We have to fight to keep our beloved countryside: we cannot allow the globalists to wreck it

The British Isles contain some of the most amazing and beautiful land in the world.  We have vast lakes, splendid plains, rolling hills and mountains.  Our forests and woodlands are home to an amazing richness of native wildlife.  Our coastal areas are breath-taking.  The diversity of life to be found upon our sacred soil is truly astounding.  This soil is ours, not to exploit and to corrupt, but to care for and pass on wholly intact to future generations.  The union of the people and the land and our glorious indigenous wildlife, is of such profound importance that protecting it must be seen as the absolute highest task of all of us.  Economics must take second place to the sanctity of our land itself and of the inhabitants of human and non-human variety.

The capitalist mentality which has so poisoned our people, has allowed for a shift in attitude towards the land upon which we live.  We are guardians of the land whose task is to conserve and nourish that which we are privileged to be a part of.  Too many people regard their personal gain as the be-all and end-all, seeing their life in terms of what they can get for themselves, rather what they can leave to generations to come.  We need to return to the true understanding of our place in time and space.  We have to treat our beloved land with the utmost respect and care; we are not its owners, we are merely borrowing it from those yet to come.

The perversion of our natural union with the land into a relationship of unbridled exploitation, is a symptom of an underlying sickness which must be eradicated.  In every country under the yoke of capitalism, the same materialism is at play, but behind it all is a power which understands the sanctity of the land, and for that reason seeks to destroy it.  Those who guide the policies which break the people from the land are globalists who hold that there can be no territorial divisions, and that borders are a barrier to commerce - which to them is the only thing of value.

The British Isles are experiencing the same exploitation and globalist materialism as the rest of the western capitalist world.  There are, of course, differences in the detail, but as far as the overall impact of material corruption is concerned, the demise of the Isles is no different from that of Spain, Sweden, Serbia or any other land in which money is king.

All of the countries in Europe are experiencing a level of non-European immigration which can only realistically be referred to as invasion.  The terrorists of NATO and the IMF have ruined far off lands The increase in population is being used as an excuse to concrete over our land.  Only those who are wilfully blind can fail to notice that our agricultural land is vanishing at an alarming rate.  Due to excessive building, the UK can not sustain the current population and has to import food and other vital resources.  Should there be a natural or economic disaster which prevents food reaching the UK, we will see mass starvation within our borders.  This is all quite contrived, and planned for.

GMOs

The UK government is a supporter of Genetically Modified (GMO) food.  The liars in Westminster and the Dail pontificate about the virtues of GMO technology, yet in typical hypocritical fashion, they ensure that their own restaurants are GMO-free.  The Ruling Class enjoy real organic food undoctored by toxins, yet the Working Class are constantly told that we must eat food they wouldn't give to their dogs.  Such is the owner-slave relationship of the Rulers and the Ruled, in the country which calls itself the Mother of Democracy and the neighbouring land which achieved independence from the corrupt tyrants in London in name only.

The scoundrels in government would have us believe that there is no alternative to GMOs for the UK.  Their twisted logic points to the fact that the land cannot provide for the settled population plus the armies of outsiders who are entering our lands.  This is indeed true, but the solution to over-population is not to industrialise the land, but to re-organise it in a manner which would make the country self-sufficient with regards to food.  GMO fanatics would argue that the use of intensive agriculture with scientifically altered seeds is precisely the way to solve our food crisis.  However, that is to miss a very important point: GMOs have not been created by benevolent organisations who only seek to end global hunger; they have been created by multinational corporations as a means of generating obscene profits through the total control of the food supply. 

GMO seeds have been engineered to be non-reproductive, thus forcing the food-growers to buy new seeds for each subsequent crop.   From a purely logistical point of view, for island-based countries such as those in the British Isles, the danger of mass starvation through an interruption to the food supply, is increased, rather than decreased, by the use of GMO technology.  GMO advocates are more than happy to ignore the growing weight of evidence that the food produced in this way is harmful to health, but they cannot argue with the undeniable fact that if for any reason the supply routes to our lands were cut, then once the stores of seeds were exhausted, we would indeed starve.

As a means of social control, GMO technology is astounding.  Should the traitors in government be allowed to hand over our farms to the likes of Monsanto, then any future revival of our country by people opposed to globalism and servitude, could be crushed quickly by cutting off access to the basic requirements to grow food.  This nightmare scenario is well on its way to becoming a reality as the paid enemies of the people who sit in Parliaments and Assemblies on both sides of the Irish Sea are using every means at their disposal to push through GMOs - even though across the globe there is mounting resistance from the people, and even from a number of governments.

The only way to deal with GMO technology is to destroy it.  Sitting down in fields and singing protest songs against the scientifically-wrecked food supply will not stop the GMOs growing and thus pushing nature out of our soil.  The style of protest so favoured since the advent of the hippies of the 1960s may work well when it comes to spreading degeneracy and all manner of decadence, but when it comes to fighting that which is against nature, it is useless.  Combating GMOs is not a matter for protracted discussion, marches and letter-writing; the only way to halt this evil is to burn it from the soil.  Rural-loyalist Farmers have largely been replaced by Corporate Farm Managers who are motivated solely by the pursuit of profits.  A field burned to the ground will yield no profits.  A farm sabotaged so that no machinery can be operated, cannot survive.

There is a romantic view of farmers as custodians of nature.  This was true of the peasantry of the past, but the modern farm manager has more in common with a stock-broker or accountant than a guardian of the land.  Just as we rightly hold the profiteers in the city with contempt, so should we view their counterparts in the country.  There are good farmers who need our support, which we can give them by making use of farm shops in preference to super markets.  However, we should not let our ideals cloud us from the reality that many farms have become corporate-controlled and are operated with no regard for the people, or for nature.

Fracking

Another attack upon the countryside is fracking.  Fracking requires 30 million litres / 6.6 million gallons per operation.  Each well can be fracked 18 times.  The waste of water alone is enough to cause droughts - which has indeed occurred across the Atlantic in Texas exacerbated by the fracking process.  The waste of water is nothing when compared with the dangerous usage of toxic chemicals which cannot but be leached into the soil beneath our feet.  The fracking process has been proven to contaminate the water table, thus introducing materials which are hazardous to health into the food chain.  There has been a wealth of research into the correlation of fracking and phenomena such as earthquakes and polluted water catching fire.  Again, as worthy as the activist protests against this criminal process are, unless the businessmen involved lose money as a result of imaginative and unpredictable disruption of fracking, they are ultimately useless.  In Lancashire, the local council listened to the people and banned fracking, only for the UK regime to impose it anyway, for the benefit of corporate share holders, against the wishes of the people directly affected.  A good analysis of the dangers of fracking can be found at: http://www.dangersoffracking.com/

Mass migration

The powers-that-be are destroying our ability to feed ourselves by means of bringing ever-more immigrants into our lands, and then using their presence as an excuse to concrete over arable land.  With the reduction in farm land comes the pre-prepared solution to this crisis, GMO technology.  This is no solution other than as a solution for the depots to the problem of free people who are able to feed themselves.  Fracking, of course, further industrialises the countryside, and no doubt will lead to a new era of land enclosures to remove the peasantry from our sacred soil.  There is a reactionary tendency to view the destruction of our land as the fault of immigration, but in truth, the immigrants are being used to divert attention from the economic powers who gain by our forced urbanisation.

In the UK there used to be a legal protection of fair land usage in the case of absentee landlords and owners.  This was known as 'Squatters' Rights'.  These rights have been stripped away, to the point where it is now illegal for a vacant property to be used as a living space.  In towns and cities up and down the UK, a staggering numbers of properties lay empty and in many cases they are falling into disrepair.  The numbers of properties are such that it would only take an Act of Parliament to compulsorily purchase these properties and then rent them out as social housing, to solve the so-called housing crisis in the UK.  This is something SMPBI wants to see.  There is no need for a single new home to be built in the UK.  With the number of properties lying vacant, even the armies of immigrants who are waiting at Calais, could be accommodated. Not that allowing further immigration is something anyone but the most insane bed-wetting liberal would consider a good idea, but nevertheless full use of the vast number of empty properties in our country would be sufficient to ensure there would be no homelessness in the UK.

Concreting over the land

Why then, is our land disappearing under concrete, as our town centres crumble?  Simply because the corrupt leaders in Parliament, Local Authorities and the Establishment, make a vast amount of money from new buildings, and consolidate their control over our lives in the process. 

Our land is sacred.  We are guardians of the soil, who have the duty to ensure it passes on to those who come after us, untainted.  We cannot tolerate GMO farming, Fracking, Building on green land, or any other action which further urbanises our country.  We need to reverse the process and ruralise the towns and cities by tearing down much of the urban sprawl and instead creating sections of farming land and recreational countryside.  That, however, can only be a long-term objective.  Right now we have to stop all attacks on the countryside which are currently under-way.  We have the power to do this, if only we can break-free from our subservience to the self-granted authority of the legal-financial rulers.  Imagination and determination will effect change; sit-down protests are as useless as the failed marches of yesteryear.

If we do not protect our land, the Ruling Class will do everything in their power to industrialise and urbanise every part of it (except the protected land where they reside).  They will continue to bring in more immigrants to make our territory a cosmopolitan fraction of the global materialistic superstate.  The total cultural genocide of our people can only be averted by fighting to not only halt the assault on all that is sacred, but taking the fight to the enemy, and defeating them in the only way they understand; financially.

The Spirit of General Ludd

The 'Luddite' approach to GMO farming is the only real alternative for 'rural protest'.

Hypothetically speaking, a neo-Luddite campaign would not only target the fields themselves, but also the buildings and machinery of the 'farms' in question.  Activists could resort to direct intimidation of the management and workers ('farmers') in a manner that was not uncommon in the late 18th and early 19th century.  Animal rights activists closed down an infamous 'Guinea Pig farm' a few years ago.  This sort of activism needs to be increased to protect the land itself - after all the countryside is still poorly policed and there is a distinct lack of CCTV, for now!

We are not advocating dragging hapless farm labourers from their tractors or running down beloved farm dogs, let alone opening every farm gate possible and cutting barbed wire or tearing up fence posts, but it could be imagined that some of our more 'creative' protesting folk would not refrain from such activity.

No doubt, the height of the harvest season would not be a good time for lanes to be blocked by chopped down trees; the needless killing of a mature tree would be senseless in the extreme. But it will be interesting to see what develops in the coming years. SMPBI cannot and will not condone any illegal acts, although the dire situation faced by our countryside is likely to inspire some to actions of a dubious nature.

The British Isles - not just a matter of geography, it is our home

The Party has been in discussion over a change of name to reflect our change in position over the issue of the Nation as we envision it.  This has led to a delay in getting out literature for distribution, and to those affected by this, we can assure you that your patience is appreciated and that the issue is being resolved.

We have come to an agreement that the party must not be limited by narrow regionalism, and must not be diluted by globalism.  The party must be anchored in the Working Class of the Motherland.  This does not mean that we have any animosity to others, but that we appreciate the need to unite the Land with the People who have come from her.

The unique admixture of Peoples in the British Isles, binds us together in a way which no other European nation can claim.  Our people have been blended together over millenia, with the ancients joined by the Britons, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Norse and others.  In a sense we are the most truly European of all the peoples of Europe, which makes our love for Europe strong.  The globalisers would use this to argue that we must remain in the EU, but that is to mix a beautiful natural reality (Europe) with a political-economic construct (EU); the latter of which through its globalist policies has become a very real threat to the survival of the former in any worthwhile sense.

We have reached agreement that the Party must be a Party for the entire British Isles, on both sides of the Irish Sea and from the very farthest of the Channel Isles right up to the far north of the Shetlands, from the westermost islands of Kerry to the shores of Suffolk.  Ours is the Party of the British Isles, embracing all our peoples and fighting against divisive regionalism and any arrogant designs of domination by one part over any other. 

We reject such 'politically correct' nonsense as our homeland being the 'Islands of the North Atlantic', the 'Anglo-Celtic Islands' etc.  The term British Isles includes the two large Islands of Ireland and Great Britain, as well as the over six thousand smaller ones.  Political Correctness is a liberal fad which will die as all mindless fads do.  The British Isles will remain. We use the term British Isles because we will not bow down to the lunacy of the liberal mafia - we aim to destroy them and build a better nation when they have been swept away.

Thanks go to Bob for all the help in sorting out graphics for the name change, with particular emphasis on the design of a Party Badge for members to wear with pride.  We are nearly ready to finalise the new name, so please bear with us and be patient for a little while longer.

Socialism without Nationalism is a Fraud and a Failure

Trotskyites and their modern descendants - the SJWs - are the enemies of Socialism.  Socialism is the reordering of Society for the betterment of the Nation.  Those who go to great pains to show that they are concerned with the plight of peoples far across the globe, and that this concern requires the compete ending of borders so that the entire world can make its ways to our shores - these people are not Socialists, they are lunatics, parasites and traitors.  It is the Working Class who suffer when mass immigration is used by the Capitalists to break organised labour power, to drive down wages, to undermine hard fought for Workers' Rights.  The globalists who want to see our borders gone, do not care about the damage they do to the Working Class.  They only care about how their Middle Class chums respond to their pathetic virtue signalling.  They are a menace which a Socialist society would have to sweep away.

True Socialism is Nationalist.  It isn't racist, chauvinistic or supremacist - it puts the Nation first, as a foundation stone for  better world of International Cooperation, in which free sovereign nations live side by side.  Nationalism in the Socialist understanding is anti-Globalist.  Capitalism and liberal/Trotskyism are two sides of the same coin - and we reject both.

The great Irish patriot, and Socialist Revolutionary, James Connolly wrote (in Shan Van Vocht, January 1897):

In Ireland at the present time there are at work a variety of agencies seeking to preserve the national sentiment in the hearts of the people.

These agencies, whether Irish Language movements, Literary Societies or Commemoration Committees, are undoubtedly doing a work of lasting benefit to this country in helping to save from extinction the precious racial and national history, language and characteristics of our people.

Nevertheless, there is a danger that by too strict an adherence to their present methods of propaganda, and consequent neglect of vital living issues, they may only succeed in stereotyping our historical studies into a worship of the past, or crystallising nationalism into a tradition – glorious and heroic indeed, but still only a tradition.

Now traditions may, and frequently do, provide materials for a glorious martyrdom, but can never be strong enough to ride the storm of a successful revolution.

If the national movement of our day is not merely to re-enact the old sad tragedies of our past history, it must show itself capable of rising to the exigencies of the moment.

It must demonstrate to the people of Ireland that our nationalism is not merely a morbid idealising of the past, but is also capable of formulating a distinct and definite answer to the problems of the present and a political and economic creed capable of adjustment to the wants of the future.

This concrete political and social ideal will best be supplied, I believe, by the frank acceptance on the part of ail earnest nationalists of the Republic as their goal.

Not a Republic, as in France, where a capitalist monarchy with an elective head parodies the constitutional abortions of England, and in open alliance with the Muscovite despotism brazenly flaunts its apostasy to the traditions of the Revolution.

Not a Republic as in the United States, where the power of the purse has established a new tyranny under the forms of freedom; where, one hundred years after the feet of the last British red-coat polluted the streets of Boston, British landlords and financiers impose upon American citizens a servitude compared with which the tax of pre-Revolution days was a mere trifle.

No! the Republic I would wish our fellow-countrymen to set before them as their ideal should be of such a character that the mere mention of its name would at all times serve as a beacon-light to the oppressed of every land, at all times holding forth promise of freedom and plenteousness as the reward of their efforts on its behalf.

To the tenant farmer, ground between landlordism on the one hand and American competition on the other, as between the upper and the nether millstone; to the wage-workers in the towns, suffering from the exactions of the slave-driving capitalist to the agricultural labourer, toiling away his life for a wage barely sufficient to keep body and soul together; in fact to every one of the toiling millions upon whose misery the outwardly-splendid fabric of our modern civilisation is reared, the Irish Republic might be made a word to conjure with – a rallying point for the disaffected, a haven for the oppressed, a point of departure for the Socialist, enthusiastic in the cause of human freedom.

This linking together of our national aspirations with the hopes of the men and women who have raised the standard of revolt against that system of capitalism and landlordism, of which the British Empire is the most aggressive type and resolute defender, should not, in any sense, import an element of discord into the ranks of earnest nationalists, and would serve to place us in touch with fresh reservoirs of moral and physical strength sufficient to lift the cause of Ireland to a more commanding position than it has occupied since the day of Benburb.

It may be pleaded that the ideal of a Socialist Republic, implying, as it does, a complete political and economic revolution would be sure to alienate all our middle-class and aristocratic supporters, who would dread the loss of their property and privileges.

What does this objection mean? That we must conciliate the privileged classes in Ireland!

But you can only disarm their hostility by assuring them that in a free Ireland their ‘privileges␁ will not be interfered with. That is to say, you must guarantee that when Ireland is free of foreign domination, the green-coated Irish soldiers will guard the fraudulent gains of capitalist and landlord from ‘the thin hands of the poor’ just as remorselessly and just as effectually as the scarlet-coated emissaries of England do today.

On no other basis will the classes unite with you. Do you expect the masses to fight for this ideal?

When you talk of freeing Ireland, do you only mean the chemical elements which compose the soil of Ireland? Or is it the Irish people you mean? If the latter, from what do you propose to free them? From the rule of England?

But all systems of political administration or governmental machinery are but the reflex of the economic forms which underlie them.

English rule in England is but the symbol of the fact that English conquerors in the past forced upon this country a property system founded upon spoliation, fraud and murder: that, as the present-day exercise of the ‘rights of property’ so originated involves the continual practice of legalised spoliation and fraud, English rule is found to be the most suitable form of government by which the spoliation can be protected, and an English army the most pliant tool with which to execute judicial murder when the fears of the propertied classes demand it.

The Socialist who would destroy, root and branch, the whole brutally materialistic system of civilisation, which like the English language we have adopted as our own, is, I hold, a far more deadly foe to English rule and tutelage, than the superficial thinker who imagines it possible to reconcile Irish freedom with those insidious but disastrous forms of economic subjection – landlord tyranny, capitalist fraud and unclean usury; baneful fruits of the Norman Conquest, the unholy trinity, of which Strongbow and Diarmuid MacMurchadha – Norman thief and Irish traitor – were the fitting precursors and apostles.

If you remove the English army to-morrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin Castle, unless you set about the organisation of the Socialist Republic your efforts would be in vain.

England would still rule you. She would rule you through her capitalists, through her landlords, through her financiers, through the whole array of commercial and individualist institutions she has planted in this country and watered with the tears of our mothers and the blood of our martyrs.

England would still rule you to your ruin, even while your lips offered hypocritical homage at the shrine of that Freedom whose cause you had betrayed.

Nationalism without Socialism – without a reorganisation of society on the basis of a broader and more developed form of that common property which underlay the social structure of Ancient Erin - is only national recreancy.

It would be tantamount to a public declaration that our oppressors had so far succeeded in inoculating us with their perverted conceptions of justice and morality that we had finally decided to accept those conceptions as our own, and no longer needed an alien army to force them upon us.

As a Socialist I am prepared to do all one man can do to achieve for our motherland her rightful heritage – independence; but if you ask me to abate one jot or tittle of the claims of social justice, in order to conciliate the privileged classes, then I must decline.

Such action would be neither honourable nor feasible. Let us never forget that he never reaches Heaven who marches thither in the company of the Devil. Let us openly proclaim our faith: the logic of events is with us.

These words were true 121 years ago, and can be seen as having been prophetic - for the modern Irish state is bourgeois, decadent and a celebration of degeneracy.  Connolly tried to warn the Irish people, but his words went unheeded.

A more recent voice of reason comes from Kim Jong Il, who stated (February 2017):

It is important to have a correct understanding of nationalism. Only when they have such an understanding can people achieve national unity, champion the interests of the nation and contribute to the shaping of its destiny.

Nationalism came into being as an ideology for defending the interests of a nation in the course of the latter’s formation and development. Although nations differ from one another in the period of their formation, every nation is a social community which has been formed and consolidated historically on the basis of a common kinship descent, language, residential area and culture, and is composed of various classes and strata. There is no person in any country or in any society who exists outside his or her nation, separate from it. Every person belongs to a class or stratum, and at the same time to a nation, endowing that person with both a national and a class character. Class character and national character and the demands of classes and nation are inseparable from each other. As a matter of fact, the classes and strata of a nation entertain different demands and interests owing to their different social and economic functions. However, all the members of a nation have the same stake in championing the independence and character of the nation and attaining national prosperity without distinction of the interests of their classes and strata. This is because the destiny of a nation is precisely the destiny of its individual members; in other words, the latter is dependent on the former. None will be happy with the sovereignty and honour of his or her nation being trampled upon and national character disregarded. It is the common ideological feeling and psychology of the members of a nation to love their nation, cherish its characteristics and interests, and yearn for its prosperity. Nationalism reflects this feeling and psychology. In other words, nationalism is an ideology that advocates love for the nation and defence of its interests. Since people carve out their destiny while living within the nation-state as a unit, genuine nationalism constitutes patriotism. The progressive nature of nationalism lies in the fact that it is a patriotic ideology which advocates the defence of national interests.

Nationalism emerged as a progressive idea along with the formation and development of each nation. However, it was understood in the past as an ideology that defends bourgeois interests. It is true that in the days of the nationalist movement against feudalism, the newly-emergent bourgeoisie, upholding the banner of nationalism, stood in the van of the movement.

At that time, the interests of both the masses of the people and the newly-emergent bourgeoisie were basically coincident in their struggle against feudalism. Therefore, the banner of nationalism seemed to reflect the common interests of the nation. As capitalism developed and the bourgeoisie became the reactionary ruling class after victorious bourgeois revolutions in various countries, nationalism was used as a means of defending the interests of the bourgeois class.

The bourgeoisie disguised their class interests as national interests, and used nationalism as an ideological instrument for solidifying their class domination. This led nationalism to be understood, among the people, as a bourgeois ideology that runs counter to the national interests. We should distinguish clearly between true nationalism that loves the nation and defends its interests and bourgeois nationalism that advocates the interests of the bourgeois class. Bourgeois nationalism reveals itself as national egoism, national exclusivism and big-power chauvinism in the relationship between countries and nations; it is reactionary in that it creates antagonism and disagreement between countries and nations, and checks the development of friendly relations between the various peoples of the world.

The original revolutionary theory of the working class failed to give a correct explanation of nationalism. It paid major attention to strengthening the international unity and solidarity of the working class all over the world-the fundamental problem in the then socialist movement-failing to pay due attention to the national problem. It went so far as to regard nationalism as an anti-socialist ideological trend, because bourgeois nationalism was doing great harm to the socialist movement. This is why progressive people in the past rejected nationalism, considering it incompatible with communism.

It is wrong to view communism as incompatible with nationalism. Communism does not advocate only the interests of the working class; it also advocates the interests of the nation-hence it is an ideology of loving the country and the people. Nationalism is also an ideology of loving the country and the people, as it defends the interests of the country and the nation. Love of the country and the people is an ideological emotion common to communism and nationalism; herein lies the ideological basis on which they can ally with one another. Therefore, there is no reason or ground to pit one against the other, and reject nationalism.

Nationalism does not conflict with internationalism. Mutual help, support and alliance between countries and nations-this is internationalism. Every country has its borders, and every nation has its identity, and revolution and construction are carried on with the country and nation as a unit. For this reason, internationalism finds its expressions in the relationships between countries and between nations, a prerequisite for which is nationalism. Internationalism divorced from the concepts of nation and nationalism is merely an empty shell. A man who is unconcerned about the destiny of his country and nation cannot be faithful to internationalism.

Revolutionaries of each country should be faithful to internationalism by struggling, first of all, for the prosperity of their own country and nation.

For the first time in history, the great leader President Kim Il Sung gave a correct explanation of nationalism, and elucidated the relationship between communism and nationalism and between communists and nationalists in his revolutionary practice of carving out the destiny of his country and people. He said that in order to be a true communist one must first become a true nationalist. With a determination to devote his life to his country and fellow-countrymen, he embarked on the road of revolution in his early years and created the immortal Juche idea, on the basis of which he established a Juche-oriented outlook on the nation, and scientifically expounded the essence and progressive character of nationalism. Through a correct combination of class character with national character and of the destiny of socialism with that of the nation, he realised an alliance between communists and nationalists, cemented the class and national positions of our socialism and led the nationalists to join the efforts for socialist construction and national reunification. Attracted by his broad magnanimity and noble personality, many nationalists took the patriotic road to national unity and national reunification, making a clean break with their erroneous pasts. Kim Ku, a life-long anti-communist, allied with communists, a patriotic changeover, in the twilight of his life, and Choe Tok Sin, a nationalist, was able to find salvation as a patriot in the leader’s embrace. The great leader treasured and championed the independence not only of our nation but also of the peoples of the rest of the world. He devoted all his efforts to the cause of making the whole world independent, as well as to the Korean revolution. We can say that there has been no man in the world as great as him, who devoted his whole life to the nation’s independence and prosperity, and a bright future for mankind. He was the most steadfast communist and, at the same time, a peerless patriot, true nationalist and paragon among internationalists.

I also assert, as the leader instructed, that one must be an ardent patriot, a true nationalist, in order to become a genuine revolutionary, a communist. The communist who fights for the realisation of the independence of the masses of the people must first of all be a true nationalist. Those who fight for their people, their country and their homeland are genuine communists, true nationalists and ardent patriots. Those who do not love their own parents, brothers and sisters cannot love their country and compatriots. Likewise, those who do not love their own homeland and people cannot become communists.

We are inheriting with fidelity the great leader’s noble idea of loving the country, the nation and the people, and making every effort to rally all the sections of the nation by dint of all-embracing politics, and lead them to the road of patriotism.

It is not communists but imperialists who oppose nationalism and place obstacles in the way of the independent development of nations at present. The imperialists are manoeuvring cunningly to realise their dominationist ambition on the plea of “globalization” and “integration.” They claim that the ideal of building a sovereign nation-state or the love for country and nation is a “national prejudice lagging behind the times,” and “globalization” and “integration” are the trend of the times in the present situation, when science and technology are developing rapidly and economic exchanges between countries are being conducted briskly on an international scale. Today, when every country and nation is carving out its own destiny with its own ideology, system and culture, there can never be a political, economic, ideological and cultural “integration” of the world. The manoeuvres of the US imperialists for “globalization” and “integration” are aimed at turning the world into what they call a “free” and “democratic” world styled after the United States, and thus bringing all countries and nations under their domination and subordination. The present era is one of independence. Human history is propelled by the struggle of the masses of the people for independence, not by the dominationist ambition and aggressive policy of the imperialists. The manoeuvres of the imperialists for “globalization” and “integration” are doomed to failure, as they are opposed by the vigorous efforts of the world’s peoples aspiring after independence.

We should resolutely oppose and reject the manoeuvres of the imperialists for “globalization” and “integration,” and staunchly fight to preserve the excellent characteristics of our nation and safeguard its independence. We frequently emphasise the Korean-nation-first principle so as to preserve the national character and defend the independence of the nation.

We in SWPE are Left-wing Nationalists.  We love our country, we love our People.  This love is what makes us Socialists, it is what makes us Internationalists against Globalisation and Imperialism. 

There is no contradiction between Patriotism and Socialism.  Indeed the two are so intertwined that the absence of either makes an ideology of absurdity.

For Class and Nation.  For Closed Borders and an Internationalism built on Mutual Respect and Clearly-defined Immutable Sovereignty.

Separatism as a Tool of Globalism. United We Stand

For map, visit: https://www.theliterarygiftcompany.com/products/literary-map-of-britain

SWPE has long had a policy of seeking an independent England.  The use of the name England in the party name is a key indication of the centrality of that policy.  After much debate internally, this policy has now been revised. More than revised, this policy has now been reversed.

Great Britain is an island nation, comprised of several sub-nations, the main ones being
England,
Cymru/Wales
Alba/Scotland. 

These main sub-nations can be broken down into the even smaller and more ancient nations which came before them, such as
Kernow/Cornwall,
Westseaxna/Wessex,
Cantaware/Kent,
Mierce/Mercia,
Norþhymbra/Northumbria,
Ēast Engla/East Anglia,
Dalriada,
Cait,
Fortriu,
Strathclyde,
Orkney,
Hebrides,
Shetland,
Deheubarth,
Gwynedd,
Powys,
Morgannwg,

But why stop there! Regional loyalty can be taken down to even smaller levels, to counties, to cities.  The historic rivalty between Yorkshire and Lancashire dates back to a dispute between rivals for the crown of England. Even today, there are a small number people on each side of the Pennines who genuinely hate those on the other, failing to appreciate that the massacres of common people during the Wars of the Roses benefited nobody except the Ruling Class families to whom loyalty was mistakenly given.  Interestingly, the modern truncated county of Lancashire (excluding Merseyside and Greater Manchester) was once (alongside Furness Cumberland and Westmorland aka Cumbria) a part of Strathclyde, which would make it reasonable to argue should exclude it from an independent England and place it inside Scotland.

To argue for separatism is to invite further spiralling into regionalism, with the end being the total disintegration of the nation, and the emergence of a vast number of little states, each with their own governments, each with their own leaders, each with their own despotisms and hidden allegiance to the same Global Ruling Class which would gain in power by virtue of the inability of any one state to have control over matters which have a Britain-wide impact.

As noted above with reference to the ancient kingdom of Strathclyde, the borders between England, Scotland and Wales have been fluid for a long time. Monmouthshire has only been in fixed in Wales by law since 1972.  And what of the northeastern border of England? The former nation of Northumbia included not only the counties of Yorkshire, Durham and Northumberland, but also the southeast of modern Scotland, including Edinburgh, the very seat of the Scottish Parliament.  Lowland Scots/Doric is a Germanic language which has no similarity at all with Scottish Gaelic. 

Culturally, ethnically, linguistically, the peoples of Britain have so intermingled that to try to separate us is pointless, yet that is exactly what the separatists and regionalists are trying to do.  The Westminster regime is the epicentre of regionalism, pushing the devolution hoax, with directly-elected City Mayors joining the rush for extra layers of government which of course have to be paid for with our taxes, and achieve nothing other than to provide centres of corruption outside of London in the manner of new hubs in a spider-like web of control.  Of note again, Lancashire has been targeted by the London regime, with its largest cities (Liverpool, Manchester and Warrington) no longer even officially recognised as being parts of Lancashire (Warrington given to Cheshire by the stroke of a pen, Liverpool and Manchester being first carved off into unitary authorites and now saddled with the expensive and un-necessary directly elected mayors so beloved by the politicians who seek to divide us in every way possible).

We formally renounce our policy of English separatism, which we now accept was a mistake. We replace this with a commitment to unity. 

The British Working Class suffer the same injustices regardless of location, we share the same hardships, we are treated by the Ruling Class with equal disdain. Over the centuries, our people have moved around the country and have intermingled. The historic divisions reflected divisions between rivals for power - and as such were of importance to the Ruling Class in terms of areas they controlled, but for us are interesting, but not reason for animosity towards our countrymen. The modern administrative demarcations have even less significance to us, being drawn up by servants of the State as lines on maps, with no care for cultural or any other ties.Who with family from these isles can seriously claim to be a 'pure' Angle, Saxon, Pict, Jute, Celt?  We all have ancestry which roots us firmly with the original inhabitants of the Isles who came before any of the recognised modern tribes. We have become a single extended family not just from Lands End to John o'Groats but also onto the many islands which surround the British mainland.

Splitting us apart is to break the family, to make us weak, to give power to hostile elements. A free Socialist Britain would throw out NATO, the US military, multinational corporations, the 'monarchy', all institutions and individuals with loyalty to any organisation, country, company, or way of life which is not, of, from and for this land.

Unity Is Strength. We need to heal the wounds caused by those who create false divisions, and to deepen and strengthen our diverse cultures which when wound together become an unshakeable foundation for a better, happier and healthier future.

For Class and Nation

The inhumanity of high-rise living

The burning of the Grenfell tower block in London on the 14th June 2017 is of course a tragedy for the people who have lost their lives, or have lost loved ones.  But beyond the human tragedy, the burning down of a massive residential block of flats, raises issues which need to be addressed:

• Firstly, the question of the very existence of cattle-pen accommodation for the Working Classes;
• Secondly, the over-population problem for the UK, with the serious problem of massive urbanisation and the destruction of nature;
• Thirdly, the complete lack of control over the borders, which is driving the demand for more high rise slum dwellings

All these factors exist in combination, and all need to be approached with the end goal of returning the UK to a natural order in which the people live in harmony with nature and not as mere pawns of the global finance-capitalist oligarchy.

There has been a great deal of comment about the fact that a considerable number of the people housed in Grenfell Tower were illegal immigrants, and that many of the tenants illegally subletted their flats, leading to an already densely populated block of flats becoming dangerously overcrowded. These are certainly significant factors in the high death toll, but the fact remains, that regardless of the backgrounds of the people who occupied the flats at the time of the fire, they were built to house Working Class people.  Fire does not check for immigration status; fire kills indiscriminately.  The death-trap tower blocks which the Working Class have been forced into for decades, remain death-traps, and the tory medias obsession with the origins of the residents of Grenfell, is a distraction from the cold hard fact that buildings like Grenfell exist all over the country, and the Ruling Class could not care less who perished in the fire - a fire which could have occurred at any time in any tower block.

The blaze in London could have occurred in any other block of flats which had been coated in highly inflammable cladding.  At present, it has been found that every single sample of cladding submitted for testing has been found to be potentially deadly in case of fire.  The number of tower blocks thus far tested numbers nearly 100 at the time of writing - and it is certain to be much higher.  That number represents tens of thousands of people who are at risk if a fire should start, and numbers only a tiny percentage of the total tower block stock, putting the number of people at risk into very high figures.

The number of tower blocks and related social housing developments in the UK is testament to the arrogance of government in creating accommodation for the Working Class which they would not consider fit to house their own families.  There are literally thousands of tower blocks in the UK. They were sold to the public as 'vertical streets', but are nothing more than high rise slums. For those of us who currently live (or at some time have lived) in such buildings, no amount of mealy-mouthed propagandising will cover up the reality we know of high rise living: Flats are antisocial places where there can be no privacy, no respite from noise, no escape from the lumpen-proletarian dross who are crammed into such places alongside good people who the Ruling Class look down upon with equal bile.  They are not vertical streets - they are vertical prisons.

The Ruling Class created the Tower Block system of accommodation with no care for how it would affect the people who had to live in them.  It doesn't take a genius to work out that cramming people together in blocks of flats, disconnected from access to nature, sharing a typically urine-soaked lift to get from the ground to where you live, with junkies and alcoholics partying at all hours with relentless shouting and 'music', with prostitutes/burglars/thieves and other scum for neighbours, doesn't do much for the mental health of anyone living in such places. Local authorities put single mothers in the same blocks as paedophiles, good people who are in need of housing in with criminal rubbish who have been released from prison and have to be housed somewhere.  To the powers that be, we are all scum, and we are all to be dumped together in inhumane accommodation where rampant criminality and antisocial behaviour cannot fail to cause depression, feelings of hopelessness, and pave the way for the decline of the ordinary Working Class into adopting some of the ways of the lumpens.

The tragedy of Grenfell could have happened anywhere, and could happen again at any time. But more than this, the tragedy of forced cohabitation and dislocation from the natural way of living, is a sure path to degeneracy and despair.  SWPE demands that all people be housed in a manner which is fitting to human beings, having land to produce food, space to live well (not just exist), with buildings made to be not only homes, but potential workshops.  Homes should be places which encourage the human mind to grow and inspire the individual and family to develop and create works of art/culture, and works of labour which are good for the individual/family and also for the community as a whole.  We demand that all tower blocks (housing and business) be brought down by controlled demolition, and the people be rehoused in ways which are good for humanity - in purpose built small towns with adequate land per dwelling and adequate space for work, dwelling, art and leisure.  We demand an end to cities and a restoration of the bond between people and the natural world.

What we are calling for cannot happen until we take back control over our country and make it a place which works for the people.  The globalist capitalist system relies on open borders to drive down wages and crush cultural homogeneity, making the whole world a bland uniform mass of indistinguishable robot-like people who care nothing for life other than the basest hedonistic pursuits, including the cut-throat accumulation of trinkets and gadgets obtained by stepping on people who are less willing to exploit other people than they are. We demand the borders be tightly sealed - which for an island nation with a navy, is not a major challenge.  We demand that our land be protected, which means the population explosion be reversed.  The Ruling Class and their collaborators must go! The lumpen-proletariat are in many ways as much a problem as the rulers, and they too must go.  We want nothing short of a total revolution.  We are not democratic socialist reformers, happy to tinker with a few minor points of living, but essentially keeping the system intact.  We have a vision of a better world, built upon the concept of Socialism in One Country, one country at a time.

Grenfell happened because the Ruling Class and its Capitalist system see the Working Class as desposable and replacable, seeing us of no more value than an old pair of shoes.  We say that we are humans and that we matter far more than the puruit of profits.  The entire focus of life has to be shifted, and those who cannot become useful members of a non-exploiting Socialist society, need to be swept away just like their anti-human buildings and their anti-human ethos.

Forward to a World of a Thousand Nations. Goodbye EU, USA, UK and all Superstates

The election of Donald Trump as President of the USA has reignited campaigns for secession from the USA.  With the vote by the UK to leave the EU, the Globalist project is proving to not be as strong as its opponents have feared.  Now is the time to join with all secessionists worldwide to fight for a better world with local sovereignty and an end to centralisation.

Local sovereignty is a safeguard for freedom.  The further power lies from the people, the less free they become.  This is why the UK voted to leave the EU, and why that process has to be continued with campaigns to dismantle the EU entirely so that no country is trapped inside the impersonal imperial superstate.  But this is only the start.  For the UK, the fight for freedom has to extend to the demise of the UK itself, with England becoming a self governing country comprised of smaller countries joined together in a federation of equals.  Ideally, SWPE would like to see the return of the nations that predate England - first as autonomous members of an English federation, but ultimately as Free Sovereign Nation States.


As Comrade Tony Green has pointed out, the USA is no longer the monolithic entity it once was. California, Texas, New Hampshire, Hawai'i and Vermont are at the forefront of the secessionist movements, but there are more besides these.(see: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/5-us-independence-movements-inspired-by-brexit-214010)

A Socialist world is a world without Empires.  It is a world of cooperation and respect, with clearly defined borders preventing the global exploitation of the Proletariat, with borders being for defence and demarcation of territory belonging to the respective people.  Superstates have no respect for culture, tradition, customs, language, morality, spiritualism, non-Capitalist economics, nature, human and animal welfare.  Borders defend all this and allow life to flourish.  A world without borders is a gift to the global Ruling Class.  A world with many, many borders, protects everyone everywhere from the greed of the few wherever it may arise.

SWPE: Socialists Against Imperialism and Colonisation

Regressive liberalism, Trotskyism and Marxist Revisionism have done a lot to harm the name of Socialism.  Socialism in its perverted and corrupted form has become a tool of the forces of globalisation, and in so becoming, a tool of the enemies of the Working Class.

The destructive and negative anti-Socialist forces hiding in our clothes include the vast majority of the fake Left, as well as many religious institutions, including the Roman Catholic Church.  The Pope, the entire political apparatus of the EU and UK, anti-racist fetishists, self-promoting 'minority' groups, all sit hand in glove with corporate Capitalists, the World Bank, IMF, UN and the terrorists of Islamic State and NATO, to promote the idea of Globalism and an end to Borders.  This isn't 'freedom', this is Imperialism and Colonialism on a Global scale.

SWPE is Socialist in the truest sense. We seek the re-creation of our homeland in which our People as a whole will live side by side in a spirit of mutual support and cooperation.  This necessitates a level of Class War, but not for the destruction of the Bourgeoisie as human beings, but as an exploiting class. We want to return the people who have been seduced by the lies of Capitalism, to the warm welcoming bosom of the Nation.

Socialism needs borders.

It is taken as a given that Socialists are Globalists. This simply isn't true.  Trotskyites are Globalists, certainly, but they are not Socialists, nor are they Communists. Trotskyites are the useful idiots of Capitalism, striving to do away with all forms of individuality and difference.  Trotskyites are the enforcers of the anti-Socialist dogma of Cultural Marxism, which may have begun as a weapon to undermine the Ruling Class, but has become nothing more than a force for the total destruction of society. Socialism IS Society, without Society there can be no Socialism, without Society there can be nothing but faceless consumerism, Capitalism.

The goal of the neoliberal/neocon/trotskyite/neoreligious groupings is Globalisation. This serves the Capitalist agenda, because a world without borders is a world without barriers to commerce.  A world in which people migrate at will, is a world with no job security in which the Ruling Class do not have to comply with demands for safe working conditions and a just standard of living.  Borders protect the people from the parasitic desires of the Ruling Class. The Trotskyites who campaign for an end to borders, are campaigning to destroy the well being of the people of every distinct nation, but most in danger of poverty and misery are the Working Class who the fake Socialists claim to champion.

The deliberate import of millions of economic migrants into the EU and UK has been sold as a mission of mercy, as the 'christian' thing to do.  The image of a dead Syrian boy on a beach, drowned due to a failed attempt to get to Europe, is an emotional tool to make the people feel guilty about having protected borders. The reality which the hysterical media refuse to discuss, is that the dead boy's father was (possibly still is) a people smuggler, living safely in Turkey away from any conflict, motivated to put his family on a rickety boat by greed and the desire to get free false teeth from a gullible EU citizenry.  None of this is mentioned, as it would halt the feelings of guilt which must be kept constant to excuse the abandonment of our natural national defences from globalising invasion.

Propaganda about a dead boy on a beach, has been used to justify opening the borders to millions of people, putting our people in danger. The rape epidemic which has resulted from the open borders policy of Globalists in the EU is denied, or excused (rape can never be excused), so is the literal explosion in terrorism.  Today a migrant murdered an American tourist who he considered to be his enemy, solely because she was different to him, culturally. 

Guilt must be maintained to ensure people do not demand the borders be strengthened.  Children are raped, a soldier is beheaded, violent crime is at an all time high, but the media ignores this, labelling the culprits 'mentally ill'.  When the people begin to take notice of the terrorism in the streets, the image of the dead boy on the beach is used to push them back into submission to the invasion of Europe, by making them feel that to not allow millions of military aged men into the EU and UK would be to put more boys at risk of being washed up on the beach dead.  No one is allowed to consider that it is the people who put the children on to boats who are to blame if the boats sink.  Greedy Capitalists are happy to use liberal and Trotskyite idiots to silence those who speak for the sanity of sovereignty.  The useful idiots are happy to do the dirty work of the State, all the while pretending (perhaps even to themselves) to be revolutionaries.

The UK has admitted 1600 Syrians who claim to be escaping from war in their own country. Of these 1600, 900 have been arrested for rape (including child rape, which is referred to as 'abuse' but is no more acceptable for the different words employed). The remaining 700 have not been arrested for rape, but that does not mean that they have not attacked anyone in the UK, only that they have not been arrested for any offence.  Even if the 700 are perfectly innocent, that leaves 900 monsters walking among us, with at least 900 of our people already harmed by their presence.  Even if the number of misogynistic criminals made only 1% of the total number of Syrians admitted, that would still be too many.  The percentage is closer to 60%, meaning that anyone living near to an imported Syrian can expect to be attacked. This is not acceptable. SWPE demands that all the so-called refugees be returned to the countries they abandoned, and not a single new one allowed in.  Unlike the liberal imbeciles who think that the suffering of the Working Class is a price worth paying for accepting 'refugees', we say NO, it is not.

The so-called refugee crisis is a crisis for the EU and UK, but not in the way that the media portray it. Our people are under attack - that is the real nature of the crisis.  It is argued that the millions of military aged men arriving in the EU and UK are fleeing for their lives from the Islamic State and/or from the legitimate government of Assad.  We are told that we have to take them in as to do otherwise would be to condemn them to death, and therefore be accomplices in their murder. This is emotional programming of the lowest level, and is nonsense.

The millions of so-called refugees coming to the EU and UK include only a tiny percentage from war-ravaged Syria. The vast majority come from places like Pakistan and sub-Saharan Africa, and they are not fleeing persecution or war, they are coming to the EU and UK for economic reasons. Capitalism is fueling the economic migrants. The poverty created by IMF interference in their home countries is driving people out of their homelands, in search of an easier life.  The anti-family policies of Capitalist Europe - supported by the fake feminist movement - has seen the birthrates in Europe collapse to the point where an aging population cannot be sustained unless the economic system is overthrown and a Socialist system ushered in, or, millions of immigrants are brought in to join the pyramid structure which feeds into the Pensions schemes for the elderly.  The Capitalist system which has created economic misery in every corner of the world, is a Global system, with no respect for borders, nationalities or spiritual and cultural identities.  Millions of people are on the move to keep the Capitalist system going.

In addition to Pensions, the millions of so-called refugees bring the added bonus to the Capitalist classes of creating job insecurity in the host populations.  The United Nations was created to serve the interests of Global Finance, making a more appropriate name for it the United Bankers (or something which sounds quite similar).  The UN, with its partners in the IMF, World Bank and its effective military arm, NATO, destroy countries in order to asset strip them. They create war for their profit. They generate 'refugees' to destroy the standard of living in every country, so that they can maximise their profits by depressing wages and making sure mass unemployment is a permanent way of life. Accepting the armies of so-called refugees is a part of the way in which puppet governments serve their globalist Capitalist masters.  The liberals who chant 'refugees are welcome here' are unwittingly working for the Bankers' UN agenda.  The agenda is for the creation of a Global Bankers / Stock Market Empire, using the mohamedan colonisers as the shock troops to smash all forms of resistance by making borders irrelevant.

The Syrian dimension of the so-called refugee crisis is one which has been manipulated for another purpose. The UN-NATO terror machine is trying to overthrow the democratically elected legitimate government of Syria.  The reason for this is that Syria has not fallen into the Global Capitalist web, and as one of the few remaining free countries, has to be crushed.  The Bankers' war of aggression is using the Islamic State and terrorist organisations such as Al Qaeda (Al CIAduh) to tear Syria apart. The so-called refugees leaving the warzone cannot be fleeing from the legitimate authority AND the terrorists.  If they are fleeing the State, it is because they are IS etc terrorists.  The wave of terrorist atrocities suggest that many of them are such terrorists.

The legitimate authority is still in charge of most of Syria, making fleeing to the EU and UK a nonsense for decent Syrians escaping the areas plagued by UN/US/EU sponsored terrorists and the Islamic State.  The fact that the overwhelming majority of so-called refugees are military-aged men, means that they are abandoning the women of Syria and the children.  They are either terrorists, economic parasites, cowards/traitors, or a combination of these.  Only two days ago a British man by the name of Dean Carl Evans was killed in Syria fighting to defend the women and children from Globalist-controlled terrorists.  It is unacceptable that Europeans are dying to defend the women and children of Syria, while vast numbers of military aged men are running away to Europe, leaving the women and children to the mercy of terrorists (and there is no mercy) while they go searching for an easy life of free accommodation and free money.  Refusing to let the so-called refugees into the EU and UK would force them to stay and fight for their country. The 'refugees welcome' chanters are condemning Syria to capture by the Global Capitalist network.

It is the duty of all Socialists to oppose the bogus refugee invasion. SWPE believe in attaining the very best for all the people of the UK.  We support the rights of women to speak, think, act, work and dress according to individual choice. The Global Capitalists hate freedom and have chosen the common ideology of the incoming Islamic State fighters as a battering ram against freedom because it views women as inferior to men, and only useful for producing more servants to its socio-economic system, even to the point of allowing for people to be bought and sold as Slaves.

SWPE values people as people and we oppose the import of millions of people who see women and children as sex objects, and kills those who have sexual preferences which its texts disapprove of.

SWPE opposes the imperialistic so-called refugee invasion because we want to build a better country where we can live as good neighbours, supporting one another, immersed in our own ways, with no such thing as unemployment to beat us down, with no such thing as homelessness, with no Bankers, no Capitalist exploiters, and with a glorious vast expanse of green rural land to live in as nature intended which will never be concreted over.

If Trotskyites, liberals, and multicultist Globalisers have a problem with living in a safe and free Socialist Republic, they would be encouraged to leave to find a new life in a country in which they can live according to their preferred way of life. We would close the borders to people trying to enter, but leave them wide open for anyone who puts selfishness and greed above the duty to contribute to the well being of Society.

Action is what achieves change, not talking about action

SWPE is a party of action.  Prior to the unification of the FWL and BSP, the FWL was a movement founded on an urge to get into the real world and make a difference.  It is gratifying to see that those who came from the BSP prior to the merger have fully joined in the struggle to push for real change now, rather than theorising about how change can be fomented in an unspecified future.  Of course, that is not to devalue the importance of ideology and vision.  The unified SWPE has the best of the qualities of the organisations which came together to form it.

December has been a month with a definite purpose.  Our activists have taken to the streets to fight the plague of paedophilia.  The destruction of childhood by predators who lack even the most basic appreciation of humanity is such an outrage that it was decided that we should leave our banners at home and fight as individuals alongside communities impacted by the presence of child rapists.  Unlike the self promoting liberal fools of the SWP, who latch on to any issue in order to push their propaganda and name, SWPE activists are motivated by a desire to save our people and to build a future in which the problems facing us become memories of a horrific past. We stand with anyone who seeks an end to the corrupt order, and we value victory on an issue by issue basis above gaining media attention and waving placards.

Activists across England have joined in peaceful protests to get paedophiles moved from neighbourhoods with children.  Joining with residents groups, helping with printed material, joining the pickets of paedophile occupied properties, researching the child rapists so that they can be exposed at their places of work, doing anything within the law which can make the lives of paedophiles as miserable as possible, all this helps to let the scum who prey on children know that they will not be tolerated. If they decide to take the coward's way out, then that at least makes our children safe.

We have found that the paedophiles themselves are not the only problem.  They are protected by the police to make sure that good people do not get hold of them and destroy them.  They are given CCTV at our expense.  It could be argued that the law has to protect the community from violence, but when people take the decision to attack the community (especially the children of the community), they no longer deserve to be counted as  part of it, and should be exempt from protection.  In a post Globalist society, the scum who destroy children will be destroyed by the people.  We are gathering information at the same time as we are protesting.

The sickest people of all are those who protect the paedophiles, not because they are ordered to do so, but because they want to.  We have found a sick unity of liberals and paedophiles, with an excess of non natives in both categories.  We know that Mohammedans worship a child rapist who they emulate, and we do not allow that to be an excuse for indulging in the violation of children (they choose to be Mohammedans so they choose to support/defend/engage in paedophilia).  We have come across a number of Christians who 'forgive' the paedophiles and allow them to hide in their homes when we come to get them evicted.  We don't care what justification they have for 'turning the other cheek' and 'loving their enemies', we don't give a damn about the insanity which motivates them. They too must be punished for enabling paedophiles to hide from justice, making them willing accomplices in the brutal attack upon our children and our society.  We make no distinction between paedophiles and those who voluntarily protect them.

Our members are active fighting for animal welfare, human welfare and for the defence of our people, land and the non human population.  In the past, we have helped to wreck animal testing institutions, we have been active hunt saboteurs, we have forced heroin dealers off the streets.  We continue our actions in our commitment to not fall into the trap of the walking political activists who go on demos and chant, then rest until the next jolly boys outing.

The hated Capitalist traitors have declared that they will allow fracking to begin under our National Parks, ruining the environment which our wildlife needs to survive.  They have declared that they will build on Green Belt land to accommodate the masses of the Third World who are illegally entering our beloved homeland.  We will not tolerate this.  Companies motivated by profit will halt their operations when it becomes obvious that they will lose financially as equipment is ruined and as employees refuse to go to work for nature rapers because they understand that to do so is wrong, or that to do so is dangerous.  We work within the law, but when the law is an act of treason, we no longer accept its rule.  We obey the Law of Nature, the Law of Tradition, the Law of Survival. 

Illegal immigrants (many of them rapists, all of them criminals and enemies of the People) are being housed at our expense, while homelessness among the native population continues to explode.  Protesting against refugee centres won't make them go away, but removing them will.  The existence of organisations and premises for the assistance of illegal immigrant invaders, is contrary to the need for the native people to survive and have a home of our own.  We obey the Laws of Nature and we reject the laws of the State.  Invader Barracks are burning across Europe - they will burn here also, preferably with all the invader scum present.

Congratulations to all who have done their bit and continue to do so.  This is what SWPE is about - bringing change right now and helping our people/land/wildlife right now.  Keep active, Comrades. We are making more of a difference than all the members of the democratic parties who fly their banners, fear to break the false laws of the oppressor class, and talk well but do nothing.  We are gaining members by this approach.  We are building the Counter Power.  We are attacking our enemies wherever we can.  We do engage in the democratic process when we can see a point to it, and as we help rip the mask from the enemy liberal bigots and finance serving traitors, we will do so more often.  Action achieves change.  The Ballot Box reflects power, it doesn't create it - that is what we must do right now, using every means necessary and every opportunity.

England's Nimrud

England's Nimrud

ISIS use power tools to destroy 3000 year old monuments before
blowing the entire site up.

*Written back in April on a previous blog. Still relevant today.*

Today is a sad day for world history as it appears that ISIS have attacked and destroyed the ancient city of Nimrud in an act of pure religious fanaticism. In videos shown across the world, images showed Islamists attacking the Assyrian city ruins which still contained priceless artifacts, some of which were over 3000 years old. Those taking part are apparently inspired by their prophet Mohammed's violent behavior as documented in the Quran, in tales where he is said to have torn down pagan idols in Mecca "with his bare hands". (I know right, this guy must have been strong, huh!)

The issue seems to be more widespread than just ISIS though, so this isn't an issue of just one group of extremists. It seems that there is an inherent issue within Islam over protection of historically important sites. In Saudi Arabia for example the Government there has completely turned a blind eye to even Mecca's heritage, with one Time Magazine article saying as much as 98% of the heritage sites there have been bulldozed for modern development. 

There were even calls last month from ISIS and extremist Islamic preachers to destroy what is left of the Sphinx and the pyramids in Giza. Of course this wouldn't be the first time as the nose of the Sphinx and many statues across Palestine and Turkey were defaced (quite literally) by religious nutters throughout history. They weren't just Muslim though, as Iconoclasm has been used quite extensively across history as a method of erasing the cultural stamp of a previous civilization when conquering land or subjugating a group of people.

Whilst the practice has been used since the dawn of time, the main offenders across history have tended to be those from an Abrahamic religious persuasion, and although we might think of these acts as occurring in exotic locations in the middle-east or on some isolated Mediterranean island, it may shock some to hear that similar practices happened in England. And fairly recently too.

There is also a fairly lax account of that religious extremism that occurred in England too, the last bout started during the reign of Puritanism. From as far back as the late 1500's during Elizabeth I's reign, Puritans had tried to steer the Church of England in a certain direction. For around hundred and fifty years or so they pushed for extreme reform. Although they never appeared to achieve full domination of the religious and political fabric of the nation, they got pretty close to it with the Parliamentarian victory of the second Civil War. Cromwell was an unabated Puritan who even sought to ban Christmas celebrations. Because of histories bias towards Cromwell (the reasons of which must wait for another time,) most of this has been mostly forgotten.

Whilst the overall story of Puritans and English-come-British history is obviously a little too complex for a few paragraphs, the overall image is of a fragmented society split between three pillars of Traditionalism, 'Enlightenment' and Religious Extremism expressed by some elements in English society.

So what is it that I've dubbed "England's Nimrud"?

Well it sits approximately twenty-odd miles north of Stonehenge and despite being a World Heritage Site (and the entire area being in the region of twenty times the size of stonehenge,) its actually fairly unheard of. Avebury: a neolithic monument of such epic proportions that it pretty much contains an entire village quite comfortably within its ditches.

Like Stonehenge, nobody is one hundred per cent sure of its purpose (I have my own theories like every other Tom, Dick and Harry,) but one thing that we do know is that throughout the years the huge sarsen stones were broken up for use in construction on farm walls and buildings. Now despite what I've suggested previously about the Puritans, the method of using the stones for building material was not something new, and this is obvious when you look at the villages architecture. The sites destruction seemed to accelerate around the late 1600's though for a brief time.

That been said, a vast amount of damage had already been done to the monument through the 14th century when the population was more or less fully converted to Christianity. The population were brainwashed into associating the once sacred monuments with the Christian concept of Satan, and this is still evident today with many neolithic sites bearing a daemonic name. This ideological obsession (spurred on by clergy) convinced men to go out and dig the stones foundations out, and bury or burn them. Fortunately (or perhaps with some divine influence from the land wights) one man taking part in the destruction of the henge was crushed under a falling stone and may have been the reason why the destruction stopped for some time. The tales have it that he was a barber by trade, and his death was seen as an omen by many so the sarsens were left alone. As it happens, an excavation in the early 20th century actually proved this old tale as being historically correct, when a skeleton was found under a buried sarsen with a coin dating to the 1300's and with his scissors still in a pouch. 

Today, a fair amount of the monument still exists, however the magnitude of its grandeur would not be possible today without the illustrations made by John Aubrey and by William Stukeley during the 17th and early 18th century. The full extent and size of the monument far exceeded what we see today, as much of the existing stone avenue was destroyed, along with two inner-rings and a large 'phallic' monolith which was destroyed apparently when Stukeley was present. Credit where it's due, there would be nothing there today at all had it not been for John Lubbock who purchased the estates in 1871 an attempt to preserve the site, or had it not been for the efforts of Alexander Keiller during the 1930's to dig up and re-erect the buried stones. 

Artist impression of the henge in it's original state

One of the 'accepted views' about the destruction of this site during the 1600's is that this was not religious in nature, and was merely due to an increasing population in the village. They support the theory that in many cases, villagers wanted the stones removed in order to make ploughing fields easier, or to use the huge stones as building material for new homes. The main reason that I would object to this idea is because of Stukeley's own words:


Just before I visited this place... the inhabitants were fallen into the custom of demolishing the stones, chiefly out of covetousness of the little area of ground, each stood on. First they dug great pits in the earth, and buried them. The expence of digging the grave, was more than 30 years purchase of the spot they possessed, when standing. After this, they found out the kanck of burning them, which has made most miserable havock of this famous temple. One Tom Robinson the Herostratus of Abury,* is particularly eminent for this kind of execution, and he very much glories in it. The method is, to dig a pit by the side of the stone, till it falls down, then to burn many loads of straw under it. They draw lines of water along it when heated, and then with smart strokes of a great sledge hammer, its prodigious bulk is divided into many lesser parts. But this Atto de fe** commonly costs thirty shillings in fire and labour, sometimes twice as much. They own too 'tis excessive hard work, for these stones are often 18 foot long, 13 broad, and 6 thick, that their weight crushes the stones in pieces, which they lay under them to make them lie hollow for burning, and for this purpose they raise them with timbers of 20 foot long, and more, by the help of twenty men, but often the timbers were rent to pieces. 

Stukeley goes on to write that a single stone could provide enough pieces to build an ordinary house, but that because of the nature of the stone, such a house "is always moist and dewy in winter, which proves damp and unwholesome, and rots the furniture. The custom of thus destroying them is so late, that I could easily trace the obit of every stone; who did it, for what purpose, and when, and by what method, what house or wall was built out of it, and the like."

Now reading that passage, to me it looks like the method is out of date for even the 1600s. It is clearly labour intensive, expensive and produced homes of inferior quality which remained cold and damp. Religious reasons have to come into this in some way or another. Lets not forget that at the same time that this was occurring, we had issues with the puritans in Government and even the Witchfinder General wandering around the land in search of commission. They gained very little land in destroying the stones, and as Stukeley states, this has more to do with Tom Robinson'sideological beliefs than for any practical reasoning.

In any case, I think its safe to say that the monument at Avebury has received a second wind. It is now a vibrant place to visit with a deep spiritual and cultural connection for hundreds of thousands of people. It receives a huge number of visitors, and is a destination for a worldwide pagan pilgrimage, which is something we can only dream of for Nimrud which was spectacularly blown up with plastic explosives in the last few weeks.

Avebury today.

Whilst there are calls to judge Islam and its more extreme elements for the damage done to historically invaluable monuments across the Middle East, we have to remember that it is only through the chance of time that the same fate did not also befall some of Europe's most treasured sites. The true enemy of civilization and culture is unshakable religious dogma. It has been shown time and time again to turn back humanities development, and ISIS is just another reverberation of that repeating history. Avebury survived by the skin of its teeth and through the hard work of conservationists spanning a hundred years or more. It's new position as a culturally important destination today is good luck. Unfortunately, Nimrud's ran out.

 

Source: http://essexsaeward.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/englands-nimrud.html