their place.  Stickers?  Do they have any purpose at all? Probably not.

Revolution is not set-piece. Revolution requires imagination and the application of skills which each of us have individually.

• The Education System is Toxic. Don't moan about it! Home school your own children. Where possible set up education cooperatives with like-minded people to teach sanity, and keep the minds of the youth safe from liberal lunacy
• Medicine is largely a cash cow for the Pharmaceuticals Industry. Research Natural Remedies, keep fit, break free as much as you can. Don't moan while continuing to feed the system - get out of the system and help others to do so.
• Stuck in a dead-end soul-destroying job?  Quit!  It isn't easy, but with planning, it is possible. As Socialists we espouse Workers' Cooperatives and the right of the individual to be his/her own boss. These are not theoretical possibilities for a post-revolutionary era; these are real and achievable building blocks of the Revolution right now.  
• Live by example. Moaning about how awful life is, while remaining a cog in the machine, is defeatist. We want to build a better society. We can start by making our own lives better. If we live as Socialists, trade as Socialists, work as Socialists, support each other, help our communities, strive for our people as Socialists, we become living examples and we inspire others to do likewise.

In Wales, the fake patriots of Meibion Glyndwr tackled the problem of tourists depriving locals of homes through buying up property to holiday in, by the utterly stupid strategy of sneaking around at night and setting second homes on fire. This helped house no-one, and only further limited available housing.  A better strategy would have been to break into empty properties and occupy them with people otherwise homeless (and not just Welsh people!)  Meibion Glyndwr made the Welsh people appear to be an English-hating set of idiots, when they could have used a better set of tactics and become a beacon for the homeless across the UK.  We have to be careful not to engage in activities which are counterproductive. The ends and means must work in unison.

Social Media is another minefield. Yes, it is useful in raising awareness. But if it is used without serious thought, it can lead people to the wrong idea about us. The message must be consistent, positive, constructive.  If people want to naval-gaze and engage in self-pitying whinging, they can turn on the TV - they don't need to have the defeatist sickness pushed at them by us. We need to inspire people, and we won't do that by becoming an echo of the mainstream media!

To work Comrades!  Be the Revolution.  Take time to think about how we behave and how the general public see us.  Actions, Not Words, will bring about the end of the Capitalist System, and it is up to us to do all we can, so that others do likewise. We are few, but we can inspire and motivate many.