Anti-Trump Carnival: A Distraction From Issues That Matter

The President of the USA has arrived in the UK for a State Visit.  This is the case of a politician from one country, coming to meet politicians from another.  It doesn't have any real impact on the Working Class at all.

A group of Middle Class agitators, with a remarkable access to funding (!) has organised a carnival, so that bourgeois wasters can walk the streets, amongst people just as foolish as themselves, to make a gesture which will have absolutely zero impact on anything.  They know that their singing, dancing, silly banners and idiotic antics, will be dutifully picked up by the media, and broadcast as the voice of the British People.  The British People couldn't give a toss about what Donald Trump does in the USA, but the Soros-aligned media will distort events to present a different picture.

According to the 'Stop Trump' group, they are organising to protest against his policies which "threatens steps towards tackling:

Inequality

Peace and disarmament

Climate change

Fighting discrimination, particularly against already marginalised groups like migrants and Muslims

Corporate greed"

Lets have a look at these claims that 'Trumpism' is a diabolical ideology.

Inequality - a catch-all term which could be used to mean anything

Peace and Disarmament - Trump's election stopped the war-plans which the Clinton side would have implemented.  The Syria catastrophe is ending. The DPRK has not been invaded.  Of course the rhetoric against Russia and Iran is escalating, but all in all, there is no more war under Trump than proposed by his opponents,  There may even be a little less.

Climate Change - Under Capitalism there will always be pollution and waste. Until Capitalism is gone, there will always be environmental damage. The protesters aim to blame one man for environmental damage.  They don't point the finger at the industrial pollution giants of India and China.  Really, they are doing harm themselves by simplifying the issue to a single man, and by not looking at global polluters.

Migrants and Muslims - By this they mean that Trump is not an Open Borders Extremist.  This indicates that they are!  The hypocrites do not see (will not see) that Globalisation causes pollution, destroys peace between people and only benefits the rich who can use people as commodities - cheap labour.  The Trots and Liberals are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.  If he wants to keep his country safe and maintain its culture and way of life, then fair play to him.  The Muslim bit refers to him seeing the tragedies in Europe, with Islamic State terrorists posing as refugees, murdering and raping across the continent, and not wanting the same for the USA. What lunatic would?  The lunatics who want Open Borders and easy access for terrorists, will be on display this weekend! And of course, using the word 'migrant' is a lie - he is not against Migration, but Illegal Immigration, which are two different things that the Open Borders idiots cannot grasp.

Corporate Greed - Capitalism is a system of Greed. Trump is a part of the system. Like the statues in Ancient Rome, when the head is removed, another takes its place and nothing changes. The system has to go.

Silent about Zionism

The Stop Trump agitators have said nothing at all about Trump's Zionism.  They couldn't care less that he has moved the US Embassy to Al Quds in the West Bank of Occupied Palestine.  They have no interest in his family ties to the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate. They are silent on his blatant subservience to Likud and the Chabad Lubavitch sect.  If the Stop Trump people cared about the powers behind Trump, they would be speaking about Zionism, but as good little Soros puppets, they fail to mention any of this.

The Stop Trump Carnival is Irrelevant

The Working Class do not care about Trump and what the Middle Class feel so aggrieved by.  The SJW Identity Politics crowd have fallen for a smoke-and-mirrors propaganda exercise which keeps them focused on one man, while the decline of living standards continues on a global scale without them seeing anything but Trump.  They believe that the President of the USA is the most powerful man in the world, and not just another figurehead.  That is naivety in the extreme, and is the product of a life of swallowing the make-believe of Hollywood and the BBC. 

Trump is irrelevant.  

What the Working Class care about is the traitors in government betraying Brexit.  We care about the NHS being sold to the highest bidder.  We care about our joke of a border being so wide open that our resources, infrastructure and land cannot cope with the influx of economic migrants and fake refugees.  The Stop Trump crowd not only ignore our concerns, but in their protest walks, they mock us, call us racist, xenophobic, thick, bigots etc, for wanting our Borders shut, our People safe (physically and financially) - much of what they will be screaming at Trump, they are screaming at us.  The Stop Trump organisation is an anti-Working Class, anti-Sovereignty collection of idiots, fantasists and Europhile traitors.  If they cared about the British Isles, they would be marching on Parliament in the spirit of the October Revolution!  But in truth, they have more in common with the traitors in Parliament than the People of the Isles.

The 'baby Trump' blimp is indicative of their mentality. Like the blimp they are full of hot-air and are only fit to be laughed at.

Trump is a politician - no worse, no better than the rest of the corporate whores.  Attacking the figurehead but ignoring the system is pointless and stupid - which again sums up the protest and those taking part in it.

The DPRK is safe - For now.

The US and the DPRK have reached an agreement which transforms the ceasefire of 1953 into Peace.  Today's Summit is a historic occasion in which the aggressors of the USA have finally recognised the right of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to be a sovereign nation.

The key points of the summit declaration statement are as follows:

• The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.–DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.
• The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.
• Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearising of the Korean Peninsula.
• The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.

SMPBI cautiously welcomes the outcome of the Summit. However, there are worrying parallels to be drawn with other countries which have effectively disarmed themselves in the pursuit of peace with the USA.

Iraq and Libya are key example of nations which were threatened by the USA.  In both cases, following the destruction of their defensive capabilities, they were invaded and destroyed, They sought peace, and to prove their sincerity made themselves vulnerable. The US criminals took full advantage, and now Iraq is an occupied country, and Libya is in ruins.

If the US modus operandi follows as it always has, then Kim Jong Un (just as Saddam Hussein and Muammar al Gaddafi before him), may well have just signed his own death warrant, and opened the path for his country to be wrecked by a fake 'colour revolution' and/or a military attack.

The DPRK has started down a dangerous path. Creeping economic liberalisation threatens to let the Capitalist parasites back into the country. The existence of a McDonalds in Pyongyang is an illustration of the backwards steps away from the Juche idea.

Has Kim Jong Un saved his country from destruction by the USA, or opened the path for just that?  We hope that this summit is the path to peace.  Ideally this could be the starting point for reunification of Korea under the ideals of Juche, not the barbarism of Capitalism.  We will probably not have too long to wait to see if this was a superb piece of diplomacy, or the leadership of the DPRK walking into a trap.

The USA is a Zionist One Party State. American Socialists need to rise up against the Zionist menace

In the USA, the Zionist President, Trump, has moved the US Embassy in Occupied Palestine to Al-Quds.  There is a temptation to see this move as out of step with ordinary US politics, but if we look back over past anti-Palestinian and pro-Zionist actions by the democracy in name only, US One Party State, the actions of Trump are just more of the same:

Six years ago in September. at the Democratic National Party Convention, former Governor of Ohio, Ted Strickland, put forward a motion enshrining in the party's official platform, recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel.  The motion was as follows:

'This summer, I was proud to serve this party as the platform drafting committee chair. I came before you today to discuss the two important matters related to our party's national platform. As an ordained United Methodist Minister, I am here to attest and affirm that our faith and belief in God is central to the American story and informs the value we have expressed in our party's platform. In addition, President Obama recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and our party's platform should as well. Mr. Chairman, I have submitted my amendment in writing and I believe it is being projected on the screen for the delegates to see. I move adoption of the amendment as submitted and shewn to the delegates.'

By linking God and Jerusalem, Ted Strickland continued the one-party-state policy of unrelenting Zionism: under the Republican administration, the Mosaic Law was more-or-less the modus operandi, the Democrats simply followed suit.

The vote at the Convention was farcical.  The oral vote had to be taken three times, and each time a clear majority voted NO to the amendment to the party platform.  Each time the vote was taken, the voice of the Democrats was clear: the will of the party was to keep the issue of God excluded from party policy, and for Jerusalem NOT to be recognised as the capital of Israel.  In a display of sheer arrogance, Convention leader (Mayor of Los Angleles)  Antonio Villaraigosa, declared that the requisite two thirds majority had been obtained, and that the motion had passed!

The USA is the face of Globalism, and certainly its military power, but it is not the over-riding power. To see what that is, just look at the decisions taken by government after government, regardless of party affiliation.  The US regime is Zionist. The UK is the side-kick of the USA. 

Although our focus is obviously on the British Isles, we do see the need to overthrow Zionism worldwide.  Our Comrades in the US sections of the SMPBI are working to promote a Free USA where Zionism has no place.  Any supporters in the USA should get in touch, so that we can pass you on to our Comrades in that country. 

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT. - An alternative view

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT. - An alternative view

[Editor's note:
SMPBI is a Party in which differing views are not stifled - unless of course they are put forward by pro-Capitalist pro-Globalist infilTRAITORS!  In this reply to Pietro's post, Peter offers an alternative analysis. The media circus, (controlled official and controlled opposition) have painted varied accounts which both muddy the facts.  To get as close to the truth as we are likely to, it is important to be open-minded. The lengthy response is published in full with the intention of creating a debate.

Theresa May is the enemy of the UK. She is backed by all manner of scum in the USA, UN, EU, NATO, IMF and other Globalist entities.  The confrontation between the West and Russia is a contrived piece of propaganda with no basis in reality - the UK, not Russia, is responsible for any nerve gas attack (if there even was one) - but what is the purpose?

Responses by comment, or by email are welcome. The situation is serious, and it requires serious thought.]



“The confrontation between the West and Russia: a deliberate plan by Theresa May, Jean Claude Juncker and the EU Establishment to Derail Brexit”.

Really? Deliberate plan by May and JUNCKER of all people?

Point 1: Juncker is the man who has always just insisted to May that “Brexit means Brexit”.

Point 2: If May and Juncker are in collusion then why has Juncker been vilified for NOT supporting “the confrontation between the West and Russia”?

“European Union boss Jean-Claude Juncker has been criticised after his "nauseating" letter of congratulations to Russia's Vladimir Putin failed to mention the Salisbury nerve agent attack. The European Commission President wrote to Mr Putin on Tuesday to congratulate the Russian leader on his recent re-election. However, the top Brussels official immediately was attacked for NEGLECTING TO INCLUDE a reference to the attempted murder of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia using the chemical weapon Novichok.

In his letter, Mr Juncker sent Mr Putin his "congratulations on your re-election as President of the Russian Federation". "I have always argued that positive relations between the European Union and the Russian Federation are crucial to the security of our continent," he wrote.  "Our common objective should be to re-establish a cooperative pan-European security order. I hope that you will use your fourth term in office to pursue this goal. I will always be a partner in this endeavour. I wish you every success in carrying out your high responsibilities."

However, the leader of Conservative MEPs in the European Parliament, Ashley Fox, branded the letter "disgraceful" as he accused Mr Juncker of "appeasing" the Russian President. "To congratulate Vladimir Putin on his election victory without referring to the clear ballot rigging that took place is bad enough," he said.

"But his failure to mention Russia's responsibility for a military nerve agent attack on innocent people in my constituency is nauseating.”

"The European Commission President is appeasing a man who poses a clear threat to Western security.” Tory MP Sarah Wollaston

“Asked if the Prime Minister was disappointed Mr Juncker had not referred to the Salisbury attack in his letter to Mr Putin, Theresa May's official spokesman said: "What I would point to is the strong response which you have seen from across the EU, from leaders in condemning what happened in Salisbury and standing with the UK." Wishful thinking from Theresa May. Whilst many in the EU are nodding politely to May, much more is going on behind the scenes in the EU. Just a few ‘minor’ points:

Millions of Euros are being spent by the EU to prevent Libya being used as a principal migrant route to Europe via Italy.

There are those in the EU who see a united European Defence Force as a way of disentangle Europe from NATO and the U.S.

The EU is also working behind the scenes to block predatory ‘inward investment’ from the USA - which Britain will be WIDE OPEN TO after Brexit.

Europe has no interest in paying for high-priced gas from the US - and Germany has just approved the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia.

KEYPOINT: the EU is NOT the monolith it is made out to be. There are even those in the EU ‘Establishment’ as well as the EU Member States who are against anti-Russian sanctions - or even wish Europe to have the united military and economic power to stand up to the US Atlanticist Empire and its Anglo-Zionist and Polish lapdogs. There is much more that could be written on this subject. We must just learn to research thoroughly,  ‘read between the lines’ - and see those current and future trajectories of geopolitical development in Europe and Eurasia which defy simplistic readings.
For a stronger Europe - a union of autonomous European nations free of U.S. hegemony!

EU Member States in favor of lifting Russian sanctions:
Bulgaria: Bulgaria considers the sanctions regime against Russia an obstacle to its own economy. 72% of Bulgarians have a positive view of Russia.
Cyprus: The Cyprian government has opposed sanctions against Russia, especially on the basis of the two countries’ economic ties, although the actual economic impact of the sanctions has been limited.
Czech Republic: The stance of the Czech Republic towards Russia changed significantly following the crisis in Ukraine and Russia’s subsequent annexation of Crimea. Despite the ambivalent positions of some individual politicians, as well as a high dependence on imports from Russia. President Miloš Zeman has repeatedly criticized the EU sanctions against Russia. Zeman also retains strong ties to Russian business.
Greece: Greece has historically been one of Russia’s advocate within the EU, advocating for the Kremlin’s interests in Brussels.  The current Greek government maintains exceptionally close ties with the Kremlin and other prominent Russian figures. Greece has typically expressed opposition to any EU measures that could alienate Russia. Greece is best described as one of the EU’s three ‘Kremlin friendlies’, together with Italy and Cyprus. 66% of Greeks have a positive view of Russia.
Italy: Though traditionally a country with deep economic ties to Russia, Italy has shown strong support for a common EU and NATO stance on Russia. At the same time, Italy does not wish to completely alienate Russia, and continues to believe that a dialogue is possible. Italian politics is full of pro Russian elements and many politicians believe that the EU sanctions are harmful to Italy and should therefore be lifted.
Slovenia: After the annexation of Crimea, Slovenia fully supported Ukrainian integrity and fulfilment of the Minsk agreements, but it has also maintained pragmatic energy-focussed economic ties with Russia. For this reason, Slovenia supports lifting the sanctions against the Russian Federation
Hungary: The government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban uses good relations with Russia as leverage in Hungary’s relations with Brussels, and in order to support his own domestic . After the annexation of Crimea, the Prime Minister sought to weaken European sanctions against Russia.
EU Member States in favor of Dialogue and Compromise
Austria: Austria’s bilateral relationship with Russia is between ‘friendly pragmatist’ and ‘strategic partner’  Austria’s most successful far-right political party, the FPÖ, has exceptionally close ties to Russia . Austrian relations with Russia have not suffered significantly due to the conflict in Ukraine. In particular, energy interests continue to shape the two countries’ relationship and remain a cornerstone of Austrian diplomacy with Russia. For this reason, Austria is skeptical about the EU sanctions regime against Russia .
Finland: Finland is the one Nordic country that has always sought to find compromise with Russia due to its dependence on Russian fossil fuels and deep economic ties with Russia. Finland still sees hope in rebuilding EU-Russian relations.
Luxembourg: Luxembourg has close economic and financial ties to Russia, and is therefore reluctant to alienate Russia with punitive measures. Due to high levels of investment from Russia (and vice versa), Luxembourg is reluctant to implement EU measures aimed at restricting financials from Russia.
Netherlands: The major dimension of Russo-Dutch relations is economic.  The Netherlands did raise concerns that Russia’s behavior threatens international order and the integrity of the EU.  Furthermore, the Netherlands are hesitant but generally supportive of the common EU stance on Russia.
Spain: Being located far away from Russia and not affected by the same fears as the easternmost EU member states, Spain remains focused on engaging in dialogue with Russia. Spain remains skeptical about possible European expansion, and Russia’s status as a strategic partner in the fight against terrorism has marked Spain’s attitude of hesitance in making strong moves to counter perceived Russian threats. Economy wise, Russia does not play a significant role in Spanish energy imports, but Russian tourism plays a big role in the Spanish economy. Thus, Spain was one of the several countries to voice criticism against anti-Russian sanctions.
Other types of analysis: http://press.ecpr.eu/documents/sampleChapters/9781785522796.pdf

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT.

by Pietro

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF WESTMINSTER AND BRUSSELS NEVER ACCEPTED THE RESULTS OF THE REFERENDUM SINCE THE MORNING OF THE 24th OF JUNE 2016. DAVID CAMERON RESIGNED AND GOT REPLACED BY THERESA MAY.

AFTER JUST REPEATING "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT" LIKE A PARROT SHE IS TRYING HER BEST TO BE IN THE EU IN ALL BUT NAME.

DESPITE THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE ABOUT THE KREMLIN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE ATTEMPTED MURDERING OF A SPY AND HIS DAUGHTER IN SALISBURY (IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE AGAINST THEIR INTEREST) THE ENTIRE WESTERN ESTABLISHMENT AND THE SOROSES OF THIS WORLD ARE PUSHING REALLY HARD TO START A NEW WAR AGAINST RUSSIA IN ORDER TO KEEP NATO, THE UN AND THE EU ALIVE AND KICKING.

WITH THE EXEMPTION OF AUSTRIA, BULGARIA AND HUNGARY (And even these have sent home a token Russian in support of this lunacy) EVERY WESTERN COUNTRY STARTED THE MAD WITCH HUNT AGAINST RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS.

THERESA MAY, EMANUEL MACRON AND ANGELA MERKEL HAVE HAD A JOINT CONFERENCE IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE HOSTILITY. UNLIKE IN 2014 WHEN CRIMEA RETURNED HOME THIS TIME THE EU IS EVEN MORE WARMONGERING THAN THE US

IN A MOMENT IN WHICH ALL THE MAINSTREAM POLITICAL PARTIES IN BRITAIN ARE AGAINST BREXIT: I MEAN THE FAKE SOCIALISTS (IN FACT GLOBOS) OF PLAID CYMRU, THE STRASBOURG NATIONAL PARTY, LABOUR (JEREMY CORBYN DITCHED HIS PREVIOUS EUROSCEPTICISM), MOST OF THE TORY PARTY AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THE LIB DEMS - ALL WANTED TO REMAIN. THE GOVERNMENT ARE YET AGAIN TRYING TO TAKE AN EXTRA STEP INSIDE THE EU.

THE 2017 SNAP GENERAL ELECTION WAS IN FACT AIMING AT UKIP. THEY WANTED TO BRING UKIP DOWN BECAUSE AT LEAST ON BREXIT AND ON IMMIGRATION THEY HAD SOMEONE TO ANSWER TO.

UKIP HAS AT THE MOMENT GOT NO CHANCE AS LONG AS THIS CLOWN (HENRY BOLTON) IS IN CHARGE OF THE PARTY.

NOW THERESA MAY AND HER CORRUPTED CABAL ARE USING THE SCARE-MONGERING OF THE RUSSIANS IN ORDER TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT BRITAIN CAN'T HAVE IT'S FREEDOM AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY BACK.

THE EU IS NOTHING FOR THE EUROPEANS. IT WAS SET BY A GROUP OF AMERICANS DURING THE COLD WAR IN ORDER TO OCCUPY ALL THE NATION STATES THAT FELL UNDER IT AND IS THE ECONOMIC WING OF NATO.

NOW THIS GLOBALIST INSTITUTION IS ALLOWING THE MASSES OF THE THIRD WORLD IN EUROPE IN ORDER TO CREATE IT'S OWN ELECTORATE, IT'S OWN "europeans" AND GENOCIDE ALL THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES BY CREATING A GLOBALISED MAN.
...... WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE TROTZ, THE SJWs, THE MULTINATIONALS AND THE MISSIONARIES USEFUL IDIOTS.

WE NEED TO EXPOSE THE EU FOR WHAT IT IS, BRING IT DOWN TOGETHER WITH NATO AND THE UN, AND CREATE AN ALLIANCE OF FREE SOVEREIGN AND IDENTITARIAN NATIONS WITH RUSSIA AND BELARUS.

DOWN WITH GLOBALISATION!
DOWN WITH CAPITALISM!
DOWN WITH THE KALERGY PLAN!

SAY NO TO THE WHITE GENOCIDE (the first blow in a war for total ethnic genocide)!


note:
MAY AND JUNCKER ARE IN COLLUSION.THEY PRETEND TO BE BICKERING AGAINST EACH OTHER BUT IT'S ALL PART OF THE SHOW! EVEN IF JUNCKER IS NOT AS OUTSPOKEN THE ���� IS PART OF THE GLOBALIST PROJECT. MAIDAN IS THE FINEST EXAMPLE OF THE RUSSOPHOBIC ATTACK. THERESA MAY EVERYONE CAN TELL SHE FEELS MORE COMFORTABLE IN BRUSSELS THAN IN BRITAIN, AS SHE WAS A REMAINER IN THE REFERENDUM.

Support Our Military - Bring Them Home

The British and Irish militaries have been working ever more closely together since the 2015 signing of the 'Memorandum of Understanding'.  The Memorandum in itself was not such a bad thing, drawing as it does the military forces together in areas of defence for the Isles.  SMPBI would like to go further and create a Military of the Isles, with all Service Men and Women united under one banner, and all stationed in our territory, for the defence of the Isles, and for that purpose alone.

Unfortunately, British and Irish military personnel serve as part of NATO.  Ireland is officially neutral, but despite this does supply the NATO Terrorists with soldiers and trainers.  They have been in place in Afghanistan since the fraudulent 'September 11th' bombing, which was blamed on country after country as a pretext for invasion, occupation and theft of oil and other valuable commodities and resources.

The death toll of people whose countries NATO has devastated is staggering.  The North Atlantic Terror Organisation has murdered over 20 million people since 2001.  The criminals have attacked 37 countries, making their atrocities cover an area which would justify this being called a World War - which it is, although the puppet media won't label it as such, so officially we live in an era of peace!

NATO routinely engage in their immoral action with illegal weaponry. They are routinely using munitions which have depleted uranium incorporated into them. This means the levels of cancer caused by radiation will be phenomenal. For the Iraqis, birth defects are now commonplace. Military action is turning whole swathes of Iraq and Afghanistan into nuclear wastelands.  NATO are the greatest hypocrites alive. They slander the Syrian Government as using Chemical Weapons on civilian, while they actually do so themselves (including in Syria, where the Chemical attacks have been undertaken by NATO proxies to justify more NATO brutality).

The wars across the globe are not about confronting 'terror', whatever that may be. They are about expanding the military occupation of the Global usurious elite into strategic areas. The staged atrocity of 9/11 was used as an excuse to 'get' Osama Bin Laden. In truth he was never a target. The wars are about building bases, increasing opium/heroin supplies and taking control of oil reserves. They are not just wars of liberation. They are wars of occupation and aggression.

The military in the present conflicts are being encouraged to commit all manner of atrocities against the indigenous peoples. By doing this they are becoming desensitised to the suffering of humanity. Having got used to torturing, raping and murdering civilians in one region, they will be able to do it anywhere.  Of course, US forces have been raping civilians for decades. The My Lai Massacre in Vietnam (16.3.68) has become widely known, but it was not the first such atrocity.  The US military in particular has a long history of raping and murdering civilians. That our militaries fight alongside these people is shameful.  There are good servicemen and women in the US military - people who refuse to obey orders which are insane. Sadly, there are all too many who will look the other way as atrocities occur, and a frightening number who will happily partake in such actions.

Our military have earned the respect of the people for defending our nations from external threats. These wars are destroying the high standards of the military. The Globalists are trying to turn the best of the nation into blood-thirsty animals. They are sadly having a measure of success.

Support the Troops. Protect the decency of the men and women who put themselves forward to defend our nations. Save them from the insane and cruel leaders who view them as 'dumb stupid animals' and cannon fodder. Put an end to war for global profit. Restore the cherished honourable name of our Men and Women in uniform.  Make Defence the only legitimate use of the Military.  In a Socialist British Isles, our armed forces will be the best trained, best equipped, and fiercest of warriors. But they will not be butchers in the pay of Capitalism, murdering and plundering sovereign nations to maximise the profits of the global criminals.

Support the Troops. Bring them home.  After 69 years of tyranny, it is time to say enough is enough and to close down NATO and the UN and restore Sovereignty and Freedom to the World.

Short circuit and endless shame.

Short circuit and endless shame.
by Federico Pieraccini

Syrians, Hezbollah, Iranians, Houthi and Russians are bombing al Qaeda. The same organization that perpetrated almost 17 years ago the 9/11 attack in NYC, according to the CIA.

How does the mainstream media react to what is going on in the middle east? Ignoring the Saudis bombing the Houthi, ignoring the Western coalition that has killed more than 30,000 civilians in Raqqa and Mosul and obviate ignoring Israel that has been exterminating Palestinians for more than fifty years.

Naturally the same mainstream media are ready to defend al-Qaeda (al nusra) in the east of Ghoutha in order to pursue their campaign of lies and disinformation.

Summing up, between Afghanistan in the 80s, Libya in 2011, Syria and Yemen today, the media is always on the side of Islamist terrorism.

Now go take a look at the news coverage of 9/11 and how the media reacted when it was the US struck by terrorism: tears and despair.

What’s the moral? For the media al Qaeda is bad only if it hits the US and Europe, in any other case it must be protected by deliberately changing terminology from 'terrorists' to 'moderate rebels'.

Yet, despite this idyllic relationship between the media and jihadists, Anderson Cooper and his cronies haven’t managed to go to Aleppo 2 years ago or in east Ghoutha to interview their 'heroes'.

Why is this you ask? Because these 'rebels' are so moderate that they usually behead their journalist friends and post these atrocities online.

Journalists and politicians are willing to lie and cover up for this scum in the vain and ridiculous hope that their jihadist friends will reach Damascus to displace Assad and reap further deaths.

Despite being proven in every possible way that al Qaeda are not 'moderate rebels', western humanitarian fanatics and other scum prefer to see the civilian population at the mercy of these beasts, rather than Damascus triumphant.

Rather than the fight against terrorism and the defense of civilians against bloody regimes, Washington and its cronies ARE the bloody regime that uses terrorism to exterminate defenseless civilians.

When the next attack hits the West, remember those politicians who armed and trained Islamic terrorists, stamping them as 'moderate rebels’.

To the next journalist who speaks about human rights and Assad, remember that he is not an impartial voice, but an al Qaeda spokesperson

Reject anti-Fascism and anti-Communism. Everything For Class And Nation

There are aspects of the fourth political theory which are disagreeable, but this excerpt is very important and very true. The anti-fascist prejudice mentioned exists to such an extent that few even realize that there were different tendencies within fascism (or even within the different forms of "fascisms"). And on the other hand the anti-communist prejudice mentioned is obviously manifest in fools who label anything they dislike as being "communist", someone like David Duke is a good example of this. He sees himself as a revolutionary against the system, but in fact unwittingly defends the system of liberal capitalism by attacking an imaginary communist boogeyman. The tendency to label everything reactionary as "fascist" (from the left perspective) and the tendency to label everything postmodern as "communist" (from the right) are identical. They fail to realize that the real enemy is capitalism and liberalism (in all of its forms).

What we need as Americans and is a near complete makeover of culture and priority. We have a government but no state as so many writers (especially Spengler and his progeny) have said before. We need to abandon capitalist economics and Trotskyist Geopolitics.

....After much trouble, Ozymandias Drakes is back on the Facebook Front. By his writings above, he has joined the fight with a determined will. Welcome back Comrade.

A Response to the debate on the Journal of Progressive Nationalism - Wilberg on Wednesday

[Editor's introduction: This is Peter's response to the ongoing Dialogical Journal of Progressive Nationalism.  For people who do not check into the Journal, this response will have been missed.  That is unfortunate.  It is reprinted below so that more people will see it, and to spur readers on to join in the debate on the Journal! 

To Anon specifically, thank you for your contribution, and please continue in this interesting discussion.  By examining ourselves we grow, and often it is necessary that in order to develop, we need to have light shone on particular aspects which we may have not been aware of. 

Anon has not stated who Anon is - and what (if any) relationship he or she may have with the party, but that is of no importance.  Discussion and examination from the perspective of another can be the catalyst we need to we see ourselves more clearly]

To Anon.

First of all, thank you for making a serious, critical contribution to The Journal of Progressive Nationalism.

"A preliminary definition of progressive nationalism: national, socialist, and therefore necessarily monetarily sovereign, but also non-racist and protective of national minorities - even whilst being fundamentally assimilatory in relation to national values, laws and cultures." Wilberg

You argue that “this roundly contradicts what has been written on the SWPE site where white separatism is promoted, not just European values and culture but it would appear that the DNA thing is central.” It would have - and still would be be - useful for me in responding if you had cited those elements on the SWPE site which you see as standing in contradiction to my remark - in particular but not only your impression that for the SWPE “the DNA thing is central”. But let us move on to the conclusion you draw re. SWPE policy:

“The result seems to be in terms of policy that the SWPE wishes to send all non-white people and of course some white non-British people away with what is called voluntary repatriation. This idea might have been a goer 50 years ago, possibly, but things have changed hugely since then. Getting nostalgic about the old NF policies as if they have standing outside of historical context is foolish. That's not to say that it is in and of itself a bad idea and that it wouldn't have any effect, but ultimately if you wanted to whiten Britain a bit more, you would end up with non-voluntary repatriation, inevitably. So please, don't try to sweeten the pill, the results would be violent and ugly.”

Again, I  find myself largely in sympathy with what you write here, although in SWPE policy outline, I could come find only one statement in the policy outline  that appears to confirm that repatriation is part of SWPE policy:

“We will use the profits of the multinational corporations to pay for the resettlement of people in their homelands.”

The question for me is that what is meant by “people” here remains a bit unclear. European whites or non-white non-European “people”? Recent, young and first generation immigrants or also second, third or fourth generation ones?  To use a personal example, my German wife, who, speaking fluent English, lived and worked in England for 30 years, did not form part of any German ‘minority’ community, and was perfectly happy to assimilate with British people and culture without giving up her German nationality.  Then again, living as I do in Prague, I see no tension whatsoever between native Czechs on the one hand, the large Ukrainian and Russian immigrant communities - which effectively form part of an intra-white and intra-European form of ‘multiculturalism’. Here also, the Vietnamese population, despite a lack of social or even linguistic assimilation, constitutes a perfectly harmless ‘national minority’.   

On the other hand, I believe there are strong arguments for the repatriation of particular groups of young, wholly un-assimilable, aggressively native-hostile or criminal first-generation non-white male immigrants in Germany, since a result of the dire conditions and demographic explosion in Africa  there will, within decades there may soon be literally hundreds of millions of Africans on their way to that country and others. And in a German context also, I believe there are also good grounds for offering aid to those recent immigrants who wish to return to their homelands - including many Syrians who have a deep attachment to their homeland, and whose return is only obstructed by continued Israeli and U.S. military provocations and attacks upon Syria. 

I am also in sympathy with your reference to Strasser and agree with the view that:

“....even if immigrant groups do exist within the social national state, they can choose to assimilate which as has already been explained is not multiculturalism, or can form a national minority group which absolutely must accept that the public, majority national culture is the dominant one and that their scope is very much limited to their own community. This, I would propose is also not multiculturalism, there would be a dominant culture, unapologetically so. This cultural self confidence would I imagine express itself in the fact that our legal system is formed by the dominant, British culture and would start to be applied without fear or favour across the land and in every quarter.”

Again, with reference to Germany, the idea of maintaining an “unapologetic” dominant national culture or Leitkultur in the terms you describe it has considerable and justificable support, and I agree with you that such a policy should be applied in Britain also - but only if we do not confuse “national culture” with the imperial nostalgia of the English ruling caste, which has, since the end of the 19th century, based its policy towards Europe on the sole principle of doing everything possible to aggravate national conflicts and bring about wars between European nations and peoples - and above all to keep Europe and Russia divided.

Returning to your critique, however, I do see a problem in ensuring through the British legal system that what you call the “scope” of national minorities  is very much limited to their own community. Throughout ancient and modern history - including American, British and Russian history, there has been a problem of ethnic minorities exerting a wholly disproportionate influence (albeit not always negative) on the economic, financial, political and social systems of their host countries, and also on their media and cultural values. Thus the entire history of American economics was effectively a history of struggle with Jewish banking interests and Zionist political interests - a struggle decisely lost with the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve bank in 1913 as well as the Zionist-pressured entry of America into both World wars and its wars of aggression in the Afghanistan and the Middle East. Similarly, the disproportionate role of Jews in the Russian revolution, as well as in the NKVD, Gulag system etc. cannot in any way be underestimated. As for Britain, the power of the Zionist-Jewish lobby - and its growing influence on even the legal system today also cannot be underestimated. This influence too, has a very long history going back many, many centuries. In the 20th century, Zionist groups were the chief backers of Churchill and Roosevelt’s warmongering against Germany  (even Churchill’s much beloved cigars were paid for with Zionist money). The there were the Zionist-backed plans - the Kaufman (1941), Hooton (1943) and Morgenthau (1944) plans - for the extermination of Germany and the Germans. I do not refer to all this to justify the wholesale expulsion of all members of a ‘national minority’ such as the Jews (and certainly not to a land - Israel - seized at gunpoint through the occupation and ‘ethnic cleansing’ of its native population). 

Having said this however, I believe that there are important further questions to be addressed in relation to your post. You offer  reasonable definitions of ‘multiculturalism’ and of ‘assimilation’ - though I believe there are more questions that can be asked about the use of these terms. Thus there is true and fake ‘assimilation’. Just think of the Zionist lobby and neocons in the U.S. - who from the outside appear assimilated, and may even be secular Jews - but whose prime loyalty is to Israel and their own international ‘tribe’.  In contrast, many German Jews were assimilated to the point of seeing themselves primarily if not only as German patriots - cherishing its culture and even fighting for it in both world wars. The German-Jewish relation could have become a model of a most fruitful symbiosis - were it not for those internationalist Jews and Jewish elites who sought only to exploit, profit and exert disproportionate power over their Gentile compatriots.     

You write also of  “national cultures” and the  “cultural self-confidence” of nations - or even simply of ‘nations’ as such. Here I see another question that still needs addressing. For if we think of the “cultural confidence” of Germans and the immense contribution of German culture European culture as a whole - we must not forget that this long preceded the establishment of Germany as a nation state. The question I see here is too complex and deep to go into here, but I would suggest there are grounds for distinguishing what has been called a national ego (whether in the form of the state, political institutions, a prominent leader etc) from the national soul - by which I do not mean anything that can be reduced to biology or DNA, but rather embraces all those distinctive or core values and qualities of different peoples which first gave birth to ‘nations’ (a word whose earliest root meaning is simply ‘to be born’). ‘Nationalism’ based on what I call ‘the national ego’ and the political state can serve to defend or even bring about a renaissance of the national soul. But it can also serve as a form of (over-)compensation for the loss of that soul, i.e. for the disensoulment of nations and their cultures which is the mark of  U.S. based global capitalism - which, through its global ‘pop’, gender and celebrity-obsessed culture industry seeks imposes its own soulless, wholly homogeneous commercial monoculture - including, paradoxically, a homogeneous monoculture of ‘diversity’ - on the media and culture of Europe and other regions. 

It is unfortunate that even the term ‘progressive’ nationalism still retains connotations of a soulless and purely ‘progress’ oriented modernism, in response to which the attempt to merely revive and mimic the symbols and rites of ‘traditional’ cultures and religions has given rise to a mere marketplace of New Age forms of pseudo-spirituality - and constitutes yet another form of superficial identity politics. 

Finally, an important question I hope to write a lot more about, but feel a need to provisionally state. The question has to do with the way in which so much political discourse in the U.K  today takes the form of virulent and vituperous debates about what the best and most correct ‘answers’ are to particular issues - rather than deeper discussion and debate of what the most essential QUESTIONS are that might lie beneath these issues.

Thanking you again for your comments,

Peter Wilberg

The New Socialism - Wilberg on Wednesday

Anti-War Anti-Wage

Anti-Waste

Anti-McWork

Anti-McWorld

For Spiritual Individualism

For Deep Values not Brand Values

For Total Pacifism and Non-Violence

For a Revolution in Human Relations

For the Re-ensoulment of Life and Science

For Free Creative Labour not Wage Slavery

For Equal Remuneration of all forms of Labour

For an End to the Medicalisation of Social Dis-ease

For Free Associations in Cooperative Enterprises

For the Global Levelling of Living Standards

For Total Respect towards all Life Species

For Quality of Life not Quantity of Profit

“From Each According to their Ability, To Each according to their Need.”

Karl Marx

The New Socialism is ‘anti-world’ – against the sham global ‘world’ of corporate capitalism – a ‘McWorld’ that turns everything of spiritual value in the human soul into a commodity.

The New Socialism is also anti-wage and anti-work. For ‘work’ in capitalism is neither creative nor fulfilling. Instead it is wage-slavery and it is also waste manufactured in the name of economic growth – the waste of both natural resources and creative human potentials in the overproduction of near identical and often entirely unnecessary consumer products.

The New Socialism is anti-waste and anti-war, war being itself the waste of human and non-human life and the waste of economic and natural resources for the manufacture and marketing of military hardware - all in the service of competition for those resources and for economic markets. 

The New Socialism is thus also anti-weaponry – in particular all those Weapons of Mass Destruction hypocritically monopolised by the major capitalist world powers. The destruction of other life species and the endangerment of the human species itself is conducted by global capitalism in the name of world economic progress. Thus today it would seem inconceivable for a politician, political party or movement to advocate a retreat from this ‘progress’ - from economic growth, employment, individual consumption and ‘living standards’ in the industrialised capitalist world. Yet this is precisely what is required to overcome the vast intra- and international inequalities of wealth and living standards generated by global capitalism, and to create genuine quality of life for all those whose lives are dominated by uncreative work compensated only by wasteful consumption.

The New Socialism is anti-world, anti-war, anti-waste, anti-wage, anti-work and therefore also anti-worship. For the only ‘god’ that capitalist culture recognises is Mammon – the god of quantitative economic value. Its only true commandment is to worship that god by any and all means possible – up to and including the total devaluation of all authentic spiritual values, the total degradation of the human being, and the total ecological devastation of the earth. But the most important form of worship that capitalism demands is ‘work’ or ‘employment’ – in other words wage slavery. Hence its greatest religious sin is ‘non-employment’ or ‘economic inactivity’. In a sick world, sickness and disability have become forms of bodily protest against spiritually debilitating work. The human body has become the principal 'conscientious objector' to all that is soul-destroying in our society - hence the endless attempt to wage war on illness through new drugs, genetic manipulation and medical technologies rather than understanding its social meaning.

The New Socialism recognises that what is religiously promoted as 'freedom' and 'democracy' by the champions of global capitalism disguises outright economic totalitarianism - not only the subordination of politics and politicians to the economics of the market but the daily subordination of individual wage- and salary-slaves to their executive autocrats and to the totally undemocratic corporate cults and dictatorships they are forced to labour for. As for 'freedom of expression' or even 'freedom to protest', this disguises the outright censorship and brainwashing brought about by corporate media monopolies and the corporate interests they serve - not least the military-industrial complex of U.S. global imperialism with its intrinsic investment in war and in the expansion of U.S. economic and cultural totalitarianism.

Long Live the DPRK. Freedom from Yankee Imperialism

Today marks what would have been the 105th Birthday of the founder of the free sovereign Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

The capitalist multi-millionaire president of the USA has threatened the DPRK with war for daring to have its own system of government and to live as a shining example of the fact that it is possible to have an economy which serves the people and not global bankers.

We salute the people of the DPRK and pledge our friendship and our support for all who are fighting against the terrorist maniacs who are pushing the USA and its criminal Zionist collaborators to threaten the DPRK with war.

The 'crime' of the DPRK is its determination to maintain its own way and to not submit to the tyranny of global finance capitalism and multinational corporate slavery.  The DPRK is one of only a very few countries without a Rothschild Central Bank.

As stated on the DPRK's website:

"The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a genuine workers' state in which all the people are completely liberated from exploitation and oppression. The workers, peasants, soldiers and intellectuals are the true masters of their destiny and are in a unique position to defend their interests."

It is for providing living proof that the despotism of globalism is not all powerful that the DPRK is lied about and threatened. Unlike the war-mongers of the globalist west, the DPRK has never invaded another country, seeking only the unification of its own territory in the 1950 war of liberation, which would have freed the south of Korea but for the interference of the USA - the very country which had created the lapdog south in 1945 as a part of their continuing war of aggression against the peoples of Asia.

The declaration that the DPRK will go to war if the USA chooses the path of war, is not a statement of aggression, but of resistance to aggression. The DPRK will not be bullied by the terrorists of the USA into surrendering the freedom and way of life the people of the DPRK hold dear.  We salute their resilience and stand with the DPRK should the enemies of humanity attack that nation.

Long Live the Democratic People's Republic of Korea!  May you continue to give inspiration to the world.  May you outlive your enemies and form a cornerstone of a free Socialist world in which the sickness of capitalism is swept away.

Party Statement on US attacks on Syria

Last year, SWPE commented on the election for President of the USA.  With Bernie Sanders out of the race, and with Jill Stein squeezed out by a system which ensures only a Democrat or Republican can win, the only candidates left with any chance of winning were Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.  There was no chance of a decent President coming from a choice between two such awful people, so our advise was for people to vote for the lesser of two evils.

There were issues of concern from the Trump camp, including the declaration of intent to end the provision of Health Care (Obamacare), although Trump spoke of replacing it with an alternative which would be more affordable, rather than simply scrapping it.  Obamacare remains in place and this broken promise stands as an early indicator of how his term in office has become - a series of u-turns on pledges; a continuation of the policies of the previous regime, directly against the wishes of the people who voted for him.

Domestic politics apart, the main reason we saw Trump as the lesser of two evils, was his declaration for peace.  The USA has long been a notorious agent of global corporate imperialism.  The USA has been the driving force behind the destruction of Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, the Sudan, the Ukraine and many other sovereign nations.  Trump spoke of ending this imperialist aggression; Clinton spoke of war with Russia.  We advised people to vote for Trump to avert the catastrophe of war for corporate interests, with profits being gained at the cost of human lives.

While Hillary Clinton was screaming hysterically for blood in the Middle East, Trump spoke of the need for the USA to mind its own business and not interfere in the internal problems of sovereign nations.  As has been seen by the War Crimes inflicted upon the Syrian Arab Republic this week by now President Trump, the only difference between the two candidates on this issue was that Clinton was more than happy to proclaim her blood lust, Trump chose to hide his.

Trump made a point of declaring that he believes Jerusalem must be recognised as the capital of Israel.  Jerusalem is a city in the occupied territory known internationally as the West Bank, to the Israelis as the twin provinces of Judea and Samaria, and to the Palestinians as home.  Trump's declaration is an affront to the people of Palestine, who were seeking a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine problem, even being ready to give up the majority of their country by recognising Israel as a sovereign entity, in return for the recognition of the much smaller territories of Gaza and the West Bank as the sovereign nation of Palestine.  His toadying to global Zionism has encouraged the Zionist state to build more settlements in Palestine, pushing the people of that land deeper into despair and subjugation.

The Global Zionist agenda is for the creation of 'Greater Israel' on land stolen from the peoples of Palestine, Jordan, Egypt, the Lebanon, Iraq and Syria.  The Zionist States of Turkey and Saudi Arabia are working alongside Israel itself to achieve this goal, with the full military backing of their vassal, the USA, and the assistance of the Kurds who see the opportunity for the creation of a sovereign state of Kurdistan from the ruins of the nations smashed by the Zionist war machine.

The contrived wars of aggression against the free Arab Republic of Iraq, under Saddam Hussein were a part of the destabilisation of the Middle East for the strengthening of the Zionist centre of global operations.  It is no coincidence that the lying War Criminals, George 'w' Bush and Tony Blair used the propaganda of (chemical) Weapons of Mass Destruction being used by the government of Iraq against the Iraqi people to justify the invasion and destruction of Iraq, and now the equally deceitful Donald Trump is using the propaganda of chemical weapons being used by the government of Syria against 'rebels' (Terrorists) in that country.  In both cases, the propaganda is a complete fabrication.

There were no WMDs in Iraq, and the Sarin weapons in Syria which killed a handful of people during an air strike by the government against a terrorist controlled area, were weapons held by the Terrorists which were hit in the air-raid.  If the Syrian air force had not hit the Terrorists' store of chemical weapons, they would have been used against ordinary Syrians - not by the government, but by the Terrorists!  Trump has just launched an attack on the victims of global Zionist aggression, to defend the very people who were preparing to murder Syrian civilians with a stockpile of chemicals which was hit by a fortunate airstrike.

The criminal attack on the sovereign nation of Syria is a part of the drive to subjugate the entire Middle East to global capitalism, including the control of the monetary supply by the Zionist Rothschild banking mafia.  The Islamic State is just Al Qaeda renamed and redeployed as a fake Muslim operation to destabilise Muslim nations and create an image which justifies the deployment of the military of the West and Zionist states in order to confront it, until it is needed elsewhere for more destabilisation operations.  If Islamic State was really the anti-Semitic Islamic extremist entity it is purported to be, then why do its fighters get medical and military support from Israel?  Why also do they never attack Israel?  Why do they concentrate their attacks on Muslim countries and do everything they can to justify the dehumanisation of Muslims in general?  It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure this one out.

Trump is just another stooge. He is the same as Clinton.  He is not the lesser of two evils. He is the equal of two evils.  Democracy is a sham. The solutions to the woes of the Working Class can only come through Revolution, not through Reformism from the ballot box, and certainly not from the presidency of a multi-millionaire oil-loving, Israel-worshipping liar.  The people of the USA have been lied to, and they are not the only victims of the lies - the greatest victims are the peoples of the Middle East who ae being murdered for the agenda of increasing Global Zionist Capitalist power.

So what is to be done?  We must make sure that no one in  military uniform is allowed to go unchallenged. We call for all our military men and women to mutiny rather than shed any blood for profit. The Revolution needs the support of our Military, and we need to support their refusal to fight for the Ruling Class.  We need to bring the Military into the Revolutionary fold, and to let them know that anyone who wears the insignia of NATO or who fights for the Capitalist cause against our brothers and sisters in any part of the world, declares him/herself an enemy of the People, and as an enemy combatant, with all that entails.

SWPE Statement on US Presidential Election

SWPE is not pro-Trump, only anti-Clinton.  We welcome the election of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the USA, solely because it means that George Soros Hillary Clinton has not been elected.

Clinton is a cold blooded murderess, a thief, a liar, a defender of rape (her husband is a notorious rapist), a tool of Global Capitalism (she is a puppet of George Soros), a profiteer from the armaments industry of death, a war monger, a wrecker of nations, a supporter of terrorism and an all round unsavoury character.

If Clinton had become President of the USA, it would have been highly likely that the cold war the present US regime is attempting to start against Russia, would have become a hot one, with countless deaths and unimaginable destruction to nature and civilisation.

Trump is no angel either.  He has pledged to force the Socialist Republic of Cuba to accept anti-Socialist politics, which will accelerate the decline of the nation which is already suffering from economic liberalisation (the drift into capitalist exploitation).

Trump has pledged to dismantle the developing Welfare State, putting the poor of America into a position of servitude and desperation.  Trump is a very rich man, and has got that way by exploiting people. His plan to cut corporate tax is not one which will necessarily generate well paying jobs, but one which will increase profits for his cronies. His plans to cut expenditure will see those who need support being at the mercy of the rich - and we all know that they have no mercy.

On the plus side, he has voiced criticism of NATO and has called for better relations with Russia, so at least he isn't trying to create war (well, at least not on his victory day!)

Clinton's greatest crime against the American people was her deliberate destruction of the Sanders campaign, which would have seen the Socialist Bernie Sanders pitted against the clown Donald Trump - and would have delivered the USA its first Socialist President, with all the benefits that would have come to everyone in the USA except the exploiter parasites (which is why Clinton and the Democrats scuppered his campaign).

The best possible outcome in the 2016 Presidential Election would have been a victory for Jill Stein, the candidate for the Green Party (GPUS), but the two party system squeezed her out.  The next best outcome would have been for Bernie Sanders to have won as an openly Socialist candidate for the Democrats.  The next best outcome would have been for anyone at all to have stopped the reprehensible Hillary Clinton from winning - and that is what we have with Donald Trump.

SWPE is relieved that Trump beat Clinton, but saddened that a Crony Capitalist has won on a campaign of sound bites which he is unlikely to ever be in the position to deliver, and some of which it would be a tragedy if he did.  These are some of his promises:

• To build a wall along the southern border of the USA, at Mexico's expense
• To stop all cooperation with Iran
• To make Jerusalem the capital of Israel, stopping the creation of a free Palestinian state
• To renegotiate (not withdraw from) TTIP and NAFTA
• To stop contributing to Climate Change programmes (boosting pollution creating industry)
• Increase military expenditure, making the USA 'more' unpredictable militarily

Trump is a Capitalist and is not going to break the USA free from the Global Capitalist system.  He is less dangerous than Clinton, but that is as good as it gets.  Is this too cynical?  Will he lead a regime which will deliver beneficial change, as his supporters claim? We shall see in due course.

After 9/11, Fifteen Years of Imperialistic Terror

On 11.09.01 (9/11/01 in US English), the World Trade Centre and the US military headquarters in the Pentagon were attacked by terrorists.  The official story was of hate-filled lunatics attacking the US because they were jealous of its freedoms.  The official story was a cynical lie to push forward the Globalist aims of Finance and Corporate Capitalism.

The US government claimed the culprits behind the WTC atrocity were mohamedan extremists operating from Afghanistan. They then duly bombed and occupied Afghanistan to capture CIA operative Tim Osman, aka Al Qaeda frontman Osama Bin Laden, overturned the legitimate rule of the Taliban in Afghanistan, placing their own Opium-growing stooges in charge.  The Dollars have been rolling in ever since, as the Heroin trade has boomed beyond levels previously unimaginable.  Afghanistan was invaded and occupied for Capitalist profits.

In 2003 the US moved on to Iraq, claiming that Saddam Hussein had 'weapons of mass destruction.' War Criminal Tony Blair lied the UK into joining the Global Terrorist assault, capitalising on the staged 7/7 murders in 2005.  The global OIL corporations stole the Oil of Iraq and made a killing on the back of the deaths of thousands of Iraqis.  The US claimed that Saddam Hussein was working with Al Qaeda, even though he had fought hard to destroy such terrorist groups in his country. Iraq was invaded and occupied for Capitalist profits.

In 2011 the US invaded Libya to destroy the ambitions of the Libyan people to break Africa away from the vultures of the IMF.  A free Libya was a threat to global banking. Occupied Libya was robbed of its OIL, Minerals and all material wealth.  Libya was invaded and occupied for Capitalist profits.

The US Ruling Class, in collusion with the Ruling Class of the UK, EU, Saudi Arabia and other countries, staged the 9/11 murders, the follow-up atrocities in London, Madrid, Mumbai, and the propaganda against nations which did not submit to Global Capitalism.  Real people died, and are still dying.  All the terrorist events since 9/11 have been orchestrated to increase the power of the Global Ruling Class and to boost Capitalist profits.

The ongoing invasion of Syria is of the same variety of lie as all the others.  Syria did not fall as was expected, and so the NATO vermin added a new weapon to their arsenal.  That weapon is the CIA creation, Islamic State.  Syria does not have a Central Bank which is a part of the Global system, and for this reason it is being attacked mercilessly.  Should it fall, only the free nation of the DPRK will remain outside the stranglehold of Global Finance Capitalism.  Syria is being ruined was to increase Capitalist profits.

The refugee situation in Europe is a weapon to destabilise the EU so that it will fall easily into the hands of the Globalist menace.  The refugees poring in from Africa are fleeing from poverty created by the IMF and terrorists created by the CIA's stooges of Boko Haram.  Those fleeing Syria are doing so to escape the CIA's Islamic State.  The CIA is the intelligence wing of the Global Capitalist disease.  Boko Haram, Islamic State and the Refugee crisis are creations of the Global Ruling Class, to terrify the Working Class worldwide and to drive down wage demands in the refugee flooded west, all for Capitalist profits.

9/11 was a part of the ongoing war for Global Governance and Ruling Class supremacy.  Ordinary people suffered, died and others continue to do the same.  SWPE says stop believing the propaganda of the Ruling Class and take the fight to the real foe.  Bombing Syria won't save anyone.  The Revolution does not see any point in attacking our enemies outside our shores, but relishes the day when a Banker, Stockbroker, Politician, Journalist, NATO officer hangs in every street of every village, town and city in the EU, UK, USA.   Rise up and fight the liars and thieves who have brought so much harm to the world. The real terrorists wear the suits of officialdom and must be made to pay for what they have done.

American Social-Nationalism: Spotlight on a Worthy Site

The following is from the website, American Social-Nationalism, which can be found at http://ussocnat.blogspot.com

We welcome the contribution to understanding made by the writer, Leolion, and would advise members and supporters to visit the American Social-Nationalism site.  The policies outlined below the section on wages, may not necessarily be shared by the SWPE and in some instances are not relevant to England as they are specifically related to the USA.  However, the policies are worth taking note of as they are ones which in many cases mirror own own objectives.

Nationalist Quotes on wages

Gaddafi 

"Income is an imperative need for man. In a socialist society, it should not be in the form of wages from any source or charity from any one. In this society there are no wage-earners, but only partners. One's income is a private matter and should either be managed privately to meet one's needs or be a share from a production process of which one is an essential component. It should not be a wage in return for production."

"Thus, the citizen in this new society secures his material needs either through self-employment, or by being a partner in a collectively-owned establishment, or by rendering public service to society which, in return, provides for his material needs."

Otto Strasser:

"We are Socialists, enemies, mortal enemies of the present capitalist economic system with its exploitation of the economically weak, with its injustice in wages, with its immoral evaluation of individuals according to wealth and money instead of responsibility and achievement, and we are determined under all circumstances to abolish this system ! And with my inclination to practical action it seems obvious to me that we have to put a better, more just, more moral system in its place, one which, as it were, has arms and legs and better arms and legs than the present one !"

Hugo Chavez

"Here we are not cutting salaries nor pension nor delaying the pension age, nothing of that,

Our policies are called the "American Way" and is focused on making the US self-sufficient and a Nationalist and Socialist State.

The Workers:
•We demand for the means of production to be in the hands of the working class.
•We demand a 30-hour work week and at least two months of annual paid vacation 
•We demand that retirement pensions be no less than 80% of the person's pay at the time that they retire. 
•We demand the right for part-time workers to be eligible for benefits as well as the right for part-time workers to join a union.
•We demand a living wage that is adjusted to inflation
•We demand that the Electoral Collage is abolished as its very existence makes democracy a farce.

Education:
•We demand descent wages for teachers 
•We demand free and quality education for all people, including college, professional and graduate schools.
•We demand that education be in the hands of the community and the state. 
•We demand realistic sex education that doesn't exaggerate statistics and is not absence based.
•We demand national financing of public K-12 schools to replace the current funding via property taxes, which ensures inequality between rural, suburban and urban schools
•We demand secular and scientific education. We oppose religion in schools which has manifested, but is not limited to, religious institutions, prayer in schools and creationism.
We demand the mandatory State funding of the Arts
We are opposed to private education and the corporate running of schools
We demand non-whitewashed teaching of our history so we can honestly learn from it

Health:
•We demand a national healthcare system that, with an eye towards preventive health care, cover every American regardless of race, sex, age, and or sexual preference. 
•We demand nationalisation of the pharmaceutical agency.
•We demand the combating of drug addiction through the use of proven medical treatments and preventive education. 
•We demand the legalisation of marijuana.
•We demand the right to abortion

Housing:
•We demand free and quality housing to every individual
•We demand state-funded construction of public apartment complexes as a means to support the growing population and to house those without homes 
•We demand an end to all home foreclosures. We oppose cuts to public housing. 
•We demand the abolition of slum-lording.

Civil Rights: 
•We demand the end of racial profiling and police brutality
•We demand that the P.A.T.R.I.O.T Act is repelled •We demand that the N.S.A is abolished. 
•We demand that the 13th Amendment is amended to exclude the line,"Except as a punishment for crime." So as we can end all forms of slavery and involuntary servitude.
•We demand that the Department of Homeland Security is abolished
•We demand that Native Americans hold the right of self-determination and secession.
•We demand the end of police discrimination and raids against Latino citizens and immigrant communities. 
•We demand the citizenship of all undocumented workers and all rights associated with them. 
•We demand a minimum of 12 months paid leave for new mothers with access to fully-funded and quality childcare centres. 
•We demand equal pay for equal work for all ethnicities, sexes, and sexual orientation.
• We demand the right of women to enter into any occupation without discrimination.
• We demand an end to discrimination as well as support full employment, benefits, quality education and job training programs for people with disabilities. 
We demand the dismantling of walls erected both physically and socially that hinder people with disabilities to fully participate in society. 
•We demand that marriage to be defined by the state as one man and one woman, one man and one man, one woman and one woman, one man with many women, and one woman with many men. Therefore legalising Homosexual, Polygamist, and Polyandrist marriages. 
We demand an end to acts of violence against persons on the basis of their race, ethnicity, religion, age, physical condition, sex or sexual identity and/or orientation.
We demand a voice for legal immigrants in our democratic republic.

International Affairs:
•We demand that the US end their association with NATO and other Imperialist organisations.
•We demand that the US no longer aids the terror state of Israel on the basis that the state of Israel has committed crimes against humanity. 
•We demand self-determination of all Commonwealth states,
•We demand the end of all Imperialist wars. 
•We demand the return of Guantanamo to Cuba.
•We demand the immediate and unconditional military withdrawal from all foreign countries.
•We demand mending our relationship with other countries, including, but not limited to, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Iran for the sake of peace and prosperity. 
•We demand that an amendment be made to the US Constitution that states that all wars must be approved by the masses before a declaration of war is made by the Senate. 

The Economy: 
We demand an end to taxes altogether and that the State to get the money for its projects through the quality of the economy. 
We demand the end of exporting jobs over seas. 
•We demand the abolition of the inheritance of all productive capital and liquid assets
. •We demand the immediate withdraw from all free-trade agreements.
•We demand that all financial institutions be commonly owned and directed by an American Central Bank that is directed democratically by the Senate
•We demand a maximum wage cap that is at least a ratio of 10:1 
•We demand retraining programs, compensation and relocation for workers displaced by technological advances.
•We demand an end to American involvement in the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organisation.
We demand an end to the gold standard and use of a fiat currency 
We demand international trade to be done with material goods and not gold.

Agriculture: 
•We demand the end of corporate farming 
•We demand the end of all inhumane treatment of livestock
•We demand the establishment and encouragement of agricultural cooperatives and collectives. •We demand state low-cost grants, loans and machinery assistance to farmers.
•We demand that measures be taken encouraging farmers to produce staple foods rather than non-essentials.
•We demand an end to current debts placed on farmers
. •We demand that the cultivation of hemp for food, fuel, fibre and industrial uses be encouraged. •We demand the right of farm workers to organise.

Energy, Transportation, the Environment and Communications: 
•We demand the nationalisation and worker control of the automobile, bus, railway, and plane industries.
•We demand the creation of a publicly-funded high-speed national rail system with low rates and access to all major U.S. cities.
•We demand government research into safe and renewable alternatives to fossil fuels. 
•We demand the development of alternative forms of energy including wind, solar, geothermal, nuclear power and hydropower. 
•We demand public ownership of all American natural resources and their conservation. 
•We demand the institution of active recycling programs of paper, metal and plastic.
•We demand affordable utility rates for working people. 
•We demand an end to private ownership of newspapers, radio, magazines, television and the internet. We oppose the hindrance of allowing the working people to show their opinions and viewpoints. 
•We demand the end of all copyright laws.
•We demand internet reform and the public ownership of all internet bandwidth. We support providing free internet access to the public at large and computers to school-aged children. 
•We demand that all communities that have 20,000 or more citizens be provided with a public transit system.